Review below about Ekvall’s ten dimensions and provide your feedback by answering the following questions: o Do you agree or disagree with their suggested need for additional dimensions? o Were you surprised that Ekvall included only one dimension that is negatively correlated? How did they evaluate their organization in this area, and what conclusions can you draw from their evaluation? o Do you agree or disagree with their post about the dimension that is the most difficult to assess? Share your reasoning.
2. Review the creative climate assessments posted by your peers and provide your feedback by answering the following questions: o Based on the notes, did you disagree with any of the ten ratings in the assessments? o Do you think it would be more beneficial for your peers’ organizations to strengthen the strongest aspects of their creative climate or improve the weakest aspects? o What recommendations would you make to your peers’ organizations to improve their creative climate? For example, think about how established organizations with existing structures designed for efficient and effective use of resources can relax some of their restrictions to allow playfulness, freedom, and risk-taking without losing control of the things that allow it to be currently successful.
• I was not surprised by the evaluation because I felt it did encompass all aspect of a creative environment that can occur and gives the chance to look at each aspect individually. I was most impressed with the
Leave a Reply