Category: Applied Physical Sciences

  • [Solved] New task

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering New task.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering presentation.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] PLAGIARISM FREE “A WORK

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS AS STATED IN THE ATTACHED ASSIGNMENT **files (1)** – ## Week3AssignmentMilestone2LoginScreenDesignsMobileApplications.pdf **## Week3AssignmentMilestone2LoginScreenDesignsMobileApplications.pdf** In your paper, you will develop design prototypes for the login and main m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS AS STATED IN THE ATTACHED ASSIGNMENT

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week3AssignmentMilestone2LoginScreenDesignsMobileApplications.pdf

    **## Week3AssignmentMilestone2LoginScreenDesignsMobileApplications.pdf**

    In your paper, you will develop design prototypes for the login and main menu screens for
    both the consumer and provider mobile application for THS. In addition, you will analyze
    the key data types that end users will use to populate these screens. You will also discuss
    the components of the overall IT architecture necessary to facilitate the deployment of
    mobile application technology for THS consumers and providers.
    In your paper,

    • Develop three to four mobile application screens representing the login and main
    menu end user screens for consumers of THS.

    • Develop three to six mobile application screens representing the login, main menu,
    and patient results review end user screens for prescribing providers (doctors and
    nurse practitioners) of THS.

    • Articulate the content of each mobile application screen for both the consumer and
    prescribing providers in detail.

    • Critique the consumer mobile application screen designs according to the eight
    elements of an easy-to-learn-and-use interface (8.4.1) outlined in your text in
    Chapter 7. For each of the eight elements, state why your design meets the criteria.

    • Critique the provider mobile application screen designs according to the eight
    elements of use validation rules (8.4.8) outlined in your text in Chapter 7. Provide a
    minimum of four specific examples of how you will validate providers’ actions in the
    mobile design.

    • Summarize the top four priority items in the technology application testing plan that
    you will develop for the applications testing professional who is testing your mobile
    applications prototypes for the consumers and providers at THS.

    The Milestone 2: Login Screen Designs Mobile Applications paper,
    • must be 12 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)

    and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style
    • The page count also includes the required consumer and provider end user mobile

    application login and main menu screens that must be included in your paper.
    • students should use either Microsoft PowerPoint or Microsoft Word (Shapes)

    functionality to generate the login and main menu end user screens. These screen
    pictures should be included in the body of the paper and referenced as figures
    utilizing APA Style guidelines.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of paper in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information
    on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    **## Week3AssignmentMilestone2LoginScreenDesignsMobileApplications.pdf**

    In your paper, you will develop design prototypes for the login and main menu screens for
    both the consumer and provider mobile application for THS. In addition, you will analyze
    the key data types that end users will use to populate these screens. You will also discuss
    the components of the overall IT architecture necessary to facilitate the deployment of
    mobile application technology for THS consumers and providers.
    In your paper,

    • Develop three to four mobile application screens representing the login and main
    menu end user screens for consumers of THS.

    • Develop three to six mobile application screens representing the login, main menu,
    and patient results review end user screens for prescribing providers (doctors and
    nurse practitioners) of THS.

    • Articulate the content of each mobile application screen for both the consumer and
    prescribing providers in detail.

    • Critique the consumer mobile application screen designs according to the eight
    elements of an easy-to-learn-and-use interface (8.4.1) outlined in your text in
    Chapter 7. For each of the eight elements, state why your design meets the criteria.

    • Critique the provider mobile application screen designs according to the eight
    elements of use validation rules (8.4.8) outlined in your text in Chapter 7. Provide a
    minimum of four specific examples of how you will validate providers’ actions in the
    mobile design.

    • Summarize the top four priority items in the technology application testing plan that
    you will develop for the applications testing professional who is testing your mobile
    applications prototypes for the consumers and providers at THS.

    The Milestone 2: Login Screen Designs Mobile Applications paper,
    • must be 12 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)

    and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style
    • The page count also includes the required consumer and provider end user mobile

    application login and main menu screens that must be included in your paper.
    • students should use either Microsoft PowerPoint or Microsoft Word (Shapes)

    functionality to generate the login and main menu end user screens. These screen
    pictures should be included in the body of the paper and referenced as figures
    utilizing APA Style guidelines.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of paper in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information
    on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

  • [Solved] papa

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering papa.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] ODH

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The entire vignette should be 10 pages total plus additional title and reference page. APA format. double-spaced with 6 references from 2023. Each vignette should be 2 ½-pages per vignette. Address the four vignettes presented below: 1. What are the ethical issues in the case? Identify the issue in…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The entire vignette should be 10 pages total plus additional title and reference page. APA format. double-spaced with 6 references from 2023.

    Each vignette should be 2 ½-pages per vignette.

    Address the four vignettes presented below:

    1. What are the ethical issues in the case? Identify the issue in the ethics code.

    2. Did the professional act in a manner consistent with current standards and principles? If not, what other courses of action would be more ethical?  Support your decision by identifying the standards and principles relevant to this case.

    3. Are there any indications of bias, stereotyping or marginalization present?

    4. If relevant did the professional advocate for the client?

    5. How can colleagues and supervisors help the professional to act ethically in this situation? Please be specific.

    Vignette 1. 2 ½ pages

    Madne is a certified school counselor and licensed clinical counselor specializing in a faith-based approach to healing. She has spent twenty years working with adolescents in a variety of school and clinical settings and has developed extensive competency in spiritual counseling of adolescents with developmental, educational, and mental health issues. She is known in her high school as the counselor "kids can trust". In the last year there have been numerous reports in the media about teenage girls who have hidden their pregnancies from their families, delivered babies alone, and had babies who died soon after birth, either because of the girl's actions or independent of them. In fact, one of the more notorious of these cases occurred in the town next to Madne's school. As a result, the school principal has mandated that all personnel who know of or suspect a student pregnancy should immediately notify parents and the school principal. Madne is disturbed by this edict and fears it will jeopardize her open-door policy with students. Therefore, she decides to ignore it.

    Vignette 2. 2 ½ pages

    Loa is a psychologist who works in the counseling center of a prestigious college with a large number of international students. She says that she could never really learn enough about the varied cultures from which many of her clients come, so she relies on the clients to teach her about their cultural background. When, for example, she had a client from Indonesia, she asked that young man directly about the ways in which he thought his culture affected his thoughts, feelings, and behavior. Loa says that because her clients are all gifted students, they have good insight into their culture and she relies heavily on their interpretation of the role of culture in their lives. She is content that she needs no other knowledge base.

    Vignette 3. 2 ½ pages

    Pia is a 27-year-old woman who is a recent immigrant from Iraq.  She lost three brothers during the war there.  She lives in the U.S. with her parents and she works as a meter-reader.  Over the last 6 months Pia has become increasingly depressed.  Her work performance has suffered and the employee assistance program at work has referred her to Jonathan for therapy. Jonathan is an experienced mental health professional who also conducts research on the effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression.  He has never worked with a recent immigrant, and he has little knowledge of the war in Iraq.  Jonathan decides to refer Pia to another clinician who is from Eastern Europe, but whose knowledge and experience in treating depression is not as extensive as his.

    Vignette 4. 2 ½ pages

    Mann, is 28-year-old war veteran. He was diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after he returned from military combat. In addition to PTSD, Mann suffers from occasional bouts of serious depression. Mann enters graduate school in counseling, hoping to provide therapy to other young veterans who have been traumatized. Although his academic performance in graduate school is satisfactory, he has been unable to provide competent therapy to his clients in internship. He cannot separate his own experiences and emotions from those of his clients and as a result, he sometimes misdiagnoses their problems and misinterprets their thoughts and feelings. Repeated efforts to help Mann develop better skills and insight are unsuccessful. Consequently, he fails internship and is dismissed from the program. Mann is frustrated and calls the actions of his supervisors unethical even though he does not disagree substantially with the faculty’s assessment of his clinical skills. He asserts that his compassion for clients and empathy for their pain should compensate for his deficiencies in other areas. Eventually, Mann finds an unaccredited degree program from which he successfully graduates after which he opens a private practice. In this practice, he offers professional services to survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

  • [Solved] WK@2D&P226

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    2 questions need seperate answers **files (1)** – ## wk2DQPD26.docx **## wk2DQPD26.docx** Book for references • PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition • Process Groups: A Practice Guide **Title:** Project Management Fundamentals. Author: Shelly Morris Publisher: Seneca College. Licensed under CC 4.0. Year P…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    2 questions need seperate answers

    **files (1)**

    – ## wk2DQPD26.docx

    **## wk2DQPD26.docx**

    Book for references

    • PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition

    • Process Groups: A Practice Guide

    **Title:** Project Management Fundamentals.

    Author: Shelly Morris

    Publisher: Seneca College. Licensed under CC 4.0.

    Year Published: 2021

    Edition: 1st

    ISBN: Licensed under CC 4.0.

    **Initial Post**

    Project management principles, performance, and value delivery are essential components of successful project management. Likewise, choosing an appropriate project development approach and life cycle model can significantly impact project development and success.

    1. What is the relationship between project management principles, performance, and value delivery? How can project managers ensure they employ practical project management principles to drive project performance and deliver maximum value to stakeholders?

    2. What are the key differences between traditional project development approaches and Agile methodologies? How can project managers determine the most suitable approach for a given project? In what ways do different life cycle models, such as Waterfall or Scrum, impact project development and success?

    **Select one of the question groups above**.  Draft an initial post demonstrating your understanding of the topic using assigned readings or any other appropriate source.

    Your initial submission should be a substantive post (~400+ words). Your response should include APA-compliant in-text citations and references. APA 7th edition style

    Add up to 5 or more references in APA 7 edition style

    ##### **In-text citation** (One author:

    · (French, 2013)

    · French (2013)

    Two authors:

    · (French & Sumatra, 2013)

    · French and Sumatra (2013)

    Three or more authors:

    · (French et al., 2013)

    · French et al. (2013)

    **Question 2**

    **TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS:**

    Title: Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management

    Author: Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris

    Publisher: Cengage Learning

    Year Published: 2023

    Edition: 14th

    ISBN: 13: 9780357673119 or 9781337627948

    ## **Discussion 2 – Evolving Data Models – Bridging Theory and Business Practice**

    For this week's discussion, compare two data models discussed in this chapter.  (1) How do they differ in terms of structure, scalability, and use cases?  (2) What are the advantages and limitations of each model from a business operations perspective? (3)  Which model do you believe is more aligned with current business needs and why?

    Be sure to support your positions with credible resources in APA 7e format.

    [Purdue Owl APA 7e](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/index.html)

    [Purdue Owl: Avoiding Plagiarism](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/avoiding_plagiarism/index.html)

    **## wk2DQPD26.docx**

    Book for references

    • PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition

    • Process Groups: A Practice Guide

    **Title:** Project Management Fundamentals.

    Author: Shelly Morris

    Publisher: Seneca College. Licensed under CC 4.0.

    Year Published: 2021

    Edition: 1st

    ISBN: Licensed under CC 4.0.

    **Initial Post**

    Project management principles, performance, and value delivery are essential components of successful project management. Likewise, choosing an appropriate project development approach and life cycle model can significantly impact project development and success.

    1. What is the relationship between project management principles, performance, and value delivery? How can project managers ensure they employ practical project management principles to drive project performance and deliver maximum value to stakeholders?

    2. What are the key differences between traditional project development approaches and Agile methodologies? How can project managers determine the most suitable approach for a given project? In what ways do different life cycle models, such as Waterfall or Scrum, impact project development and success?

    **Select one of the question groups above**.  Draft an initial post demonstrating your understanding of the topic using assigned readings or any other appropriate source.

    Your initial submission should be a substantive post (~400+ words). Your response should include APA-compliant in-text citations and references. APA 7th edition style

    Add up to 5 or more references in APA 7 edition style

    ##### **In-text citation** (One author:

    · (French, 2013)

    · French (2013)

    Two authors:

    · (French & Sumatra, 2013)

    · French and Sumatra (2013)

    Three or more authors:

    · (French et al., 2013)

    · French et al. (2013)

    **Question 2**

    **TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS:**

    Title: Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management

    Author: Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris

    Publisher: Cengage Learning

    Year Published: 2023

    Edition: 14th

    ISBN: 13: 9780357673119 or 9781337627948

    ## **Discussion 2 – Evolving Data Models – Bridging Theory and Business Practice**

    For this week's discussion, compare two data models discussed in this chapter.  (1) How do they differ in terms of structure, scalability, and use cases?  (2) What are the advantages and limitations of each model from a business operations perspective? (3)  Which model do you believe is more aligned with current business needs and why?

    Be sure to support your positions with credible resources in APA 7e format.

    [Purdue Owl APA 7e](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/index.html)

    [Purdue Owl: Avoiding Plagiarism](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/avoiding_plagiarism/index.html)

  • [Solved] deductive arguments

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx – 10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx **## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx** 202620 10 Writing Assignment: Deductive Argument Patterns What is the most important insight you gained from the required readings for this m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx

    – 10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx

    **## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx**

    202620 10 Writing Assignment: Deductive Argument Patterns

    What is the most important insight you gained from the required readings for this module? This insight could be a definition, a term, concept, idea, or even a specific passage or quote from the readings. Your writing must demonstrate careful reading and thoughtful reflection on the PowerPoint introduction and textbook. Please answer each of the following.

    1.
    **What is the insight?** Explain it thoroughly and include specific details from the readings. Please note that this assignment is NOT asking for a summary of the readings.

    2.
    **Why is this insight important?** Does this insight strengthen, reinforce, clarify, change, or correct your previous understanding or knowledge?

    3.
    **How will you apply this insight?** How will this insight help you address the challenges you face (or will face) in your personal life, academic work, profession, or in carrying out your duties as a responsible citizen?

    **Since this assignment asks for your personal reflections on the required readings, essays generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools will**
    **_not_ express**
    **_your_ thoughts and**
    **_your_ voice and, thus, will not meet the criteria of the rubric (See below).  Critical thinking, above all else, means thinking for yourself. Please do not let AI think for you!**

    **10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/10deductiveargumentpatternsspring2026-pptx)

    **10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/10deductiveargumentpatternsspring2026-pptx)

    **## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx**

    202620 10 Writing Assignment: Deductive Argument Patterns

    What is the most important insight you gained from the required readings for this module? This insight could be a definition, a term, concept, idea, or even a specific passage or quote from the readings. Your writing must demonstrate careful reading and thoughtful reflection on the PowerPoint introduction and textbook. Please answer each of the following.

    1.
    **What is the insight?** Explain it thoroughly and include specific details from the readings. Please note that this assignment is NOT asking for a summary of the readings.

    2.
    **Why is this insight important?** Does this insight strengthen, reinforce, clarify, change, or correct your previous understanding or knowledge?

    3.
    **How will you apply this insight?** How will this insight help you address the challenges you face (or will face) in your personal life, academic work, profession, or in carrying out your duties as a responsible citizen?

    **Since this assignment asks for your personal reflections on the required readings, essays generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools will**
    **_not_ express**
    **_your_ thoughts and**
    **_your_ voice and, thus, will not meet the criteria of the rubric (See below).  Critical thinking, above all else, means thinking for yourself. Please do not let AI think for you!**

    **10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/10deductiveargumentpatternsspring2026-pptx)

    **## writingassigndeductiveargumentpatterns.docx**

    202620 10 Writing Assignment: Deductive Argument Patterns

    What is the most important insight you gained from the required readings for this module? This insight could be a definition, a term, concept, idea, or even a specific passage or quote from the readings. Your writing must demonstrate careful reading and thoughtful reflection on the PowerPoint introduction and textbook. Please answer each of the following.

    1.
    **What is the insight?** Explain it thoroughly and include specific details from the readings. Please note that this assignment is NOT asking for a summary of the readings.

    2.
    **Why is this insight important?** Does this insight strengthen, reinforce, clarify, change, or correct your previous understanding or knowledge?

    3.
    **How will you apply this insight?** How will this insight help you address the challenges you face (or will face) in your personal life, academic work, profession, or in carrying out your duties as a responsible citizen?

    **Since this assignment asks for your personal reflections on the required readings, essays generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools will**
    **_not_ express**
    **_your_ thoughts and**
    **_your_ voice and, thus, will not meet the criteria of the rubric (See below).  Critical thinking, above all else, means thinking for yourself. Please do not let AI think for you!**

    **10DeductiveArgumentPatternsSpring2026.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/10deductiveargumentpatternsspring2026-pptx)

  • [Solved] poor kids

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Poor Kids Documentary Discussion 300words watch doc https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/poor-kids/ 1. The documentary illustrates how poverty impacts children's daily lives and their sense of self. Choose one specific child (or family) from the documentary and discuss how their experience…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Poor Kids Documentary Discussion 300words watch doc

    https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/poor-kids/

    1. The documentary illustrates how poverty impacts children's daily lives and their sense of self. Choose one specific child (or family) from the documentary and discuss how their experiences challenged or reinforced your existing understanding of poverty. What particular challenges or moments stood out to you, and why?
    2. _Poor Kids_ reveals the systemic nature of poverty, showing how factors like job loss, lack of affordable housing, and limited access to resources contribute to poverty. Beyond individual choices, what structural or societal factors presented in the documentary do you believe are most significant in contributing to the children's situations? Reflect on how these systemic issues might differ from common individualistic perceptions of poverty.
    3. _Poor Kids_ offers a look into the complex realities faced by children growing up in poverty. As a future social worker, identify two specific insights or learning you gained from this documentary regarding the challenges, strengths, or systemic barriers experienced by families living in poverty. How will these insights shape your approach to social work practice, particularly in terms of your interventions, client advocacy, or understanding of broader systems?

  • [Solved] BENCHMARK RESEARCH PROPOSAL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx – ## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf **## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx** BENCHMARK- HEALTH CARE RESEARCH PROPOSAL Identify a specific health care administration issue **(staffing shortage and high turnover)** or barrier that you want to uti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx

    – ## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf

    **## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx**

    BENCHMARK- HEALTH CARE RESEARCH PROPOSAL

    Identify a specific health care administration issue
    **(staffing shortage and high turnover)** or barrier that you want to utilize as the focus for your health care research paper. In
    **750-1,000 words**, propose the topic for your health care research paper. Include the following:

    1. Describe the health care administration issue or barrier.

    2. Summarize the stakeholders affected by the health care issue or barrier.

    3. Discuss the relevance of the health care administration problem as it relates to health care research.

    4. Explain the role of health care and science research in solving the identified problem.

    5. Provide at least two quantitative or qualitative articles that support your proposed topic and include an explanation of why these support your topic.

    **USE APA FORMAT RUBRIC IS ATTACHED SEPARATEDLY**

    **## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf**

    Benchmark – Health Care Research Proposal – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    0 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is not presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete or inaccurate

    description of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented.

    Significant detail or evidence

    is needed.

    9 points

    A summary of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented. More

    information or detail is

    needed to fully describe the

    health care problem.

    10.2 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is presented. Some

    minor details or evidence is

    needed.

    12 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is clearly presented.

    Strong supporting evidence

    is provided.

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    0 points

    A summarization of the

    stakeholders affected by the

    health care administration

    issue or barrier is not

    presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    More information is needed

    to provide a comprehensive

    understanding of how the

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier.

    9 points

    A general summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Some additional information

    is needed to fully illustrate

    how the stakeholders are

    affected by the health care

    administration problem.

    10.2 points

    A complete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Adequate information is

    provided to explain how

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration problem.

    12 points

    A strong summary of all

    stakeholders is presented.

    Detailed information explains

    how stakeholders are directly

    or indirectly affected by the

    health care administration

    problem.

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    0 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    its relationship to health care

    research are not presented.

    The problem presented is

    not within the scope of a

    health care administrative

    problem.

    10.4 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are referenced, but

    a relationship between the

    two is not established.

    Significant information and

    evidence are needed to

    explain how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    12 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are somewhat

    evident, but some parts of

    the summary are unclear. A

    relationship between the two

    is not strongly established.

    Some information or

    evidence is needed to fully

    establish how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    13.6 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are evident.

    Information and evidence are

    presented that demonstrate

    how health care research is

    relevant and supports the

    problem.

    16 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are thoroughly

    discussed. Detailed

    information and strong

    evidence are supplied that

    demonstrate how health care

    research is highly relevant to

    supporting the problem.

    Article Supporting

    Proposed Topic (B) (B)

    Article Supporting Proposed

    Topic (C3.6) (C3.6)

    0 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles are not

    provided.

    10.4 points

    At least two articles are

    provided that relates to the

    proposed topic, but the

    article is not qualitative or

    quantitative.

    12 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles have

    some relevance to the

    proposed topic.

    13.6 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles are

    relevant to the proposed

    topic.

    16 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These article are

    highly relevant to, and

    provides strong support for,

    the proposed topic.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or organizing

    claim.

    3.64 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague. Purpose

    is not clear.

    4.2 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    4.76 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts

    the development of the

    paper. Thesis is descriptive

    and reflective of the

    arguments and appropriate

    to the purpose.

    5.6 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and

    contains the essence of the

    paper. Thesis statement

    makes the purpose of the

    paper clear.

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    0 points

    Statement of purpose is not

    justified by the conclusion.

    The conclusion does not

    support the claim made.

    Argument is incoherent and

    uses noncredible sources.

    4.16 points

    Sufficient justification of

    claims is lacking. Argument

    lacks consistent unity. There

    are obvious flaws in the logic.

    Some sources have

    questionable credibility.

    4.8 points

    Argument is orderly but may

    have a few inconsistencies.

    The argument presents

    minimal justification of

    claims. Argument logically,

    but not thoroughly, supports

    the purpose. Sources used

    are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the

    thesis.

    5.44 points

    Argument shows logical

    progression. Techniques of

    argumentation are evident.

    There is a smooth

    progression of claims from

    introduction to conclusion.

    Most sources are

    authoritative.

    6.4 points

    Clear and convincing

    argument presents a

    persuasive claim in a

    distinctive and compelling

    manner. All sources are

    authoritative.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    2.6 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    3 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    3.4 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately, or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    2.6 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements are

    missing or mistaken. A lack

    of control with formatting is

    apparent.

    3 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor errors

    may be present.

    3.4 points

    Appropriate template is fully

    used. There are virtually no

    errors in formatting style.

    4 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    2.6 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    3 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    3.4 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    4 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf**

    Benchmark – Health Care Research Proposal – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    0 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is not presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete or inaccurate

    description of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented.

    Significant detail or evidence

    is needed.

    9 points

    A summary of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented. More

    information or detail is

    needed to fully describe the

    health care problem.

    10.2 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is presented. Some

    minor details or evidence is

    needed.

    12 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is clearly presented.

    Strong supporting evidence

    is provided.

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    0 points

    A summarization of the

    stakeholders affected by the

    health care administration

    issue or barrier is not

    presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    More information is needed

    to provide a comprehensive

    understanding of how the

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier.

    9 points

    A general summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Some additional information

    is needed to fully illustrate

    how the stakeholders are

    affected by the health care

    administration problem.

    10.2 points

    A complete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Adequate information is

    provided to explain how

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration problem.

    12 points

    A strong summary of all

    stakeholders is presented.

    Detailed information explains

    how stakeholders are directly

    or indirectly affected by the

    health care administration

    problem.

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    0 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    its relationship to health care

    research are not presented.

    The problem presented is

    not within the scope of a

    health care administrative

    problem.

    10.4 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are referenced, but

    a relationship between the

    two is not established.

    Significant information and

    evidence are needed to

    explain how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    12 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are somewhat

    evident, but some parts of

    the summary are unclear. A

    relationship between the two

    is not strongly established.

    Some information or

    evidence is needed to fully

    establish how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    13.6 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are evident.

    Information and evidence are

    presented that demonstrate

    how health care research is

    relevant and supports the

    problem.

    16 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are thoroughly

    discussed. Detailed

    information and strong

    evidence are supplied that

    demonstrate how health care

    research is highly relevant to

    supporting the problem.

    Article Supporting

    Proposed Topic (B) (B)

    Article Supporting Proposed

    Topic (C3.6) (C3.6)

    0 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles are not

    provided.

    10.4 points

    At least two articles are

    provided that relates to the

    proposed topic, but the

    article is not qualitative or

    quantitative.

    12 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles have

    some relevance to the

    proposed topic.

    13.6 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles are

    relevant to the proposed

    topic.

    16 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These article are

    highly relevant to, and

    provides strong support for,

    the proposed topic.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or organizing

    claim.

    3.64 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague. Purpose

    is not clear.

    4.2 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    4.76 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts

    the development of the

    paper. Thesis is descriptive

    and reflective of the

    arguments and appropriate

    to the purpose.

    5.6 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and

    contains the essence of the

    paper. Thesis statement

    makes the purpose of the

    paper clear.

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    0 points

    Statement of purpose is not

    justified by the conclusion.

    The conclusion does not

    support the claim made.

    Argument is incoherent and

    uses noncredible sources.

    4.16 points

    Sufficient justification of

    claims is lacking. Argument

    lacks consistent unity. There

    are obvious flaws in the logic.

    Some sources have

    questionable credibility.

    4.8 points

    Argument is orderly but may

    have a few inconsistencies.

    The argument presents

    minimal justification of

    claims. Argument logically,

    but not thoroughly, supports

    the purpose. Sources used

    are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the

    thesis.

    5.44 points

    Argument shows logical

    progression. Techniques of

    argumentation are evident.

    There is a smooth

    progression of claims from

    introduction to conclusion.

    Most sources are

    authoritative.

    6.4 points

    Clear and convincing

    argument presents a

    persuasive claim in a

    distinctive and compelling

    manner. All sources are

    authoritative.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    2.6 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    3 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    3.4 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately, or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    2.6 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements are

    missing or mistaken. A lack

    of control with formatting is

    apparent.

    3 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor errors

    may be present.

    3.4 points

    Appropriate template is fully

    used. There are virtually no

    errors in formatting style.

    4 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    2.6 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    3 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    3.4 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    4 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx**

    BENCHMARK- HEALTH CARE RESEARCH PROPOSAL

    Identify a specific health care administration issue
    **(staffing shortage and high turnover)** or barrier that you want to utilize as the focus for your health care research paper. In
    **750-1,000 words**, propose the topic for your health care research paper. Include the following:

    1. Describe the health care administration issue or barrier.

    2. Summarize the stakeholders affected by the health care issue or barrier.

    3. Discuss the relevance of the health care administration problem as it relates to health care research.

    4. Explain the role of health care and science research in solving the identified problem.

    5. Provide at least two quantitative or qualitative articles that support your proposed topic and include an explanation of why these support your topic.

    **USE APA FORMAT RUBRIC IS ATTACHED SEPARATEDLY**

    **## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf**

    Benchmark – Health Care Research Proposal – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    0 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is not presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete or inaccurate

    description of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented.

    Significant detail or evidence

    is needed.

    9 points

    A summary of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented. More

    information or detail is

    needed to fully describe the

    health care problem.

    10.2 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is presented. Some

    minor details or evidence is

    needed.

    12 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is clearly presented.

    Strong supporting evidence

    is provided.

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    0 points

    A summarization of the

    stakeholders affected by the

    health care administration

    issue or barrier is not

    presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    More information is needed

    to provide a comprehensive

    understanding of how the

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier.

    9 points

    A general summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Some additional information

    is needed to fully illustrate

    how the stakeholders are

    affected by the health care

    administration problem.

    10.2 points

    A complete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Adequate information is

    provided to explain how

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration problem.

    12 points

    A strong summary of all

    stakeholders is presented.

    Detailed information explains

    how stakeholders are directly

    or indirectly affected by the

    health care administration

    problem.

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    0 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    its relationship to health care

    research are not presented.

    The problem presented is

    not within the scope of a

    health care administrative

    problem.

    10.4 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are referenced, but

    a relationship between the

    two is not established.

    Significant information and

    evidence are needed to

    explain how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    12 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are somewhat

    evident, but some parts of

    the summary are unclear. A

    relationship between the two

    is not strongly established.

    Some information or

    evidence is needed to fully

    establish how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    13.6 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are evident.

    Information and evidence are

    presented that demonstrate

    how health care research is

    relevant and supports the

    problem.

    16 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are thoroughly

    discussed. Detailed

    information and strong

    evidence are supplied that

    demonstrate how health care

    research is highly relevant to

    supporting the problem.

    Article Supporting

    Proposed Topic (B) (B)

    Article Supporting Proposed

    Topic (C3.6) (C3.6)

    0 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles are not

    provided.

    10.4 points

    At least two articles are

    provided that relates to the

    proposed topic, but the

    article is not qualitative or

    quantitative.

    12 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles have

    some relevance to the

    proposed topic.

    13.6 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles are

    relevant to the proposed

    topic.

    16 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These article are

    highly relevant to, and

    provides strong support for,

    the proposed topic.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or organizing

    claim.

    3.64 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague. Purpose

    is not clear.

    4.2 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    4.76 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts

    the development of the

    paper. Thesis is descriptive

    and reflective of the

    arguments and appropriate

    to the purpose.

    5.6 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and

    contains the essence of the

    paper. Thesis statement

    makes the purpose of the

    paper clear.

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    0 points

    Statement of purpose is not

    justified by the conclusion.

    The conclusion does not

    support the claim made.

    Argument is incoherent and

    uses noncredible sources.

    4.16 points

    Sufficient justification of

    claims is lacking. Argument

    lacks consistent unity. There

    are obvious flaws in the logic.

    Some sources have

    questionable credibility.

    4.8 points

    Argument is orderly but may

    have a few inconsistencies.

    The argument presents

    minimal justification of

    claims. Argument logically,

    but not thoroughly, supports

    the purpose. Sources used

    are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the

    thesis.

    5.44 points

    Argument shows logical

    progression. Techniques of

    argumentation are evident.

    There is a smooth

    progression of claims from

    introduction to conclusion.

    Most sources are

    authoritative.

    6.4 points

    Clear and convincing

    argument presents a

    persuasive claim in a

    distinctive and compelling

    manner. All sources are

    authoritative.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    2.6 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    3 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    3.4 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately, or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    2.6 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements are

    missing or mistaken. A lack

    of control with formatting is

    apparent.

    3 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor errors

    may be present.

    3.4 points

    Appropriate template is fully

    used. There are virtually no

    errors in formatting style.

    4 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    2.6 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    3 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    3.4 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    4 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## BENCHMARK-RESEARCHPROPOSAL.docx**

    BENCHMARK- HEALTH CARE RESEARCH PROPOSAL

    Identify a specific health care administration issue
    **(staffing shortage and high turnover)** or barrier that you want to utilize as the focus for your health care research paper. In
    **750-1,000 words**, propose the topic for your health care research paper. Include the following:

    1. Describe the health care administration issue or barrier.

    2. Summarize the stakeholders affected by the health care issue or barrier.

    3. Discuss the relevance of the health care administration problem as it relates to health care research.

    4. Explain the role of health care and science research in solving the identified problem.

    5. Provide at least two quantitative or qualitative articles that support your proposed topic and include an explanation of why these support your topic.

    **USE APA FORMAT RUBRIC IS ATTACHED SEPARATEDLY**

    **## Rubric-HealthCareResearchProposal.pdf**

    Benchmark – Health Care Research Proposal – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    Description of Health Care

    Proposal

    0 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is not presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete or inaccurate

    description of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented.

    Significant detail or evidence

    is needed.

    9 points

    A summary of the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier is presented. More

    information or detail is

    needed to fully describe the

    health care problem.

    10.2 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is presented. Some

    minor details or evidence is

    needed.

    12 points

    A description of the health

    care administration issue or

    barrier is clearly presented.

    Strong supporting evidence

    is provided.

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    Summarization of

    Stakeholders Affected by

    Health Care Administration

    Issue or Barrier

    0 points

    A summarization of the

    stakeholders affected by the

    health care administration

    issue or barrier is not

    presented.

    7.8 points

    An incomplete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    More information is needed

    to provide a comprehensive

    understanding of how the

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration issue or

    barrier.

    9 points

    A general summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Some additional information

    is needed to fully illustrate

    how the stakeholders are

    affected by the health care

    administration problem.

    10.2 points

    A complete summary of

    stakeholders is presented.

    Adequate information is

    provided to explain how

    stakeholders are affected by

    the health care

    administration problem.

    12 points

    A strong summary of all

    stakeholders is presented.

    Detailed information explains

    how stakeholders are directly

    or indirectly affected by the

    health care administration

    problem.

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    Relevance of Problem to

    Health Care Research

    0 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    its relationship to health care

    research are not presented.

    The problem presented is

    not within the scope of a

    health care administrative

    problem.

    10.4 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are referenced, but

    a relationship between the

    two is not established.

    Significant information and

    evidence are needed to

    explain how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    12 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are somewhat

    evident, but some parts of

    the summary are unclear. A

    relationship between the two

    is not strongly established.

    Some information or

    evidence is needed to fully

    establish how health care

    research is relevant and

    supports the problem.

    13.6 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are evident.

    Information and evidence are

    presented that demonstrate

    how health care research is

    relevant and supports the

    problem.

    16 points

    The health care

    administration problem and

    a relationship to health care

    research are thoroughly

    discussed. Detailed

    information and strong

    evidence are supplied that

    demonstrate how health care

    research is highly relevant to

    supporting the problem.

    Article Supporting

    Proposed Topic (B) (B)

    Article Supporting Proposed

    Topic (C3.6) (C3.6)

    0 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles are not

    provided.

    10.4 points

    At least two articles are

    provided that relates to the

    proposed topic, but the

    article is not qualitative or

    quantitative.

    12 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles have

    some relevance to the

    proposed topic.

    13.6 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These articles are

    relevant to the proposed

    topic.

    16 points

    At least two qualitative or

    quantitative articles relating

    to the proposed topic are

    provided. These article are

    highly relevant to, and

    provides strong support for,

    the proposed topic.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or organizing

    claim.

    3.64 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague. Purpose

    is not clear.

    4.2 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    4.76 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts

    the development of the

    paper. Thesis is descriptive

    and reflective of the

    arguments and appropriate

    to the purpose.

    5.6 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and

    contains the essence of the

    paper. Thesis statement

    makes the purpose of the

    paper clear.

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    Argument Logic and

    Construction

    0 points

    Statement of purpose is not

    justified by the conclusion.

    The conclusion does not

    support the claim made.

    Argument is incoherent and

    uses noncredible sources.

    4.16 points

    Sufficient justification of

    claims is lacking. Argument

    lacks consistent unity. There

    are obvious flaws in the logic.

    Some sources have

    questionable credibility.

    4.8 points

    Argument is orderly but may

    have a few inconsistencies.

    The argument presents

    minimal justification of

    claims. Argument logically,

    but not thoroughly, supports

    the purpose. Sources used

    are credible. Introduction

    and conclusion bracket the

    thesis.

    5.44 points

    Argument shows logical

    progression. Techniques of

    argumentation are evident.

    There is a smooth

    progression of claims from

    introduction to conclusion.

    Most sources are

    authoritative.

    6.4 points

    Clear and convincing

    argument presents a

    persuasive claim in a

    distinctive and compelling

    manner. All sources are

    authoritative.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    2.6 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    3 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    3.4 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,

    academic English.

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    Paper Format (use of

    appropriate style for the

    major and assignment)

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately, or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    2.6 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements are

    missing or mistaken. A lack

    of control with formatting is

    apparent.

    3 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor errors

    may be present.

    3.4 points

    Appropriate template is fully

    used. There are virtually no

    errors in formatting style.

    4 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    2.6 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    3 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    3.4 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    4 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

  • [Solved] DB 1 OSHA 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## DB1.docx – ## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf **## DB1.docx** DB1 Part II: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards promulgation process is quite elaborate and provides a great deal of deliberation between OSHA and various stakeholder groups. Describe wa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## DB1.docx

    – ## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB1

    Part II: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards promulgation process is quite elaborate and provides a great deal of deliberation between OSHA and various stakeholder groups. Describe ways this might be helpful with respect to ensuring the final rule coming out of the process is the best it can be, and/or describe ways this deliberative process can have a negative impact.

    Reply 1:
    **Hudson Haas**

    Top of Form

    Good afternoon team and Professor Warner,

    My name is Hudson Haas and I am from Seguin, Texas. I am currently employed as an EHS Specialist in a chemical manufacturing plant. I am married to my lovely wife and have a 21 month old daughter. Some of my future goals include earning my bachelor's degree, completing my CSP and CHMM certifications and continuing to serve as a beacon of reason.I look at OSHA a lot like I look at the federal government: there is representation from all across the land, there are varying opinions and getting anything done in a timely manner is the easiest over bet you can make. However, at the end of the day they are the standard that is set for most of America. As I have journeyed in my career, it seems that more companies are pushing above OSHA regulations where they can to set the precedence that they are
    truly committed to safety. As long as OSHA is around to keep pushing the culture forward, we will continue to see less incidents.

    Bottom of Form

    Reply 2:
    **Shawn Hunt** Top of Form

    My name is Shawn, and I’m from Walterboro, SC. I currently work as a journeyman lineman, and I’ve been working in the electrical field for 26 years. Right now, I’m continuing my education in occupational safety and health. My goal is to move into a safety role, possibly with the current company I’m with now, where I can use both my field experience and what I’m learning in school to help keep workers safe on the job.

    I feel the OSHA standards process can be helpful because it allows input from different groups like workers, employers, and safety experts. This helps make sure the rules are realistic and actually work in the real world. For example, workers can speak on what hazards they deal with every day, while employers can explain what is possible from a cost and operations side. This kind of back and forth can lead to better, more balanced rules that protect people without shutting down business operations.

    On the other hand, the process can also be slow. Since there are so many steps and opinions involved, it can take a long time for new rules to be put in place. This can be a problem when workers are exposed to hazards that need to be addressed quickly. In some cases, delays in the process could mean people are not protected as soon as they should be.

    This  process is important because it helps create strong and fair safety standards, but the time it takes can sometimes be a downsideBottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Recognize how the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

    are promulgated.

    4. Differentiate between laws and regulations.
    4.1 Identify distinguishing aspects of laws and regulations.
    4.2 Differentiate between the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and OSHA standards.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Corcoran, D. (2020). The OSH Act of 1970. Manuscript in preparation.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart]. United

    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Unit Lesson

    Welcome! This course is essentially an introductory course to assist students in understanding how
    environmental and occupational safety and health (OSH) laws and regulations are made and the roles and
    responsibilities of various regulatory agencies at the state and federal level. This course covers both the
    environmental and OSH regulatory environment because many individuals working in OSH, particularly in
    small- to medium-sized organizations, are asked to wear the environmental hat as well. Thus, it is good to
    understand the similarities and differences in the two regulatory systems.

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Occupational Safety and Health
    Regulation Promulgation Process

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1)

    [https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html](https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1)

    [https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made](https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    The OSH Act

    In the United States, laws enacted at the
    federal level go through a process (see
    Figure 1). The president can take other
    actions, of course, such as vetoing the
    bill or ignoring the bill, in which case one
    of two things can happen: One, if
    Congress is in session for 10 days
    following receipt of the bill by the
    president and he or she does not sign it,
    the bill becomes a law. Alternatively, if
    Congress is not in session, the bill does
    not become a law. This is called a
    pocket veto.

    Each state government has a similar
    process, but these processes vary
    somewhat from state to state. The
    governor of each state, however, is the
    top executive officer of the state who
    signs state-level bills into law.

    The primary federal law covering

    occupational safety and health in the United States is the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. This
    act was signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon. The law has been updated several times over the
    years. As indicated in your readings, the OSH Act was a pivotal document with respect to creating an
    infrastructure for regulating occupational safety and health in the United States. Some of the more important
    effects of the act include the following:

    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    • provided a means for OSHA to create a set of regulations based on existing consensus standards,
    • provided a process for promulgation of future standards,
    • required employers to keep their worksites free from recognized hazards,
    • outlined how OSHA would be administered and how regulations would be enforced,
    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission,
    • enabled the creation of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
    • provided states with a process and funding for running their own state-run OSH enforcement

    agencies, and
    • provided states with a process and funding for free, on-site consultation programs for small

    employers.

    Standards and Standards Promulgation

    This list is not all-inclusive, but it does provide a good overview of the key tenets of the act. The first three
    items on the list deal with the creation of OSHA and the dissemination of OSH regulations. In order to
    establish the first set of enforceable regulations, the act allowed the Secretary of Labor to adopt standards
    that already existed that had been published by various nonprofit organizations. As a result, much of the first
    set of standards came from organizations like the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American
    National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
    (ACGIH). Many of those (40+-year-old) standards are still on the books today, and some have only recently
    been updated.

    Of course, the standards put in place 2 years after the passage of the act only served as a starting point.
    Since that point in time, a number of occupational safety and health standards have been added to the books.
    Some of the most well-known standards that have been added to the Code of Federal Regulations include the
    Hazard Communication, Confined Space, and Lockout/Tagout standards. These standards were added
    through a fairly convoluted process that involves participation from the public and industry (OSHA, 2001).

    Figure 1: The legislative process
    (How Laws Are Made, n.d.)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Essentially, the process starts with a perceived need of some sort typically associated with a specific hazard
    or set of hazards that need to be addressed. When OSHA recognizes such a need, it typically starts by asking
    for input from the public, industry, and/or subject matter experts. Inquiries may be made to different groups as
    well, such as industry leaders and associations.

    This input may be obtained through the process of forming advisory committees and/or by publishing an
    Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register in which they typically outline the
    problem, present available information, and may provide a rough outline of what they expect the proposed
    standard might look like.

    One of the main purposes behind the ANPRM is to solicit input and comments from the public and impacted
    industries. They typically also consult established stakeholders such as the Office of Management and
    Budget, small business groups, the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health
    (NACOSH), and the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health. Expert groups are also
    consulted, such as the NIOSH (OSHA, n.d.).

    Information gathered from these stakeholder groups and from the public can then be reviewed by OSHA and
    used to assist the agency by serving as a foundation for the publication of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    (NPRM) in the Federal Register. Obviously at this point, OSHA tends to have more information and input from
    industries on which to base a tentative regulation known as a proposed rule. The proposed rule provides a
    detailed outline of what OSHA thinks the new regulation should look like based on their information, along
    with a preamble to the proposed rule that includes input and comments from various individuals and groups
    that have made a contribution along the way (OSHA, n.d.).

    After all this, you would think that OSHA would be ready to promulgate their final rule but not so. Once the
    proposed rule is published, the agency asks for additional input and typically holds hearings for impacted
    stakeholders to provide input and present arguments and supporting evidence. Once again, this information is
    gathered, entered into the docket, and considered. From these deliberations, OSHA drafts its final rule to
    publish in the Federal Register.

    The final rule is essentially the standard that is published as an OSHA standard or regulation in the Code of
    Federal Regulations (OSHA, n.d.). There is typically an implementation period written to new standards that
    allows the industry to phase in all of the new requirements over a period of months or even years. As you
    should have ascertained at this point, the OSHA standard-setting process is quite elaborate and allows for a
    great deal of public input and opportunities for deliberation. This is important in order to get employers within
    a given industry to be willing to comply with standards. First, gaining input from the public and stakeholders
    helps OSHA to identify what is feasible and what is not with respect to protecting employees. Indeed, OSHA
    has been accused of going a bit overboard with some of its standards from time to time and getting input from
    industry is helpful in keeping expectations realistic.

    Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

    Thus far, we have discussed the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations without much
    clarification on what those two publications are about. Basically, the Federal Register is a daily publication
    that includes the written documents and activities of the federal government to keep the public informed. It
    includes everything from notices of hearings, requests for information, notices of proposed rules, and final
    rules issued by federal agencies.

    The Code of Federal Regulations is a collection of final rules published by different agencies and the final
    rules are published under a system that codes the various regulations according to the agency of jurisdiction
    and the specific regulation codification system used by each governmental agency. OSHA is an agency that
    falls under the U.S. Department of Labor. Its regulations can be found under Title 29 where labor standards
    are found. OSHA standards are then broken down by numerical code indicating industry sector. All standards
    falling under general industry are coded 1910. All standards falling under construction are coded 1926. After
    that, standard numbers tend to focus on specific standard content. For instance, 29 CFR 1910.146 is the
    general industry confined space standard.

    Individual requirements in the standards are then separated with an outline-based numbering system starting
    with a lowercase letter in parentheses, then a number, then small Roman numerals. For instance, 29 CFR

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    1910.1200(e)(1)(i) is a specific requirement in OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard that requires a list of
    hazardous chemicals used in the facility.

    As you can see, there were a lot of moving parts related to occupational safety and health that were put into
    effect in the early 1970s as a result of the promulgation of the OSH Act. Several governmental bodies were
    formed including OSHA and NIOSH along with a process for accepting the first set of safety and health
    regulations and a process for promulgating new ones. Also, since the 1970s, there has been a marked
    decrease in the number of workplace-related fatalities. We have seen other significant improvements to
    workplace safety and health suggesting that the changes that were put into effect at the national level at that
    time have resulted in some significant changes in helping to make the American workplace safe.

    References

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart].

    https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – The OSH Act
    – Standards and Standards Promulgation
    – Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
    – References

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Recognize how the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

    are promulgated.

    4. Differentiate between laws and regulations.
    4.1 Identify distinguishing aspects of laws and regulations.
    4.2 Differentiate between the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and OSHA standards.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Corcoran, D. (2020). The OSH Act of 1970. Manuscript in preparation.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart]. United

    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Unit Lesson

    Welcome! This course is essentially an introductory course to assist students in understanding how
    environmental and occupational safety and health (OSH) laws and regulations are made and the roles and
    responsibilities of various regulatory agencies at the state and federal level. This course covers both the
    environmental and OSH regulatory environment because many individuals working in OSH, particularly in
    small- to medium-sized organizations, are asked to wear the environmental hat as well. Thus, it is good to
    understand the similarities and differences in the two regulatory systems.

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Occupational Safety and Health
    Regulation Promulgation Process

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1)

    [https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html](https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1)

    [https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made](https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    The OSH Act

    In the United States, laws enacted at the
    federal level go through a process (see
    Figure 1). The president can take other
    actions, of course, such as vetoing the
    bill or ignoring the bill, in which case one
    of two things can happen: One, if
    Congress is in session for 10 days
    following receipt of the bill by the
    president and he or she does not sign it,
    the bill becomes a law. Alternatively, if
    Congress is not in session, the bill does
    not become a law. This is called a
    pocket veto.

    Each state government has a similar
    process, but these processes vary
    somewhat from state to state. The
    governor of each state, however, is the
    top executive officer of the state who
    signs state-level bills into law.

    The primary federal law covering

    occupational safety and health in the United States is the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. This
    act was signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon. The law has been updated several times over the
    years. As indicated in your readings, the OSH Act was a pivotal document with respect to creating an
    infrastructure for regulating occupational safety and health in the United States. Some of the more important
    effects of the act include the following:

    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    • provided a means for OSHA to create a set of regulations based on existing consensus standards,
    • provided a process for promulgation of future standards,
    • required employers to keep their worksites free from recognized hazards,
    • outlined how OSHA would be administered and how regulations would be enforced,
    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission,
    • enabled the creation of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
    • provided states with a process and funding for running their own state-run OSH enforcement

    agencies, and
    • provided states with a process and funding for free, on-site consultation programs for small

    employers.

    Standards and Standards Promulgation

    This list is not all-inclusive, but it does provide a good overview of the key tenets of the act. The first three
    items on the list deal with the creation of OSHA and the dissemination of OSH regulations. In order to
    establish the first set of enforceable regulations, the act allowed the Secretary of Labor to adopt standards
    that already existed that had been published by various nonprofit organizations. As a result, much of the first
    set of standards came from organizations like the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American
    National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
    (ACGIH). Many of those (40+-year-old) standards are still on the books today, and some have only recently
    been updated.

    Of course, the standards put in place 2 years after the passage of the act only served as a starting point.
    Since that point in time, a number of occupational safety and health standards have been added to the books.
    Some of the most well-known standards that have been added to the Code of Federal Regulations include the
    Hazard Communication, Confined Space, and Lockout/Tagout standards. These standards were added
    through a fairly convoluted process that involves participation from the public and industry (OSHA, 2001).

    Figure 1: The legislative process
    (How Laws Are Made, n.d.)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Essentially, the process starts with a perceived need of some sort typically associated with a specific hazard
    or set of hazards that need to be addressed. When OSHA recognizes such a need, it typically starts by asking
    for input from the public, industry, and/or subject matter experts. Inquiries may be made to different groups as
    well, such as industry leaders and associations.

    This input may be obtained through the process of forming advisory committees and/or by publishing an
    Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register in which they typically outline the
    problem, present available information, and may provide a rough outline of what they expect the proposed
    standard might look like.

    One of the main purposes behind the ANPRM is to solicit input and comments from the public and impacted
    industries. They typically also consult established stakeholders such as the Office of Management and
    Budget, small business groups, the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health
    (NACOSH), and the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health. Expert groups are also
    consulted, such as the NIOSH (OSHA, n.d.).

    Information gathered from these stakeholder groups and from the public can then be reviewed by OSHA and
    used to assist the agency by serving as a foundation for the publication of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    (NPRM) in the Federal Register. Obviously at this point, OSHA tends to have more information and input from
    industries on which to base a tentative regulation known as a proposed rule. The proposed rule provides a
    detailed outline of what OSHA thinks the new regulation should look like based on their information, along
    with a preamble to the proposed rule that includes input and comments from various individuals and groups
    that have made a contribution along the way (OSHA, n.d.).

    After all this, you would think that OSHA would be ready to promulgate their final rule but not so. Once the
    proposed rule is published, the agency asks for additional input and typically holds hearings for impacted
    stakeholders to provide input and present arguments and supporting evidence. Once again, this information is
    gathered, entered into the docket, and considered. From these deliberations, OSHA drafts its final rule to
    publish in the Federal Register.

    The final rule is essentially the standard that is published as an OSHA standard or regulation in the Code of
    Federal Regulations (OSHA, n.d.). There is typically an implementation period written to new standards that
    allows the industry to phase in all of the new requirements over a period of months or even years. As you
    should have ascertained at this point, the OSHA standard-setting process is quite elaborate and allows for a
    great deal of public input and opportunities for deliberation. This is important in order to get employers within
    a given industry to be willing to comply with standards. First, gaining input from the public and stakeholders
    helps OSHA to identify what is feasible and what is not with respect to protecting employees. Indeed, OSHA
    has been accused of going a bit overboard with some of its standards from time to time and getting input from
    industry is helpful in keeping expectations realistic.

    Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

    Thus far, we have discussed the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations without much
    clarification on what those two publications are about. Basically, the Federal Register is a daily publication
    that includes the written documents and activities of the federal government to keep the public informed. It
    includes everything from notices of hearings, requests for information, notices of proposed rules, and final
    rules issued by federal agencies.

    The Code of Federal Regulations is a collection of final rules published by different agencies and the final
    rules are published under a system that codes the various regulations according to the agency of jurisdiction
    and the specific regulation codification system used by each governmental agency. OSHA is an agency that
    falls under the U.S. Department of Labor. Its regulations can be found under Title 29 where labor standards
    are found. OSHA standards are then broken down by numerical code indicating industry sector. All standards
    falling under general industry are coded 1910. All standards falling under construction are coded 1926. After
    that, standard numbers tend to focus on specific standard content. For instance, 29 CFR 1910.146 is the
    general industry confined space standard.

    Individual requirements in the standards are then separated with an outline-based numbering system starting
    with a lowercase letter in parentheses, then a number, then small Roman numerals. For instance, 29 CFR

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    1910.1200(e)(1)(i) is a specific requirement in OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard that requires a list of
    hazardous chemicals used in the facility.

    As you can see, there were a lot of moving parts related to occupational safety and health that were put into
    effect in the early 1970s as a result of the promulgation of the OSH Act. Several governmental bodies were
    formed including OSHA and NIOSH along with a process for accepting the first set of safety and health
    regulations and a process for promulgating new ones. Also, since the 1970s, there has been a marked
    decrease in the number of workplace-related fatalities. We have seen other significant improvements to
    workplace safety and health suggesting that the changes that were put into effect at the national level at that
    time have resulted in some significant changes in helping to make the American workplace safe.

    References

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart].

    https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – The OSH Act
    – Standards and Standards Promulgation
    – Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
    – References

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB1

    Part II: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards promulgation process is quite elaborate and provides a great deal of deliberation between OSHA and various stakeholder groups. Describe ways this might be helpful with respect to ensuring the final rule coming out of the process is the best it can be, and/or describe ways this deliberative process can have a negative impact.

    Reply 1:
    **Hudson Haas**

    Top of Form

    Good afternoon team and Professor Warner,

    My name is Hudson Haas and I am from Seguin, Texas. I am currently employed as an EHS Specialist in a chemical manufacturing plant. I am married to my lovely wife and have a 21 month old daughter. Some of my future goals include earning my bachelor's degree, completing my CSP and CHMM certifications and continuing to serve as a beacon of reason.I look at OSHA a lot like I look at the federal government: there is representation from all across the land, there are varying opinions and getting anything done in a timely manner is the easiest over bet you can make. However, at the end of the day they are the standard that is set for most of America. As I have journeyed in my career, it seems that more companies are pushing above OSHA regulations where they can to set the precedence that they are
    truly committed to safety. As long as OSHA is around to keep pushing the culture forward, we will continue to see less incidents.

    Bottom of Form

    Reply 2:
    **Shawn Hunt** Top of Form

    My name is Shawn, and I’m from Walterboro, SC. I currently work as a journeyman lineman, and I’ve been working in the electrical field for 26 years. Right now, I’m continuing my education in occupational safety and health. My goal is to move into a safety role, possibly with the current company I’m with now, where I can use both my field experience and what I’m learning in school to help keep workers safe on the job.

    I feel the OSHA standards process can be helpful because it allows input from different groups like workers, employers, and safety experts. This helps make sure the rules are realistic and actually work in the real world. For example, workers can speak on what hazards they deal with every day, while employers can explain what is possible from a cost and operations side. This kind of back and forth can lead to better, more balanced rules that protect people without shutting down business operations.

    On the other hand, the process can also be slow. Since there are so many steps and opinions involved, it can take a long time for new rules to be put in place. This can be a problem when workers are exposed to hazards that need to be addressed quickly. In some cases, delays in the process could mean people are not protected as soon as they should be.

    This  process is important because it helps create strong and fair safety standards, but the time it takes can sometimes be a downsideBottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Recognize how the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

    are promulgated.

    4. Differentiate between laws and regulations.
    4.1 Identify distinguishing aspects of laws and regulations.
    4.2 Differentiate between the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and OSHA standards.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Corcoran, D. (2020). The OSH Act of 1970. Manuscript in preparation.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart]. United

    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Unit Lesson

    Welcome! This course is essentially an introductory course to assist students in understanding how
    environmental and occupational safety and health (OSH) laws and regulations are made and the roles and
    responsibilities of various regulatory agencies at the state and federal level. This course covers both the
    environmental and OSH regulatory environment because many individuals working in OSH, particularly in
    small- to medium-sized organizations, are asked to wear the environmental hat as well. Thus, it is good to
    understand the similarities and differences in the two regulatory systems.

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Occupational Safety and Health
    Regulation Promulgation Process

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1)

    [https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html](https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1)

    [https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made](https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    The OSH Act

    In the United States, laws enacted at the
    federal level go through a process (see
    Figure 1). The president can take other
    actions, of course, such as vetoing the
    bill or ignoring the bill, in which case one
    of two things can happen: One, if
    Congress is in session for 10 days
    following receipt of the bill by the
    president and he or she does not sign it,
    the bill becomes a law. Alternatively, if
    Congress is not in session, the bill does
    not become a law. This is called a
    pocket veto.

    Each state government has a similar
    process, but these processes vary
    somewhat from state to state. The
    governor of each state, however, is the
    top executive officer of the state who
    signs state-level bills into law.

    The primary federal law covering

    occupational safety and health in the United States is the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. This
    act was signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon. The law has been updated several times over the
    years. As indicated in your readings, the OSH Act was a pivotal document with respect to creating an
    infrastructure for regulating occupational safety and health in the United States. Some of the more important
    effects of the act include the following:

    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    • provided a means for OSHA to create a set of regulations based on existing consensus standards,
    • provided a process for promulgation of future standards,
    • required employers to keep their worksites free from recognized hazards,
    • outlined how OSHA would be administered and how regulations would be enforced,
    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission,
    • enabled the creation of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
    • provided states with a process and funding for running their own state-run OSH enforcement

    agencies, and
    • provided states with a process and funding for free, on-site consultation programs for small

    employers.

    Standards and Standards Promulgation

    This list is not all-inclusive, but it does provide a good overview of the key tenets of the act. The first three
    items on the list deal with the creation of OSHA and the dissemination of OSH regulations. In order to
    establish the first set of enforceable regulations, the act allowed the Secretary of Labor to adopt standards
    that already existed that had been published by various nonprofit organizations. As a result, much of the first
    set of standards came from organizations like the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American
    National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
    (ACGIH). Many of those (40+-year-old) standards are still on the books today, and some have only recently
    been updated.

    Of course, the standards put in place 2 years after the passage of the act only served as a starting point.
    Since that point in time, a number of occupational safety and health standards have been added to the books.
    Some of the most well-known standards that have been added to the Code of Federal Regulations include the
    Hazard Communication, Confined Space, and Lockout/Tagout standards. These standards were added
    through a fairly convoluted process that involves participation from the public and industry (OSHA, 2001).

    Figure 1: The legislative process
    (How Laws Are Made, n.d.)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Essentially, the process starts with a perceived need of some sort typically associated with a specific hazard
    or set of hazards that need to be addressed. When OSHA recognizes such a need, it typically starts by asking
    for input from the public, industry, and/or subject matter experts. Inquiries may be made to different groups as
    well, such as industry leaders and associations.

    This input may be obtained through the process of forming advisory committees and/or by publishing an
    Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register in which they typically outline the
    problem, present available information, and may provide a rough outline of what they expect the proposed
    standard might look like.

    One of the main purposes behind the ANPRM is to solicit input and comments from the public and impacted
    industries. They typically also consult established stakeholders such as the Office of Management and
    Budget, small business groups, the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health
    (NACOSH), and the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health. Expert groups are also
    consulted, such as the NIOSH (OSHA, n.d.).

    Information gathered from these stakeholder groups and from the public can then be reviewed by OSHA and
    used to assist the agency by serving as a foundation for the publication of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    (NPRM) in the Federal Register. Obviously at this point, OSHA tends to have more information and input from
    industries on which to base a tentative regulation known as a proposed rule. The proposed rule provides a
    detailed outline of what OSHA thinks the new regulation should look like based on their information, along
    with a preamble to the proposed rule that includes input and comments from various individuals and groups
    that have made a contribution along the way (OSHA, n.d.).

    After all this, you would think that OSHA would be ready to promulgate their final rule but not so. Once the
    proposed rule is published, the agency asks for additional input and typically holds hearings for impacted
    stakeholders to provide input and present arguments and supporting evidence. Once again, this information is
    gathered, entered into the docket, and considered. From these deliberations, OSHA drafts its final rule to
    publish in the Federal Register.

    The final rule is essentially the standard that is published as an OSHA standard or regulation in the Code of
    Federal Regulations (OSHA, n.d.). There is typically an implementation period written to new standards that
    allows the industry to phase in all of the new requirements over a period of months or even years. As you
    should have ascertained at this point, the OSHA standard-setting process is quite elaborate and allows for a
    great deal of public input and opportunities for deliberation. This is important in order to get employers within
    a given industry to be willing to comply with standards. First, gaining input from the public and stakeholders
    helps OSHA to identify what is feasible and what is not with respect to protecting employees. Indeed, OSHA
    has been accused of going a bit overboard with some of its standards from time to time and getting input from
    industry is helpful in keeping expectations realistic.

    Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

    Thus far, we have discussed the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations without much
    clarification on what those two publications are about. Basically, the Federal Register is a daily publication
    that includes the written documents and activities of the federal government to keep the public informed. It
    includes everything from notices of hearings, requests for information, notices of proposed rules, and final
    rules issued by federal agencies.

    The Code of Federal Regulations is a collection of final rules published by different agencies and the final
    rules are published under a system that codes the various regulations according to the agency of jurisdiction
    and the specific regulation codification system used by each governmental agency. OSHA is an agency that
    falls under the U.S. Department of Labor. Its regulations can be found under Title 29 where labor standards
    are found. OSHA standards are then broken down by numerical code indicating industry sector. All standards
    falling under general industry are coded 1910. All standards falling under construction are coded 1926. After
    that, standard numbers tend to focus on specific standard content. For instance, 29 CFR 1910.146 is the
    general industry confined space standard.

    Individual requirements in the standards are then separated with an outline-based numbering system starting
    with a lowercase letter in parentheses, then a number, then small Roman numerals. For instance, 29 CFR

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    1910.1200(e)(1)(i) is a specific requirement in OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard that requires a list of
    hazardous chemicals used in the facility.

    As you can see, there were a lot of moving parts related to occupational safety and health that were put into
    effect in the early 1970s as a result of the promulgation of the OSH Act. Several governmental bodies were
    formed including OSHA and NIOSH along with a process for accepting the first set of safety and health
    regulations and a process for promulgating new ones. Also, since the 1970s, there has been a marked
    decrease in the number of workplace-related fatalities. We have seen other significant improvements to
    workplace safety and health suggesting that the changes that were put into effect at the national level at that
    time have resulted in some significant changes in helping to make the American workplace safe.

    References

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart].

    https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – The OSH Act
    – Standards and Standards Promulgation
    – Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
    – References

    **## DB1.docx**

    DB1

    Part II: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards promulgation process is quite elaborate and provides a great deal of deliberation between OSHA and various stakeholder groups. Describe ways this might be helpful with respect to ensuring the final rule coming out of the process is the best it can be, and/or describe ways this deliberative process can have a negative impact.

    Reply 1:
    **Hudson Haas**

    Top of Form

    Good afternoon team and Professor Warner,

    My name is Hudson Haas and I am from Seguin, Texas. I am currently employed as an EHS Specialist in a chemical manufacturing plant. I am married to my lovely wife and have a 21 month old daughter. Some of my future goals include earning my bachelor's degree, completing my CSP and CHMM certifications and continuing to serve as a beacon of reason.I look at OSHA a lot like I look at the federal government: there is representation from all across the land, there are varying opinions and getting anything done in a timely manner is the easiest over bet you can make. However, at the end of the day they are the standard that is set for most of America. As I have journeyed in my career, it seems that more companies are pushing above OSHA regulations where they can to set the precedence that they are
    truly committed to safety. As long as OSHA is around to keep pushing the culture forward, we will continue to see less incidents.

    Bottom of Form

    Reply 2:
    **Shawn Hunt** Top of Form

    My name is Shawn, and I’m from Walterboro, SC. I currently work as a journeyman lineman, and I’ve been working in the electrical field for 26 years. Right now, I’m continuing my education in occupational safety and health. My goal is to move into a safety role, possibly with the current company I’m with now, where I can use both my field experience and what I’m learning in school to help keep workers safe on the job.

    I feel the OSHA standards process can be helpful because it allows input from different groups like workers, employers, and safety experts. This helps make sure the rules are realistic and actually work in the real world. For example, workers can speak on what hazards they deal with every day, while employers can explain what is possible from a cost and operations side. This kind of back and forth can lead to better, more balanced rules that protect people without shutting down business operations.

    On the other hand, the process can also be slow. Since there are so many steps and opinions involved, it can take a long time for new rules to be put in place. This can be a problem when workers are exposed to hazards that need to be addressed quickly. In some cases, delays in the process could mean people are not protected as soon as they should be.

    This  process is important because it helps create strong and fair safety standards, but the time it takes can sometimes be a downsideBottom of Form

    **## UnitIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Recognize how the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

    are promulgated.

    4. Differentiate between laws and regulations.
    4.1 Identify distinguishing aspects of laws and regulations.
    4.2 Differentiate between the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act and OSHA standards.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Corcoran, D. (2020). The OSH Act of 1970. Manuscript in preparation.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart]. United

    States Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Unit Lesson

    Welcome! This course is essentially an introductory course to assist students in understanding how
    environmental and occupational safety and health (OSH) laws and regulations are made and the roles and
    responsibilities of various regulatory agencies at the state and federal level. This course covers both the
    environmental and OSH regulatory environment because many individuals working in OSH, particularly in
    small- to medium-sized organizations, are asked to wear the environmental hat as well. Thus, it is good to
    understand the similarities and differences in the two regulatory systems.

    UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
    Occupational Safety and Health
    Regulation Promulgation Process

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-122402865_1)

    [https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html](https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-160966164_1)

    [https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made](https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    The OSH Act

    In the United States, laws enacted at the
    federal level go through a process (see
    Figure 1). The president can take other
    actions, of course, such as vetoing the
    bill or ignoring the bill, in which case one
    of two things can happen: One, if
    Congress is in session for 10 days
    following receipt of the bill by the
    president and he or she does not sign it,
    the bill becomes a law. Alternatively, if
    Congress is not in session, the bill does
    not become a law. This is called a
    pocket veto.

    Each state government has a similar
    process, but these processes vary
    somewhat from state to state. The
    governor of each state, however, is the
    top executive officer of the state who
    signs state-level bills into law.

    The primary federal law covering

    occupational safety and health in the United States is the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. This
    act was signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon. The law has been updated several times over the
    years. As indicated in your readings, the OSH Act was a pivotal document with respect to creating an
    infrastructure for regulating occupational safety and health in the United States. Some of the more important
    effects of the act include the following:

    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
    • provided a means for OSHA to create a set of regulations based on existing consensus standards,
    • provided a process for promulgation of future standards,
    • required employers to keep their worksites free from recognized hazards,
    • outlined how OSHA would be administered and how regulations would be enforced,
    • enabled the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission,
    • enabled the creation of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
    • provided states with a process and funding for running their own state-run OSH enforcement

    agencies, and
    • provided states with a process and funding for free, on-site consultation programs for small

    employers.

    Standards and Standards Promulgation

    This list is not all-inclusive, but it does provide a good overview of the key tenets of the act. The first three
    items on the list deal with the creation of OSHA and the dissemination of OSH regulations. In order to
    establish the first set of enforceable regulations, the act allowed the Secretary of Labor to adopt standards
    that already existed that had been published by various nonprofit organizations. As a result, much of the first
    set of standards came from organizations like the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American
    National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
    (ACGIH). Many of those (40+-year-old) standards are still on the books today, and some have only recently
    been updated.

    Of course, the standards put in place 2 years after the passage of the act only served as a starting point.
    Since that point in time, a number of occupational safety and health standards have been added to the books.
    Some of the most well-known standards that have been added to the Code of Federal Regulations include the
    Hazard Communication, Confined Space, and Lockout/Tagout standards. These standards were added
    through a fairly convoluted process that involves participation from the public and industry (OSHA, 2001).

    Figure 1: The legislative process
    (How Laws Are Made, n.d.)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Essentially, the process starts with a perceived need of some sort typically associated with a specific hazard
    or set of hazards that need to be addressed. When OSHA recognizes such a need, it typically starts by asking
    for input from the public, industry, and/or subject matter experts. Inquiries may be made to different groups as
    well, such as industry leaders and associations.

    This input may be obtained through the process of forming advisory committees and/or by publishing an
    Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register in which they typically outline the
    problem, present available information, and may provide a rough outline of what they expect the proposed
    standard might look like.

    One of the main purposes behind the ANPRM is to solicit input and comments from the public and impacted
    industries. They typically also consult established stakeholders such as the Office of Management and
    Budget, small business groups, the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health
    (NACOSH), and the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health. Expert groups are also
    consulted, such as the NIOSH (OSHA, n.d.).

    Information gathered from these stakeholder groups and from the public can then be reviewed by OSHA and
    used to assist the agency by serving as a foundation for the publication of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    (NPRM) in the Federal Register. Obviously at this point, OSHA tends to have more information and input from
    industries on which to base a tentative regulation known as a proposed rule. The proposed rule provides a
    detailed outline of what OSHA thinks the new regulation should look like based on their information, along
    with a preamble to the proposed rule that includes input and comments from various individuals and groups
    that have made a contribution along the way (OSHA, n.d.).

    After all this, you would think that OSHA would be ready to promulgate their final rule but not so. Once the
    proposed rule is published, the agency asks for additional input and typically holds hearings for impacted
    stakeholders to provide input and present arguments and supporting evidence. Once again, this information is
    gathered, entered into the docket, and considered. From these deliberations, OSHA drafts its final rule to
    publish in the Federal Register.

    The final rule is essentially the standard that is published as an OSHA standard or regulation in the Code of
    Federal Regulations (OSHA, n.d.). There is typically an implementation period written to new standards that
    allows the industry to phase in all of the new requirements over a period of months or even years. As you
    should have ascertained at this point, the OSHA standard-setting process is quite elaborate and allows for a
    great deal of public input and opportunities for deliberation. This is important in order to get employers within
    a given industry to be willing to comply with standards. First, gaining input from the public and stakeholders
    helps OSHA to identify what is feasible and what is not with respect to protecting employees. Indeed, OSHA
    has been accused of going a bit overboard with some of its standards from time to time and getting input from
    industry is helpful in keeping expectations realistic.

    Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

    Thus far, we have discussed the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations without much
    clarification on what those two publications are about. Basically, the Federal Register is a daily publication
    that includes the written documents and activities of the federal government to keep the public informed. It
    includes everything from notices of hearings, requests for information, notices of proposed rules, and final
    rules issued by federal agencies.

    The Code of Federal Regulations is a collection of final rules published by different agencies and the final
    rules are published under a system that codes the various regulations according to the agency of jurisdiction
    and the specific regulation codification system used by each governmental agency. OSHA is an agency that
    falls under the U.S. Department of Labor. Its regulations can be found under Title 29 where labor standards
    are found. OSHA standards are then broken down by numerical code indicating industry sector. All standards
    falling under general industry are coded 1910. All standards falling under construction are coded 1926. After
    that, standard numbers tend to focus on specific standard content. For instance, 29 CFR 1910.146 is the
    general industry confined space standard.

    Individual requirements in the standards are then separated with an outline-based numbering system starting
    with a lowercase letter in parentheses, then a number, then small Roman numerals. For instance, 29 CFR

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    1910.1200(e)(1)(i) is a specific requirement in OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard that requires a list of
    hazardous chemicals used in the facility.

    As you can see, there were a lot of moving parts related to occupational safety and health that were put into
    effect in the early 1970s as a result of the promulgation of the OSH Act. Several governmental bodies were
    formed including OSHA and NIOSH along with a process for accepting the first set of safety and health
    regulations and a process for promulgating new ones. Also, since the 1970s, there has been a marked
    decrease in the number of workplace-related fatalities. We have seen other significant improvements to
    workplace safety and health suggesting that the changes that were put into effect at the national level at that
    time have resulted in some significant changes in helping to make the American workplace safe.

    References

    How laws are made and how to research them. (n.d.). USA.gov. https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). The OSHA rulemaking process [Flow chart].

    https://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2001). OSHA standards development. United States

    Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/OCIS/stand_dev.html

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – The OSH Act
    – Standards and Standards Promulgation
    – Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
    – References