Category: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] DNP-EVI

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floor is a problem the institution has been dealing with for the last year and the problem still has not been corrected. The patient’s satisfaction is compromised, and the nurse patient ratio is high.

    **Step 1: Identify the problem -** **Cultivate a spirit of inquiry**

    Explain, in your own words, what is the problem?

    What are the data and sources that validate the problem?

    – Safety
    – Quality indicators
    – Practice observations
    – Patient satisfaction
    – Other

    Why is the problem is relevant?

    What is the current practice?

    1. **Create the clinical question utilizing the PICOT format -** **Ask clinical questions utilizing the PICOT format**

    P = Patient Population

    I = Intervention or issue

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status

    O = Outcome

    T = Timeframe to accomplish the O

    Final Clinical Question: _________________________________________

    1. **Searching for the best evidence**

    The student will look at the different databases to search for the strongest evidence that will be used to answer the clinical question.

    1. **Critically appraise the evidence – Summarize the evidence**

    The student will evaluate the evidence and will choose the ones that will help to answer the clinical question. They will create a summary of the best information found and synthesize the findings.

    1. **Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise**

    – Develop best evidence recommendations
    – Create an action plan
    – Implement action plan

    1. **Reports results to stakeholders**

    – Create a report to the stakeholders

    1. **Disseminate findings**

    – Hospital administration meeting – PowerPoint

    **General Instructions**

    1. Remember that your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet, has to be not greater than 10% of plagiarism or AI text.
    2. 9 pages
    3. References within the past 5 years and with DOI#
    4. FORMAT APA, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    – Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
    – When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    DUE DATE MARCH 4 , 2026

  • [Solved] Education

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nursing outcome

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Infection control and public health presentation

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Infection control and public health presentation

  • [Solved] Peer response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et al., 2022). Even though QSEN is not directly mentioned in the article, the themes align closely with QSEN competencies such as safety, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and systems-based practice (QSEN Institute, 2023).

    One part that really stood out to me was the discussion about inconsistencies in title protection and regulation. That resonated with me because, as I move from the RN role into the APRN role, the scope of practice and accountability increases. If regulation is inconsistent, it can lead to confusion about role expectations and competency standards, which ultimately affects patient safety (Wheeler et al., 2022). Advanced practice comes with greater autonomy, but that autonomy must be supported by strong educational preparation and regulatory oversight.

    QSEN competencies help define the APRN role by expanding responsibility beyond bedside care into leadership and systems thinking. As an RN, my job focuses on implementing safe, evidence-based care and monitoring patient outcomes. As an APRN, I transition into diagnosing, prescribing, evaluating treatment, and participating in quality improvement initiatives. That shift requires deeper clinical reasoning and a stronger understanding of how healthcare systems function. National data continue to show that quality and safety education remains foundational to nursing practice at all levels,  ultimately reinforcing the importance of these competencies as nurses advance in their roles (Djukic et al., 2025).

    The transition from RN to APRN is not just about increased independence.  It reflects an expanded responsibility for improving outcomes for the patient. QSEN provides a framework that supports this growth by emphasizing accountability, collaboration, and evidence-based decision-making (QSEN Institute, 2023). As advanced practice nurses, we not only provide direct patient care but also take an active role in improving how care is delivered within the healthcare system.

    Djukic, M., Thompson, C., Ke, Z., Phan, J., & Padhye, N. (2025). Taking a pulse on quality and safety education: An analysis of the 2022 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. _Nurse Educator, 50_(3), 129–134. [https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001811](https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001811)

    QSEN Institute. (2023). QSEN competencies. [http://qsen.org](http://qsen.org/)

    Wheeler, K. J., Miller, M., Pulcini, J., Gray, D., Ladd, E., & Rayens, M. K. (2022). Advanced practice nursing roles, regulation, education, and practice: A global study. _Annals of Global Health, 88_(1), 42. [https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3698](https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3698)

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see file **files (1)** – ## springas3.docx **## springas3.docx** In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see file

    **files (1)**

    – ## springas3.docx

    **## springas3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    ## Annotated Training Agenda

    Objective:

    [Summarize the objective of the training session.]

    Date, Time, Duration:

    [Specify the date, time, and duration of the training session.]

    ### Training Agenda

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Training Agenda Outline | Annotation |
    | **Introduction**<br>Welcome and overview of the training session.<br>Importance of [Policy Name] and its impact on patient care and organizational goals. | |
    | Understanding [Policy Name] <br>Brief overview of the policy’s purpose, scope, and objectives.<br>Key provisions and guidelines. | |
    | Roles and Responsibilities<br>Identify the specific roles targeted for pilot implementation (for example, nursing staff, administrative team, physicians).<br>Discuss the responsibilities of each role within the context of [Policy Name].<br>Highlight collaboration and interprofessional communication. | |
    | Training Strategies<br>Brainstorming: Encourage participants to share their insights and questions related to the policy.<br>Group discussions: Facilitate conversations on practical scenarios and case studies.<br>Outlining: Collaboratively create a roadmap for integrating [Policy Name] into daily workflows. | |
    | Q&A and Clarifications<br>Address any participant queries or concerns.<br>Clarify ambiguities related to [Policy Name]. | |
    | Next Steps (15 minutes)<br>Provide resources (for example, policy documents, contact information) for ongoing support.<br>Announce follow-up sessions or additional training opportunities.<br>Express gratitude for participants’ commitment to quality care. | |

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    NO USE OF AI. USE CORRECT USAGE OF APA IN TEXT CITATIONS

    **## springas3.docx**

    In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot team that will accompany your presentation.

    In this assessment, inform the leadership stakeholders of a planned pilot project to test the implementation of your new policy. Describe the policy in an elevator-speech style, explain why the policy is needed, and why the group was chosen for the pilot. Then, develop a detailed training agenda that will describe the training needed, including any resources, number and times of classes (including length) and if there will be any skills training and return demonstrations or written exams. Connect the pilot to the benchmarks you will measure. As a result of this presentation, stakeholders are expected to:

    · Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.

    · Understand the importance of the policy to improving quality or outcomes.

    · Understand how the designated role group is key to successful implementation.

    · Have awareness of the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.

    **Elevator Speech Presentation**

    Record a 5-minute recorded slide presentation for your elevator speech. Be sure to include:

    · A brief description of the policy and why it is necessary to improve benchmark metrics or comply with new regulations.

    · Include a description of the pilot group and why they were chosen to demonstrate the change in workflow and improve quality of care.

    · Describe the metrics that will be used to determine current practice and compare it after the training has ended.

    · Summarize the training implementation.

    **Annotated Training Agenda**

    You will also develop an agenda for the training sessions, including:

    · Length and number of class sessions.

    · Location of classes—simulation lab, classroom, et cetera.

    · The resources needed for the courses, any teaching staff, equipment, technology, or supplies needed.

    · What teaching strategies will be employed to measure learner success, including any check-off lists or written exams (you do not have to provide the actual exam)?

    · How will employees be scheduled and who will maintain records of completion, any grades, or skills verification?

    · Any credit that will be provided to the staff (that is, continuing education credits).

    · Plans to train the rest of the staff and new employees following the pilot.

    · The follow-up plan for assessing sustainability.

    ## Annotated Training Agenda

    Objective:

    [Summarize the objective of the training session.]

    Date, Time, Duration:

    [Specify the date, time, and duration of the training session.]

    ### Training Agenda

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Training Agenda Outline | Annotation |
    | **Introduction**<br>Welcome and overview of the training session.<br>Importance of [Policy Name] and its impact on patient care and organizational goals. | |
    | Understanding [Policy Name] <br>Brief overview of the policy’s purpose, scope, and objectives.<br>Key provisions and guidelines. | |
    | Roles and Responsibilities<br>Identify the specific roles targeted for pilot implementation (for example, nursing staff, administrative team, physicians).<br>Discuss the responsibilities of each role within the context of [Policy Name].<br>Highlight collaboration and interprofessional communication. | |
    | Training Strategies<br>Brainstorming: Encourage participants to share their insights and questions related to the policy.<br>Group discussions: Facilitate conversations on practical scenarios and case studies.<br>Outlining: Collaboratively create a roadmap for integrating [Policy Name] into daily workflows. | |
    | Q&A and Clarifications<br>Address any participant queries or concerns.<br>Clarify ambiguities related to [Policy Name]. | |
    | Next Steps (15 minutes)<br>Provide resources (for example, policy documents, contact information) for ongoing support.<br>Announce follow-up sessions or additional training opportunities.<br>Express gratitude for participants’ commitment to quality care. | |

    The strategy summary and annotated training agenda requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the desired impact of implementing the new policy and practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · How will the change be implemented?

    · How will the new policy affect the daily work routines and responsibilities of the role for the pilot group?

    · How will the policy and guidelines help improve the quality of care or outcomes and how will success be measured?

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is the work and buy-in of the role group important for successful implementation?

    · How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement during implementation?

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Why will these strategies be effective?

    · What measures might provide early indications of success?

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · How will each proposed activity on your agenda support learning and skill development?

    · Can you complete the training within the allotted two hours?

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your strategy summary and training agenda, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your strategies.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

    · Title slide.

    · Presentation title.

    · Your name.

    · Date.

    · Course number and title.

    · References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

    Your slide deck should consist of 5–7 slides, not including a title slide and references slide. Your presentation should last approximately 5 minutes.

    Ensure you provide speaker notes for each slide to fully address scoring guide criteria.

    Cite 2–4 external sources to support your strategies for working with the group you have identified and generating their buy-in, as well as for your approach to the training session, activities, and materials.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain to stakeholders the desired impact of implementing the new policy or practice guidelines on benchmark performance.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain the selected pilot group's role and importance in implementing the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Summarize evidence-based strategies to promote stakeholder buy-in and prepare them for the implementation of a new policy based on practice guidelines and regulations.

    · Determine the resources needed to effectively implement a training session for the new policy or practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    NO USE OF AI. USE CORRECT USAGE OF APA IN TEXT CITATIONS

  • [Solved] complete post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please create a discussion post following the instructions and the rubric. Please also use the resources provided Instructions: **Post** a response to the following prompts: – Identify nursing problems implicit in the nursing research study and the QI DNP project. – Describe how the nursing problems…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please create a discussion post following the instructions and the rubric. Please also use the resources provided

    Instructions: **Post** a response to the following prompts:

    – Identify nursing problems implicit in the nursing research study and the QI DNP project.
    – Describe how the nursing problems define the gap in knowledge (research) and the gap in practice (QI and DNP projects). Compare and contrast how the problems are presented and potentially influence a positive nursing practice change.
    – Identify one key measurement/variable used in each of the three studies/projects.
    – Critique the question development tool presented in terms of the problem, the EBP question, and the measurement (Hicks, 2024).

    Rubric: RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussion posts minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 11:59pm ET. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 11:59pm ET. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellent• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Detailed response to faculty.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGood• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Appropriate reply to faculty.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFair• Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoor• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30 possible points)

    **30** **to >29.0** **ptsExcellentInitial Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.**

    **29** **to >23.0** **ptsGoodInitial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.**

    **23** **to >18.0** **ptsFairInitial Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence.**

    **18** **to >0** **ptsPoorInitial Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly resources are not provided.**

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: First Response (20 possible points)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides rich and relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on separate day.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on same day.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: Second Response (20 possible points)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • Minimal scholarly sources provided to support post. • Posts on separate day.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • No sources provided. • Posts on same day.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQUALITY OF WRITING (10 possible points)

    **10** **to >9.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion postings and responses exceed doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing. • Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **9** **to >8.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion postings and responses meet doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing • Makes a few errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **8** **to >6.0** **ptsFairDiscussion postings and responses are somewhat below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Numerous errors in APA 7 format • May be less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **6** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion postings and responses are well below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Uses incorrect APA 7 format • Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Resources: Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2025). _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_(5th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

    – Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice: Past, Present, and Future” (pp. 4–13)
    – Chapter 4, “The Practice Question Phase: The EBP Question” (pp. 54–62)
    – Question Development Tool (pp. 210–215)
    – Emsden, C., Schäfer, U. B., Denhaerynck, K., Grossmann, F., Frei, I. A., & Kirsch, M. (2020). [Validating a pain assessment tool in heterogeneous ICU patients: Is it possible?Links to an external site.](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nicc.12469 "Link") _Nursing in Critical Care, 25_(1), 8–15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nicc.12469
    – Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2025). _Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics_ (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    – Chapter 1, “Statistics or Sadistics? It’s Up to You” (pp. 5–23)
    – Chapter 4: "Reliability and Validity: Tell the Truth, Precisely the Truth (pp. 75–95)
    – **Document:** Hicks, T. (2024). [_Quality evaluation of a central line associated bloodstream infection_](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216680/files/18029282?wrap=1) [Download Quality evaluation of a central line associated bloodstream infection](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216680/files/18029282/download?download_frd=1). Walden University CAO Repository.

  • [Solved] Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Ethics.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Cardiovascular Disorders

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Cardiovascular Disorders.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I have some questions about the Health Industry

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I have some questions about the Health Industry