My Blog

Category: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] Persuasive P.. on Policy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## PersuasivePaperonPolicy..docx **## PersuasivePaperonPolicy..docx** **_Persuasive Paper on Policy_** Select any state in the US and a policy reform that has been updated, revised, or reformed in the past five years. Discuss why the policy you selected is important and why it is imp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## PersuasivePaperonPolicy..docx

    **## PersuasivePaperonPolicy..docx**

    **_Persuasive Paper on Policy_**

    Select any state in the US and a policy reform that has been updated, revised, or reformed in the past five years. Discuss why the policy you selected is important and why it is important to you as a person and as a professional.

    Create this professional paper using a persuasive voice – Convince your reader(s) why this reform was necessary to the State and to the nursing profession.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper should be a minimum of 750 words.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/persuasive-p-on-policy)

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Essay/Paper Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |

    ‌

    ## image1.png

    **## PersuasivePaperonPolicy..docx**

    **_Persuasive Paper on Policy_**

    Select any state in the US and a policy reform that has been updated, revised, or reformed in the past five years. Discuss why the policy you selected is important and why it is important to you as a person and as a professional.

    Create this professional paper using a persuasive voice – Convince your reader(s) why this reform was necessary to the State and to the nursing profession.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper should be a minimum of 750 words.

    · This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/persuasive-p-on-policy)

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Essay/Paper Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 to >2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |

    ‌

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Nursing DUNI- Policy Analysis ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Assignment Instructions:** Students are to submit an assignment between 5-6 pages excluding title page and reference pages. Assignment must be organized according to the guidelines provided below (remember to follow the grading rubric) and need to include all the identified sections and informatio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Assignment Instructions:**

    Students are to submit an assignment between 5-6 pages excluding title page and reference pages. Assignment must be organized according to the guidelines provided below (remember to follow the grading rubric) and need to include all the identified sections and information as it is outlined in the grading rubric and assignment instructions. Must be completed in APA format and contain current scholarly sources dated from 2019 until current. Resources to assist students in conducting a policy analysis are provided throughout Blackboard and in course readings.

    **Introduction**

    This part of the assignment should introduce the topics the student will be discussing and provide a bit of context about the approach. This is specific to the student content to be presented and not general to the assignment itself.

    **Step 1:** Identify the Policy Problem/Issue & Provide Context

    The first thing the student needs identify is a healthcare issue that, in your opinion, is a problem that calls for a policy solution, so the first step is to determine the policy issue of interest.

    **Step 2:** Provide the Landscape

    Identify the key stakeholders/ and or key factors of previous efforts to address the policy issue These are the individuals and groups likely to affect or be affected by new policies taken in response to the policy issue under discussion. Identify key factors such as political, social, economic, practical, legal or quality-of-care factors.

    **Conclusion**

    The conclusion summarizes the findings and recommendations of the entire analysis. This focuses on the student’s paper outlining key points that have been learned and assessed throughout the paper in a comprehensive and succinct manner.

    Can't have more than 10% plagiarism this assignment will be submitted via turnitinn

    DUE DATE MARCH 31, 2026

  • [Solved] Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions across the lifespan.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions across the lifespan.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions across the lifespan.

  • [Solved] Distinguish risk factors associated with cirrhosis states across the lifespan.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Distinguish risk factors associated with cirrhosis states across the lifespan.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Distinguish risk factors associated with cirrhosis states across the lifespan.

  • [Solved] YULE CAPSTONE 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Review of Literature: – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Review of Literature:

    – Review and discuss literature: Synthesize at least 10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else's opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. This is a synthesis rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence.

    2. Analyze and apply knowledge directly to your PICOT- The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question.

    3. Provide precise body of evidence for your Practice Change- Include Nurses as leaders in this project, statistics, cost, impact on healthcare.

    4. Discuss objectives for your practice change, Why is change necessary?

    5. Discuss where the problem exists, why it exists, what is the preposition for change. Include information from your PICOT.

    6. Apply all that is relevant to the problem. For example: Pros vs Cons, current state of problem

    NOTE: It should not reflect your opinion, but rather Evidence Based Practice should be applied

    -After completing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen health problem, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found, compare anc constrast.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 4 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All must be written APA in the 3rd person.

    -Cant have more than 10% plagiarism this assignment will be submitted via turnitin

    DUE DATE MARCH 31, 2026

    – [\
    \
    YULEXISCAPSTONE1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/yulexiscapstone1-docx "YULEXISCAPSTONE1.docx")

  • [Solved] YISE-POLICY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Assignment Instructions:** Students are to submit an assignment between 5-6 pages excluding title page and reference pages. Assignment must be organized according to the guidelines provided below (remember to follow the grading rubric) and need to include all the identified sections and informatio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Assignment Instructions:**

    Students are to submit an assignment between 5-6 pages excluding title page and reference pages. Assignment must be organized according to the guidelines provided below (remember to follow the grading rubric) and need to include all the identified sections and information as it is outlined in the grading rubric and assignment instructions. Must be completed in APA format and contain current scholarly sources dated from 2019 until current. Resources to assist students in conducting a policy analysis are provided throughout Blackboard and in course readings.

    **Introduction**

    This part of the assignment should introduce the topics the student will be discussing and provide a bit of context about the approach. This is specific to the student content to be presented and not general to the assignment itself.

    **Step 1:** Identify the Policy Problem/Issue & Provide Context

    The first thing the student needs identify is a healthcare issue that, in your opinion, is a problem that calls for a policy solution, so the first step is to determine the policy issue of interest.

    **Step 2:** Provide the Landscape

    Identify the key stakeholders/ and or key factors of previous efforts to address the policy issue These are the individuals and groups likely to affect or be affected by new policies taken in response to the policy issue under discussion. Identify key factors such as political, social, economic, practical, legal or quality-of-care factors.

    **Conclusion**

    The conclusion summarizes the findings and recommendations of the entire analysis. This focuses on the student’s paper outlining key points that have been learned and assessed throughout the paper in a comprehensive and succinct manner.

    Can't have more than 10% plagiarism this assignment will be submitted via turnitinn

    DUE DATE MARCH 31, 2026

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see file **files (1)** – ## as1_spring26.docx **## as1_spring26.docx** Prepare an analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience and outline a QI initiative that would address it. Adverse event scenario: Patient began having reaction to blood tran…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see file

    **files (1)**

    – ## as1_spring26.docx

    **## as1_spring26.docx**

    Prepare an analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience and outline a QI initiative that would address it.

    Adverse event scenario: Patient began having reaction to blood transfusion. Orders for transfusion reaction included epinephrine IM (intramuscular). The bedside nurse administered the Epinephrine intravenously by mistake, not realizing the order said to be administered intramuscular. Patient began to feel physical symptoms such as chest pain from Intravenous epinephrine. EKG showed changes requiring cardiology evaluation to rule out heart attack caused by the epinephrine being administered intravenously.

    Prepare a comprehensive analysis of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Provide an analysis of the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. How was it managed, who was involved, and how was it resolved? Be sure to:

    · Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.

    · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis.

    · Evaluate QI actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

    · Evaluate how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events.

    · Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss to support need for improvement.

    · Outline a QI initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss.

    · Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of submission**: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page or References section.

    ·
    **Number of references**: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.

    · Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.

    · Analyze the implications of an adverse event or a near miss for all stakeholders.

    · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or a near miss using a root cause analysis.

    · Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

    · Evaluate and identify quality improvement actions or technologies related to an event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

    · Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    ## Guiding Questions

    ### Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis

    This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a prewriting exercise, an outlining tool, or a final check to ensure you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment.
    **Do not** turn in this document as your assessment submission.

    For examples of adverse events or near misses, visit:

    ###### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). [WebM&M cases & commentaries](https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm). https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm

    **Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.**

    · What are the possible short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community, et cetera)?

    · What are the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team related to the adverse event or near miss?

    · What measures should have been taken? Who are the responsible parties or roles?

    · How did the incident impact the stakeholders? Did it change how they do their work, or how or what they report?

    **Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis.**

    · How did the event result from a patient's medical management rather than from the underlying condition?

    · What were the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the adverse event or near miss? What was overlooked? Why?

    · What kind of interprofessional communications could have prevented this event?

    · To what extent was the adverse event or near miss preventable?

    **Evaluate quality improvement actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.**

    · What quality improvement technologies are in place to increase patient safety and reduce risks that pertain to this adverse event? What would prevent it from happening in the future?

    · Are those technologies being utilized appropriately? How could they be more usefully employed?

    · How do other institutions prevent these types of events from occurring?

    · What data are generated from the facility’s dashboard related to the selected incident? (By dashboard, we mean the data that are generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management. This is not something you will find online or in the Capella library.)

    · What data are associated with the adverse event or near miss? What do the relevant metrics show? (Patient satisfaction and readmission rates are important metrics. Look at trending data and compare to see where relevant metrics are headed.)

    · What research or data related to the adverse event or near miss is available outside of your institution?

    · Compare internal data to external data. What do you find?

    **Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices.**

    · How was the incident managed and monitored in the selected institution?

    · What quality improvement initiatives have been shown to work? Why are they successful? What is the evidence?

    · What elements can be applied to prevent future adverse events or near misses?

    **Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.**

    · Is your analysis logically structured?

    · Is your analysis 5–7 double-spaced pages (not including title page and reference list)?

    · Is your writing clear and free from errors?

    · Does your analysis include both a title page and reference list?

    · Did you use a minimum of three sources? Were they published within the last five years?

    · Are they cited in current APA format throughout the plan?

    ****NO USE OF AI. PLEASE USE APPROPRIATE APA IN TEXT CITATION****

    **## as1_spring26.docx**

    Prepare an analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience and outline a QI initiative that would address it.

    Adverse event scenario: Patient began having reaction to blood transfusion. Orders for transfusion reaction included epinephrine IM (intramuscular). The bedside nurse administered the Epinephrine intravenously by mistake, not realizing the order said to be administered intramuscular. Patient began to feel physical symptoms such as chest pain from Intravenous epinephrine. EKG showed changes requiring cardiology evaluation to rule out heart attack caused by the epinephrine being administered intravenously.

    Prepare a comprehensive analysis of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Provide an analysis of the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. How was it managed, who was involved, and how was it resolved? Be sure to:

    · Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.

    · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis.

    · Evaluate QI actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

    · Evaluate how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events.

    · Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss to support need for improvement.

    · Outline a QI initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss.

    · Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of submission**: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page or References section.

    ·
    **Number of references**: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.

    · Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.

    · Analyze the implications of an adverse event or a near miss for all stakeholders.

    · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or a near miss using a root cause analysis.

    · Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

    · Evaluate and identify quality improvement actions or technologies related to an event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

    · Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

    · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

    ## Guiding Questions

    ### Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis

    This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a prewriting exercise, an outlining tool, or a final check to ensure you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment.
    **Do not** turn in this document as your assessment submission.

    For examples of adverse events or near misses, visit:

    ###### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). [WebM&M cases & commentaries](https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm). https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm

    **Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.**

    · What are the possible short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community, et cetera)?

    · What are the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team related to the adverse event or near miss?

    · What measures should have been taken? Who are the responsible parties or roles?

    · How did the incident impact the stakeholders? Did it change how they do their work, or how or what they report?

    **Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis.**

    · How did the event result from a patient's medical management rather than from the underlying condition?

    · What were the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the adverse event or near miss? What was overlooked? Why?

    · What kind of interprofessional communications could have prevented this event?

    · To what extent was the adverse event or near miss preventable?

    **Evaluate quality improvement actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.**

    · What quality improvement technologies are in place to increase patient safety and reduce risks that pertain to this adverse event? What would prevent it from happening in the future?

    · Are those technologies being utilized appropriately? How could they be more usefully employed?

    · How do other institutions prevent these types of events from occurring?

    · What data are generated from the facility’s dashboard related to the selected incident? (By dashboard, we mean the data that are generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management. This is not something you will find online or in the Capella library.)

    · What data are associated with the adverse event or near miss? What do the relevant metrics show? (Patient satisfaction and readmission rates are important metrics. Look at trending data and compare to see where relevant metrics are headed.)

    · What research or data related to the adverse event or near miss is available outside of your institution?

    · Compare internal data to external data. What do you find?

    **Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices.**

    · How was the incident managed and monitored in the selected institution?

    · What quality improvement initiatives have been shown to work? Why are they successful? What is the evidence?

    · What elements can be applied to prevent future adverse events or near misses?

    **Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.**

    · Is your analysis logically structured?

    · Is your analysis 5–7 double-spaced pages (not including title page and reference list)?

    · Is your writing clear and free from errors?

    · Does your analysis include both a title page and reference list?

    · Did you use a minimum of three sources? Were they published within the last five years?

    · Are they cited in current APA format throughout the plan?

    ****NO USE OF AI. PLEASE USE APPROPRIATE APA IN TEXT CITATION****

  • [Solved] Nursing Cultural Interview Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – In preparation for your module three assignment, choose a cultural group that is different from your own background and plan to interview someone from this culture. – The goal is to explore a culture that you will likely encounter in your nurse practitioner role. – Using Module one’s mind map and …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – In preparation for your module three assignment, choose a cultural group that is different from your own background and plan to interview someone from this culture.
    – The goal is to explore a culture that you will likely encounter in your nurse practitioner role.
    – Using Module one’s mind map and the textbook’s FIG. 1.1 and FIG. 1.2 in chapter 1, begin preparing a list of questions that will help you gain insights into the cultural aspects of healthcare for your selected interviewee.
    – Ensure your questions are respectful and culturally sensitive.

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ IMG-20260330-WA0005.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-20260330-wa0005-jpg "IMG-20260330-WA0005.jpg") – [\ \ IMG-20260330-WA0006.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-20260330-wa0006-jpg "IMG-20260330-WA0006.jpg") – [\ \ IMG-20260330-WA0007.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fil…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    IMG-20260330-WA0005.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-20260330-wa0005-jpg "IMG-20260330-WA0005.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG-20260330-WA0006.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-20260330-wa0006-jpg "IMG-20260330-WA0006.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG-20260330-WA0007.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-20260330-wa0007-jpg "IMG-20260330-WA0007.jpg")

  • [Solved] Nursing Week 3 – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The CDC WONDER program can help public health workers manage trends by organizing data to make it consumable for program planning. #### **Part 1: Patient Population Data** **Consider** the problem and the patient population you identified in your Week 2 – Summative Assessment: Advocacy, Patients, an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The CDC WONDER program can help public health workers manage trends by organizing data to make it consumable for program planning.

    #### **Part 1: Patient Population Data**

    **Consider** the problem and the patient population you identified in your Week 2 – Summative Assessment: Advocacy, Patients, and the Community.

    **Review** the statistics that relate to the prevention of a particular communicable disease in your selected patient population.

    Thinking about the SWOT analysis you conducted in Part 2a of your Week 2 – Summative Assessment: Advocacy, Patients, and the Community, **identify** the same communicable disease that applies to your patient population.

    **Follow** these steps to help plan for health promotion and disease prevention for the previously identified communicable disease or a chronic health issue:

    1. Access and explore the [**CDC WONDER**](https://wonder.cdc.gov/) **website** to understand what data is available in relation to your topic (e.g., trends in spreading, who is being infected, available treatments).
    2. On the homepage, select the **Topics tab**.
    3. From the information that populates on the Topics tab, click on a **topic** you would like to prevent with your Weeks 4 and 5 teaching project and presentation.
    4. Click into your **statistic of interest** (e.g., TB Annual Surveillance Reports) statistics.
    5. As you research your topic, review available **state-specific information** within your topic’s statistics (e.g., United States Statistics: Data Visualizations).
    6. On the map, click on your **state**.
    7. Below the map, review and compare the **rate and number of deaths** for your chosen condition in your local community, state, and nation, if applicable.

    Using the nursing process and the assessment you conducted with your patient population in your Week 2 summative assessment (Part 2a), **diagnose** actual or potential health problems. To do this, **create a list of problems** you have identified and prioritize them (e.g., deficient of knowledge: TB transmission related to…).

    **Write** a 350-word summary of how you will use CDC WONDER data and the assessments you have made to develop and plan for your teaching project in the Week 4 summative assessment. This teaching project relates to the problem you identified in your patient population. Include the following in your summary:

    – Incidence rate in your state (if available)
    – Prevalence rate in your state
    – Age-adjusted rates
    – Qualitative data from your population assessments (e.g., Three of the five people I talked to at the food bank told me that access to fresh fruits and vegetables was an ongoing problem.)
    – Nursing diagnosis or priority problem
    – Discussion how you might use this information to develop your teaching project

    **Format** citations and references for any sources used in your summary according to APA guidelines.

    #### **Part 2: Clinical Activities – Health Promotion and Disease Prevention**

    Using your findings from Part 1 of this assignment, **continue** (or start a new) conversation with your patient population during which you:

    – Provide feedback on the status of the selected health issue at the local, state, and national level.
    – Teach your patient population about ways to prevent the occurrence or the exacerbation of the health issue. (Intervene)
    – Evaluate the effectiveness of your teaching by asking at least 5 clients from the patient population (individual, family, or group) to describe 1 or more activities they will implement to prevent or alleviate symptoms of the disease and to prevent exacerbations (i.e., disease worsening). (Evaluate)

    **Write** a 250-word summary of your interactions with the patient populations. As you write your summary, ensure that you reflect on the clinical objective(s) for the week and discuss how you met the objective(s).

    **Cite** a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to support your assignment.

    **Format** your assignment according to APA guidelines.