Category: Nursing

[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (1)** – ## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx **## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx** The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, _The Landmarks of Tom…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx

**## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx**

The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,
_The Landmarks of Tomorrow_ (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

_Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers._

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211760/modules/items/8951234)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.

· Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

· Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

**The Assignment:**

· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.

· Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

· Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.

· Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| · <br>**Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role. | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**13 to >11.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**11 to >10.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. | 35 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Presentation includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx**

The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,
_The Landmarks of Tomorrow_ (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

_Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers._

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211760/modules/items/8951234)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.

· Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

· Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

**The Assignment:**

· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.

· Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

· Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.

· Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| · <br>**Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role. | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**13 to >11.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**11 to >10.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. | 35 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Presentation includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (1)** – ## CasestudyRaydel.docx **## CasestudyRaydel.docx** Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA, GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete presc…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## CasestudyRaydel.docx

**## CasestudyRaydel.docx**

Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required
learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,
GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each
medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route,
frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you
would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if
applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA
format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

Note on Assignment Attempts
Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to
due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one
submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple
submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted
unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted prior to the assignment
deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment

prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is not
permitted.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the due dates noted in the course and
welcome announcement. In extenuating circumstances, such as illness, the student
must contact the instructor as soon as possible to discuss the situation. In those
circumstances, faculty will determine the appropriate course of action for the student.
Depending on the situation, these actions may include recommendations to drop the
course (if within the university drop/withdrawal period), acceptance of some or all of the
overdue assignments with or without penalties, or failure to accept assignments.
Assignments submitted late without the prior agreement of the instructor, outside of an
emergency absence, or in violation of agreements for late submission, will receive a
grade reduction for the assignment amounting up to 20%. Each day late will result in a
4% point deduction up to day 5. After 5 days, the assignment will be graded a zero.
However ALL assignments, quizzes, and exams must be completed to pass the
course.

Wishing you much success,

Dr. Ridley

WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 1-2)

SCENARIO 1
What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each
prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action
(MOA)?
Repatha 140 mg IV every 2 weeks #1 1 RF
Hyzaar (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide) 50/25 mg PO daily #30 3 RF
digoxin 1.25 mg PO daily #30 1 RF
hydralazine/isosorbide mononitrate (BiDil) 37.5 mg/20 mg PO every 8 hours #90
1 RF
clonidine 0.3 mg patch PO once weekly #4 1 RF

SCENARIO 2
A patient with stable angina is prescribed nitroglycerin. The provider avoids oral tablets
and instead chooses a sublingual or transdermal formulation. Why is oral nitroglycerin
not clinically useful? Discuss how first-pass metabolism affects nitroglycerin’s
bioavailability and define both terms. Identify the route of administration with 100%
bioavailability and explain how alternative routes overcome the first pass effect. Include
a sample prescription for nitroglycerin.

SCENARIO 3
Where are the majority of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes located? Using the
Drugs.com pill identifier, enter the following characteristics to identify the medication
AND strength. What CYP enzyme metabolizes this medication? How can this
information be applied to medication therapy management? Write a sample prescription
for the identified medication and strength.
Imprint (E 137) Shape (Round) Color (Pink) Form (Tablet) Scoring (None)

SCENARIO 4
KU is a 47-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He
smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on lisinopril 40 mg po daily, liraglutide (Victoza)
0.6 mg subcutaneously once daily and St. John’s Wort. Fasting lipid profile shows total
cholesterol 260 mg/dL, LDL 180 mg/dL, HDL 43 mg/dL, and TG 185 mg/dL. He is 5’9”
and weighs 204 lbs. What treatment plan would you implement for KU? What are GOAL
Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and Triglyceride levels for KU? What is his BMI per
Medscape calculator? What patient monitoring and education would you provide? How
many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them
specifically.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

Total Points: 100

**## CasestudyRaydel.docx**

Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required
learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,
GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each
medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route,
frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you
would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if
applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA
format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

Note on Assignment Attempts
Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to
due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one
submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple
submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted
unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted prior to the assignment
deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment

prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is not
permitted.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the due dates noted in the course and
welcome announcement. In extenuating circumstances, such as illness, the student
must contact the instructor as soon as possible to discuss the situation. In those
circumstances, faculty will determine the appropriate course of action for the student.
Depending on the situation, these actions may include recommendations to drop the
course (if within the university drop/withdrawal period), acceptance of some or all of the
overdue assignments with or without penalties, or failure to accept assignments.
Assignments submitted late without the prior agreement of the instructor, outside of an
emergency absence, or in violation of agreements for late submission, will receive a
grade reduction for the assignment amounting up to 20%. Each day late will result in a
4% point deduction up to day 5. After 5 days, the assignment will be graded a zero.
However ALL assignments, quizzes, and exams must be completed to pass the
course.

Wishing you much success,

Dr. Ridley

WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 1-2)

SCENARIO 1
What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each
prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action
(MOA)?
Repatha 140 mg IV every 2 weeks #1 1 RF
Hyzaar (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide) 50/25 mg PO daily #30 3 RF
digoxin 1.25 mg PO daily #30 1 RF
hydralazine/isosorbide mononitrate (BiDil) 37.5 mg/20 mg PO every 8 hours #90
1 RF
clonidine 0.3 mg patch PO once weekly #4 1 RF

SCENARIO 2
A patient with stable angina is prescribed nitroglycerin. The provider avoids oral tablets
and instead chooses a sublingual or transdermal formulation. Why is oral nitroglycerin
not clinically useful? Discuss how first-pass metabolism affects nitroglycerin’s
bioavailability and define both terms. Identify the route of administration with 100%
bioavailability and explain how alternative routes overcome the first pass effect. Include
a sample prescription for nitroglycerin.

SCENARIO 3
Where are the majority of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes located? Using the
Drugs.com pill identifier, enter the following characteristics to identify the medication
AND strength. What CYP enzyme metabolizes this medication? How can this
information be applied to medication therapy management? Write a sample prescription
for the identified medication and strength.
Imprint (E 137) Shape (Round) Color (Pink) Form (Tablet) Scoring (None)

SCENARIO 4
KU is a 47-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He
smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on lisinopril 40 mg po daily, liraglutide (Victoza)
0.6 mg subcutaneously once daily and St. John’s Wort. Fasting lipid profile shows total
cholesterol 260 mg/dL, LDL 180 mg/dL, HDL 43 mg/dL, and TG 185 mg/dL. He is 5’9”
and weighs 204 lbs. What treatment plan would you implement for KU? What are GOAL
Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and Triglyceride levels for KU? What is his BMI per
Medscape calculator? What patient monitoring and education would you provide? How
many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them
specifically.

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

Total Points: 100

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Policy Brief

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Building on the topic the student used for the first assignment (first assignment is attached), this assignment will require the student to write a one page policy brief to be sent to their legislator. A policy brief is used to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current problem or po…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Building on the topic the student used for the first assignment (first assignment is attached), this assignment will require the student to write a one page policy brief to be sent to their legislator.

A policy brief is used to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current

problem or policy concern and present the need to adopt the preferred alternative

or course of action outlined. It is commonly produced in response to a request

directly from a decision-‐maker (legislator) or within an organization that intends to

advocate for the position detailed in the brief.

Efficient policy briefs include several common features.

Those features include:

• The brief is focused. All aspects discussed are focused on achieving

the intended audience to take the requested action.

• The brief is professional and not academic. The usual audience is not

interested in research or analysis conducted to produce the evidence.

Rather they are interested in knowing the writer’s perspective on the

problem and potential solutions, based on NEW and convincing

evidence.

• The brief should be evidence-‐based. The policy brief serves as a

communication tool produced by someone with a vested interest in

the policy (stakeholder), therefore the target audience will only be

convinced by arguments that are supported by evidence.

• The brief should also be concise. One page documents are the ones

most likely to be read by busy lawmakers and their legislative teams.

The format of the brief should be written as a one-‐page single spaced document.

It does not need to include a title page, running header, or abstract. However, all

references in-‐text and the reference list MUST be in APA format.

The policy brief should include the following components:

• An interesting title to attract the attention of the reader.

• A clear and concise statement of the problem or issue.

• A short overview of the root causes of the problem or issue.

• One to two recommendations with a least two rationales with

supporting evidence to validate the recommendations made.

Evidence should come from scholarly journals, not textbooks or organization web sites. Three scholarly journal articles are required

to be used.

• Finally, the conclusion with a summary of the action the brief is

requesting.

You can find examples of each of these in your book. Once your policy brief has

been reviewed by the faculty member, we encourage you to send it to the person

whom your letter is addressed.

Components of the Policy Brief:

Title and Statement of the Problem – The policy brief has an interesting title and

the statement of the problem is clear and concise.

Root Causes – The root causes of the issue are addressed.

Recommendations – 1-‐2 recommendations for action are provided with solid

supporting evidence.

Conclusion – Brief summary of the action the policy brief is asking for.

References – One a separate page, in APA format, list the scholarly references used.

– [\
\
WorkplaceViolenceFINAL.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/workplaceviolencefinal-docx-10512465 "WorkplaceViolenceFINAL.docx")

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Nursing 1

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing 1.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] nursing

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (1)** – ## LiteratureReviewmodule7.docx **## LiteratureReviewmodule7.docx** _Literature Review_ Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review inc…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## LiteratureReviewmodule7.docx

**## LiteratureReviewmodule7.docx**

_Literature Review_

Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

·
**Official Assignment Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| – Official Assignment Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

· Total Points: 100

**## LiteratureReviewmodule7.docx**

_Literature Review_

Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

·
**Official Assignment Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| – Official Assignment Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

· Total Points: 100

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Nursing

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (1)** – ## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx **## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx** ase Study Analysis ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445) An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (1)**

– ## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx

**## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx**

ase Study Analysis

![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445)

An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. In 1-2 pages, you will answer the questions provided following the case scenario. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210815/modules/items/9032293)

**To prepare:**

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

**The Assignment**

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

Week 2 Case Study

A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint
pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports:
• Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour)
• Photosensitivity
• Facial rash that worsens with sun exposure
• Hair thinning
• Bilateral ankle swelling
No recent infection. No new medications.
Physical Examination
• BP: 148/92 mmHg
• Temp: 99.4°F
• Erythematous malar rash sparing nasolabial folds
• Tender MCP and PIP joints bilaterally
• Mild bilateral ankle edema
Laboratory Data
Test Result
Hgb 9.8 g/dL
WBC 3,000/mm³
Platelets 110,000/mm³
Creatinine 1.6 mg/dL
Urinalysis 2+ protein, RBC casts
ESR 65 mm/hr
ANA Positive (1:640)
Anti-dsDNA Elevated
Anti-Smith Positive
Complement C3/C4 Decreased
Questions:
1. Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and
symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular
pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and
diagnosis.
2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease?
3. What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? How do treatment
strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?

**NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the impact of the disease on the immune system? …… How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease? | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**24 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based source. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

## image1.jpeg

**## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx**

ase Study Analysis

![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445)

An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. In 1-2 pages, you will answer the questions provided following the case scenario. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210815/modules/items/9032293)

**To prepare:**

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

**The Assignment**

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

Week 2 Case Study

A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint
pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports:
• Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour)
• Photosensitivity
• Facial rash that worsens with sun exposure
• Hair thinning
• Bilateral ankle swelling
No recent infection. No new medications.
Physical Examination
• BP: 148/92 mmHg
• Temp: 99.4°F
• Erythematous malar rash sparing nasolabial folds
• Tender MCP and PIP joints bilaterally
• Mild bilateral ankle edema
Laboratory Data
Test Result
Hgb 9.8 g/dL
WBC 3,000/mm³
Platelets 110,000/mm³
Creatinine 1.6 mg/dL
Urinalysis 2+ protein, RBC casts
ESR 65 mm/hr
ANA Positive (1:640)
Anti-dsDNA Elevated
Anti-Smith Positive
Complement C3/C4 Decreased
Questions:
1. Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and
symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular
pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and
diagnosis.
2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease?
3. What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? How do treatment
strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?

**NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the impact of the disease on the immune system? …… How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease? | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**24 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based source. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

## image1.jpeg

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (2)** – ## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc – ## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx **## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc** [removed] **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx** **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet** It may seem to…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (2)**

– ## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc

– ## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx

**## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

[removed]

**## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

**Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

**Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
**mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

· Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

· Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

·
**Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

**The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

**Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

· Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

· Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

**Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

· Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

· How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

· An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

**Part 3: Fact Sheet**

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

· Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

· Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Assignment document should include:

1. Title page

2. Introductory paragraph

3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

4. Fact sheet

5. Summary/conclusions

6. References

By Day 7 of Week 2

**Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

**NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

**Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

**Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
**mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

· Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

· Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

·
**Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

**The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

**Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

· Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

· Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

**Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

· Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

· How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

· An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

**Part 3: Fact Sheet**

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

· Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

· Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Assignment document should include:

1. Title page

2. Introductory paragraph

3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

4. Fact sheet

5. Summary/conclusions

6. References

By Day 7 of Week 2

**Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

**NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

[removed]

**## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

**Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

**Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
**mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

· Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

· Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

·
**Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

**The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

**Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

· Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

· Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

**Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

· Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

· How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

· An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

**Part 3: Fact Sheet**

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

· Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

· Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Assignment document should include:

1. Title page

2. Introductory paragraph

3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

4. Fact sheet

5. Summary/conclusions

6. References

By Day 7 of Week 2

**Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

**NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

[removed]

**## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

**Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

**To Prepare:**

· Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

**Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
**mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

· Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

· Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

·
**Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

**The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

**Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

· Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

· Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

**Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

· Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

· How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

· An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

**Part 3: Fact Sheet**

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

· Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

· Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Assignment document should include:

1. Title page

2. Introductory paragraph

3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

4. Fact sheet

5. Summary/conclusions

6. References

By Day 7 of Week 2

**Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

**NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

November 6, 2026
[Solved] AIM Statement

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**files (2)** – ## unit2.docx – ## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx **## unit2.docx** In this assignment, you are going to formulate a Problem Statement, a draft AIM Statement derived from the Problem Statement and select a framework to utilize as a guide for designing a scholarly project. Examine your …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (2)**

– ## unit2.docx

– ## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx

**## unit2.docx**

In this assignment, you are going to formulate a Problem Statement, a draft AIM Statement derived from the Problem Statement and select a framework to utilize as a guide for designing a scholarly project.

Examine your current practice setting, or reflect on observations from a prior practice setting, and identify a practice problem. Examples of problems could the absence of an evidence-based approach to care, a procedure that is not aligned with current best practices, practice approaches not aligned with current practice guidelines, or the inability for current practice approaches to achieve required performance metrics.

For the assignment, you are going to use the problem you identified and draft an approach for a proposed change.

The assignment format is that of an academic paper constructed utilizing APA guidelines, including a title page, appropriate use of headings to separate the main sections of the body of the paper, proper in-text citations, and a references page.

The paper should be formatted with the below template that includes:

· A description of the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem.

· A succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document as a guide.

· An 'Aim Statement' relevant to the identified problem.

· Define the target population or setting (where the change will occur).

· Specify the desired outcome (what will improve and by how much).

· Include the intervention or change strategy (how the improvement will be achieved).

· Include a timeframe (by when the goal will be reached).

· A description of a framework to address the problem accompanied by a discussion of how the framework correlates to elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, a conceptual model, an in depth framing of the concept from the literature, etc.

**Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. The assignment requires you to upload a PDF file of the full-text article for all of your resources for your faculty to review.**

**## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx**

**Title of Paper**

Student Name

Herzing University

Course #/Name of Course

Faculty Name

Due Date

1

8

**Insert Title of Paper Here**

Tips for Introduction: It is always good to start a paper with a statistic (with citation) regarding the topic to grab the reader's attention. Then, introduce the paper's topic and explain why it is important. In scholarly writing, do not write in the first person language; instead, write in the third person. End the introduction paragraph with a purpose or thesis statement as your last sentence of the paragraph to introduce the main points/sections of your paper. Example: The purpose of this paper is to… (Include at least 2 main points/sections you will address in the body of your paper.)

Practice Setting

This section should describe the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting, ensuring enough detail to frame the context of the problem (i.e., outpatient/inpatient, urban/rural, facility, and unit type).

**Population**

This section should describe the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting. Consider age range, common diagnoses, language, cultural factors, or other defining characteristics that might affect care delivery or outcomes, which help tie your intervention to the population’s needs.

**Description of the Problem**

This section should describe your problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem. Clearly state how the current practice deviates from guidelines, evidence, or expected outcomes.

Problem Statement

This section should include a succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document “Constructing a Problem Statement,” provided in the assignment instructions and acts as a guide.

**AIM Statement**

This section should include your AIM statement relevant to the identified problem. Utilize IHI’s AIM Statement worksheet to guide your development of the statement so that it is clear, measurable, and time-bound. This section should be in narrative form, not a copy/paste of the worksheet.

**Framework**

This section should include a description of the framework to address the problem and a discussion of how the framework correlates to the elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, which helps to understand why a problem exists based on behaviors, motivation, or decision-making processes and predict outcomes (i.e., Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Self-Determination Theory, etc.) or a conceptual model that illustrates relationships between core concepts in your topic (i.e., Technology Acceptance Model, Roy Adaptation Model, etc.), or if there is no clear framing of the concept then an in-depth framing of the concept from the literature. Do not utilize the Iowa, KTA, PDSA, or any other QI framework.

Conclusion

Tips: Notice the Conclusion is a Level 1 Header, centered and bolded. A conclusion section should be included in all scholarly papers to summarize the paper. It is normally one paragraph in length, succinct, and restates the main points of your paper. You should also restate or rephrase your purpose/thesis statement. In conclusion, you should not add new ideas or new information with citations; you should simply summarize the paper and reflect on key elements of the paper. If you need to add cited information, move that information to a previous section of your paper. You can end the conclusion by clarifying the intent and importance of the paper. For additional APA font choices for scholarly papers, see
[https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font).

**References**

Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review.
_Implementation Science_,
_9_(1), 1.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2) (Journal Example for a template)

Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005).
_The adult learner: The definitive class in adult education and human resource development_ (6th ed.). Elsevier. (Book Example)

National League for Nursing (2021).
_Coaching for excellence in nursing: A guide for educators._ NLN.
[https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing](https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing) (Web article Example; Use all 3 examples as templates)

\*\* Remember that ALL references should be accessible and cited in the body of the paper. The in-text citations for the above examples are as follows:

(Field et al., 2014)

(Knowles et al., 2005)

(National League for Nursing [NLN], 2021)- First citation.

(NLN, 2021)- Subsequent citation.

**## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx**

**Title of Paper**

Student Name

Herzing University

Course #/Name of Course

Faculty Name

Due Date

1

8

**Insert Title of Paper Here**

Tips for Introduction: It is always good to start a paper with a statistic (with citation) regarding the topic to grab the reader's attention. Then, introduce the paper's topic and explain why it is important. In scholarly writing, do not write in the first person language; instead, write in the third person. End the introduction paragraph with a purpose or thesis statement as your last sentence of the paragraph to introduce the main points/sections of your paper. Example: The purpose of this paper is to… (Include at least 2 main points/sections you will address in the body of your paper.)

Practice Setting

This section should describe the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting, ensuring enough detail to frame the context of the problem (i.e., outpatient/inpatient, urban/rural, facility, and unit type).

**Population**

This section should describe the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting. Consider age range, common diagnoses, language, cultural factors, or other defining characteristics that might affect care delivery or outcomes, which help tie your intervention to the population’s needs.

**Description of the Problem**

This section should describe your problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem. Clearly state how the current practice deviates from guidelines, evidence, or expected outcomes.

Problem Statement

This section should include a succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document “Constructing a Problem Statement,” provided in the assignment instructions and acts as a guide.

**AIM Statement**

This section should include your AIM statement relevant to the identified problem. Utilize IHI’s AIM Statement worksheet to guide your development of the statement so that it is clear, measurable, and time-bound. This section should be in narrative form, not a copy/paste of the worksheet.

**Framework**

This section should include a description of the framework to address the problem and a discussion of how the framework correlates to the elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, which helps to understand why a problem exists based on behaviors, motivation, or decision-making processes and predict outcomes (i.e., Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Self-Determination Theory, etc.) or a conceptual model that illustrates relationships between core concepts in your topic (i.e., Technology Acceptance Model, Roy Adaptation Model, etc.), or if there is no clear framing of the concept then an in-depth framing of the concept from the literature. Do not utilize the Iowa, KTA, PDSA, or any other QI framework.

Conclusion

Tips: Notice the Conclusion is a Level 1 Header, centered and bolded. A conclusion section should be included in all scholarly papers to summarize the paper. It is normally one paragraph in length, succinct, and restates the main points of your paper. You should also restate or rephrase your purpose/thesis statement. In conclusion, you should not add new ideas or new information with citations; you should simply summarize the paper and reflect on key elements of the paper. If you need to add cited information, move that information to a previous section of your paper. You can end the conclusion by clarifying the intent and importance of the paper. For additional APA font choices for scholarly papers, see
[https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font).

**References**

Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review.
_Implementation Science_,
_9_(1), 1.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2) (Journal Example for a template)

Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005).
_The adult learner: The definitive class in adult education and human resource development_ (6th ed.). Elsevier. (Book Example)

National League for Nursing (2021).
_Coaching for excellence in nursing: A guide for educators._ NLN.
[https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing](https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing) (Web article Example; Use all 3 examples as templates)

\*\* Remember that ALL references should be accessible and cited in the body of the paper. The in-text citations for the above examples are as follows:

(Field et al., 2014)

(Knowles et al., 2005)

(National League for Nursing [NLN], 2021)- First citation.

(NLN, 2021)- Subsequent citation.

**## unit2.docx**

In this assignment, you are going to formulate a Problem Statement, a draft AIM Statement derived from the Problem Statement and select a framework to utilize as a guide for designing a scholarly project.

Examine your current practice setting, or reflect on observations from a prior practice setting, and identify a practice problem. Examples of problems could the absence of an evidence-based approach to care, a procedure that is not aligned with current best practices, practice approaches not aligned with current practice guidelines, or the inability for current practice approaches to achieve required performance metrics.

For the assignment, you are going to use the problem you identified and draft an approach for a proposed change.

The assignment format is that of an academic paper constructed utilizing APA guidelines, including a title page, appropriate use of headings to separate the main sections of the body of the paper, proper in-text citations, and a references page.

The paper should be formatted with the below template that includes:

· A description of the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem.

· A succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document as a guide.

· An 'Aim Statement' relevant to the identified problem.

· Define the target population or setting (where the change will occur).

· Specify the desired outcome (what will improve and by how much).

· Include the intervention or change strategy (how the improvement will be achieved).

· Include a timeframe (by when the goal will be reached).

· A description of a framework to address the problem accompanied by a discussion of how the framework correlates to elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, a conceptual model, an in depth framing of the concept from the literature, etc.

**Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. The assignment requires you to upload a PDF file of the full-text article for all of your resources for your faculty to review.**

**## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx**

**Title of Paper**

Student Name

Herzing University

Course #/Name of Course

Faculty Name

Due Date

1

8

**Insert Title of Paper Here**

Tips for Introduction: It is always good to start a paper with a statistic (with citation) regarding the topic to grab the reader's attention. Then, introduce the paper's topic and explain why it is important. In scholarly writing, do not write in the first person language; instead, write in the third person. End the introduction paragraph with a purpose or thesis statement as your last sentence of the paragraph to introduce the main points/sections of your paper. Example: The purpose of this paper is to… (Include at least 2 main points/sections you will address in the body of your paper.)

Practice Setting

This section should describe the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting, ensuring enough detail to frame the context of the problem (i.e., outpatient/inpatient, urban/rural, facility, and unit type).

**Population**

This section should describe the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting. Consider age range, common diagnoses, language, cultural factors, or other defining characteristics that might affect care delivery or outcomes, which help tie your intervention to the population’s needs.

**Description of the Problem**

This section should describe your problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem. Clearly state how the current practice deviates from guidelines, evidence, or expected outcomes.

Problem Statement

This section should include a succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document “Constructing a Problem Statement,” provided in the assignment instructions and acts as a guide.

**AIM Statement**

This section should include your AIM statement relevant to the identified problem. Utilize IHI’s AIM Statement worksheet to guide your development of the statement so that it is clear, measurable, and time-bound. This section should be in narrative form, not a copy/paste of the worksheet.

**Framework**

This section should include a description of the framework to address the problem and a discussion of how the framework correlates to the elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, which helps to understand why a problem exists based on behaviors, motivation, or decision-making processes and predict outcomes (i.e., Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Self-Determination Theory, etc.) or a conceptual model that illustrates relationships between core concepts in your topic (i.e., Technology Acceptance Model, Roy Adaptation Model, etc.), or if there is no clear framing of the concept then an in-depth framing of the concept from the literature. Do not utilize the Iowa, KTA, PDSA, or any other QI framework.

Conclusion

Tips: Notice the Conclusion is a Level 1 Header, centered and bolded. A conclusion section should be included in all scholarly papers to summarize the paper. It is normally one paragraph in length, succinct, and restates the main points of your paper. You should also restate or rephrase your purpose/thesis statement. In conclusion, you should not add new ideas or new information with citations; you should simply summarize the paper and reflect on key elements of the paper. If you need to add cited information, move that information to a previous section of your paper. You can end the conclusion by clarifying the intent and importance of the paper. For additional APA font choices for scholarly papers, see
[https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font).

**References**

Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review.
_Implementation Science_,
_9_(1), 1.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2) (Journal Example for a template)

Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005).
_The adult learner: The definitive class in adult education and human resource development_ (6th ed.). Elsevier. (Book Example)

National League for Nursing (2021).
_Coaching for excellence in nursing: A guide for educators._ NLN.
[https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing](https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing) (Web article Example; Use all 3 examples as templates)

\*\* Remember that ALL references should be accessible and cited in the body of the paper. The in-text citations for the above examples are as follows:

(Field et al., 2014)

(Knowles et al., 2005)

(National League for Nursing [NLN], 2021)- First citation.

(NLN, 2021)- Subsequent citation.

**## unit2.docx**

In this assignment, you are going to formulate a Problem Statement, a draft AIM Statement derived from the Problem Statement and select a framework to utilize as a guide for designing a scholarly project.

Examine your current practice setting, or reflect on observations from a prior practice setting, and identify a practice problem. Examples of problems could the absence of an evidence-based approach to care, a procedure that is not aligned with current best practices, practice approaches not aligned with current practice guidelines, or the inability for current practice approaches to achieve required performance metrics.

For the assignment, you are going to use the problem you identified and draft an approach for a proposed change.

The assignment format is that of an academic paper constructed utilizing APA guidelines, including a title page, appropriate use of headings to separate the main sections of the body of the paper, proper in-text citations, and a references page.

The paper should be formatted with the below template that includes:

· A description of the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. [your current or a prior practice setting]

· A description of the problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem.

· A succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document as a guide.

· An 'Aim Statement' relevant to the identified problem.

· Define the target population or setting (where the change will occur).

· Specify the desired outcome (what will improve and by how much).

· Include the intervention or change strategy (how the improvement will be achieved).

· Include a timeframe (by when the goal will be reached).

· A description of a framework to address the problem accompanied by a discussion of how the framework correlates to elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, a conceptual model, an in depth framing of the concept from the literature, etc.

**Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. The assignment requires you to upload a PDF file of the full-text article for all of your resources for your faculty to review.**

**## NU760Unit2PaperTemplate.docx**

**Title of Paper**

Student Name

Herzing University

Course #/Name of Course

Faculty Name

Due Date

1

8

**Insert Title of Paper Here**

Tips for Introduction: It is always good to start a paper with a statistic (with citation) regarding the topic to grab the reader's attention. Then, introduce the paper's topic and explain why it is important. In scholarly writing, do not write in the first person language; instead, write in the third person. End the introduction paragraph with a purpose or thesis statement as your last sentence of the paragraph to introduce the main points/sections of your paper. Example: The purpose of this paper is to… (Include at least 2 main points/sections you will address in the body of your paper.)

Practice Setting

This section should describe the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting, ensuring enough detail to frame the context of the problem (i.e., outpatient/inpatient, urban/rural, facility, and unit type).

**Population**

This section should describe the population in the practice setting where you identified the problem. This could be your current or a prior practice setting. Consider age range, common diagnoses, language, cultural factors, or other defining characteristics that might affect care delivery or outcomes, which help tie your intervention to the population’s needs.

**Description of the Problem**

This section should describe your problem along with the information, observations, or data that prompted the identification of the problem. Clearly state how the current practice deviates from guidelines, evidence, or expected outcomes.

Problem Statement

This section should include a succinct problem statement utilizing the linked document “Constructing a Problem Statement,” provided in the assignment instructions and acts as a guide.

**AIM Statement**

This section should include your AIM statement relevant to the identified problem. Utilize IHI’s AIM Statement worksheet to guide your development of the statement so that it is clear, measurable, and time-bound. This section should be in narrative form, not a copy/paste of the worksheet.

**Framework**

This section should include a description of the framework to address the problem and a discussion of how the framework correlates to the elements of the problem or activities/actions that will be undertaken to address the problem. The framework could be a relevant theory, which helps to understand why a problem exists based on behaviors, motivation, or decision-making processes and predict outcomes (i.e., Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Self-Determination Theory, etc.) or a conceptual model that illustrates relationships between core concepts in your topic (i.e., Technology Acceptance Model, Roy Adaptation Model, etc.), or if there is no clear framing of the concept then an in-depth framing of the concept from the literature. Do not utilize the Iowa, KTA, PDSA, or any other QI framework.

Conclusion

Tips: Notice the Conclusion is a Level 1 Header, centered and bolded. A conclusion section should be included in all scholarly papers to summarize the paper. It is normally one paragraph in length, succinct, and restates the main points of your paper. You should also restate or rephrase your purpose/thesis statement. In conclusion, you should not add new ideas or new information with citations; you should simply summarize the paper and reflect on key elements of the paper. If you need to add cited information, move that information to a previous section of your paper. You can end the conclusion by clarifying the intent and importance of the paper. For additional APA font choices for scholarly papers, see
[https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/font).

**References**

Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review.
_Implementation Science_,
_9_(1), 1.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2) (Journal Example for a template)

Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005).
_The adult learner: The definitive class in adult education and human resource development_ (6th ed.). Elsevier. (Book Example)

National League for Nursing (2021).
_Coaching for excellence in nursing: A guide for educators._ NLN.
[https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing](https://ondemand.nln.org/product?catalog=Coaching-for-Excellence-in-Nursing) (Web article Example; Use all 3 examples as templates)

\*\* Remember that ALL references should be accessible and cited in the body of the paper. The in-text citations for the above examples are as follows:

(Field et al., 2014)

(Knowles et al., 2005)

(National League for Nursing [NLN], 2021)- First citation.

(NLN, 2021)- Subsequent citation.

November 6, 2026