My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see file **files (1)** – ## springas2.docx **## springas2.docx** Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, pr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see file

    **files (1)**

    – ## springas2.docx

    **## springas2.docx**

    Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions.

    The policy proposal requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.
    **Use your topic from Assessment 1 to complete this.**

    · What is the current benchmark for the organization and the numeric score for underperformance?

    · How is the benchmark underperformance affecting the provision of quality care or the organization's operations?

    · What are the potential repercussions of not making any changes?

    · What evidence supports your conclusions?

    · Summarize your proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.

    · Identify applicable local, state, or federal healthcare policy or law that prescribes relevant performance benchmarks that your policy proposal addresses (using your Advocacy Issues topic from the AHA).

    · Keep your audience in mind when creating this summary statement.

    · Analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on your recommended practice guidelines.

    · What regulatory considerations could affect your recommended guidelines?

    · What resources could affect your recommended guidelines (staffing, financial, and logistical considerations, or support services)?

    · Explain ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance and the impact the proposed changes will have on the targeted group.

    · What does the evidence-based literature suggest are potential strategies to improve performance for your targeted benchmark?

    · How would these strategies ensure performance improvement or compliance with applicable local, state, or federal healthcare policy or law?

    · How can you ensure that these strategies are ethical and culturally inclusive in their application?

    · What is the direct impact of these changes on the stakeholders' work setting/job requirements?

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of your proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is it important to engage these stakeholders and groups?

    · How can their participation produce a stronger policy and facilitate its implementation?

    · Present strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?

    · Why is the stakeholder group and their collaboration important for successful implementation?

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your proposal, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposal.

    · Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external sources.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Policy Proposal Format and Length**

    It may be helpful to use a template or format for your proposal used in your current organization. The risk management or quality department could be a good resource for finding an appropriate template or format. If you are not currently in practice, or your organization does not have these resources, many appropriate templates are freely available on the Internet.

    Your policy summary statement should be succinct (about one paragraph). Overall, your proposal should be 4–6 pages in length.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 3–5 references to current and scholarly research, case studies, or best practice guidelines to support your analysis and recommendations.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    · Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.

    · Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform healthcare laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.

    · Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    · Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    NO USE OF AI, PLEASE USE APPROPRIATE APA IN TEXT CITATIONS

    **## springas2.docx**

    Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions.

    The policy proposal requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Explain the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.
    **Use your topic from Assessment 1 to complete this.**

    · What is the current benchmark for the organization and the numeric score for underperformance?

    · How is the benchmark underperformance affecting the provision of quality care or the organization's operations?

    · What are the potential repercussions of not making any changes?

    · What evidence supports your conclusions?

    · Summarize your proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.

    · Identify applicable local, state, or federal healthcare policy or law that prescribes relevant performance benchmarks that your policy proposal addresses (using your Advocacy Issues topic from the AHA).

    · Keep your audience in mind when creating this summary statement.

    · Analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on your recommended practice guidelines.

    · What regulatory considerations could affect your recommended guidelines?

    · What resources could affect your recommended guidelines (staffing, financial, and logistical considerations, or support services)?

    · Explain ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance and the impact the proposed changes will have on the targeted group.

    · What does the evidence-based literature suggest are potential strategies to improve performance for your targeted benchmark?

    · How would these strategies ensure performance improvement or compliance with applicable local, state, or federal healthcare policy or law?

    · How can you ensure that these strategies are ethical and culturally inclusive in their application?

    · What is the direct impact of these changes on the stakeholders' work setting/job requirements?

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of your proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Why is it important to engage these stakeholders and groups?

    · How can their participation produce a stronger policy and facilitate its implementation?

    · Present strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?

    · Why is the stakeholder group and their collaboration important for successful implementation?

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Proofread your proposal, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposal.

    · Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external sources.

    · Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

    **Policy Proposal Format and Length**

    It may be helpful to use a template or format for your proposal used in your current organization. The risk management or quality department could be a good resource for finding an appropriate template or format. If you are not currently in practice, or your organization does not have these resources, many appropriate templates are freely available on the Internet.

    Your policy summary statement should be succinct (about one paragraph). Overall, your proposal should be 4–6 pages in length.

    **Supporting Evidence**

    Cite 3–5 references to current and scholarly research, case studies, or best practice guidelines to support your analysis and recommendations.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    · Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.

    · Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform healthcare laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.

    · Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    · Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    NO USE OF AI, PLEASE USE APPROPRIATE APA IN TEXT CITATIONS

  • [Solved] DNP-N.T IVA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework. Contrib…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

    Contribute a minimum of 3 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT, WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNITIN

    DUE DATE MARCH 4 , 2026

  • [Solved] DNP-EVI-IVA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floor is a problem the institution has been dealing with for the last year and the problem still has not been corrected. The patient’s satisfaction is compromised, and the nurse patient ratio is high.  **Step 1: Identify the problem -** **Cultivate a spirit of inquiry** Explain, in your own words, what is the problem?  What are the data and sources that validate the problem?

    – Safety
    – Quality indicators
    – Practice observations
    – Patient satisfaction
    – Other

    Why is the problem is relevant?   What is the current practice?

    1. **Create the clinical question utilizing the PICOT format -** **Ask clinical questions utilizing the PICOT format**

    P = Patient Population  I = Intervention or issue  C = Comparison Intervention or Status  O = Outcome  T = Timeframe to accomplish the O  Final Clinical Question: _________________________________________

    1. **Searching for the best evidence**

    The student will look at the different databases to search for the strongest evidence that will be used to answer the clinical question.

    1. **Critically appraise the evidence – Summarize the evidence**

    The student will evaluate the evidence and will choose the ones that will help to answer the clinical question. They will create a summary of the best information found and synthesize the findings.

    1. **Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise**

    – Develop best evidence recommendations
    – Create an action plan
    – Implement action plan

    1. **Reports results to stakeholders**

    – Create a report to the stakeholders

    1. **Disseminate findings**

    – Hospital administration meeting – PowerPoint

    **General Instructions**

    1. Remember that your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet, has to be not greater than 10% of plagiarism or AI text.
    2. 9 pages
    3. References within the past 5 years and with DOI#
    4. FORMAT APA, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    – Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
    – When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    DUE DATE MARCH 4 , 2026

  • [Solved] DNP-EVI

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floor is a problem the institution has been dealing with for the last year and the problem still has not been corrected. The patient’s satisfaction is compromised, and the nurse patient ratio is high.

    **Step 1: Identify the problem -** **Cultivate a spirit of inquiry**

    Explain, in your own words, what is the problem?

    What are the data and sources that validate the problem?

    – Safety
    – Quality indicators
    – Practice observations
    – Patient satisfaction
    – Other

    Why is the problem is relevant?

    What is the current practice?

    1. **Create the clinical question utilizing the PICOT format -** **Ask clinical questions utilizing the PICOT format**

    P = Patient Population

    I = Intervention or issue

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status

    O = Outcome

    T = Timeframe to accomplish the O

    Final Clinical Question: _________________________________________

    1. **Searching for the best evidence**

    The student will look at the different databases to search for the strongest evidence that will be used to answer the clinical question.

    1. **Critically appraise the evidence – Summarize the evidence**

    The student will evaluate the evidence and will choose the ones that will help to answer the clinical question. They will create a summary of the best information found and synthesize the findings.

    1. **Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise**

    – Develop best evidence recommendations
    – Create an action plan
    – Implement action plan

    1. **Reports results to stakeholders**

    – Create a report to the stakeholders

    1. **Disseminate findings**

    – Hospital administration meeting – PowerPoint

    **General Instructions**

    1. Remember that your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet, has to be not greater than 10% of plagiarism or AI text.
    2. 9 pages
    3. References within the past 5 years and with DOI#
    4. FORMAT APA, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    – Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
    – When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    DUE DATE MARCH 4 , 2026

  • [Solved] Education

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nursing outcome

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Infection control and public health presentation

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Infection control and public health presentation

  • [Solved] Cardiovascular Disorders

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Cardiovascular Disorders.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] complete post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please create a discussion post following the instructions and the rubric. Please also use the resources provided Instructions: **Post** a response to the following prompts: – Identify nursing problems implicit in the nursing research study and the QI DNP project. – Describe how the nursing problems…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please create a discussion post following the instructions and the rubric. Please also use the resources provided

    Instructions: **Post** a response to the following prompts:

    – Identify nursing problems implicit in the nursing research study and the QI DNP project.
    – Describe how the nursing problems define the gap in knowledge (research) and the gap in practice (QI and DNP projects). Compare and contrast how the problems are presented and potentially influence a positive nursing practice change.
    – Identify one key measurement/variable used in each of the three studies/projects.
    – Critique the question development tool presented in terms of the problem, the EBP question, and the measurement (Hicks, 2024).

    Rubric: RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussion posts minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 11:59pm ET. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 11:59pm ET. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellent• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Detailed response to faculty.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGood• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Appropriate reply to faculty.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFair• Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoor• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30 possible points)

    **30** **to >29.0** **ptsExcellentInitial Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.**

    **29** **to >23.0** **ptsGoodInitial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.**

    **23** **to >18.0** **ptsFairInitial Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence.**

    **18** **to >0** **ptsPoorInitial Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly resources are not provided.**

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: First Response (20 possible points)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides rich and relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on separate day.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on same day.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: Second Response (20 possible points)

    **20** **to >19.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day.**

    **19** **to >15.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day.**

    **15** **to >12.0** **ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • Minimal scholarly sources provided to support post. • Posts on separate day.**

    **12** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • No sources provided. • Posts on same day.**

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQUALITY OF WRITING (10 possible points)

    **10** **to >9.0** **ptsExcellentDiscussion postings and responses exceed doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing. • Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **9** **to >8.0** **ptsGoodDiscussion postings and responses meet doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing • Makes a few errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **8** **to >6.0** **ptsFairDiscussion postings and responses are somewhat below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Numerous errors in APA 7 format • May be less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    **6** **to >0** **ptsPoorDiscussion postings and responses are well below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Uses incorrect APA 7 format • Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.**

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Resources: Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2025). _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_(5th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

    – Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice: Past, Present, and Future” (pp. 4–13)
    – Chapter 4, “The Practice Question Phase: The EBP Question” (pp. 54–62)
    – Question Development Tool (pp. 210–215)
    – Emsden, C., Schäfer, U. B., Denhaerynck, K., Grossmann, F., Frei, I. A., & Kirsch, M. (2020). [Validating a pain assessment tool in heterogeneous ICU patients: Is it possible?Links to an external site.](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nicc.12469 "Link") _Nursing in Critical Care, 25_(1), 8–15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nicc.12469
    – Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2025). _Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics_ (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    – Chapter 1, “Statistics or Sadistics? It’s Up to You” (pp. 5–23)
    – Chapter 4: "Reliability and Validity: Tell the Truth, Precisely the Truth (pp. 75–95)
    – **Document:** Hicks, T. (2024). [_Quality evaluation of a central line associated bloodstream infection_](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216680/files/18029282?wrap=1) [Download Quality evaluation of a central line associated bloodstream infection](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216680/files/18029282/download?download_frd=1). Walden University CAO Repository.

  • [Solved] Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Ethics.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I have some questions about the Health Industry

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I have some questions about the Health Industry