My Blog

Tag: Care Plans

  • [Solved] Home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## DLV12.docx **## DLV12.docx** Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. **Project Deliverable tie to Competency** In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## DLV12.docx

    **## DLV12.docx**

    Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable.

    **Project Deliverable tie to Competency**

    In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting a hypothesis test for correlation, and constructing the equation of the regression line, you will gain essential skills in data analysis and prediction. This process not only reinforces key concepts in statistics but also builds analytical thinking skills that are widely applicable in real-world contexts.

    **Scenario**

    Your boss is impressed with your data analysis so far. They are interested in one more comparison using the data that was collected in module 01. This time, they want to see if there is a correlation between Yearly Income and Yearly Client Expenditure.

    Download the Excel Workbook provided below. Ensure that you use the data provided in the Workbook to make all calculations.

    **Instructions**

    The Excel Workbook contains five tabs. The first tab contains the instructions. The second tab, labeled "data," contains the raw data that will be used for your calculations. The next three tabs contain questions for you to answer. Ensure that you are completely answering all questions with explanations, and your work is shown in Excel when needed.

    **Submission Requirements**

    · You must submit the Workbook with the completed calculations, answers, and analysis.

    **## DLV12.docx**

    Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable.

    **Project Deliverable tie to Competency**

    In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting a hypothesis test for correlation, and constructing the equation of the regression line, you will gain essential skills in data analysis and prediction. This process not only reinforces key concepts in statistics but also builds analytical thinking skills that are widely applicable in real-world contexts.

    **Scenario**

    Your boss is impressed with your data analysis so far. They are interested in one more comparison using the data that was collected in module 01. This time, they want to see if there is a correlation between Yearly Income and Yearly Client Expenditure.

    Download the Excel Workbook provided below. Ensure that you use the data provided in the Workbook to make all calculations.

    **Instructions**

    The Excel Workbook contains five tabs. The first tab contains the instructions. The second tab, labeled "data," contains the raw data that will be used for your calculations. The next three tabs contain questions for you to answer. Ensure that you are completely answering all questions with explanations, and your work is shown in Excel when needed.

    **Submission Requirements**

    · You must submit the Workbook with the completed calculations, answers, and analysis.

  • [Solved] Neurological

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Neurological.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Assigment2week3.docx **## Assigment2week3.docx** Assigment 2 1. 2. [Literature Review: Evidence-Based Primary Care Topic](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880671) **Assignment Description:** Evidence-based practice is a foundational skill for Nurse Practiti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assigment2week3.docx

    **## Assigment2week3.docx**

    Assigment 2

    1.

    2.
    [Literature Review: Evidence-Based Primary Care Topic](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880671)

    **Assignment Description:**

    Evidence-based practice is a foundational skill for Nurse Practitioners and advanced practice nurses. The purpose of this assignment is to help students strengthen academic writing, critical thinking, and research appraisal skills by completing a structured
    **literature review** on a
    **primary care topic** relevant to advanced practice nursing.

    In this assignment, students will locate and review
    **five (5)** peer-reviewed scholarly articles and develop a well-organized literature review that summarizes current evidence, identifies common themes across studies, and discusses implications for primary care Nurse Practitioner practice.

    This is an introductory literature review assignment designed for students who are beginning graduate-level scholarly writing and evidence evaluation.

    **Learning Objectives:**

    By completing this assignment, students will be able to:

    1. Select a primary care topic relevant to advanced practice nursing and Nurse Practitioner practice.

    2. Conduct a focused academic literature search using scholarly databases.

    3. Select appropriate peer-reviewed research articles related to a clinical topic.

    4. Summarize research evidence clearly and accurately.

    5. Compare findings across studies and identify trends, themes, or gaps in evidence.

    6. Discuss how evidence supports clinical decision-making and patient care in primary care settings.

    7. Demonstrate correct APA 7th edition formatting, scholarly tone, and professional writing.

    **Assignment Instructions;**

    **Step 1: Select a Primary Care Topic**

    Choose ONE topic relevant to primary care. Your topic should be specific enough to be supported by published research and appropriate for the Nurse Practitioner role.

    **Examples of acceptable topics include (but are not limited to):**

    . Hypertension management strategies in adults

    . Type 2 diabetes self-management education interventions

    . Lifestyle counseling approaches for obesity/overweight

    . Smoking cessation interventions in primary care

    . Depression/anxiety screening and early intervention

    . Medication adherence strategies in chronic illness

    . Asthma management and inhaler adherence

    . Vaccination hesitancy and patient education strategies

    . Chronic pain management approaches in primary care

    . Preventive screenings (e.g., colorectal cancer screening adherence)

    . Health coaching or motivational interviewing for behavior change

    . Nurse-led interventions to improve chronic care outcomes

    **Important:** If you are unsure whether your topic is appropriate, choose a topic that is common in primary care and supported by multiple studies.

    **Step 2: Locate 5 Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Articles**

    You must locate and use
    **five (5)** peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles related to your topic.

    Required criteria for your articles:

    Peer-reviewed scholarly journal sources
    Evidence-based research articles (quantitative, qualitative, systematic review, meta-analysis, or integrative review)
    Related to primary care patient outcomes, interventions, screening, or management
    Published within the last
    **5 years** (exceptions may be allowed with instructor approval)
    Must support the topic and contribute meaningful evidence

    **Not acceptable:**

    Blogs, Wikipedia, non-scholarly websites
    Editorials/opinion pieces without evidence
    Articles not related to primary care or clinical practice
    Non-peer-reviewed sources

    **Recommended databases:**

    .
    **CINAHL**

    .
    **PubMed / Medline**

    .
    **Cochrane Library**

    .
    **Google Scholar** (use carefully—confirm peer-reviewed status)

    **Paper Length Requirements:**

    Your paper must be:

    **5–8 pages** of content (the body of the paper)

    **Title page is not included** in the 5–8 pages

    **Reference page is not included** in the 5–8 pages

    **Required Paper Sections (Use Headings)**

    Your literature review must include the following required sections and headings:

    **1. Title Page (APA 7th edition)**

    Include:

    . Title of paper

    . Your name

    . Institution

    . Course name and number

    . Instructor name

    . Due date

    **2. Introduction (Approximately 1 page)**

    In the introduction, address the following:

    . Clearly identify the primary care topic

    . Explain why the topic is important in primary care practice

    . Provide context (brief background) to introduce the clinical issue

    . State the purpose of the paper (literature review of 5 scholarly sources)

    . Include a thesis statement or focus statement that previews the goal of the review

    **3. Search Strategy (½ page minimum)**

    Describe how you located the five articles. Include:

    . The databases you used (example: CINAHL, PubMed)

    . Keywords and/or search phrases (example: “hypertension AND lifestyle counseling AND primary care”)

    . Any filters applied (example: 2018–2025, peer-reviewed, adults, English)

    . Inclusion criteria (example: primary care settings, adult patients, intervention studies)

    . Exclusion criteria (example: pediatric-only studies, hospital-only studies, non-research articles)

    **This section demonstrates that your review was systematic and intentional.**

    4
    **. Literature Review: Summary and Synthesis of Evidence (Approximately 3–5 pages)**

    This is the main section of your paper.

    You will summarize and synthesize the evidence from your five articles by doing the following:

    A. Summarize each study (briefly, but clearly):

    For each article, include:

    . Purpose of the study

    . Population/sample (who was studied)

    . Setting (primary care, community clinic, outpatient, etc.)

    . Design/methods (qualitative, RCT, cohort study, systematic review, etc.)

    . Key findings/results

    . Any relevant limitations noted by the authors

    B. Synthesize across the five studies:

    Instead of listing the five studies separately with no connection, your review should show patterns by organizing your discussion into themes such as:

    . Common interventions that improved outcomes

    . Barriers and facilitators to success

    . Patient education approaches

    . Adherence and behavior change strategies

    . Health equity considerations (if applicable)

    . Gaps in research or inconsistent findings

    **Goal:** demonstrate that you can compare evidence and create meaning from multiple research sources.

    **5. Discussion: Implications for Nurse Practitioner Practice (Approximately 1–2 pages)**

    In this section, connect the evidence to clinical decision-making as an NP/APRN.

    Include:

    . How the evidence supports or improves primary care practice

    . Recommendations for patient education and counseling

    . Practice changes that could improve outcomes (screening, follow-up, care coordination, etc.)

    . Clinical considerations: age, comorbidities, cultural factors, access to care

    . Any relevant guidelines or best practice implications (only if supported by your selected research)

    . Identify at least one realistic way the NP can apply the evidence in a clinical setting

    **6. Conclusion (½–1 page)**

    Provide a strong closing paragraph(s) that:

    . Summarizes what the current evidence shows overall

    . Reinforces why this topic matters in primary care

    . Notes one key gap in evidence or an area for future research

    . Ends with a clear takeaway statement for NP practice

    **7. References Page (APA 7th edition)**

    . Include all five required articles

    . Format in correct APA 7th edition style

    . Ensure every in-text citation appears in the reference list

    **Writing and Formatting Requirements**

    . APA 7th edition (citations, headings, reference format)

    . 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Calibri

    . Double-spaced

    . 1-inch margins

    . Page numbers included

    . Scholarly tone (professional, formal writing)

    . Use paragraph structure and transitions to organize ideas

    . Avoid excessive direct quoting—paraphrase evidence with citations

    **Submission Instructions:**

    Submit your paper in Canvas as:
    Word document (.docx) or PDF

    Rubric

    **Literature Review (5 Articles) – Total 100 Points**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Literature Review (5 Articles) – Total 100 Points |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic, Purpose & Organization (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Topic is clearly defined, relevant to primary care NP practice, and appropriately focused. Purpose statement is strong. Paper is logically organized with required headings and smooth transitions.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProficient** Topic is relevant and mostly clear. Purpose is stated. Organization is good with minor issues in flow or structure.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Topic is too broad or somewhat unclear. Purpose is vague. Organization is inconsistent or headings are incomplete.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Topic is unclear or not appropriate for primary care. Purpose is missing. Paper lacks structure and organization | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSearch Strategy & Quality of Evidence (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly describes databases, keywords, and filters. All 5 articles meet criteria (peer-reviewed, scholarly, evidence-based, current). Sources are highly relevant to the topic.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProficient** Search strategy is described with minor missing details. Most sources meet criteria and support the topic.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Search strategy is minimal or unclear. Some articles may not fully meet criteria or have limited relevance.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Search strategy is missing. Sources are not appropriate (non-scholarly or not evidence-based) and/or fewer than 5 acceptable articles. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary & Synthesis of the 5 Articles (30 points) | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Accurately summarizes all studies (design, sample, findings). Evidence is synthesized across articles with clear themes/patterns. Shows strong critical thinking (comparisons, gaps, consistencies).<br> <br>**26 to >22.0 ptsProficient** Summaries are accurate with minor omissions. Some synthesis is present but may lean toward article-by-article description.<br> <br>**22 to >17.0 ptsDeveloping** Summaries are incomplete or inconsistent. Limited synthesis; mostly separate summaries with weak connections.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Major inaccuracies or missing summaries. Little to no synthesis or understanding of evidence. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications for Nurse Practitioner Practice (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly connects evidence to NP clinical decision-making in primary care. Includes strong practice implications (patient education, interventions, screening, follow-up) and realistic recommendations.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProeficiency** Discusses practice implications with some connection to NP role; recommendations are present but may be general.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Implications are limited or unclear; weak connection to NP practice and primary care application.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Minimal or missing discussion of implications for NP practice. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 7 Format, Writing Quality & Mechanics (10 points) | **10 ptsExcellent** Correct APA 7 format (title page, citations, references). Writing is clear, scholarly, and professional. Minimal grammar/spelling errors.<br> <br>**8 ptsProficient** Minor APA or writing errors that do not affect understanding.<br> <br>**6 ptsDeveloping** Multiple APA errors and/or writing issues that reduce clarity.<br> <br>**4 ptsNeeds improvement** Significant APA problems and frequent writing errors; lacks scholarly tone. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ReplyForward

    **## Assigment2week3.docx**

    Assigment 2

    1.

    2.
    [Literature Review: Evidence-Based Primary Care Topic](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880671)

    **Assignment Description:**

    Evidence-based practice is a foundational skill for Nurse Practitioners and advanced practice nurses. The purpose of this assignment is to help students strengthen academic writing, critical thinking, and research appraisal skills by completing a structured
    **literature review** on a
    **primary care topic** relevant to advanced practice nursing.

    In this assignment, students will locate and review
    **five (5)** peer-reviewed scholarly articles and develop a well-organized literature review that summarizes current evidence, identifies common themes across studies, and discusses implications for primary care Nurse Practitioner practice.

    This is an introductory literature review assignment designed for students who are beginning graduate-level scholarly writing and evidence evaluation.

    **Learning Objectives:**

    By completing this assignment, students will be able to:

    1. Select a primary care topic relevant to advanced practice nursing and Nurse Practitioner practice.

    2. Conduct a focused academic literature search using scholarly databases.

    3. Select appropriate peer-reviewed research articles related to a clinical topic.

    4. Summarize research evidence clearly and accurately.

    5. Compare findings across studies and identify trends, themes, or gaps in evidence.

    6. Discuss how evidence supports clinical decision-making and patient care in primary care settings.

    7. Demonstrate correct APA 7th edition formatting, scholarly tone, and professional writing.

    **Assignment Instructions;**

    **Step 1: Select a Primary Care Topic**

    Choose ONE topic relevant to primary care. Your topic should be specific enough to be supported by published research and appropriate for the Nurse Practitioner role.

    **Examples of acceptable topics include (but are not limited to):**

    . Hypertension management strategies in adults

    . Type 2 diabetes self-management education interventions

    . Lifestyle counseling approaches for obesity/overweight

    . Smoking cessation interventions in primary care

    . Depression/anxiety screening and early intervention

    . Medication adherence strategies in chronic illness

    . Asthma management and inhaler adherence

    . Vaccination hesitancy and patient education strategies

    . Chronic pain management approaches in primary care

    . Preventive screenings (e.g., colorectal cancer screening adherence)

    . Health coaching or motivational interviewing for behavior change

    . Nurse-led interventions to improve chronic care outcomes

    **Important:** If you are unsure whether your topic is appropriate, choose a topic that is common in primary care and supported by multiple studies.

    **Step 2: Locate 5 Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Articles**

    You must locate and use
    **five (5)** peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles related to your topic.

    Required criteria for your articles:

    Peer-reviewed scholarly journal sources
    Evidence-based research articles (quantitative, qualitative, systematic review, meta-analysis, or integrative review)
    Related to primary care patient outcomes, interventions, screening, or management
    Published within the last
    **5 years** (exceptions may be allowed with instructor approval)
    Must support the topic and contribute meaningful evidence

    **Not acceptable:**

    Blogs, Wikipedia, non-scholarly websites
    Editorials/opinion pieces without evidence
    Articles not related to primary care or clinical practice
    Non-peer-reviewed sources

    **Recommended databases:**

    .
    **CINAHL**

    .
    **PubMed / Medline**

    .
    **Cochrane Library**

    .
    **Google Scholar** (use carefully—confirm peer-reviewed status)

    **Paper Length Requirements:**

    Your paper must be:

    **5–8 pages** of content (the body of the paper)

    **Title page is not included** in the 5–8 pages

    **Reference page is not included** in the 5–8 pages

    **Required Paper Sections (Use Headings)**

    Your literature review must include the following required sections and headings:

    **1. Title Page (APA 7th edition)**

    Include:

    . Title of paper

    . Your name

    . Institution

    . Course name and number

    . Instructor name

    . Due date

    **2. Introduction (Approximately 1 page)**

    In the introduction, address the following:

    . Clearly identify the primary care topic

    . Explain why the topic is important in primary care practice

    . Provide context (brief background) to introduce the clinical issue

    . State the purpose of the paper (literature review of 5 scholarly sources)

    . Include a thesis statement or focus statement that previews the goal of the review

    **3. Search Strategy (½ page minimum)**

    Describe how you located the five articles. Include:

    . The databases you used (example: CINAHL, PubMed)

    . Keywords and/or search phrases (example: “hypertension AND lifestyle counseling AND primary care”)

    . Any filters applied (example: 2018–2025, peer-reviewed, adults, English)

    . Inclusion criteria (example: primary care settings, adult patients, intervention studies)

    . Exclusion criteria (example: pediatric-only studies, hospital-only studies, non-research articles)

    **This section demonstrates that your review was systematic and intentional.**

    4
    **. Literature Review: Summary and Synthesis of Evidence (Approximately 3–5 pages)**

    This is the main section of your paper.

    You will summarize and synthesize the evidence from your five articles by doing the following:

    A. Summarize each study (briefly, but clearly):

    For each article, include:

    . Purpose of the study

    . Population/sample (who was studied)

    . Setting (primary care, community clinic, outpatient, etc.)

    . Design/methods (qualitative, RCT, cohort study, systematic review, etc.)

    . Key findings/results

    . Any relevant limitations noted by the authors

    B. Synthesize across the five studies:

    Instead of listing the five studies separately with no connection, your review should show patterns by organizing your discussion into themes such as:

    . Common interventions that improved outcomes

    . Barriers and facilitators to success

    . Patient education approaches

    . Adherence and behavior change strategies

    . Health equity considerations (if applicable)

    . Gaps in research or inconsistent findings

    **Goal:** demonstrate that you can compare evidence and create meaning from multiple research sources.

    **5. Discussion: Implications for Nurse Practitioner Practice (Approximately 1–2 pages)**

    In this section, connect the evidence to clinical decision-making as an NP/APRN.

    Include:

    . How the evidence supports or improves primary care practice

    . Recommendations for patient education and counseling

    . Practice changes that could improve outcomes (screening, follow-up, care coordination, etc.)

    . Clinical considerations: age, comorbidities, cultural factors, access to care

    . Any relevant guidelines or best practice implications (only if supported by your selected research)

    . Identify at least one realistic way the NP can apply the evidence in a clinical setting

    **6. Conclusion (½–1 page)**

    Provide a strong closing paragraph(s) that:

    . Summarizes what the current evidence shows overall

    . Reinforces why this topic matters in primary care

    . Notes one key gap in evidence or an area for future research

    . Ends with a clear takeaway statement for NP practice

    **7. References Page (APA 7th edition)**

    . Include all five required articles

    . Format in correct APA 7th edition style

    . Ensure every in-text citation appears in the reference list

    **Writing and Formatting Requirements**

    . APA 7th edition (citations, headings, reference format)

    . 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Calibri

    . Double-spaced

    . 1-inch margins

    . Page numbers included

    . Scholarly tone (professional, formal writing)

    . Use paragraph structure and transitions to organize ideas

    . Avoid excessive direct quoting—paraphrase evidence with citations

    **Submission Instructions:**

    Submit your paper in Canvas as:
    Word document (.docx) or PDF

    Rubric

    **Literature Review (5 Articles) – Total 100 Points**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Literature Review (5 Articles) – Total 100 Points |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic, Purpose & Organization (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Topic is clearly defined, relevant to primary care NP practice, and appropriately focused. Purpose statement is strong. Paper is logically organized with required headings and smooth transitions.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProficient** Topic is relevant and mostly clear. Purpose is stated. Organization is good with minor issues in flow or structure.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Topic is too broad or somewhat unclear. Purpose is vague. Organization is inconsistent or headings are incomplete.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Topic is unclear or not appropriate for primary care. Purpose is missing. Paper lacks structure and organization | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSearch Strategy & Quality of Evidence (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly describes databases, keywords, and filters. All 5 articles meet criteria (peer-reviewed, scholarly, evidence-based, current). Sources are highly relevant to the topic.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProficient** Search strategy is described with minor missing details. Most sources meet criteria and support the topic.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Search strategy is minimal or unclear. Some articles may not fully meet criteria or have limited relevance.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Search strategy is missing. Sources are not appropriate (non-scholarly or not evidence-based) and/or fewer than 5 acceptable articles. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary & Synthesis of the 5 Articles (30 points) | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Accurately summarizes all studies (design, sample, findings). Evidence is synthesized across articles with clear themes/patterns. Shows strong critical thinking (comparisons, gaps, consistencies).<br> <br>**26 to >22.0 ptsProficient** Summaries are accurate with minor omissions. Some synthesis is present but may lean toward article-by-article description.<br> <br>**22 to >17.0 ptsDeveloping** Summaries are incomplete or inconsistent. Limited synthesis; mostly separate summaries with weak connections.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Major inaccuracies or missing summaries. Little to no synthesis or understanding of evidence. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications for Nurse Practitioner Practice (20 points) | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly connects evidence to NP clinical decision-making in primary care. Includes strong practice implications (patient education, interventions, screening, follow-up) and realistic recommendations.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsProeficiency** Discusses practice implications with some connection to NP role; recommendations are present but may be general.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsDeveloping** Implications are limited or unclear; weak connection to NP practice and primary care application.<br> <br>**11 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Minimal or missing discussion of implications for NP practice. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 7 Format, Writing Quality & Mechanics (10 points) | **10 ptsExcellent** Correct APA 7 format (title page, citations, references). Writing is clear, scholarly, and professional. Minimal grammar/spelling errors.<br> <br>**8 ptsProficient** Minor APA or writing errors that do not affect understanding.<br> <br>**6 ptsDeveloping** Multiple APA errors and/or writing issues that reduce clarity.<br> <br>**4 ptsNeeds improvement** Significant APA problems and frequent writing errors; lacks scholarly tone. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ReplyForward

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Assigment1week3.docx **## Assigment1week3.docx** Assigment 1 Due Sunday 3/1 NRSE 500 : Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Dr. Grivel Hera Gómez : me · Mon, Feb 23 at 8:13 AM **Message Body** 1. [Journal Article Summary #5 — Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in Prim…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assigment1week3.docx

    **## Assigment1week3.docx**

    Assigment 1 Due Sunday 3/1 NRSE 500 : Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Dr. Grivel Hera Gómez

    :  me · Mon, Feb 23 at 8:13 AM

    **Message Body**

    1.
    [Journal Article Summary #5 — Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in Primary Care](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880670)

    **Purpose:**

    To strengthen NP competency in applying quality and safety evidence to healthcare systems and clinical practice.

    **Instructions:**

    1. Choose an article related to quality improvement (QI), patient safety, clinical outcomes, or system improvement in outpatient/primary care.

    2. Summarize findings and discuss how they can improve FNP practice.

    **Required Topic Focus:** **Quality Improvement & Patient Safety**

    **What to include:**

    · QI problem identified

    · Intervention (if any)

    · Results/outcomes

    · How a similar initiative could be used in FNP practice

    · Reflection: What would you improve in a clinic setting?

    ·
    **Formatting Requirements:**

    ·
    **APA 7th edition format**

    ·
    **12 pt Times New Roman**, double-spaced

    · 1-inch margins

    · In-text citations + reference page

    · Minimal 2 pages excluding presentation and references page.

    **Submission:**
    Upload as a Word or PDF document to Canvas.

    **Journal Article Summary Rubric — 100 Points Total-**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Journal Article Summary Rubric — 100 Points Total- |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Selection & Relevance (10 points)<br>Student selects one peer-reviewed advanced practice nursing article that aligns with the weekly topic focus and meets assignment requirements. | **10 ptsExemplary Article Selection** Peer-reviewed article from an advanced practice journal; clearly aligns with weekly topic; appropriate scope and relevance.<br> <br>**8 ptsStrong Article Selection** Appropriate peer-reviewed article and generally aligned with the weekly topic; minor mismatch in focus or relevance.<br> <br>**6 ptsPartial Alignment** Article is weakly related to weekly topic OR journal quality is unclear; relevance is limited.<br> <br>**3 ptsPoor Alignment** Article minimally related to advanced practice nursing topic OR does not meet article expectations.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Submitted / Incorrect** No article submitted OR article is not peer-reviewed or not appropriate. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary Quality & Accuracy (30 points)<br>Summary demonstrates understanding of the article’s purpose and key concepts and accurately represents the author’s ideas. | **30 ptsThorough & Accurate Summary** Clearly summarizes purpose, background, and key content; highly accurate and well organized; demonstrates strong comprehension.<br> <br>**24 ptsAccurate Summary** Summary is mostly accurate and organized; includes key points but may miss minor details.<br> <br>**18 ptsBasic Summary** Summary is somewhat unclear or missing important information; some details may be vague or incomplete.<br> <br>**10 ptsLimited Summary** Summary is very brief, disorganized, or missing major points; comprehension is unclear.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Submitted** No summary submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Findings / Evidence Explained (20 Points)<br>Student identifies and explains the article’s findings, recommendations, or key arguments and why they matter. | **20 ptsStrong Evidence Interpretation** Clearly explains findings/recommendations and their significance; shows strong critical thinking.<br> <br>**16 ptsAppropriate Interpretation** Identifies major findings and provides explanation; some detail or depth may be missing.<br> <br>**12 ptsLimited Interpretation** Mentions findings but explanation is brief, unclear, or not well connected to meaning.<br> <br>**6 ptsWeak Interpretation** Mentions findings but explanation is brief, unclear, or not well connected to meaning.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Key findings/evidence not included. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication to FNP Practice (25 points)<br>Student connects the article to Family Nurse Practitioner practice with realistic clinical relevance and insight. | **25 ptsHighly Relevant Application** Provides strong, specific examples of how the evidence informs FNP practice, clinical decisions, and patient outcomes.<br> <br>**20 ptsClear Application** Connects article to FNP practice with reasonable examples; may lack depth or specificity.<br> <br>**15 ptsGeneral Application** Application is present but vague or overly general; limited practice connection.<br> <br>**8 ptsMinimal Application** Application is weak, unrealistic, or not clearly connected to FNP practice.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Addressed** No application to clinical practice included | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Professional Insight (10 Points)<br>Student reflects on learning and professional growth and explains how the article will influence future NP practice. | **10 ptsMeaningful Reflection** Thoughtful reflection showing strong insight; clearly explains learning and future use in NP role.<br> <br>**8 ptsClear Reflection** Reflection is relevant and understandable; some insight shown.<br> <br>**6 ptsLimited Reflection** Reflection is brief or surface-level; limited personal insight<br> <br>**3 ptsWeak Reflection** Reflection is minimal, unclear, or not meaningful.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Reflection not included. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format & Writing Mechanics (5 Points)<br>Work follows APA 7th edition format and demonstrates professional writing (grammar, organization, clarity). | **5 ptsCorrect APA & Professional Writing** APA reference and in-text citations correct; writing is clear, organized, and free of major errors.<br> <br>**3.75 ptsMinor APA/Grammar Errors** Minor APA or writing issues that do not affect readability.<br> <br>**2.5 ptsMultiple Errors** APA and/or grammar errors present and distract from readability; formatting inconsistencies.<br> <br>**1.25 ptsSignificant Errors** Many errors in APA and writing mechanics; difficult to follow.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot in APA / Unacceptable** Missing APA citations/references OR writing is not readable. | 5 pts |

    ReplyForward

    **## Assigment1week3.docx**

    Assigment 1 Due Sunday 3/1 NRSE 500 : Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Dr. Grivel Hera Gómez

    :  me · Mon, Feb 23 at 8:13 AM

    **Message Body**

    1.
    [Journal Article Summary #5 — Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in Primary Care](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880670)

    **Purpose:**

    To strengthen NP competency in applying quality and safety evidence to healthcare systems and clinical practice.

    **Instructions:**

    1. Choose an article related to quality improvement (QI), patient safety, clinical outcomes, or system improvement in outpatient/primary care.

    2. Summarize findings and discuss how they can improve FNP practice.

    **Required Topic Focus:** **Quality Improvement & Patient Safety**

    **What to include:**

    · QI problem identified

    · Intervention (if any)

    · Results/outcomes

    · How a similar initiative could be used in FNP practice

    · Reflection: What would you improve in a clinic setting?

    ·
    **Formatting Requirements:**

    ·
    **APA 7th edition format**

    ·
    **12 pt Times New Roman**, double-spaced

    · 1-inch margins

    · In-text citations + reference page

    · Minimal 2 pages excluding presentation and references page.

    **Submission:**
    Upload as a Word or PDF document to Canvas.

    **Journal Article Summary Rubric — 100 Points Total-**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Journal Article Summary Rubric — 100 Points Total- |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Selection & Relevance (10 points)<br>Student selects one peer-reviewed advanced practice nursing article that aligns with the weekly topic focus and meets assignment requirements. | **10 ptsExemplary Article Selection** Peer-reviewed article from an advanced practice journal; clearly aligns with weekly topic; appropriate scope and relevance.<br> <br>**8 ptsStrong Article Selection** Appropriate peer-reviewed article and generally aligned with the weekly topic; minor mismatch in focus or relevance.<br> <br>**6 ptsPartial Alignment** Article is weakly related to weekly topic OR journal quality is unclear; relevance is limited.<br> <br>**3 ptsPoor Alignment** Article minimally related to advanced practice nursing topic OR does not meet article expectations.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Submitted / Incorrect** No article submitted OR article is not peer-reviewed or not appropriate. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary Quality & Accuracy (30 points)<br>Summary demonstrates understanding of the article’s purpose and key concepts and accurately represents the author’s ideas. | **30 ptsThorough & Accurate Summary** Clearly summarizes purpose, background, and key content; highly accurate and well organized; demonstrates strong comprehension.<br> <br>**24 ptsAccurate Summary** Summary is mostly accurate and organized; includes key points but may miss minor details.<br> <br>**18 ptsBasic Summary** Summary is somewhat unclear or missing important information; some details may be vague or incomplete.<br> <br>**10 ptsLimited Summary** Summary is very brief, disorganized, or missing major points; comprehension is unclear.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Submitted** No summary submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Findings / Evidence Explained (20 Points)<br>Student identifies and explains the article’s findings, recommendations, or key arguments and why they matter. | **20 ptsStrong Evidence Interpretation** Clearly explains findings/recommendations and their significance; shows strong critical thinking.<br> <br>**16 ptsAppropriate Interpretation** Identifies major findings and provides explanation; some detail or depth may be missing.<br> <br>**12 ptsLimited Interpretation** Mentions findings but explanation is brief, unclear, or not well connected to meaning.<br> <br>**6 ptsWeak Interpretation** Mentions findings but explanation is brief, unclear, or not well connected to meaning.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Key findings/evidence not included. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication to FNP Practice (25 points)<br>Student connects the article to Family Nurse Practitioner practice with realistic clinical relevance and insight. | **25 ptsHighly Relevant Application** Provides strong, specific examples of how the evidence informs FNP practice, clinical decisions, and patient outcomes.<br> <br>**20 ptsClear Application** Connects article to FNP practice with reasonable examples; may lack depth or specificity.<br> <br>**15 ptsGeneral Application** Application is present but vague or overly general; limited practice connection.<br> <br>**8 ptsMinimal Application** Application is weak, unrealistic, or not clearly connected to FNP practice.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot Addressed** No application to clinical practice included | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Professional Insight (10 Points)<br>Student reflects on learning and professional growth and explains how the article will influence future NP practice. | **10 ptsMeaningful Reflection** Thoughtful reflection showing strong insight; clearly explains learning and future use in NP role.<br> <br>**8 ptsClear Reflection** Reflection is relevant and understandable; some insight shown.<br> <br>**6 ptsLimited Reflection** Reflection is brief or surface-level; limited personal insight<br> <br>**3 ptsWeak Reflection** Reflection is minimal, unclear, or not meaningful.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Reflection not included. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format & Writing Mechanics (5 Points)<br>Work follows APA 7th edition format and demonstrates professional writing (grammar, organization, clarity). | **5 ptsCorrect APA & Professional Writing** APA reference and in-text citations correct; writing is clear, organized, and free of major errors.<br> <br>**3.75 ptsMinor APA/Grammar Errors** Minor APA or writing issues that do not affect readability.<br> <br>**2.5 ptsMultiple Errors** APA and/or grammar errors present and distract from readability; formatting inconsistencies.<br> <br>**1.25 ptsSignificant Errors** Many errors in APA and writing mechanics; difficult to follow.<br> <br>**0 ptsNot in APA / Unacceptable** Missing APA citations/references OR writing is not readable. | 5 pts |

    ReplyForward

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## AppApplicationofBehavioralTheory.docx **## AppApplicationofBehavioralTheory.docx** ### App Application of Behavioral Theory ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20963461)To effectively determine best methods for behavior change, th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## AppApplicationofBehavioralTheory.docx

    **## AppApplicationofBehavioralTheory.docx**

    ### App Application of Behavioral Theory

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20963461)To effectively determine best methods for behavior change, the professional behavior analyst needs to develop a strong understanding of how to analyze the situation, including the target behavior, antecedent conditions, and consequences for the behavior. Understanding the terms and phrases used in applied behavior analysis is critical to appropriately evaluate a situation and determine effective methods for behavior change.

    One of the most frequently misused terms in psychology is “negative reinforcement.” Many people use this term to describe punishment because it “sounds better.” In behavioral psychology, terms are sometimes used differently than they are in everyday language. For example, the term “reinforcement” means that the rate of a behavior is increased. The term “punishment” means the rate of a behavior is decreased. The term “positive” means a stimulus is presented, and the term “negative” means a stimulus is removed. Therefore, negative reinforcement occurs when an aversive stimulus is removed, which results in an increase in probability of the behavior it followed.

    For this Assignment, you will explore the application of behavioral theory. You will review a set of scenarios, analyze and identify the applied behavioral characteristic involved in the scenario, and explain how the scenario meets the definition of the characteristic you identified.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/modules/items/9128588)

    To Prepare

    · Review the Learning Resources for this week, including the required weekly media programs.

    · Review the “Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet” found in the Learning Resources. You will use this worksheet to complete the Assignment.

    **Assignment**(1–2 pages)

    Complete the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet. To complete the worksheet, do the following for each scenario:

    · Identify and define the following consequences used in applied behavior analysis in each scenario (i.e., positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, negative punishment).

    · Explain how each scenario meets the definition of the applied behavior analysis characteristic you identified. Within your explanation, identify each of the components of the definition within the scenario.

    _Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources._

    By Day 7 of Week 1

    **Submit** the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/assignments/3031988)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/assignments/3031988)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="text-size-adjust: auto; margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://api.turnitin.com/api/lti/1p0/user/static_eula)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **PSYC_6717_Week1_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PSYC_6717_Week1_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | **12 to >10.25 ptsExcellent** Assignment demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, discerning ideas, and evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**10.25 to >8.25 ptsGood** Assignment demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment includes moderate detail, discerning ideas, and sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**8.25 to >4.5 ptsFair** Assignment demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples, discerning ideas, evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**4.5 to >0 ptsPoor** Assignment demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples discerning ideas, or sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet). | 12 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **3 to >2.0 ptsExcellent** Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**2 to >1.0 ptsGood** Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**1 to >0.0 ptsFair** Assignment is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior sources (number or quality of scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Assignment is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet). | 3 pts |

    Total Points: 15

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## AppApplicationofBehavioralTheory.docx**

    ### App Application of Behavioral Theory

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20963461)To effectively determine best methods for behavior change, the professional behavior analyst needs to develop a strong understanding of how to analyze the situation, including the target behavior, antecedent conditions, and consequences for the behavior. Understanding the terms and phrases used in applied behavior analysis is critical to appropriately evaluate a situation and determine effective methods for behavior change.

    One of the most frequently misused terms in psychology is “negative reinforcement.” Many people use this term to describe punishment because it “sounds better.” In behavioral psychology, terms are sometimes used differently than they are in everyday language. For example, the term “reinforcement” means that the rate of a behavior is increased. The term “punishment” means the rate of a behavior is decreased. The term “positive” means a stimulus is presented, and the term “negative” means a stimulus is removed. Therefore, negative reinforcement occurs when an aversive stimulus is removed, which results in an increase in probability of the behavior it followed.

    For this Assignment, you will explore the application of behavioral theory. You will review a set of scenarios, analyze and identify the applied behavioral characteristic involved in the scenario, and explain how the scenario meets the definition of the characteristic you identified.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/modules/items/9128588)

    To Prepare

    · Review the Learning Resources for this week, including the required weekly media programs.

    · Review the “Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet” found in the Learning Resources. You will use this worksheet to complete the Assignment.

    **Assignment**(1–2 pages)

    Complete the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet. To complete the worksheet, do the following for each scenario:

    · Identify and define the following consequences used in applied behavior analysis in each scenario (i.e., positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, negative punishment).

    · Explain how each scenario meets the definition of the applied behavior analysis characteristic you identified. Within your explanation, identify each of the components of the definition within the scenario.

    _Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources._

    By Day 7 of Week 1

    **Submit** the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/assignments/3031988)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/216777/assignments/3031988)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="text-size-adjust: auto; margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://api.turnitin.com/api/lti/1p0/user/static_eula)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **PSYC_6717_Week1_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PSYC_6717_Week1_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | **12 to >10.25 ptsExcellent** Assignment demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, discerning ideas, and evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**10.25 to >8.25 ptsGood** Assignment demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment includes moderate detail, discerning ideas, and sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**8.25 to >4.5 ptsFair** Assignment demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples, discerning ideas, evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**4.5 to >0 ptsPoor** Assignment demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples discerning ideas, or sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet). | 12 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | **3 to >2.0 ptsExcellent** Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**2 to >1.0 ptsGood** Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**1 to >0.0 ptsFair** Assignment is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior sources (number or quality of scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Assignment is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet). | 3 pts |

    Total Points: 15

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Food Insecurity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Part 1:** Work with your chosen family, **create** a meal plan in which you detail opportunities for a selected family member who has Type 1 Diabetes (10-year-old son) to gain adequate access to appropriate, affordable food for 1 week. Your plan must address: – Appropriate and realistic estimated …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Part 1:** Work with your chosen family, **create** a meal plan in which you detail opportunities for a selected family member who has Type 1 Diabetes (10-year-old son) to gain adequate access to appropriate, affordable food for 1 week.

    Your plan must address:

    – Appropriate and realistic estimated budget
    – Shopping locations; include food banks within a 5-mile radius
    – Meal storage
    – Meal preparation
    – Transportation means, routes, and timing
    – Support services
    – Healthy meal planning apps that may be useful for the individual or family (e.g., [USDA MyPlate](https://www.myplate.gov/))
    – The individual’s medical conditions and cultural preferences
    – Available community resources
    – Referrals to community resources, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and/or Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Food and Nutrition Service

    **Review** the plan, related education and health counseling with all family members (the 2 parents and 10-yr-old son) in the discussion.

    **Help** the family work with community agencies in their efforts to obtain nutritional food (e.g., SNAP, WIC, other).

    **Provide** a copy of the meal plan to the individual and family.

    **Evaluate** the feasibility of your meal planning by contacting the individual/family in person. Inquire as to how the meal plan worked. Was it useful? Were they able to stay within budget and find all the items they were looking for? If not, were they able to find substitutes that were nutritionally sound? Problem-solve and provide alternatives during this evaluation.

    **Write** a 500-word summary of your interactions with the individual and/or family. Include your detailed meal plan and outcomes. As part of your summary, discuss the interprofessional nature of working with families to address food insecurity (e.g., consider agencies that you referred the family to and/or you assisted the family to access).

    **Part 2:** Defining the needs of a vulnerable population is key to providing the best care.

    Research 3 rural populations in California.

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 170 words:

    – What was most surprising to you about the demographics and social determinants of health (SDOH) in your selected locations? Why was it surprising?
    – Using the definition of underserved in which, “ _Underserved_ relates to limited access to services that are accessible, acceptable, and affordable, including healthcare” (CDC, 2022), what services were limited, difficult to access, unacceptable, or unaffordable to the patient population?
    – What relationships do you see between the SDOH and people who are medically and/or socially underserved in your selected locations?

  • [Solved] Evaluation and Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – American Psychiatric Association. (2024). [_CPT coding and reimbursementLinks to an external site._](https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/practice-management/coding-and-reimbursement) _._ https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/practice-management/coding-and-reimbursement – …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – American Psychiatric Association. (2024). [_CPT coding and reimbursementLinks to an external site._](https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/practice-management/coding-and-reimbursement) _._ https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/practice-management/coding-and-reimbursement

    – American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Section II. [In _Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders_Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787) (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

    – Buppert, C. (2021). _Nurse practitioner's business practice and legal guide_  (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    – Chapter 9, “Reimbursement for Nurse Practitioner Services”
    – Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). [_Medicare & mental health coverageLinks to an external site._](https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mln1986542-medicare-mental-health-coverage.pdf). https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mln1986542-medicare-mental-health-coverage.pdf

    – Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). [_Your billing responsibilities_Links to an external site.](https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coordination-of-Benefits-and-Recovery/ProviderServices/Your-Billing-Responsibilities). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coordination-of-Benefits-and-Recovery/ProviderServices/Your-Billing-Responsibilities

    – DeNisco, S. M. (2023). _Role development for the nurse practitioner_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    – Chapter 17, “Reimbursement for Nurse Practitioner Services” (pp. 403-427)
    – Chapter 14, “Concepts and Challenges of the Professional Nurse Practitioner” (pp. 351-362)
    – Chapter 15, “Health Policy and the Nurse Practitioner” (pp. 367-384)
    – Chapter 16, “Mentoring and Lifelong Learning”  (pp. 389-399)
    – Walden University Academic Skills Center. (2017). [_Developing SMART goals_Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=51901492). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=51901492

    – Zakhari, R. (2021). _The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual_ . Springer Publishing Company.

    – Chapter 4 “Neuroanatomy, Physiology, and Mental Illness”
    – **Document:** [E/M Patient Case Study (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/213292/files/18127684?wrap=1) [Download E/M Patient Case Study (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/213292/files/18127684/download?download_frd=1)

    – [\
    \
    EvaluationandManagement6675.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evaluationandmanagement6675-docx "EvaluationandManagement6675.docx")

  • [Solved] Health Assessment RUA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See the attached **files (1)** – NR304_Health_History_and_Physical_Assessment_Guidelines_Nov25.docx **NR304_Health_History_and_Physical_Assessment_Guidelines_Nov25.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nr304-health-history-and-p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See the attached

    **files (1)**

    – NR304_Health_History_and_Physical_Assessment_Guidelines_Nov25.docx

    **NR304_Health_History_and_Physical_Assessment_Guidelines_Nov25.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nr304-health-history-and-physical-assessment-guidelines-nov25-docx-10508547)

    **NR304_Health_History_and_Physical_Assessment_Guidelines_Nov25.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nr304-health-history-and-physical-assessment-guidelines-nov25-docx-10508547)

  • [Solved] Nursing Theories, Conceptual Models and Philosophies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Module 7:** _Literature Review_ Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or mode…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Module 7:** _Literature Review_

    Now that you had the possibility to discuss and examine the different nursing theories and models, choose the one ( or more) that must fix with your research topic. Develop a literature review including projects or researches that incorporated this theory or model as a theoretical framework.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.
    – Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
    – Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.