Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx **## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx** ase Study Analysis ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445) An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx

    **## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx**

    ase Study Analysis

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445)

    An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

    An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. In 1-2 pages, you will answer the questions provided following the case scenario. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210815/modules/items/9032293)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    Week 2 Case Study

    A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint
    pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports:
    • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour)
    • Photosensitivity
    • Facial rash that worsens with sun exposure
    • Hair thinning
    • Bilateral ankle swelling
    No recent infection. No new medications.
    Physical Examination
    • BP: 148/92 mmHg
    • Temp: 99.4°F
    • Erythematous malar rash sparing nasolabial folds
    • Tender MCP and PIP joints bilaterally
    • Mild bilateral ankle edema
    Laboratory Data
    Test Result
    Hgb 9.8 g/dL
    WBC 3,000/mm³
    Platelets 110,000/mm³
    Creatinine 1.6 mg/dL
    Urinalysis 2+ protein, RBC casts
    ESR 65 mm/hr
    ANA Positive (1:640)
    Anti-dsDNA Elevated
    Anti-Smith Positive
    Complement C3/C4 Decreased
    Questions:
    1. Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and
    symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular
    pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and
    diagnosis.
    2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease?
    3. What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? How do treatment
    strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?

    **NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the impact of the disease on the immune system? …… How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease? | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**24 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based source. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## caseStudyAnalysisadys.docx**

    ase Study Analysis

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20964445)

    An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

    Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

    An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

    In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. In 1-2 pages, you will answer the questions provided following the case scenario. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210815/modules/items/9032293)

    **To prepare:**

    By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

    **The Assignment**

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.

    Week 2 Case Study

    A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint
    pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports:
    • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour)
    • Photosensitivity
    • Facial rash that worsens with sun exposure
    • Hair thinning
    • Bilateral ankle swelling
    No recent infection. No new medications.
    Physical Examination
    • BP: 148/92 mmHg
    • Temp: 99.4°F
    • Erythematous malar rash sparing nasolabial folds
    • Tender MCP and PIP joints bilaterally
    • Mild bilateral ankle edema
    Laboratory Data
    Test Result
    Hgb 9.8 g/dL
    WBC 3,000/mm³
    Platelets 110,000/mm³
    Creatinine 1.6 mg/dL
    Urinalysis 2+ protein, RBC casts
    ESR 65 mm/hr
    ANA Positive (1:640)
    Anti-dsDNA Elevated
    Anti-Smith Positive
    Complement C3/C4 Decreased
    Questions:
    1. Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and
    symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular
    pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and
    diagnosis.
    2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease?
    3. What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? How do treatment
    strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?

    **NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.<br> <br>**24 to >22.0 ptsFair** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.<br> <br>**22 to >0 ptsPoor** The response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the impact of the disease on the immune system? …… How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease? | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**24 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based source. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] week 33

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## week33.docx **## week33.docx** Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the following: · Chapters 5, 6, and 7 from the text _Understanding Homeland Security_ (4th ed.) · Chapter 1 from the book _The U. S. Intelligence Community_ · [Local Government Emergency ManagementLi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## week33.docx

    **## week33.docx**

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the following:

    · Chapters 5, 6, and 7 from the text
    _Understanding Homeland Security_ (4th ed.)

    · Chapter 1 from the book
    _The U. S. Intelligence Community_

    ·
    [Local Government Emergency ManagementLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/docview/2791600778?accountid=32521)

    ·
    [Hurricane Harvey Hospital Flood Impacts: Accuracy of Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Hazard Areas in Harris County, TexasLinks to an external site.](https://research.ebsco.com/c/6cb5lq/viewer/html/6zo4ig7djr)

    ·
    [Factors Influencing Preparedness Self-Efficacy Among Hispanics and Latinos in The United StatesLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/docview/2698596622?accountid=32521)

    ·
    [Health and Social Impacts of California Wildfires and the Deficiencies in Current Recovery Resources: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Systems-Level IssuesLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.656418632&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897)

    ·
    [_Disasters_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/topics/disasters)

    ·
    [_About Us_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/about)

    ·
    [_Equity_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/)

    ·
    [_Controlling Our Airspace in the Age of Drones_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/controlling-our-airspace-age-drones)

    ·
    [_Office of Intelligence and Analysis_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/office-intelligence-and-analysis)

    ·
    [_Disaster Response and Recovery_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/disaster-response-and-recovery)

    ·
    [_Fusion Centers_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers)

    ·
    [_Tribal Homeland Security Advisory Council (THSAC)_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/tribal-advisory-council)

    ·
    [_Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS)_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/counter-unmanned-aircraft-systems-c-uas)

    The scenario for this assignment focuses on emergency response and homeland security. For this assignment, DHS is requesting your service as a consultant. You have received a request to analyze three events that have occurred within the past ten years in the United States. For this assignment, you will need to select three events.

    For this assignment, you will need to select one homeland security case involving a natural disaster that has occurred within the past ten years in the United States. Consider the following sources to assist you in your selection of a natural disaster case:

    ·
    [_Declared Disasters_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/disaster/declarations)

    ·
    [_Disaster Declarations for States and Counties_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/data-visualization/disaster-declarations-states-and-counties)

    ·
    [_Hazard Mitigation Assistance_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/grants/mitigation/hazard-mitigation-assistance-guidance)

    You will need to find scholarly or credible sources that provide information on your selected cases, so keep this in mind as you select them. You have been asked to present your analysis through slides with audio narration. Please write a written script for the audio narration for each slide and place the script in the notes section for each slide. The slide content should reflect a style and format consistent with guidance from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center on PowerPoint presentations.

    **Format:** For each slide, there will be two content areas: the slide itself and the “notes” section corresponding to each slide.

    · Slide content: As you prepare your slides, follow guidance from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center on PowerPoint presentations.

    · Narration with script: For each slide, prepare a script and place the script in the “notes” section corresponding to each slide. Record your voice reading the script word for word for each slide. This will support accessibility for those attending your presentation.

    In your slide presentation,

    · Explain methods and response effectiveness of FEMA in a natural disaster case in the United States in the past ten years.

    · Differentiate homeland security responsibilities and functions of agencies across jurisdictions for natural disasters, threats, technological hazards, and biological hazards.

    · Examine the use of fusion centers, intelligence, drones, and skills of members of a DHS agency for one of the following: a natural disaster, threats, or hazards.

    · Analyze applications for the “intelligence cycle” and the Office of Intelligence Analysis for homeland security policy issues in federal, state, tribal, and local jurisdictions.

    · Evaluate ethical, legal, and social justice issues for homeland security actions in a natural disaster case and a diversity policy issue in homeland security.

    The slide presentation

    · must be six to eight slides in length (not including title and references slides) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    · must include a separate title slide with the following in title case:

    · title of presentation in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · student’s name

    · name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · course name and number

    · instructor’s name

    · due date

    · must utilize academic voice. Review the
    [_Academic Voice_](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice)

    must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

    · Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    must use at least four scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text

    must include a separate references slide that is formatted according to APA Style

    **## week33.docx**

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the following:

    · Chapters 5, 6, and 7 from the text
    _Understanding Homeland Security_ (4th ed.)

    · Chapter 1 from the book
    _The U. S. Intelligence Community_

    ·
    [Local Government Emergency ManagementLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/docview/2791600778?accountid=32521)

    ·
    [Hurricane Harvey Hospital Flood Impacts: Accuracy of Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Hazard Areas in Harris County, TexasLinks to an external site.](https://research.ebsco.com/c/6cb5lq/viewer/html/6zo4ig7djr)

    ·
    [Factors Influencing Preparedness Self-Efficacy Among Hispanics and Latinos in The United StatesLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/docview/2698596622?accountid=32521)

    ·
    [Health and Social Impacts of California Wildfires and the Deficiencies in Current Recovery Resources: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Systems-Level IssuesLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.656418632&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8856897)

    ·
    [_Disasters_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/topics/disasters)

    ·
    [_About Us_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/about)

    ·
    [_Equity_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/)

    ·
    [_Controlling Our Airspace in the Age of Drones_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/controlling-our-airspace-age-drones)

    ·
    [_Office of Intelligence and Analysis_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/office-intelligence-and-analysis)

    ·
    [_Disaster Response and Recovery_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/disaster-response-and-recovery)

    ·
    [_Fusion Centers_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers)

    ·
    [_Tribal Homeland Security Advisory Council (THSAC)_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/tribal-advisory-council)

    ·
    [_Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS)_ Links to an external site.](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/counter-unmanned-aircraft-systems-c-uas)

    The scenario for this assignment focuses on emergency response and homeland security. For this assignment, DHS is requesting your service as a consultant. You have received a request to analyze three events that have occurred within the past ten years in the United States. For this assignment, you will need to select three events.

    For this assignment, you will need to select one homeland security case involving a natural disaster that has occurred within the past ten years in the United States. Consider the following sources to assist you in your selection of a natural disaster case:

    ·
    [_Declared Disasters_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/disaster/declarations)

    ·
    [_Disaster Declarations for States and Counties_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/data-visualization/disaster-declarations-states-and-counties)

    ·
    [_Hazard Mitigation Assistance_ Links to an external site.](https://www.fema.gov/grants/mitigation/hazard-mitigation-assistance-guidance)

    You will need to find scholarly or credible sources that provide information on your selected cases, so keep this in mind as you select them. You have been asked to present your analysis through slides with audio narration. Please write a written script for the audio narration for each slide and place the script in the notes section for each slide. The slide content should reflect a style and format consistent with guidance from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center on PowerPoint presentations.

    **Format:** For each slide, there will be two content areas: the slide itself and the “notes” section corresponding to each slide.

    · Slide content: As you prepare your slides, follow guidance from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center on PowerPoint presentations.

    · Narration with script: For each slide, prepare a script and place the script in the “notes” section corresponding to each slide. Record your voice reading the script word for word for each slide. This will support accessibility for those attending your presentation.

    In your slide presentation,

    · Explain methods and response effectiveness of FEMA in a natural disaster case in the United States in the past ten years.

    · Differentiate homeland security responsibilities and functions of agencies across jurisdictions for natural disasters, threats, technological hazards, and biological hazards.

    · Examine the use of fusion centers, intelligence, drones, and skills of members of a DHS agency for one of the following: a natural disaster, threats, or hazards.

    · Analyze applications for the “intelligence cycle” and the Office of Intelligence Analysis for homeland security policy issues in federal, state, tribal, and local jurisdictions.

    · Evaluate ethical, legal, and social justice issues for homeland security actions in a natural disaster case and a diversity policy issue in homeland security.

    The slide presentation

    · must be six to eight slides in length (not including title and references slides) and formatted according to
    [_APA Style_](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    · must include a separate title slide with the following in title case:

    · title of presentation in bold font

    · Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

    · student’s name

    · name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    · course name and number

    · instructor’s name

    · due date

    · must utilize academic voice. Review the
    [_Academic Voice_](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice)

    must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

    · Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    must use at least four scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text

    must include a separate references slide that is formatted according to APA Style

  • [Solved] neva

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment **files (1)** – ## nevamidterm.docx **## nevamidterm.docx** **Digital Biographies: Black Historical Figures Project-Midterm** **Project Overview** Students will research a Black historical figure from Africa, the Americas, or the Caribbean and create a digital product showcasin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## nevamidterm.docx

    **## nevamidterm.docx**

    **Digital Biographies: Black Historical Figures Project-Midterm**

    **Project Overview**

    Students will research a Black historical figure from Africa, the Americas, or the Caribbean and create a digital product showcasing their contributions, legacy, and cultural impact. This project emphasizes diverse representation, including Afro-Latinx and Caribbean figures often underrepresented in society.

    The formats that you can use are listed in module seven under project format options. You can always use this
    [link](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BVxSfVLIGV6GOOXwTZxz5ggiSfZhEbt-BG9oJjGTBVM/edit?usp=sharing) to access the complete document.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Conduct in-depth historical research using primary and secondary sources

    · Analyze the cultural, social, and political contexts of historical figures

    · Create professional digital content using appropriate technology tools

    · Develop critical thinking about representation and historical narratives

    · Practice digital literacy and media creation skills

    **Project Timeline**

    **Total Duration:** 3-4 weeks

    ·
    **Week 1:** Research and source gathering

    ·
    **Week 2:** Content development and outline creation

    ·
    **Week 3:** Source submission and product development

    ·
    **Week 4:** Digital product creation and submission

    **Part 1: Selecting a Historical Figure**

    **Requirements**

    Students can choose ONE figure from the provided categories. Each student should select a different person to ensure diverse representation across the class. If more than two people have selected a historical figure, please select another person. If you want to cover someone who isn't listed, please email me to confirm your selection.

    **Category A: Afro-Latinx Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Gaspar Yanga** (Mexico) – Leader of the first free African settlement in the Americas

    ·
    **José Leonardo Chirino** (Venezuela) – Leader of the 1795 slave rebellion

    ·
    **Vicente Guerrero**(Mexico)- First Black Mexican President

    ·
    **Arturo Alfonso Schomburg** (Puerto Rico/USA) – Historian and curator of Black history

    ·
    **Juana Ramírez** (Venezuela) – Independence war heroine

    ·
    **Victoria Santa Cruz** (Peru) – Poet, choreographer, and Afro-Peruvian cultural activist

    ·
    **Adalberto Ortiz** (Ecuador) – Afro-Ecuadorian writer and diplomat

    ·
    **Beatriz Nascimento** (Brazil) – Historian and quilombo researcher

    ·
    **Lélia Gonzalez** (Brazil) – Intellectual and founder of Black feminism in Brazil

    ·
    **Juan Gualberto Gómez** (Cuba) – Journalist and independence activist

    ·
    **Esteban Montejo** (Cuba) – Former enslaved person and centenarian storyteller

    **Category B: Caribbean Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Toussaint Louverture** (Haiti) – Revolutionary leader of Haitian Revolution

    ·
    **Nanny of the Maroons** (Jamaica) – Leader of Jamaican Maroons

    ·
    **Samuel Sharpe** (Jamaica) – Baptist deacon and rebel leader

    ·
    **Claudia Jones** (Trinidad/UK) – Journalist and civil rights activist

    ·
    **Marcus Garvey** (Jamaica) – Pan-Africanist leader

    ·
    **Walter Rodney** (Guyana) – Historian and political activist

    ·
    **Aimé Césaire** (Martinique) – Poet and politician, founder of Négritude movement

    ·
    **C.L.R. James** (Trinidad) – Historian, journalist, and socialist

    ·
    **Frantz Fanon** (Martinique) – Psychiatrist, philosopher, and revolutionary

    ·
    **Jean-Jacques Dessalines** (Haiti) – First ruler of independent Haiti

    ·
    **Mary Seacole** (Jamaica/UK) – Nurse and businesswoman in the Crimean War

    ·
    **Bob Marley** (Jamaica) – Musician and cultural icon

    **Category C: African and African American Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Harriet Tubman** – Abolitionist and Underground Railroad conductor

    ·
    **Frederick Douglass** – Abolitionist, orator, and writer

    ·
    **Sojourner Truth** – Abolitionist and women's rights activist

    ·
    **Ida B. Wells** – Journalist and anti-lynching activist

    ·
    **Booker T. Washington** – Educator and advisor

    ·
    **W.E.B. Du Bois** – Sociologist, historian, and civil rights activist

    ·
    **Zora Neale Hurston** – Anthropologist and author

    ·
    **Bayard Rustin** – Civil rights organizer

    ·
    **Fannie Lou Hamer** – Voting rights activist

    ·
    **Kwame Nkrumah** (Ghana) – Pan-Africanist and first Prime Minister/President

    ·
    **Patrice Lumumba** (Congo) – Independence leader and first Prime Minister

    ·
    **Queen Nzinga** (Angola) – 17th-century warrior queen

    ·
    **Yaa Asantewaa** (Ghana) – Queen Mother and military leader

    **Part 2: Research Requirements**

    **Essential Research Components**

    Students must gather information on the following:

    1.
    **Biographical Information**

    · Birth and death dates/locations

    · Family background and early life

    · Education and formative experiences

    2.
    **Historical Context**

    · Time period and major historical events

    · Social, political, and economic conditions

    · Cultural environment and influences

    3.
    **Major Contributions**

    · Key accomplishments and achievements

    · Leadership roles and positions held

    · Specific actions or works created

    4.
    **Challenges and Obstacles**

    · Forms of oppression or resistance faced

    · Personal struggles and how they were overcome

    · Opposition encountered

    5.
    **Legacy and Impact**

    · Immediate effects of their work

    · Long-term influence on society

    · Contemporary relevance

    · How they're remembered today

    6.
    **Primary and Secondary Sources**

    · Minimum 3 primary sources (speeches, letters, photographs, documents)

    · Minimum 3 secondary sources (books, scholarly articles, documentaries)

    · At least 2 sources must be from academic databases or scholarly publications

    **Research Documentation**

    Students must maintain an
    **Annotated Bibliography** including:

    · Full citation in MLA  format

    · 2-3 sentence summary of each source

    · 2-3 sentence evaluation of its impact or effectiveness

    · 2-3 sentence reflection on how it will be useful to your project

    **## nevamidterm.docx**

    **Digital Biographies: Black Historical Figures Project-Midterm**

    **Project Overview**

    Students will research a Black historical figure from Africa, the Americas, or the Caribbean and create a digital product showcasing their contributions, legacy, and cultural impact. This project emphasizes diverse representation, including Afro-Latinx and Caribbean figures often underrepresented in society.

    The formats that you can use are listed in module seven under project format options. You can always use this
    [link](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BVxSfVLIGV6GOOXwTZxz5ggiSfZhEbt-BG9oJjGTBVM/edit?usp=sharing) to access the complete document.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Conduct in-depth historical research using primary and secondary sources

    · Analyze the cultural, social, and political contexts of historical figures

    · Create professional digital content using appropriate technology tools

    · Develop critical thinking about representation and historical narratives

    · Practice digital literacy and media creation skills

    **Project Timeline**

    **Total Duration:** 3-4 weeks

    ·
    **Week 1:** Research and source gathering

    ·
    **Week 2:** Content development and outline creation

    ·
    **Week 3:** Source submission and product development

    ·
    **Week 4:** Digital product creation and submission

    **Part 1: Selecting a Historical Figure**

    **Requirements**

    Students can choose ONE figure from the provided categories. Each student should select a different person to ensure diverse representation across the class. If more than two people have selected a historical figure, please select another person. If you want to cover someone who isn't listed, please email me to confirm your selection.

    **Category A: Afro-Latinx Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Gaspar Yanga** (Mexico) – Leader of the first free African settlement in the Americas

    ·
    **José Leonardo Chirino** (Venezuela) – Leader of the 1795 slave rebellion

    ·
    **Vicente Guerrero**(Mexico)- First Black Mexican President

    ·
    **Arturo Alfonso Schomburg** (Puerto Rico/USA) – Historian and curator of Black history

    ·
    **Juana Ramírez** (Venezuela) – Independence war heroine

    ·
    **Victoria Santa Cruz** (Peru) – Poet, choreographer, and Afro-Peruvian cultural activist

    ·
    **Adalberto Ortiz** (Ecuador) – Afro-Ecuadorian writer and diplomat

    ·
    **Beatriz Nascimento** (Brazil) – Historian and quilombo researcher

    ·
    **Lélia Gonzalez** (Brazil) – Intellectual and founder of Black feminism in Brazil

    ·
    **Juan Gualberto Gómez** (Cuba) – Journalist and independence activist

    ·
    **Esteban Montejo** (Cuba) – Former enslaved person and centenarian storyteller

    **Category B: Caribbean Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Toussaint Louverture** (Haiti) – Revolutionary leader of Haitian Revolution

    ·
    **Nanny of the Maroons** (Jamaica) – Leader of Jamaican Maroons

    ·
    **Samuel Sharpe** (Jamaica) – Baptist deacon and rebel leader

    ·
    **Claudia Jones** (Trinidad/UK) – Journalist and civil rights activist

    ·
    **Marcus Garvey** (Jamaica) – Pan-Africanist leader

    ·
    **Walter Rodney** (Guyana) – Historian and political activist

    ·
    **Aimé Césaire** (Martinique) – Poet and politician, founder of Négritude movement

    ·
    **C.L.R. James** (Trinidad) – Historian, journalist, and socialist

    ·
    **Frantz Fanon** (Martinique) – Psychiatrist, philosopher, and revolutionary

    ·
    **Jean-Jacques Dessalines** (Haiti) – First ruler of independent Haiti

    ·
    **Mary Seacole** (Jamaica/UK) – Nurse and businesswoman in the Crimean War

    ·
    **Bob Marley** (Jamaica) – Musician and cultural icon

    **Category C: African and African American Historical Figures**

    ·
    **Harriet Tubman** – Abolitionist and Underground Railroad conductor

    ·
    **Frederick Douglass** – Abolitionist, orator, and writer

    ·
    **Sojourner Truth** – Abolitionist and women's rights activist

    ·
    **Ida B. Wells** – Journalist and anti-lynching activist

    ·
    **Booker T. Washington** – Educator and advisor

    ·
    **W.E.B. Du Bois** – Sociologist, historian, and civil rights activist

    ·
    **Zora Neale Hurston** – Anthropologist and author

    ·
    **Bayard Rustin** – Civil rights organizer

    ·
    **Fannie Lou Hamer** – Voting rights activist

    ·
    **Kwame Nkrumah** (Ghana) – Pan-Africanist and first Prime Minister/President

    ·
    **Patrice Lumumba** (Congo) – Independence leader and first Prime Minister

    ·
    **Queen Nzinga** (Angola) – 17th-century warrior queen

    ·
    **Yaa Asantewaa** (Ghana) – Queen Mother and military leader

    **Part 2: Research Requirements**

    **Essential Research Components**

    Students must gather information on the following:

    1.
    **Biographical Information**

    · Birth and death dates/locations

    · Family background and early life

    · Education and formative experiences

    2.
    **Historical Context**

    · Time period and major historical events

    · Social, political, and economic conditions

    · Cultural environment and influences

    3.
    **Major Contributions**

    · Key accomplishments and achievements

    · Leadership roles and positions held

    · Specific actions or works created

    4.
    **Challenges and Obstacles**

    · Forms of oppression or resistance faced

    · Personal struggles and how they were overcome

    · Opposition encountered

    5.
    **Legacy and Impact**

    · Immediate effects of their work

    · Long-term influence on society

    · Contemporary relevance

    · How they're remembered today

    6.
    **Primary and Secondary Sources**

    · Minimum 3 primary sources (speeches, letters, photographs, documents)

    · Minimum 3 secondary sources (books, scholarly articles, documentaries)

    · At least 2 sources must be from academic databases or scholarly publications

    **Research Documentation**

    Students must maintain an
    **Annotated Bibliography** including:

    · Full citation in MLA  format

    · 2-3 sentence summary of each source

    · 2-3 sentence evaluation of its impact or effectiveness

    · 2-3 sentence reflection on how it will be useful to your project

  • [Solved] Outbreak Investigation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Note: This week's discussion is a reflection on the experience of completing this assignment.** Try to complete your assignment early in the week to give yourself time to create your discussion and respond to peers. In the fields of epidemiology and public health, the ability to swiftly and effect…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Note: This week's discussion is a reflection on the experience of completing this assignment.** Try to complete your assignment early in the week to give yourself time to create your discussion and respond to peers.

    In the fields of epidemiology and public health, the ability to swiftly and effectively investigate disease outbreaks is a critical skill for epidemiologists and other health professionals. Outbreak investigations not only serve to identify the source and contain the spread of infectious diseases, but they also provide valuable insights into disease patterns, risk factors, and effective interventions. This knowledge can inform public health policies and strategies, ultimately protecting communities and improving health outcomes. In this assignment, we will delve into the importance of outbreak investigation and practice some of the investigative and critical thinking skills you will need in your career.

    ## Instructions

    For this assignment you will need to access the CDC's [Solve the OutbreakLinks to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/digital-social-media-tools/mobile/applications/sto/web-app.html) tool.

    – If needed, please access the [508 Accessible: Solve the Outbreak Links to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/digital-social-media-tools/mobile/applications/sto/508STO.html) page and work with your instructor on options to submit the assignment.

    After you have accessed Solve the Outbreak, look for the Level 1 section. You should see thirteen possible outbreak scenarios for you to choose from. You can earn up to 1500 points on a scenario. Your goal for this assignment is to score at least 1000 points on three of the scenarios and score a total of 5000 points total across all the scenarios you attempt.

    As you complete the simulations, be sure to click on the supplementary materials embedded within the activities so that you can learn more about the disease conditions as well as important epidemiological terms.

    To complete this assignment, do the following, after accessing the Solve the Outbreak website:

    – Click on Level 1.
    – Preview the available scenarios.
    – Select your first scenario and work through it until you've achieved a score of at least 1000 points.
    – Take a screenshot of your completion screen that shows you scored at least 1000 points.
    – Insert the screenshot into a Word document.
    – You should have one screenshot in your Word document.
    – Complete the same steps for a second and third scenario.
    – You should have three screenshots of your score pages in your Word document now.
    – At this point you should have at minimum 3000 total points and at most 4500 total points. Your goal is to reach 5000 total points.
    – Work through as many additional scenarios as you need to reach 5000 total points on the Solve the Outbreak challenge.
    – After reaching 5000 total points, click on “Scores” at the bottom of the screen and then, click on “Stats.”
    – Take a screenshot of your “Stats” screen that shows you have at least 5000 total points.
    – Insert the screenshot into your Word document.
    – You should now have 4 total screenshots.
    – Submit the Word document with your 4 screenshots in the assignment area.

    ## Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    – Competency 1: Apply epidemiological methods to the breadth of settings and situations in public health practice.
    – Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on one of the Solve the Outbreak scenarios.
    – Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on a second Solve the Outbreak scenarios.
    – Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on a third Solve the Outbreak scenarios.
    – Submit a screenshot of the Your Stats page that shows a cumulative score of at least 5000 points.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Week 9 Assignment: Outbreak Investigation |
    | — |
    | Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
    | — | — | — |
    | Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on one of the Solve the Outbreak scenarios. | 50 pts<br>DEMONSTRATED<br>YES<br>0 pts<br>NOT_DEMONSTRATED<br>NO | / 50 pts |
    | Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on a second Solve the Outbreak scenarios. | 50 pts<br>DEMONSTRATED<br>YES<br>0 pts<br>NOT_DEMONSTRATED<br>NO | / 50 pts |
    | Submit a screenshot that shows a score of at least 1000 points on a third Solve the Outbreak scenarios. | 50 pts<br>DEMONSTRATED<br>YES<br>0 pts<br>NOT_DEMONSTRATED<br>NO | / 50 pts |
    | Submit a screenshot of the Your Stats page that shows a cumulative score of at least 5000 points. | 50 pts<br>DEMONSTRATED<br>YES<br>0 pts<br>NOT_DEMONSTRATED<br>NO | / 50 pts |
    | Total Points: 0 |

    Week 9 Assignment: Outbreak Investigation

    Choose a submission type

    [PreviousWhat You Need to Know](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/55963/modules/items/2816557)

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc – ## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx **## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc** [removed] **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx** **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet** It may seem to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc

    – ## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx

    **## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

    [removed]

    **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

    **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

    It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

    Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

    As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

    In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

    **Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
    **mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

    · Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

    · Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

    ·
    **Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

    **The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

    **Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

    Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

    · Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

    · Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

    **Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

    Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

    · Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

    · How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

    · An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

    **Part 3: Fact Sheet**

    Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

    · Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

    · Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

    Assignment document should include:

    1. Title page

    2. Introductory paragraph

    3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

    4. Fact sheet

    5. Summary/conclusions

    6. References

    By Day 7 of Week 2

    **Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

    **NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

    **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

    It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

    Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

    As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

    In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

    **Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
    **mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

    · Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

    · Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

    ·
    **Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

    **The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

    **Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

    Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

    · Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

    · Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

    **Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

    Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

    · Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

    · How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

    · An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

    **Part 3: Fact Sheet**

    Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

    · Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

    · Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

    Assignment document should include:

    1. Title page

    2. Introductory paragraph

    3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

    4. Fact sheet

    5. Summary/conclusions

    6. References

    By Day 7 of Week 2

    **Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

    **NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

    [removed]

    **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

    **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

    It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

    Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

    As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

    In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

    **Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
    **mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

    · Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

    · Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

    ·
    **Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

    **The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

    **Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

    Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

    · Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

    · Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

    **Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

    Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

    · Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

    · How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

    · An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

    **Part 3: Fact Sheet**

    Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

    · Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

    · Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

    Assignment document should include:

    1. Title page

    2. Introductory paragraph

    3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

    4. Fact sheet

    5. Summary/conclusions

    6. References

    By Day 7 of Week 2

    **Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

    **NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## USW1_NURS_6050_AgendaComparisonGridTemplateadys.doc**

    [removed]

    **## AgendaComparisonGridandFactSheetadys.docx**

    **Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet**

    It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

    Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

    As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

    In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/210535/modules/items/9007612)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

    **Tip:** You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
    **mental health Obama presidential agenda**.

    · Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

    · Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

    ·
    **Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment**.

    **The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.**

    **Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid**

    Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

    · Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

    · Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

    **Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis**

    Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

    · Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

    · How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

    · An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

    **Part 3: Fact Sheet**

    Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

    · Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

    · Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

    Assignment document should include:

    1. Title page

    2. Introductory paragraph

    3. Agenda comparison grid and analysis

    4. Fact sheet

    5. Summary/conclusions

    6. References

    By Day 7 of Week 2

    **Submit** your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

    **NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues | **30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent** Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**26 to >23.0 ptsGood** Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsFair** Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<br> <br>**20 to >0 ptsPoor** Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Response includes 2 or fewer resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Policy Brief

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Building on the topic the student used for the first assignment (first assignment is attached), this assignment will require the student to write a one page policy brief to be sent to their legislator. A policy brief is used to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current problem or po…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Building on the topic the student used for the first assignment (first assignment is attached), this assignment will require the student to write a one page policy brief to be sent to their legislator.

    A policy brief is used to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current

    problem or policy concern and present the need to adopt the preferred alternative

    or course of action outlined. It is commonly produced in response to a request

    directly from a decision-­‐maker (legislator) or within an organization that intends to

    advocate for the position detailed in the brief.

    Efficient policy briefs include several common features.

    Those features include:

    • The brief is focused. All aspects discussed are focused on achieving

    the intended audience to take the requested action.

    • The brief is professional and not academic. The usual audience is not

    interested in research or analysis conducted to produce the evidence.

    Rather they are interested in knowing the writer’s perspective on the

    problem and potential solutions, based on NEW and convincing

    evidence.

    • The brief should be evidence-­‐based. The policy brief serves as a

    communication tool produced by someone with a vested interest in

    the policy (stakeholder), therefore the target audience will only be

    convinced by arguments that are supported by evidence.

    • The brief should also be concise. One page documents are the ones

    most likely to be read by busy lawmakers and their legislative teams.

    The format of the brief should be written as a one-­‐page single spaced document.

    It does not need to include a title page, running header, or abstract. However, all

    references in-­‐text and the reference list MUST be in APA format.

    The policy brief should include the following components:

    • An interesting title to attract the attention of the reader.

    • A clear and concise statement of the problem or issue.

    • A short overview of the root causes of the problem or issue.

    • One to two recommendations with a least two rationales with

    supporting evidence to validate the recommendations made.

    Evidence should come from scholarly journals, not textbooks or organization web sites. Three scholarly journal articles are required

    to be used.

    • Finally, the conclusion with a summary of the action the brief is

    requesting.

    You can find examples of each of these in your book. Once your policy brief has

    been reviewed by the faculty member, we encourage you to send it to the person

    whom your letter is addressed.

    Components of the Policy Brief:

    Title and Statement of the Problem – The policy brief has an interesting title and

    the statement of the problem is clear and concise.

    Root Causes – The root causes of the issue are addressed.

    Recommendations – 1-­‐2 recommendations for action are provided with solid

    supporting evidence.

    Conclusion – Brief summary of the action the policy brief is asking for.

    References – One a separate page, in APA format, list the scholarly references used.

    – [\
    \
    WorkplaceViolenceFINAL.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/workplaceviolencefinal-docx-10512465 "WorkplaceViolenceFINAL.docx")

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx **## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx** The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, _The Landmarks of Tom…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx

    **## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx**

    The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

    The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,
    _The Landmarks of Tomorrow_  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

    Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

    In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

    _Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers._

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211760/modules/items/8951234)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.

    · Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

    · Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

    **The Assignment:**

    · Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.

    · Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

    · Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.

    · Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | · <br>**Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role. | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**13 to >11.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**11 to >10.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Presentation includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## TheNurseLeaderasKnowledgeWorkerpowerpointeraydel.docx**

    The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

    The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,
    _The Landmarks of Tomorrow_  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

    Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

    In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

    _Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers._

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211760/modules/items/8951234)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.

    · Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

    · Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

    **The Assignment:**

    · Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.

    · Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

    · Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.

    · Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | · <br>**Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role. | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**13 to >11.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.<br> <br>**11 to >10.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.<br> <br>**10 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Presentation includes: 1 or no resources. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Lorem

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Lorem.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## CasestudyRaydel.docx **## CasestudyRaydel.docx** Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA, GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete presc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## CasestudyRaydel.docx

    **## CasestudyRaydel.docx**

    Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required
    learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,
    GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each
    medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route,
    frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you
    would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if
    applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA
    format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

    Note on Assignment Attempts
    Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to
    due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one
    submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple
    submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted
    unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted prior to the assignment
    deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment

    prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is not
    permitted.
    Late Assignment Policy
    Students are expected to submit assignments by the due dates noted in the course and
    welcome announcement. In extenuating circumstances, such as illness, the student
    must contact the instructor as soon as possible to discuss the situation. In those
    circumstances, faculty will determine the appropriate course of action for the student.
    Depending on the situation, these actions may include recommendations to drop the
    course (if within the university drop/withdrawal period), acceptance of some or all of the
    overdue assignments with or without penalties, or failure to accept assignments.
    Assignments submitted late without the prior agreement of the instructor, outside of an
    emergency absence, or in violation of agreements for late submission, will receive a
    grade reduction for the assignment amounting up to 20%. Each day late will result in a
    4% point deduction up to day 5. After 5 days, the assignment will be graded a zero.
    However ALL assignments, quizzes, and exams must be completed to pass the
    course.

    Wishing you much success,

    Dr. Ridley

    WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 1-2)

    SCENARIO 1
    What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each
    prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action
    (MOA)?
    Repatha 140 mg IV every 2 weeks #1 1 RF
    Hyzaar (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide) 50/25 mg PO daily #30 3 RF
    digoxin 1.25 mg PO daily #30 1 RF
    hydralazine/isosorbide mononitrate (BiDil) 37.5 mg/20 mg PO every 8 hours #90
    1 RF
    clonidine 0.3 mg patch PO once weekly #4 1 RF

    SCENARIO 2
    A patient with stable angina is prescribed nitroglycerin. The provider avoids oral tablets
    and instead chooses a sublingual or transdermal formulation. Why is oral nitroglycerin
    not clinically useful? Discuss how first-pass metabolism affects nitroglycerin’s
    bioavailability and define both terms. Identify the route of administration with 100%
    bioavailability and explain how alternative routes overcome the first pass effect. Include
    a sample prescription for nitroglycerin.

    SCENARIO 3
    Where are the majority of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes located? Using the
    Drugs.com pill identifier, enter the following characteristics to identify the medication
    AND strength. What CYP enzyme metabolizes this medication? How can this
    information be applied to medication therapy management? Write a sample prescription
    for the identified medication and strength.
    Imprint (E 137)  Shape (Round) Color (Pink)  Form (Tablet)  Scoring (None)

    SCENARIO 4
    KU is a 47-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He
    smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on lisinopril 40 mg po daily, liraglutide (Victoza)
    0.6 mg subcutaneously once daily and St. John’s Wort. Fasting lipid profile shows total
    cholesterol 260 mg/dL, LDL 180 mg/dL, HDL 43 mg/dL, and TG 185 mg/dL. He is 5’9”
    and weighs 204 lbs. What treatment plan would you implement for KU? What are GOAL
    Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and Triglyceride levels for KU? What is his BMI per
    Medscape calculator? What patient monitoring and education would you provide? How
    many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them
    specifically.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## CasestudyRaydel.docx**

    Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required
    learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,
    GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each
    medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route,
    frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you
    would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if
    applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA
    format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

    Note on Assignment Attempts
    Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to
    due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one
    submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple
    submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted
    unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted prior to the assignment
    deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment

    prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is not
    permitted.
    Late Assignment Policy
    Students are expected to submit assignments by the due dates noted in the course and
    welcome announcement. In extenuating circumstances, such as illness, the student
    must contact the instructor as soon as possible to discuss the situation. In those
    circumstances, faculty will determine the appropriate course of action for the student.
    Depending on the situation, these actions may include recommendations to drop the
    course (if within the university drop/withdrawal period), acceptance of some or all of the
    overdue assignments with or without penalties, or failure to accept assignments.
    Assignments submitted late without the prior agreement of the instructor, outside of an
    emergency absence, or in violation of agreements for late submission, will receive a
    grade reduction for the assignment amounting up to 20%. Each day late will result in a
    4% point deduction up to day 5. After 5 days, the assignment will be graded a zero.
    However ALL assignments, quizzes, and exams must be completed to pass the
    course.

    Wishing you much success,

    Dr. Ridley

    WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 1-2)

    SCENARIO 1
    What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each
    prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action
    (MOA)?
    Repatha 140 mg IV every 2 weeks #1 1 RF
    Hyzaar (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide) 50/25 mg PO daily #30 3 RF
    digoxin 1.25 mg PO daily #30 1 RF
    hydralazine/isosorbide mononitrate (BiDil) 37.5 mg/20 mg PO every 8 hours #90
    1 RF
    clonidine 0.3 mg patch PO once weekly #4 1 RF

    SCENARIO 2
    A patient with stable angina is prescribed nitroglycerin. The provider avoids oral tablets
    and instead chooses a sublingual or transdermal formulation. Why is oral nitroglycerin
    not clinically useful? Discuss how first-pass metabolism affects nitroglycerin’s
    bioavailability and define both terms. Identify the route of administration with 100%
    bioavailability and explain how alternative routes overcome the first pass effect. Include
    a sample prescription for nitroglycerin.

    SCENARIO 3
    Where are the majority of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes located? Using the
    Drugs.com pill identifier, enter the following characteristics to identify the medication
    AND strength. What CYP enzyme metabolizes this medication? How can this
    information be applied to medication therapy management? Write a sample prescription
    for the identified medication and strength.
    Imprint (E 137)  Shape (Round) Color (Pink)  Form (Tablet)  Scoring (None)

    SCENARIO 4
    KU is a 47-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He
    smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on lisinopril 40 mg po daily, liraglutide (Victoza)
    0.6 mg subcutaneously once daily and St. John’s Wort. Fasting lipid profile shows total
    cholesterol 260 mg/dL, LDL 180 mg/dL, HDL 43 mg/dL, and TG 185 mg/dL. He is 5’9”
    and weighs 204 lbs. What treatment plan would you implement for KU? What are GOAL
    Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and Triglyceride levels for KU? What is his BMI per
    Medscape calculator? What patient monitoring and education would you provide? How
    many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them
    specifically.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

    Total Points: 100