Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf – IMG_6870.jpeg – Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf** Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf

    – IMG_6870.jpeg
    – Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508721)

    **Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-01-26at4-00-32pm-png-10508727)

    **Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-01-26at4-00-32pm-png-10508727)

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508721)

    **Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-01-26at4-00-32pm-png-10508727)

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508721)

    **Screenshot2026-01-26at4.00.32PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-01-26at4-00-32pm-png-10508727)

  • [Solved] casestudy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf – IMG_6870.jpeg **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf** Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf

    – IMG_6870.jpeg

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508713)

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508713)

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508713)

    **## BloodTransfusiondone.pdf**

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Blood Transfusion

    1. Which findings from the present problem are most important and noticed by the nurse as clinically significant?

    Most Important Findings Clinical Significance

    Procedural Safety Principles: Blood Administration

    2. What will you do if you have not performed blood administration in the clinical setting?

    3. If the nurse was going to administer another unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC), what supplies does the nurse

    need to gather?

    4. Review and summarize essential steps and knowledge the nurse will apply to administer the remainder of this
    transfusion safely.

    5. What will the nurse communicate to educate the patient or family about the need for this procedure and what to
    expect?

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    Evaluation

    6. You collect the following assessment data. Make a clinical judgment for each finding by placing an "x" in the
    appropriate column if the finding is expected or unexpected.

    Assessment Finding Expected Unexpected
    T: 98.2 F/36.8 C (oral)
    P: 108 (regular)
    R: 25 (regular)
    BP: 128/83
    O2 sat: 88% RA
    Appears anxious
    Breathing rapidly
    Skin is cool and clammy

    7. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. Declined
    c. No change

    8. Complete the table below for each home medication.

    Medication Pharm. Class Mechanism of Action Expected Outcome
    Metoprolol

    Lisinopril

    Furosemide

    Ferrous gluconate

    Potassium chloride

    9. Which home medication(s) that were not taken would have the greatest impact on his current status?

    Medication Rationale

    Lucy Myers

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    10. Calculate the patient's total intake and output, then interpret the significance of your findings.
    Intake and Output Clinical Significance

    11. What clinical data is most important and must be recognized as clinically significant by the nurse?

    Most Important Data Clinical Significance

    12. To interpret the clinical data collected, list at least two possible problems for this patient. Which problem is the

    priority?
    Possible Problems Priority Problem Pathophysiology of Priority Problem

    13. After evaluating the patient, identify the current nursing priority and which action(s) the nurse should take. List

    interventions by priority and the expected outcome.
    Nursing Priority
    Priority Intervention(s) Rationale Expected Outcome

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    14. Recognizing a potential problem, you use Identify-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR)
    to update the provider. Summarize what you would communicate for an ISBAR report.

    I identify Specify who you are/where you work.

    • Yourself: name/position/location

    • Patient: name/age/gender

    S situation What is the problem/reason for contact?

    Concise summary of primary problem:

    B background If urgent, state concern. Provide concise/relevant history

    • Primary problem/diagnosis:

    • Day of admission/post-op day #:

    • Relevant past medical history:

    • Relevant treatments/interventions:

    A assessment Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical data.

    State your concern by communicating
    concerning clinical data:

    • Vital signs

    • Nursing assessment

    • Lab/diagnostic results

    Trend of most important clinical data
    (stable-increasing/decreasing):

    R recommendation Request specific advice/interventions. Clarify expectations.

    • Nurse suggestions to advance the plan
    of care:

    • What do you recommend?

    • Repeat and state back new
    orders/confirm plan of care:

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    15. Identify the rationale for each provider order and its expected outcome.

    Provider Orders Rationale Expected Outcome
    Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Discontinue blood
    transfusion

    Apply oxygen to maintain
    oxygen saturation >92%

    Dosage Calculation: Furosemide 40 mg IV push

    Medication

    Time frame to
    Administer

    Show Work Volume to Administer

    16. Which findings are expected if the nursing and medical intervention(s) were effective?

    Expected Findings Rationale

    Nursing Skills & Reasoning

    © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any
    form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN

    17. The nurse has implemented the medical and nursing plan of care. One hour later, you collect the following
    assessment data below.
    For each finding, make a clinical judgment by placing an "x" in the appropriate column if the patient's
    condition has improved, has not changed, or has declined.

    Assessment Finding Improved No Change Declined
    Urine output: 750 mL
    HR: 89/minute
    RR: 18/minute non-labored
    BP: 124/80
    O2 sat: 96% room air
    Crackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced
    Resting comfortably appears less anxious

    18. Is the overall status of the patient:

    a. Improved
    b. No change
    c. Declined

    Documentation
    Write a concise nurse's note to document what was most important in the medical record.

    Nurse Reflection
    To strengthen your clinical judgment skills, reflect on your knowledge and the decisions made caring for this patient by
    answering the reflection questions below.
    Reflection Question Nurse Reflection
    As you worked through this
    simulation, how did it make you
    feel?

    What did you already know and do
    well on this simulation?

    What areas do you need to
    develop/improve?

    What did you learn? How will you
    apply what was learned to improve
    patient care?

    Lucy Myers

    01. Most Important Findings: History of heart failure
    Iron deficiency anemia
    low hemoglobin
    02. Clinical Significance: low hemoglobin needs blood tranfusion
    Heart failure can cause breath difficulties

    03. 2: As a student nurse I can not administrater blood alone without supervision, so I will ask charge nurse and also look at the hospital policy.
    04. need to gather: I will need gloves, vital sign machine, blood tubing with fliter, IV pump and normal saline
    05. transfusion safely: Check prescriptions for allergy, expiration, virefied orders with second nurse check vitals before blood tranfusion monitor patient during tranfusion watch for side inffect and decumention.
    06. expect: Educate patient that blood tranfusion will help with their hemonglobin, they should wash and report these symptoms; shortness of breath, and chest pain.
    07. Assessment Finding:
    08. ExpectedT 982 F368 C oral: x
    09. UnexpectedT 982 F368 C oral:
    10. ExpectedP 108 regular:
    11. UnexpectedP 108 regular: x
    12. ExpectedR 25 regular:
    13. UnexpectedR 25 regular: x
    14. ExpectedBP 12883: x
    15. UnexpectedBP 12883:
    16. ExpectedO2 sat 88 RA:
    17. UnexpectedO2 sat 88 RA: x
    18. ExpectedAppears anxious:
    19. UnexpectedAppears anxious: x
    20. ExpectedBreathing rapidly:
    21. UnexpectedBreathing rapidly: x
    22. ExpectedSkin is cool and clammy:
    23. UnexpectedSkin is cool and clammy: x
    24. Medication:
    25. Pharm ClassMetoprolol: Beta blocker
    26. Mechanism of ActionMetoprolol: reduce heart rate
    27. Expected OutcomeMetoprolol: lower heart rate
    28. Pharm ClassLisinopril: ACE inhabitor
    29. Mechanism of ActionLisinopril: lower BP
    30. Expected OutcomeLisinopril: lower BP
    31. Pharm ClassFurosemide: loop diuretic
    32. Mechanism of ActionFurosemide: Increase urine output
    33. Expected OutcomeFurosemide: reduce fluid retention
    34. Pharm ClassFerrous gluconate: iron suppliment
    35. Mechanism of ActionFerrous gluconate: Provide essential iron
    36. Expected OutcomeFerrous gluconate: prevention of iron deficiency enemia
    37. Pharm ClassPotassium chloride: electrolyte suppliment
    38. Mechanism of ActionPotassium chloride: replaces potassium
    39. Expected OutcomePotassium chloride: prevention of hypokalemia
    40. MedicationRow1: furosemide
    41. RationaleRow1: Furosemide, because it causes fliud build up
    42. Intake and OutputRow1: Blood tranfusion
    43. Clinical SignificanceRow1: excess fluid causes respiratory issue, like SOB
    44. Most Important DataRow1: Heart failure and rapid breathing
    45. Clinical SignificanceRow1_2: fluid overload
    46. Possible ProblemsRow1: fluid overload
    rapid breathing
    47. Priority ProblemRow1: fluid overload
    48. Pathophysiology of Priority ProblemRow1: excess fluid build-up place critical strain on the heart.
    49. Nursing Priority:
    50. Priority InterventionsRow1: Improving breathing
    51. RationaleRow1_2: administrater furosemide, notify provider and applying oxygen,
    52. Expected OutcomeRow1: improving breathing
    53. I identify:
    54. Specify who you arewhere you workYourself namepositionlocation Patient nameagegender: Nurse Lucy Myers, RN nurse on the medicine floor

    PT. is Andre Ronaine, 64yrs male PT.
    55. S situation:
    56. What is the problemreason for contactConcise summary of primary problem: Rapid breathing during tranfusion
    57. B background:
    58. If urgent state concern Provide conciserelevant historyPrimary problemdiagnosis Day of admissionpostop day Relevant past medical history Relevant treatmentsinterventions: History of heart failure, Iron deficiency anemia and low hemoglobin
    Admited this morning
    date of adnission, N/A
    Heart failure
    Tranfusion
    59. A assessment:
    60. Assessment of the situation using the most important clinical dataState your concern by communicating concerning clinical data Vital signs Nursing assessment Labdiagnostic results Trend of most important clinical data stableincreasingdecreasing: Pluse is 108, rispiratory 25 and O2 is 88%

    PT. vital signs

    Iron deficiency and low hemoglobin
    61. R recommendation:
    62. Request specific adviceinterventions Clarify expectationsNurse suggestions to advance the plan of care What do you recommend Repeat and state back new ordersconfirm plan of care: Give diuretics

    Give furosemide

    Continue to monitor Pt vitals
    63. Provider Orders:
    64. RationaleFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: To eliminate fluid overload

    Stop more overload

    To increase oxygen level
    65. Expected OutcomeFurosemide 40 mg IV push Discontinue blood transfusion Apply oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation 92: Enhance rispiration

    66. Administer: 1-2 minutes
    67. Show Work: 40mg/100mg =0.4×10=4ml
    68. Expected FindingsRow1: O2 level>92
    rapid breathing
    69. RationaleRow1_3: To improve gas exchange

    70. Assessment Finding_2:
    71. ImprovedUrine output 750 mL: x
    72. No ChangeUrine output 750 mL:
    73. DeclinedUrine output 750 mL:
    74. ImprovedHR 89minute: x
    75. No ChangeHR 89minute:
    76. DeclinedHR 89minute:
    77. ImprovedRR 18minute nonlabored: x
    78. No ChangeRR 18minute nonlabored:
    79. DeclinedRR 18minute nonlabored:
    80. ImprovedBP 12480: x
    81. No ChangeBP 12480:
    82. DeclinedBP 12480:
    83. ImprovedO2 sat 96 room air: x
    84. No ChangeO2 sat 96 room air:
    85. DeclinedO2 sat 96 room air:
    86. ImprovedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced: x
    87. No ChangeCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    88. DeclinedCrackles persist in bases but are not as pronounced:
    89. ImprovedResting comfortably appears less anxious: x
    90. No ChangeResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    91. DeclinedResting comfortably appears less anxious:
    92. Write a concise nurses note to document what was most important in the medical record: Furosimide IV push was administrater to pt. during blood transfusion, Pt experienced rapid breathing.
    93. Reflection Question:
    94. Nurse Reflection: It was somehow challenging
    95. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you already know and do well on this simulation: regonizing and understanding some the problem
    96. Nurse ReflectionWhat areas do you need to developimprove: monitoring for adverse effects
    97. Nurse ReflectionWhat did you learn How will you apply what was learned to improve patient care: I have learned that monitoring the patient closely and washing up for symptoms like, chest pain and shortness of breath it’s very essential.
    for patient care
    98. Text1: 4 ml

    **IMG_6870.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6870-jpeg-10508713)

  • [Solved] FP Week 1 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Provide an assessment of the following: Q1. What is the characteristic (diagnostic) features of homicidal cut-throat? **(5 Points)** Q2. Why is it important to perform an autopsy on the driver(s) in a motor-vehicle collision **(5 points**) Required: Utilize proper APA formatting for your paper: Time…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Provide an assessment of the following:

    Q1. What is the characteristic (diagnostic) features of homicidal cut-throat? **(5 Points)**

    Q2. Why is it important to perform an autopsy on the driver(s) in a motor-vehicle collision **(5 points**)

    Required:

    Utilize proper APA formatting for your paper: Times New Roman 12 pt or Calibri 11 pt font, reference list with credible sources, 1” margins, and double spacing of text. The title page and reference list are not included in the page count. Always remember to add an introduction and a conclusion paragraph. See the course resources section for an APA-formatted paper template.

    A reference list with scholarly sources is required, along with content from sources with in-text citations to support your work.

  • [Solved] assitant needed kk ac

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment **files (1)** – ## AOS492AppliedFinacialDecisionProject.pdf **## AOS492AppliedFinacialDecisionProject.pdf** AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders Applied Financial Decision Project PURPOSE: To integrate the learning from all the course units within the AOS492 course, this ass…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## AOS492AppliedFinacialDecisionProject.pdf

    **## AOS492AppliedFinacialDecisionProject.pdf**

    AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders

    Applied Financial Decision Project

    PURPOSE: To integrate the learning from all the course units within the AOS492

    course, this assignment is an opportunity to incorporate the important aspects learned in

    the course, research, and other readings to be able to apply in real-life situations.

    DESCRIPTION: This is a comprehensive demonstration of learning for the course that

    includes a synthesis that incorporates theoretical learning from the course and your own

    research along with an applied component from a financial literacy concept. In this

    assignment, assume you are a leader of a major organization or in a position of making

    personal life decision. You are confronted with a financial situation that needs a

    thoughtful and careful decision. Fortunately, you just recently completed a financial

    literacy course, how would you approach the issue?

    The assignment outline should be as follows:

    1. Introduction, introduce yourself and the brief overview of what you are going to

    discuss in this paper

    2. Identify the financial problem or issue you are facing. Describe in detail why this

    issue requires a thoughtful analysis and careful decision making. You must be

    prepared to share the implications of your decision.

    3. Discuss the importance of financial literacy for leaders and why you think your

    financial knowledge places you in a better position to address this issue

    4. Identify at least one aspect in the course and/ or literature that you find useful, and

    demonstrate your understanding of this aspect that is vital in financial decision

    making

    5. In conclusion, how would you in summary, based on your individual financial

    decision-making experience, encourage and advise other leaders in matters of

    financial literacy.

    The completed work and the reference list should be submitted to the dropbox in the

    assignments section of the course platform.

    AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders

    GRADING RUBRIC: A total of 100 points is available for this assignment.

    CORE AREA EXPECTATION POINT

    VALUE

    1. Academic Quality
    • Use of proper spelling & grammar.

    • Use of APA citation to credit sources &

    use of scholarly sources

    10

    2. Financial Issue
    • Clearly and effectively identify and

    discuss a financial issue/problem,

    whether personal or professional

    15

    3. Discuss Financial

    Literacy

    • Effectively describes you as a leader,

    [professional or personal], and

    demonstrate the role of financial literacy

    in addressing the problem.

    30

    4. Identify Financial

    Aspect
    • Effectively describes the specific

    aspects in the course or literature you

    find helpful

    30

    5. Conclusion
    • Effectively summarizes the lessons

    learned from the course and the

    recommendations to other leaders.

    15

    **## AOS492AppliedFinacialDecisionProject.pdf**

    AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders

    Applied Financial Decision Project

    PURPOSE: To integrate the learning from all the course units within the AOS492

    course, this assignment is an opportunity to incorporate the important aspects learned in

    the course, research, and other readings to be able to apply in real-life situations.

    DESCRIPTION: This is a comprehensive demonstration of learning for the course that

    includes a synthesis that incorporates theoretical learning from the course and your own

    research along with an applied component from a financial literacy concept. In this

    assignment, assume you are a leader of a major organization or in a position of making

    personal life decision. You are confronted with a financial situation that needs a

    thoughtful and careful decision. Fortunately, you just recently completed a financial

    literacy course, how would you approach the issue?

    The assignment outline should be as follows:

    1. Introduction, introduce yourself and the brief overview of what you are going to

    discuss in this paper

    2. Identify the financial problem or issue you are facing. Describe in detail why this

    issue requires a thoughtful analysis and careful decision making. You must be

    prepared to share the implications of your decision.

    3. Discuss the importance of financial literacy for leaders and why you think your

    financial knowledge places you in a better position to address this issue

    4. Identify at least one aspect in the course and/ or literature that you find useful, and

    demonstrate your understanding of this aspect that is vital in financial decision

    making

    5. In conclusion, how would you in summary, based on your individual financial

    decision-making experience, encourage and advise other leaders in matters of

    financial literacy.

    The completed work and the reference list should be submitted to the dropbox in the

    assignments section of the course platform.

    AOS 492- Financial Literacy for Leaders

    GRADING RUBRIC: A total of 100 points is available for this assignment.

    CORE AREA EXPECTATION POINT

    VALUE

    1. Academic Quality
    • Use of proper spelling & grammar.

    • Use of APA citation to credit sources &

    use of scholarly sources

    10

    2. Financial Issue
    • Clearly and effectively identify and

    discuss a financial issue/problem,

    whether personal or professional

    15

    3. Discuss Financial

    Literacy

    • Effectively describes you as a leader,

    [professional or personal], and

    demonstrate the role of financial literacy

    in addressing the problem.

    30

    4. Identify Financial

    Aspect
    • Effectively describes the specific

    aspects in the course or literature you

    find helpful

    30

    5. Conclusion
    • Effectively summarizes the lessons

    learned from the course and the

    recommendations to other leaders.

    15

  • [Solved] Social Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    facebook.com/watch/?v=305819686801025&ref=sharing&share_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffb.watch%2FFkzP5stvv5%2F – [\ \ PHOTO-2026-03-01-15-50-05.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/photo-2026-03-01-15-50-05-jpg "PHOTO-2026-03-01-15-50-05.jpg") – [\ \ mccall-toward-a-field-of-intersectionality-studies-theo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    facebook.com/watch/?v=305819686801025&ref=sharing&share_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffb.watch%2FFkzP5stvv5%2F

    – [\
    \
    PHOTO-2026-03-01-15-50-05.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/photo-2026-03-01-15-50-05-jpg "PHOTO-2026-03-01-15-50-05.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    mccall-toward-a-field-of-intersectionality-studies-theory-applications-and-praxis-2013.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mccall-toward-a-field-of-intersectionality-studies-theory-applications-and-praxis-2013-pdf "mccall-toward-a-field-of-intersectionality-studies-theory-applications-and-praxis-2013.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    ES300WWeek6LectureSlidesDrTran.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/es300wweek6lectureslidesdrtran-pptx "ES300WWeek6LectureSlidesDrTran.pptx")

  • [Solved] Wk7 SR

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Social work research course 2 assignment: discussion and research question assignment I also need 2 discussion response but I can’t attach the image until I posted my discussion thread – [\ \ IMG_2436.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2436-jpeg "IMG_2436.jpeg") – [\ \ IMG_2435.jpeg](h…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Social work research course 2 assignment: discussion and research question assignment

    I also need 2 discussion response but I can’t attach the image until I posted my discussion thread

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2436.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2436-jpeg "IMG_2436.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_2435.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2435-jpeg-10507881 "IMG_2435.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_2437.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2437-jpeg-10507883 "IMG_2437.jpeg")

  • [Solved] DUE 3/3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (2)** – ## repliesinstruction1.docx – ## Replies.docx **## repliesinstruction1.docx** **Discussion Ethics in Public Administration reply Assignment Instructions** you will post replies of 200–250 words each to 2 classmates’ threads. Each reply must be unique and must integrate i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (2)**

    – ## repliesinstruction1.docx

    – ## Replies.docx

    **## repliesinstruction1.docx**

    **Discussion Ethics in Public Administration reply Assignment Instructions**

    you will post replies of 200–250 words each to 2 classmates’ threads. Each reply must be unique and must integrate ideas (and citations) from the required reading. Merely posting the same reply in 2 places is not sufficient. The original thread must incorporate ideas and citations from all of the required readings and presentations for that Module: Week. It must also address statecraft as part of a meaningful discussion of effective statesmanship and it must include citations from at least two additional scholarly sources. The reply posts must also integrate ideas and citations from the required readings and presentations for the Module: Week, as appropriate, and at least two scholarly sources.

    **Replies:**

    · 2 replies

    · 200-250 words per reply

    · Ideas and citations from required reading and presentations from the Module: Week, as appropriate

    · Ideas and citations from two scholarly sources per reply

    Remember that the art of communication is in many ways the lifeblood of effective political leadership. Everything you write—every paper, post, and email—creates or reinforces an impression of you. Begin to cultivate the communication skills of the statesman and stateswoman—the ability to logically and persuasively speak the truth with compassion and respect. Each response post must include new research and analysis, and must build upon the ideas communicated in the original post. Thus, they must go beyond merely restating and affirming what a classmate has said and instead bring in more depth, research and analysis. Accordingly, each response post must include citations from the required reading and presentations.

    Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order
    **to move the conversation forward**. Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced. As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.

    **## Replies.docx**

    **Latonya**

    Ethical Failure, Covenant, and Administrative Responsibility: Citizenship Verification in Housing Assistance

    Case Study Overview

    A contemporary ethical issue in public administration involves the enforcement of citizenship verification requirements within federally funded housing assistance programs administered by local governments. Federal regulations require verification of eligible immigration or citizenship status for individuals receiving housing benefits funded through programs such as HOME and related assistance initiatives. While these requirements have existed in statutory and regulatory frameworks for years, renewed enforcement emphasis has required local agencies to operationalize policies that were previously inconsistently applied. Public administrators must therefore interpret federal mandates, develop verification procedures, and ensure compliance while continuing to serve vulnerable populations equitably.

    This case reflects a real administrative context involving local housing agencies nationwide as they translate federal eligibility standards into daily practice. Stakeholders include program managers, local governments, federal oversight agencies, and low-income households seeking housing assistance. The ethical challenge arises not from the existence of law itself, but from how administrators implement requirements affecting access to essential services.

    Ethical Issues and Administrative Responsibility

    Plant (2018) argues that public administration ethics extend beyond procedural compliance because administrators operate within morally complex environments. Citizenship verification requirements may be legally mandated, yet ethical questions emerge regarding proportionality, fairness, administrative burden, and potential unintended exclusion of eligible participants.

    Herbert Simon’s distinction between administrative “is” and “ought” is particularly relevant. Policies define what administrators must do, but ethical judgment guides how implementation occurs in practice (Simon, 1997). Rules alone cannot anticipate the lived realities of families navigating documentation barriers, language differences, or bureaucratic complexity. Ethical administration therefore requires discretion informed by both legality and moral reasoning.

    Fischer’s (2010) covenantal framework further clarifies administrative responsibility. Authority is entrusted rather than possessed; public servants act as stewards responsible for the flourishing of those they serve. When implementation emphasizes enforcement without relational accountability, trust between citizens and government may erode. Ethical leadership requires balancing program integrity with compassion and transparency.

    Organizational Culture and Ethical Practice

    Organizational behavior plays a central role in ethical outcomes. Shafritz and Hyde (2017) emphasize that administrative systems shape individual behavior through incentives, norms, and institutional expectations. During policy transitions, agencies must develop shared interpretations of new requirements to avoid inconsistent or inequitable application. Fischer’s discussions of individual behavior and workplace motivation similarly highlight that ethical climates emerge through leadership modeling and organizational learning processes (Fischer, 2010).

    Government-wide ethics laws and guidance from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics reinforce principles of impartiality, accountability, and public trust, reminding administrators that lawful action must also maintain public confidence (U.S. Office of Government Ethics, n.d.).

    Ethical Judgment

    As a public administrator overseeing federally funded affordable housing programs at the county level, I recognize similar ethical tensions emerging in practice. Increased emphasis on verification requirements has required administrators to translate regulatory language into operational procedures while agencies are still learning what verification looks like in practice. Questions arise concerning acceptable documentation standards and how to ensure fairness for households unfamiliar with bureaucratic systems.

    Simon’s (1997) “is” versus “ought” distinction becomes visible at the frontline level, where administrators must interpret rules within human contexts. Fischer’s covenantal perspective suggests administrators must exercise stewardship that protects both legal compliance and human dignity (Fischer, 2010). Ethical leadership in such situations requires patience, transparency, and procedural consistency so that compliance strengthens, rather than undermines, public trust.

    Ethical Assessment

    This case demonstrates that ethical public administration requires more than rule enforcement. From an ethical standpoint, the administrative actions themselves are not inherently unethical because they derive from lawful federal mandates. However, ethical risk emerges when implementation lacks clarity, consistency, or safeguards against disproportionate harm. Ethical administration therefore depends less on the policy’s existence and more on how discretion is exercised during implementation.  Einolf (2014) notes that ethical behavior develops through moral formation supported by institutional structures. Administrators act ethically when implementation reflects justice, proportionality, and respect for persons.

    If placed in this situation, ethical statesmanship would involve clear communication, staff training, accessible verification processes, and safeguards against unintended exclusion. The goal is neither resistance to law nor blind enforcement, but faithful stewardship balancing accountability with equity.

    Ultimately, public administration legitimacy depends upon integrating competence with character. Ethical governance occurs when administrators implement policy in ways that uphold both the rule of law and the dignity of those served. From an ethical standpoint, denying or limiting housing assistance to otherwise eligible citizens solely because they reside with a noncitizen household member raises serious concerns of proportionality and distributive justice. While administrators are obligated to enforce federal eligibility requirements, ethical public administration requires careful attention to unintended harms that may fall upon legally eligible participants. When policy implementation produces outcomes in which vulnerable citizens lose access to essential housing stability due to household composition rather than individual eligibility, administrators must critically evaluate whether enforcement practices align with principles of fairness, stewardship, and public trust.

    References

    Einolf, C. J. (2014). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics. Public Integrity.

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations.

    Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in public administration ethics. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S33–S45.

    Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Classics of public administration (Chapter 13; Chapter 41). Cengage Learning.

    Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

    U.S. Office of Government Ethics. (n.d.). Government-wide ethics laws.
    [https://www.oge.gov/Links to an external site.](https://www.oge.gov/).

    **JOSEPH E**

    Case Study: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

    A look into innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) as it influences public administration services is the topic of choice for Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023). Their article,
    _“The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration,”_ takes a deep dive into issues such as: the integration of AI into curriculum, envisioning the possibilities of a fully integrated AI environment, considering the ethical concerns AI brings in the early stages of development, and using feedback to prevent bias during the implementation process (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023).

    Popescu et al (2023) surveyed six academics who oversaw projects which use AI-powered chatbots. The projects were located in universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, and Romania. The study was a two-prong approach focusing on the challenges of implementing AI and the advantages it produces as a service mechanism. The researchers found that the AI produced a diverse array of questions dealing with standard routine questions to more complex ones. AI chatbots contributed to effectiveness and efficiency of student services, merely supplementing standard routine questions which human personnel would typically take (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023). Since the chatbot worked twenty-four hours a day, seven-days a week, and provided help in multiple languages, universities were able to provide greater services to international students and improved accessibility. The outcome of the studies greatly increased enrollment at the participating institutions with the expanded services AI provided.

    With the benefits of artificial intelligence comes the drawbacks. The case study gleaned ethical concerns that should be considered for future study. One major concern is the distrust of the public, and in this case the distrust students have toward AI having their personal information collected and used. Students’ feedback informed researchers of the usefulness of the chatbots; the marketing use of that information and the lack of transparency leave much to question about the chatbot’s ethical values and its ability to recognize the need to act ethically. The researchers closed their study stating that maintaining the trust of students and the public would be their greatest priority moving forward and in any future development to come.

    Other ethical considerations are the bias researchers may have in conducting the study on chatbots with students’ personal information. This is a common ethical dilemma for most studies, especially when there is an imbalance of power such as the case of academic professionals (researchers) to students. Academics have power over students’ academic standing. It must be considered in forming academic policies that there is this power imbalance and should be a disclaimer with third-party audits to prevent questions of abuse (Marini, 1992). Regardless, the study of artificial intelligence’s impact on academia and public services is paramount to future innovation (O’Reilly, 2011).

    Having over thirteen years of law enforcement (LEO) experience and civil service, ethical values are at the core of everything one does as an LEO. Law enforcement officers have power over the public and must exercise ethical consciousness when dealing with the public, regardless of their role as a victim, bystander, or offender. Personal beliefs and issues have no place in the handling of law enforcement services. Officers have the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics, a pledge of moral and ethical conduct, to uphold. A violation of that ethical code constitutes dereliction of duty (U.S. Department of the Interior, July 2024).

    The dynamic between academic professionals and students embodies the importance of covenantal relationships. Covenantal management is the relation between leader and follower that engenders trust, fairness, and mutuality. It is best said in Micah 6:8 about moral foundations that, “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). These traits Micah speaks of are the core of what should be enforced in the use of artificial intelligence and the covenantal relationship of leaders and followers. Artificial intelligence although void of human values is a designed by humans, and thus should reflect the

    The relationship between students and university administrators mirrors this same covenantal expectation. Fischer (2010) describes covenantal management as a relationship built on trust, fairness, and mutual responsibility. Micah 6:8 reinforces this moral foundation: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). Justice, humility, and mercy are essential values when considering the ethical use of AI and the responsibilities of covenantal leadership. Because AI is created by human beings, its design must reflect human rights, accountability, and fairness. Without these elements, neither AI systems nor human leaders can earn public trust.

    The case study by Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023) ultimately demonstrates how covenantal management principles—trust, informed consent, fairness, and nonmaleficence—apply directly to AI integration in higher education (Fischer 2010). As AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, its role in public administration will only grow. Ensuring that AIdriven university services uphold these ethical values is essential for fostering positive, equitable, and effective public administration outcomes. Ultimately, the value of any technology is measured by the benefits it delivers to the people it is meant to serve.

    References

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Faculty Publications and Presentations, 523. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/523

    Marini, F. (1992). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics: The example of Antigone. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/976801

    New International Version. (2011). The Holy Bible. Zondervan.

    O'Reilly, P. (2011). Herbert Simon: “Is’s” and “Oughts” After Sixty Years. Public Integrity, 13(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130405

    Popescu, R., Sabie, O. M., & Trusca, M. I. (2023). The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(70 E), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.5

    U.S. Department of the Interior. (July 2024). Government-wide ethics laws. https://www.doi.gov/ethics/government-wide-ethics-laws

    **## Replies.docx**

    **Latonya**

    Ethical Failure, Covenant, and Administrative Responsibility: Citizenship Verification in Housing Assistance

    Case Study Overview

    A contemporary ethical issue in public administration involves the enforcement of citizenship verification requirements within federally funded housing assistance programs administered by local governments. Federal regulations require verification of eligible immigration or citizenship status for individuals receiving housing benefits funded through programs such as HOME and related assistance initiatives. While these requirements have existed in statutory and regulatory frameworks for years, renewed enforcement emphasis has required local agencies to operationalize policies that were previously inconsistently applied. Public administrators must therefore interpret federal mandates, develop verification procedures, and ensure compliance while continuing to serve vulnerable populations equitably.

    This case reflects a real administrative context involving local housing agencies nationwide as they translate federal eligibility standards into daily practice. Stakeholders include program managers, local governments, federal oversight agencies, and low-income households seeking housing assistance. The ethical challenge arises not from the existence of law itself, but from how administrators implement requirements affecting access to essential services.

    Ethical Issues and Administrative Responsibility

    Plant (2018) argues that public administration ethics extend beyond procedural compliance because administrators operate within morally complex environments. Citizenship verification requirements may be legally mandated, yet ethical questions emerge regarding proportionality, fairness, administrative burden, and potential unintended exclusion of eligible participants.

    Herbert Simon’s distinction between administrative “is” and “ought” is particularly relevant. Policies define what administrators must do, but ethical judgment guides how implementation occurs in practice (Simon, 1997). Rules alone cannot anticipate the lived realities of families navigating documentation barriers, language differences, or bureaucratic complexity. Ethical administration therefore requires discretion informed by both legality and moral reasoning.

    Fischer’s (2010) covenantal framework further clarifies administrative responsibility. Authority is entrusted rather than possessed; public servants act as stewards responsible for the flourishing of those they serve. When implementation emphasizes enforcement without relational accountability, trust between citizens and government may erode. Ethical leadership requires balancing program integrity with compassion and transparency.

    Organizational Culture and Ethical Practice

    Organizational behavior plays a central role in ethical outcomes. Shafritz and Hyde (2017) emphasize that administrative systems shape individual behavior through incentives, norms, and institutional expectations. During policy transitions, agencies must develop shared interpretations of new requirements to avoid inconsistent or inequitable application. Fischer’s discussions of individual behavior and workplace motivation similarly highlight that ethical climates emerge through leadership modeling and organizational learning processes (Fischer, 2010).

    Government-wide ethics laws and guidance from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics reinforce principles of impartiality, accountability, and public trust, reminding administrators that lawful action must also maintain public confidence (U.S. Office of Government Ethics, n.d.).

    Ethical Judgment

    As a public administrator overseeing federally funded affordable housing programs at the county level, I recognize similar ethical tensions emerging in practice. Increased emphasis on verification requirements has required administrators to translate regulatory language into operational procedures while agencies are still learning what verification looks like in practice. Questions arise concerning acceptable documentation standards and how to ensure fairness for households unfamiliar with bureaucratic systems.

    Simon’s (1997) “is” versus “ought” distinction becomes visible at the frontline level, where administrators must interpret rules within human contexts. Fischer’s covenantal perspective suggests administrators must exercise stewardship that protects both legal compliance and human dignity (Fischer, 2010). Ethical leadership in such situations requires patience, transparency, and procedural consistency so that compliance strengthens, rather than undermines, public trust.

    Ethical Assessment

    This case demonstrates that ethical public administration requires more than rule enforcement. From an ethical standpoint, the administrative actions themselves are not inherently unethical because they derive from lawful federal mandates. However, ethical risk emerges when implementation lacks clarity, consistency, or safeguards against disproportionate harm. Ethical administration therefore depends less on the policy’s existence and more on how discretion is exercised during implementation.  Einolf (2014) notes that ethical behavior develops through moral formation supported by institutional structures. Administrators act ethically when implementation reflects justice, proportionality, and respect for persons.

    If placed in this situation, ethical statesmanship would involve clear communication, staff training, accessible verification processes, and safeguards against unintended exclusion. The goal is neither resistance to law nor blind enforcement, but faithful stewardship balancing accountability with equity.

    Ultimately, public administration legitimacy depends upon integrating competence with character. Ethical governance occurs when administrators implement policy in ways that uphold both the rule of law and the dignity of those served. From an ethical standpoint, denying or limiting housing assistance to otherwise eligible citizens solely because they reside with a noncitizen household member raises serious concerns of proportionality and distributive justice. While administrators are obligated to enforce federal eligibility requirements, ethical public administration requires careful attention to unintended harms that may fall upon legally eligible participants. When policy implementation produces outcomes in which vulnerable citizens lose access to essential housing stability due to household composition rather than individual eligibility, administrators must critically evaluate whether enforcement practices align with principles of fairness, stewardship, and public trust.

    References

    Einolf, C. J. (2014). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics. Public Integrity.

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations.

    Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in public administration ethics. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S33–S45.

    Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Classics of public administration (Chapter 13; Chapter 41). Cengage Learning.

    Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

    U.S. Office of Government Ethics. (n.d.). Government-wide ethics laws.
    [https://www.oge.gov/Links to an external site.](https://www.oge.gov/).

    **JOSEPH E**

    Case Study: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

    A look into innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) as it influences public administration services is the topic of choice for Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023). Their article,
    _“The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration,”_ takes a deep dive into issues such as: the integration of AI into curriculum, envisioning the possibilities of a fully integrated AI environment, considering the ethical concerns AI brings in the early stages of development, and using feedback to prevent bias during the implementation process (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023).

    Popescu et al (2023) surveyed six academics who oversaw projects which use AI-powered chatbots. The projects were located in universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, and Romania. The study was a two-prong approach focusing on the challenges of implementing AI and the advantages it produces as a service mechanism. The researchers found that the AI produced a diverse array of questions dealing with standard routine questions to more complex ones. AI chatbots contributed to effectiveness and efficiency of student services, merely supplementing standard routine questions which human personnel would typically take (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023). Since the chatbot worked twenty-four hours a day, seven-days a week, and provided help in multiple languages, universities were able to provide greater services to international students and improved accessibility. The outcome of the studies greatly increased enrollment at the participating institutions with the expanded services AI provided.

    With the benefits of artificial intelligence comes the drawbacks. The case study gleaned ethical concerns that should be considered for future study. One major concern is the distrust of the public, and in this case the distrust students have toward AI having their personal information collected and used. Students’ feedback informed researchers of the usefulness of the chatbots; the marketing use of that information and the lack of transparency leave much to question about the chatbot’s ethical values and its ability to recognize the need to act ethically. The researchers closed their study stating that maintaining the trust of students and the public would be their greatest priority moving forward and in any future development to come.

    Other ethical considerations are the bias researchers may have in conducting the study on chatbots with students’ personal information. This is a common ethical dilemma for most studies, especially when there is an imbalance of power such as the case of academic professionals (researchers) to students. Academics have power over students’ academic standing. It must be considered in forming academic policies that there is this power imbalance and should be a disclaimer with third-party audits to prevent questions of abuse (Marini, 1992). Regardless, the study of artificial intelligence’s impact on academia and public services is paramount to future innovation (O’Reilly, 2011).

    Having over thirteen years of law enforcement (LEO) experience and civil service, ethical values are at the core of everything one does as an LEO. Law enforcement officers have power over the public and must exercise ethical consciousness when dealing with the public, regardless of their role as a victim, bystander, or offender. Personal beliefs and issues have no place in the handling of law enforcement services. Officers have the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics, a pledge of moral and ethical conduct, to uphold. A violation of that ethical code constitutes dereliction of duty (U.S. Department of the Interior, July 2024).

    The dynamic between academic professionals and students embodies the importance of covenantal relationships. Covenantal management is the relation between leader and follower that engenders trust, fairness, and mutuality. It is best said in Micah 6:8 about moral foundations that, “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). These traits Micah speaks of are the core of what should be enforced in the use of artificial intelligence and the covenantal relationship of leaders and followers. Artificial intelligence although void of human values is a designed by humans, and thus should reflect the

    The relationship between students and university administrators mirrors this same covenantal expectation. Fischer (2010) describes covenantal management as a relationship built on trust, fairness, and mutual responsibility. Micah 6:8 reinforces this moral foundation: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). Justice, humility, and mercy are essential values when considering the ethical use of AI and the responsibilities of covenantal leadership. Because AI is created by human beings, its design must reflect human rights, accountability, and fairness. Without these elements, neither AI systems nor human leaders can earn public trust.

    The case study by Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023) ultimately demonstrates how covenantal management principles—trust, informed consent, fairness, and nonmaleficence—apply directly to AI integration in higher education (Fischer 2010). As AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, its role in public administration will only grow. Ensuring that AIdriven university services uphold these ethical values is essential for fostering positive, equitable, and effective public administration outcomes. Ultimately, the value of any technology is measured by the benefits it delivers to the people it is meant to serve.

    References

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Faculty Publications and Presentations, 523. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/523

    Marini, F. (1992). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics: The example of Antigone. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/976801

    New International Version. (2011). The Holy Bible. Zondervan.

    O'Reilly, P. (2011). Herbert Simon: “Is’s” and “Oughts” After Sixty Years. Public Integrity, 13(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130405

    Popescu, R., Sabie, O. M., & Trusca, M. I. (2023). The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(70 E), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.5

    U.S. Department of the Interior. (July 2024). Government-wide ethics laws. https://www.doi.gov/ethics/government-wide-ethics-laws

    **## repliesinstruction1.docx**

    **Discussion Ethics in Public Administration reply Assignment Instructions**

    you will post replies of 200–250 words each to 2 classmates’ threads. Each reply must be unique and must integrate ideas (and citations) from the required reading. Merely posting the same reply in 2 places is not sufficient. The original thread must incorporate ideas and citations from all of the required readings and presentations for that Module: Week. It must also address statecraft as part of a meaningful discussion of effective statesmanship and it must include citations from at least two additional scholarly sources. The reply posts must also integrate ideas and citations from the required readings and presentations for the Module: Week, as appropriate, and at least two scholarly sources.

    **Replies:**

    · 2 replies

    · 200-250 words per reply

    · Ideas and citations from required reading and presentations from the Module: Week, as appropriate

    · Ideas and citations from two scholarly sources per reply

    Remember that the art of communication is in many ways the lifeblood of effective political leadership. Everything you write—every paper, post, and email—creates or reinforces an impression of you. Begin to cultivate the communication skills of the statesman and stateswoman—the ability to logically and persuasively speak the truth with compassion and respect. Each response post must include new research and analysis, and must build upon the ideas communicated in the original post. Thus, they must go beyond merely restating and affirming what a classmate has said and instead bring in more depth, research and analysis. Accordingly, each response post must include citations from the required reading and presentations.

    Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order
    **to move the conversation forward**. Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced. As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.

    **## Replies.docx**

    **Latonya**

    Ethical Failure, Covenant, and Administrative Responsibility: Citizenship Verification in Housing Assistance

    Case Study Overview

    A contemporary ethical issue in public administration involves the enforcement of citizenship verification requirements within federally funded housing assistance programs administered by local governments. Federal regulations require verification of eligible immigration or citizenship status for individuals receiving housing benefits funded through programs such as HOME and related assistance initiatives. While these requirements have existed in statutory and regulatory frameworks for years, renewed enforcement emphasis has required local agencies to operationalize policies that were previously inconsistently applied. Public administrators must therefore interpret federal mandates, develop verification procedures, and ensure compliance while continuing to serve vulnerable populations equitably.

    This case reflects a real administrative context involving local housing agencies nationwide as they translate federal eligibility standards into daily practice. Stakeholders include program managers, local governments, federal oversight agencies, and low-income households seeking housing assistance. The ethical challenge arises not from the existence of law itself, but from how administrators implement requirements affecting access to essential services.

    Ethical Issues and Administrative Responsibility

    Plant (2018) argues that public administration ethics extend beyond procedural compliance because administrators operate within morally complex environments. Citizenship verification requirements may be legally mandated, yet ethical questions emerge regarding proportionality, fairness, administrative burden, and potential unintended exclusion of eligible participants.

    Herbert Simon’s distinction between administrative “is” and “ought” is particularly relevant. Policies define what administrators must do, but ethical judgment guides how implementation occurs in practice (Simon, 1997). Rules alone cannot anticipate the lived realities of families navigating documentation barriers, language differences, or bureaucratic complexity. Ethical administration therefore requires discretion informed by both legality and moral reasoning.

    Fischer’s (2010) covenantal framework further clarifies administrative responsibility. Authority is entrusted rather than possessed; public servants act as stewards responsible for the flourishing of those they serve. When implementation emphasizes enforcement without relational accountability, trust between citizens and government may erode. Ethical leadership requires balancing program integrity with compassion and transparency.

    Organizational Culture and Ethical Practice

    Organizational behavior plays a central role in ethical outcomes. Shafritz and Hyde (2017) emphasize that administrative systems shape individual behavior through incentives, norms, and institutional expectations. During policy transitions, agencies must develop shared interpretations of new requirements to avoid inconsistent or inequitable application. Fischer’s discussions of individual behavior and workplace motivation similarly highlight that ethical climates emerge through leadership modeling and organizational learning processes (Fischer, 2010).

    Government-wide ethics laws and guidance from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics reinforce principles of impartiality, accountability, and public trust, reminding administrators that lawful action must also maintain public confidence (U.S. Office of Government Ethics, n.d.).

    Ethical Judgment

    As a public administrator overseeing federally funded affordable housing programs at the county level, I recognize similar ethical tensions emerging in practice. Increased emphasis on verification requirements has required administrators to translate regulatory language into operational procedures while agencies are still learning what verification looks like in practice. Questions arise concerning acceptable documentation standards and how to ensure fairness for households unfamiliar with bureaucratic systems.

    Simon’s (1997) “is” versus “ought” distinction becomes visible at the frontline level, where administrators must interpret rules within human contexts. Fischer’s covenantal perspective suggests administrators must exercise stewardship that protects both legal compliance and human dignity (Fischer, 2010). Ethical leadership in such situations requires patience, transparency, and procedural consistency so that compliance strengthens, rather than undermines, public trust.

    Ethical Assessment

    This case demonstrates that ethical public administration requires more than rule enforcement. From an ethical standpoint, the administrative actions themselves are not inherently unethical because they derive from lawful federal mandates. However, ethical risk emerges when implementation lacks clarity, consistency, or safeguards against disproportionate harm. Ethical administration therefore depends less on the policy’s existence and more on how discretion is exercised during implementation.  Einolf (2014) notes that ethical behavior develops through moral formation supported by institutional structures. Administrators act ethically when implementation reflects justice, proportionality, and respect for persons.

    If placed in this situation, ethical statesmanship would involve clear communication, staff training, accessible verification processes, and safeguards against unintended exclusion. The goal is neither resistance to law nor blind enforcement, but faithful stewardship balancing accountability with equity.

    Ultimately, public administration legitimacy depends upon integrating competence with character. Ethical governance occurs when administrators implement policy in ways that uphold both the rule of law and the dignity of those served. From an ethical standpoint, denying or limiting housing assistance to otherwise eligible citizens solely because they reside with a noncitizen household member raises serious concerns of proportionality and distributive justice. While administrators are obligated to enforce federal eligibility requirements, ethical public administration requires careful attention to unintended harms that may fall upon legally eligible participants. When policy implementation produces outcomes in which vulnerable citizens lose access to essential housing stability due to household composition rather than individual eligibility, administrators must critically evaluate whether enforcement practices align with principles of fairness, stewardship, and public trust.

    References

    Einolf, C. J. (2014). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics. Public Integrity.

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations.

    Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in public administration ethics. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S33–S45.

    Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Classics of public administration (Chapter 13; Chapter 41). Cengage Learning.

    Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

    U.S. Office of Government Ethics. (n.d.). Government-wide ethics laws.
    [https://www.oge.gov/Links to an external site.](https://www.oge.gov/).

    **JOSEPH E**

    Case Study: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

    A look into innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) as it influences public administration services is the topic of choice for Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023). Their article,
    _“The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration,”_ takes a deep dive into issues such as: the integration of AI into curriculum, envisioning the possibilities of a fully integrated AI environment, considering the ethical concerns AI brings in the early stages of development, and using feedback to prevent bias during the implementation process (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023).

    Popescu et al (2023) surveyed six academics who oversaw projects which use AI-powered chatbots. The projects were located in universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, and Romania. The study was a two-prong approach focusing on the challenges of implementing AI and the advantages it produces as a service mechanism. The researchers found that the AI produced a diverse array of questions dealing with standard routine questions to more complex ones. AI chatbots contributed to effectiveness and efficiency of student services, merely supplementing standard routine questions which human personnel would typically take (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023). Since the chatbot worked twenty-four hours a day, seven-days a week, and provided help in multiple languages, universities were able to provide greater services to international students and improved accessibility. The outcome of the studies greatly increased enrollment at the participating institutions with the expanded services AI provided.

    With the benefits of artificial intelligence comes the drawbacks. The case study gleaned ethical concerns that should be considered for future study. One major concern is the distrust of the public, and in this case the distrust students have toward AI having their personal information collected and used. Students’ feedback informed researchers of the usefulness of the chatbots; the marketing use of that information and the lack of transparency leave much to question about the chatbot’s ethical values and its ability to recognize the need to act ethically. The researchers closed their study stating that maintaining the trust of students and the public would be their greatest priority moving forward and in any future development to come.

    Other ethical considerations are the bias researchers may have in conducting the study on chatbots with students’ personal information. This is a common ethical dilemma for most studies, especially when there is an imbalance of power such as the case of academic professionals (researchers) to students. Academics have power over students’ academic standing. It must be considered in forming academic policies that there is this power imbalance and should be a disclaimer with third-party audits to prevent questions of abuse (Marini, 1992). Regardless, the study of artificial intelligence’s impact on academia and public services is paramount to future innovation (O’Reilly, 2011).

    Having over thirteen years of law enforcement (LEO) experience and civil service, ethical values are at the core of everything one does as an LEO. Law enforcement officers have power over the public and must exercise ethical consciousness when dealing with the public, regardless of their role as a victim, bystander, or offender. Personal beliefs and issues have no place in the handling of law enforcement services. Officers have the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics, a pledge of moral and ethical conduct, to uphold. A violation of that ethical code constitutes dereliction of duty (U.S. Department of the Interior, July 2024).

    The dynamic between academic professionals and students embodies the importance of covenantal relationships. Covenantal management is the relation between leader and follower that engenders trust, fairness, and mutuality. It is best said in Micah 6:8 about moral foundations that, “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). These traits Micah speaks of are the core of what should be enforced in the use of artificial intelligence and the covenantal relationship of leaders and followers. Artificial intelligence although void of human values is a designed by humans, and thus should reflect the

    The relationship between students and university administrators mirrors this same covenantal expectation. Fischer (2010) describes covenantal management as a relationship built on trust, fairness, and mutual responsibility. Micah 6:8 reinforces this moral foundation: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). Justice, humility, and mercy are essential values when considering the ethical use of AI and the responsibilities of covenantal leadership. Because AI is created by human beings, its design must reflect human rights, accountability, and fairness. Without these elements, neither AI systems nor human leaders can earn public trust.

    The case study by Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023) ultimately demonstrates how covenantal management principles—trust, informed consent, fairness, and nonmaleficence—apply directly to AI integration in higher education (Fischer 2010). As AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, its role in public administration will only grow. Ensuring that AIdriven university services uphold these ethical values is essential for fostering positive, equitable, and effective public administration outcomes. Ultimately, the value of any technology is measured by the benefits it delivers to the people it is meant to serve.

    References

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Faculty Publications and Presentations, 523. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/523

    Marini, F. (1992). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics: The example of Antigone. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/976801

    New International Version. (2011). The Holy Bible. Zondervan.

    O'Reilly, P. (2011). Herbert Simon: “Is’s” and “Oughts” After Sixty Years. Public Integrity, 13(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130405

    Popescu, R., Sabie, O. M., & Trusca, M. I. (2023). The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(70 E), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.5

    U.S. Department of the Interior. (July 2024). Government-wide ethics laws. https://www.doi.gov/ethics/government-wide-ethics-laws

    **## repliesinstruction1.docx**

    **Discussion Ethics in Public Administration reply Assignment Instructions**

    you will post replies of 200–250 words each to 2 classmates’ threads. Each reply must be unique and must integrate ideas (and citations) from the required reading. Merely posting the same reply in 2 places is not sufficient. The original thread must incorporate ideas and citations from all of the required readings and presentations for that Module: Week. It must also address statecraft as part of a meaningful discussion of effective statesmanship and it must include citations from at least two additional scholarly sources. The reply posts must also integrate ideas and citations from the required readings and presentations for the Module: Week, as appropriate, and at least two scholarly sources.

    **Replies:**

    · 2 replies

    · 200-250 words per reply

    · Ideas and citations from required reading and presentations from the Module: Week, as appropriate

    · Ideas and citations from two scholarly sources per reply

    Remember that the art of communication is in many ways the lifeblood of effective political leadership. Everything you write—every paper, post, and email—creates or reinforces an impression of you. Begin to cultivate the communication skills of the statesman and stateswoman—the ability to logically and persuasively speak the truth with compassion and respect. Each response post must include new research and analysis, and must build upon the ideas communicated in the original post. Thus, they must go beyond merely restating and affirming what a classmate has said and instead bring in more depth, research and analysis. Accordingly, each response post must include citations from the required reading and presentations.

    Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order
    **to move the conversation forward**. Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced. As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.

    **## Replies.docx**

    **Latonya**

    Ethical Failure, Covenant, and Administrative Responsibility: Citizenship Verification in Housing Assistance

    Case Study Overview

    A contemporary ethical issue in public administration involves the enforcement of citizenship verification requirements within federally funded housing assistance programs administered by local governments. Federal regulations require verification of eligible immigration or citizenship status for individuals receiving housing benefits funded through programs such as HOME and related assistance initiatives. While these requirements have existed in statutory and regulatory frameworks for years, renewed enforcement emphasis has required local agencies to operationalize policies that were previously inconsistently applied. Public administrators must therefore interpret federal mandates, develop verification procedures, and ensure compliance while continuing to serve vulnerable populations equitably.

    This case reflects a real administrative context involving local housing agencies nationwide as they translate federal eligibility standards into daily practice. Stakeholders include program managers, local governments, federal oversight agencies, and low-income households seeking housing assistance. The ethical challenge arises not from the existence of law itself, but from how administrators implement requirements affecting access to essential services.

    Ethical Issues and Administrative Responsibility

    Plant (2018) argues that public administration ethics extend beyond procedural compliance because administrators operate within morally complex environments. Citizenship verification requirements may be legally mandated, yet ethical questions emerge regarding proportionality, fairness, administrative burden, and potential unintended exclusion of eligible participants.

    Herbert Simon’s distinction between administrative “is” and “ought” is particularly relevant. Policies define what administrators must do, but ethical judgment guides how implementation occurs in practice (Simon, 1997). Rules alone cannot anticipate the lived realities of families navigating documentation barriers, language differences, or bureaucratic complexity. Ethical administration therefore requires discretion informed by both legality and moral reasoning.

    Fischer’s (2010) covenantal framework further clarifies administrative responsibility. Authority is entrusted rather than possessed; public servants act as stewards responsible for the flourishing of those they serve. When implementation emphasizes enforcement without relational accountability, trust between citizens and government may erode. Ethical leadership requires balancing program integrity with compassion and transparency.

    Organizational Culture and Ethical Practice

    Organizational behavior plays a central role in ethical outcomes. Shafritz and Hyde (2017) emphasize that administrative systems shape individual behavior through incentives, norms, and institutional expectations. During policy transitions, agencies must develop shared interpretations of new requirements to avoid inconsistent or inequitable application. Fischer’s discussions of individual behavior and workplace motivation similarly highlight that ethical climates emerge through leadership modeling and organizational learning processes (Fischer, 2010).

    Government-wide ethics laws and guidance from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics reinforce principles of impartiality, accountability, and public trust, reminding administrators that lawful action must also maintain public confidence (U.S. Office of Government Ethics, n.d.).

    Ethical Judgment

    As a public administrator overseeing federally funded affordable housing programs at the county level, I recognize similar ethical tensions emerging in practice. Increased emphasis on verification requirements has required administrators to translate regulatory language into operational procedures while agencies are still learning what verification looks like in practice. Questions arise concerning acceptable documentation standards and how to ensure fairness for households unfamiliar with bureaucratic systems.

    Simon’s (1997) “is” versus “ought” distinction becomes visible at the frontline level, where administrators must interpret rules within human contexts. Fischer’s covenantal perspective suggests administrators must exercise stewardship that protects both legal compliance and human dignity (Fischer, 2010). Ethical leadership in such situations requires patience, transparency, and procedural consistency so that compliance strengthens, rather than undermines, public trust.

    Ethical Assessment

    This case demonstrates that ethical public administration requires more than rule enforcement. From an ethical standpoint, the administrative actions themselves are not inherently unethical because they derive from lawful federal mandates. However, ethical risk emerges when implementation lacks clarity, consistency, or safeguards against disproportionate harm. Ethical administration therefore depends less on the policy’s existence and more on how discretion is exercised during implementation.  Einolf (2014) notes that ethical behavior develops through moral formation supported by institutional structures. Administrators act ethically when implementation reflects justice, proportionality, and respect for persons.

    If placed in this situation, ethical statesmanship would involve clear communication, staff training, accessible verification processes, and safeguards against unintended exclusion. The goal is neither resistance to law nor blind enforcement, but faithful stewardship balancing accountability with equity.

    Ultimately, public administration legitimacy depends upon integrating competence with character. Ethical governance occurs when administrators implement policy in ways that uphold both the rule of law and the dignity of those served. From an ethical standpoint, denying or limiting housing assistance to otherwise eligible citizens solely because they reside with a noncitizen household member raises serious concerns of proportionality and distributive justice. While administrators are obligated to enforce federal eligibility requirements, ethical public administration requires careful attention to unintended harms that may fall upon legally eligible participants. When policy implementation produces outcomes in which vulnerable citizens lose access to essential housing stability due to household composition rather than individual eligibility, administrators must critically evaluate whether enforcement practices align with principles of fairness, stewardship, and public trust.

    References

    Einolf, C. J. (2014). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics. Public Integrity.

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations.

    Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in public administration ethics. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S33–S45.

    Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Classics of public administration (Chapter 13; Chapter 41). Cengage Learning.

    Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

    U.S. Office of Government Ethics. (n.d.). Government-wide ethics laws.
    [https://www.oge.gov/Links to an external site.](https://www.oge.gov/).

    **JOSEPH E**

    Case Study: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

    A look into innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) as it influences public administration services is the topic of choice for Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023). Their article,
    _“The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration,”_ takes a deep dive into issues such as: the integration of AI into curriculum, envisioning the possibilities of a fully integrated AI environment, considering the ethical concerns AI brings in the early stages of development, and using feedback to prevent bias during the implementation process (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023).

    Popescu et al (2023) surveyed six academics who oversaw projects which use AI-powered chatbots. The projects were located in universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, and Romania. The study was a two-prong approach focusing on the challenges of implementing AI and the advantages it produces as a service mechanism. The researchers found that the AI produced a diverse array of questions dealing with standard routine questions to more complex ones. AI chatbots contributed to effectiveness and efficiency of student services, merely supplementing standard routine questions which human personnel would typically take (Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca 2023). Since the chatbot worked twenty-four hours a day, seven-days a week, and provided help in multiple languages, universities were able to provide greater services to international students and improved accessibility. The outcome of the studies greatly increased enrollment at the participating institutions with the expanded services AI provided.

    With the benefits of artificial intelligence comes the drawbacks. The case study gleaned ethical concerns that should be considered for future study. One major concern is the distrust of the public, and in this case the distrust students have toward AI having their personal information collected and used. Students’ feedback informed researchers of the usefulness of the chatbots; the marketing use of that information and the lack of transparency leave much to question about the chatbot’s ethical values and its ability to recognize the need to act ethically. The researchers closed their study stating that maintaining the trust of students and the public would be their greatest priority moving forward and in any future development to come.

    Other ethical considerations are the bias researchers may have in conducting the study on chatbots with students’ personal information. This is a common ethical dilemma for most studies, especially when there is an imbalance of power such as the case of academic professionals (researchers) to students. Academics have power over students’ academic standing. It must be considered in forming academic policies that there is this power imbalance and should be a disclaimer with third-party audits to prevent questions of abuse (Marini, 1992). Regardless, the study of artificial intelligence’s impact on academia and public services is paramount to future innovation (O’Reilly, 2011).

    Having over thirteen years of law enforcement (LEO) experience and civil service, ethical values are at the core of everything one does as an LEO. Law enforcement officers have power over the public and must exercise ethical consciousness when dealing with the public, regardless of their role as a victim, bystander, or offender. Personal beliefs and issues have no place in the handling of law enforcement services. Officers have the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics, a pledge of moral and ethical conduct, to uphold. A violation of that ethical code constitutes dereliction of duty (U.S. Department of the Interior, July 2024).

    The dynamic between academic professionals and students embodies the importance of covenantal relationships. Covenantal management is the relation between leader and follower that engenders trust, fairness, and mutuality. It is best said in Micah 6:8 about moral foundations that, “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). These traits Micah speaks of are the core of what should be enforced in the use of artificial intelligence and the covenantal relationship of leaders and followers. Artificial intelligence although void of human values is a designed by humans, and thus should reflect the

    The relationship between students and university administrators mirrors this same covenantal expectation. Fischer (2010) describes covenantal management as a relationship built on trust, fairness, and mutual responsibility. Micah 6:8 reinforces this moral foundation: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8, New International Version, 2011). Justice, humility, and mercy are essential values when considering the ethical use of AI and the responsibilities of covenantal leadership. Because AI is created by human beings, its design must reflect human rights, accountability, and fairness. Without these elements, neither AI systems nor human leaders can earn public trust.

    The case study by Popescu, Sabie, and Trusca (2023) ultimately demonstrates how covenantal management principles—trust, informed consent, fairness, and nonmaleficence—apply directly to AI integration in higher education (Fischer 2010). As AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, its role in public administration will only grow. Ensuring that AIdriven university services uphold these ethical values is essential for fostering positive, equitable, and effective public administration outcomes. Ultimately, the value of any technology is measured by the benefits it delivers to the people it is meant to serve.

    References

    Fischer, K. (2010). A biblical-covenantal perspective on organizational behavior & leadership. Faculty Publications and Presentations, 523. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/523

    Marini, F. (1992). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics: The example of Antigone. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/976801

    New International Version. (2011). The Holy Bible. Zondervan.

    O'Reilly, P. (2011). Herbert Simon: “Is’s” and “Oughts” After Sixty Years. Public Integrity, 13(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130405

    Popescu, R., Sabie, O. M., & Trusca, M. I. (2023). The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(70 E), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.5

    U.S. Department of the Interior. (July 2024). Government-wide ethics laws. https://www.doi.gov/ethics/government-wide-ethics-laws

  • [Solved] case study 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Case studies will offer students the opportunity to explore how lessons learned from class can be applied to real world situations. Case studies can illustrate theories, concepts, methodologies, solutions, and more. We will use case studies in the class to evaluate employee perceptions, motivations,…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Case studies will offer students the opportunity to explore how lessons learned from class can be applied to real world situations. Case studies can illustrate theories, concepts, methodologies, solutions, and more. We will use case studies in the class to evaluate employee perceptions, motivations, and behaviors. _Please refer to this .pdf for the full case scenario…_ [_**Conifer Corp Case Study.pdf**_](https://canvas.fsu.edu/courses/350683/files/38327959?wrap=1 "Conifer Corp Case Study.pdf")

    **Here is just a brief scenario**

    **Conifer Corp is a sawmill operation in Oregon, that is owned by a major forest products company, but operates independently of headquarters. The mill is divided into six operating departments: boom, sawmill, planer, packaging, shipping, and maintenance. It won packaging quality awards over the past few years, but product quality has recently fallen and customers have switched to other producers. The planing and sawmilling departments have significantly increased productivity over the past couple of years, whereas the packaging department has decreased productivity. This has resulted in a backlog of finished product, adding to Conifer’s inventory costs and the risk of damaged stock. The company pays packaging employees overtime to complete the work on Saturdays. The packaging department extends its lunch and coffee breaks, and usually leaves work early. The packaging department is located in a separate building from the others and has no supervisor.**

    – [\
    \
    ConiferCorpCaseStudy.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/conifercorpcasestudy-pdf "ConiferCorpCaseStudy.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    Chapter10PowerandInfluence.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chapter10powerandinfluence-pptx "Chapter10PowerandInfluence.pptx")

  • [Solved] Peer response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et al., 2022). Even though QSEN is not directly mentioned in the article, the themes align closely with QSEN competencies such as safety, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and systems-based practice (QSEN Institute, 2023).

    One part that really stood out to me was the discussion about inconsistencies in title protection and regulation. That resonated with me because, as I move from the RN role into the APRN role, the scope of practice and accountability increases. If regulation is inconsistent, it can lead to confusion about role expectations and competency standards, which ultimately affects patient safety (Wheeler et al., 2022). Advanced practice comes with greater autonomy, but that autonomy must be supported by strong educational preparation and regulatory oversight.

    QSEN competencies help define the APRN role by expanding responsibility beyond bedside care into leadership and systems thinking. As an RN, my job focuses on implementing safe, evidence-based care and monitoring patient outcomes. As an APRN, I transition into diagnosing, prescribing, evaluating treatment, and participating in quality improvement initiatives. That shift requires deeper clinical reasoning and a stronger understanding of how healthcare systems function. National data continue to show that quality and safety education remains foundational to nursing practice at all levels,  ultimately reinforcing the importance of these competencies as nurses advance in their roles (Djukic et al., 2025).

    The transition from RN to APRN is not just about increased independence.  It reflects an expanded responsibility for improving outcomes for the patient. QSEN provides a framework that supports this growth by emphasizing accountability, collaboration, and evidence-based decision-making (QSEN Institute, 2023). As advanced practice nurses, we not only provide direct patient care but also take an active role in improving how care is delivered within the healthcare system.

    Djukic, M., Thompson, C., Ke, Z., Phan, J., & Padhye, N. (2025). Taking a pulse on quality and safety education: An analysis of the 2022 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. _Nurse Educator, 50_(3), 129–134. [https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001811](https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001811)

    QSEN Institute. (2023). QSEN competencies. [http://qsen.org](http://qsen.org/)

    Wheeler, K. J., Miller, M., Pulcini, J., Gray, D., Ladd, E., & Rayens, M. K. (2022). Advanced practice nursing roles, regulation, education, and practice: A global study. _Annals of Global Health, 88_(1), 42. [https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3698](https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3698)

  • [Solved] Education

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.