My Blog

Tag: Valuation & Market Analysis

  • [Solved] Which of the following is a feature of models?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics) Which of the following is a feature of models? Why? A. Models help make predictions for the future. B. Models are more complicated than real-life phenomena. C. Models are the same as hypotheses. D. Models are as…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics)

    Which of the following is a feature of models? Why?

    A. Models help make predictions for the future.

    B. Models are more complicated than real-life phenomena.

    C. Models are the same as hypotheses.

    D. Models are as complex as the phenomenon being studied.

    Last edited by  [steal a brainrot](https://steala-brainrot.io/)

  • [Solved] Supply & Demand Costs, Competition, Inflation & Recession; Money, Interest Rates & Fiscal Policy).

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) paper that synthesizes (Supply & Demand; Costs, Competition, Inflation & Recession; Money, Interest Rates & Fiscal Policy). – Key Concepts: Briefly explain the most important economic concepts from each unit i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    paper that synthesizes

    (Supply & Demand; Costs, Competition, Inflation & Recession; Money, Interest Rates & Fiscal Policy).

    – Key Concepts: Briefly explain the most important economic concepts from each unit in your own words.
    – Integration: Describe how these concepts connect across units.
    – Application: Apply at least 1 concept to a current or recent economic issue.
    – Reflection: Discuss how your understanding of economics has developed and how these ideas relate to your personal, professional, or ethical perspective.

    575 words

  • [Solved] Module Four Journal People, Planet and Profit

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) see attachment **files (1)** – ## ModuleFourJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip **## ModuleFourJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip** ## Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html ## QSO 321 Module Four J…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## ModuleFourJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip

    **## ModuleFourJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip**

    ## Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html

    ## QSO 321 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Scenario

    You are the chief operating officer (COO) of a local supermarket chain that has 10 stores within a 100-mile radius. The farm-to-table movement has been gaining momentum locally, and now it is a consumer demand and a good practice. This movement supports the use of local suppliers to limit the environmental impact caused by the long-distance transportation of food. It also supports small family farms that use sustainable practices, such as avoiding genetically modified organisms and pesticides or using organic fertilizers. The chief executive officer (CEO) of the supermarket chain has asked you to see if the supermarket can apply some of the farm-to-table principles to how it selects produce suppliers. Before moving too far in that direction, both you and the CEO agree that the inventory management implications need to be understood.

    Keep in mind that supermarket customers want a wide range of produce all year long—even produce that does not grow locally during parts of the year. For example, oranges cannot survive very cold weather, but local customers expect to be able to buy them even during snowstorms in the winter.

    ### Directions

    For this journal, address the following rubric criteria:

    – Incorporated Farm-to-Table Principles: Identify different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands.
    – Benefits and Risks: Explain the benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain.
    – Data and Communication: Describe how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor.
    – Factors or Metrics: Identify factors or metrics that will determine whether you, as the COO, will support applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket and explain why.

    ### What to Submit

    Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

    ### AI Usage

    If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
    [these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
    [this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

    ### Module Four Journal Rubric

    | Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Partially Meets Expectations | Does Not Meet Expectations | Value |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Incorporated Farm-to-Table Practices | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands | Identifies different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands | Identifies different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles with limited relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process | Does not attempt to describe different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles | 20 |
    | Benefits and Risks | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain | Explains the benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain | Explains while showing limited depth of knowledge, indicating a need to explore the module’s content further | Does not attempt to address prompts, reflecting that the module’s content was not read | 20 |
    | Data and Communication | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor | Describes how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor | Describes some means of communication with limited detail, demonstrating limited incorporation of the module’s content | Does not attempt to explain the means of communication | 20 |
    | Factors or Metrics | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of factors or metrics that will determine support for applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket while explaining why | Identifies factors or metrics that will determine support for applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket and explains why | Identifies some factors or metrics with limited detail demonstrating limited incorporation of the module’s content | Does not attempt to identify factors or metrics | 20 |
    | Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 20 |
    | Total: | 100% |

    **## ModuleFourJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip**

    ## Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html

    ## QSO 321 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Scenario

    You are the chief operating officer (COO) of a local supermarket chain that has 10 stores within a 100-mile radius. The farm-to-table movement has been gaining momentum locally, and now it is a consumer demand and a good practice. This movement supports the use of local suppliers to limit the environmental impact caused by the long-distance transportation of food. It also supports small family farms that use sustainable practices, such as avoiding genetically modified organisms and pesticides or using organic fertilizers. The chief executive officer (CEO) of the supermarket chain has asked you to see if the supermarket can apply some of the farm-to-table principles to how it selects produce suppliers. Before moving too far in that direction, both you and the CEO agree that the inventory management implications need to be understood.

    Keep in mind that supermarket customers want a wide range of produce all year long—even produce that does not grow locally during parts of the year. For example, oranges cannot survive very cold weather, but local customers expect to be able to buy them even during snowstorms in the winter.

    ### Directions

    For this journal, address the following rubric criteria:

    – Incorporated Farm-to-Table Principles: Identify different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands.
    – Benefits and Risks: Explain the benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain.
    – Data and Communication: Describe how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor.
    – Factors or Metrics: Identify factors or metrics that will determine whether you, as the COO, will support applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket and explain why.

    ### What to Submit

    Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

    ### AI Usage

    If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
    [these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
    [this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

    ### Module Four Journal Rubric

    | Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Partially Meets Expectations | Does Not Meet Expectations | Value |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Incorporated Farm-to-Table Practices | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands | Identifies different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles into its operations while still meeting consumer demands | Identifies different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles with limited relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process | Does not attempt to describe different ways the supermarket chain could incorporate farm-to-table principles | 20 |
    | Benefits and Risks | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain | Explains the benefits and risks associated with incorporating farm-to-table principles into the grocery chain’s supply chain | Explains while showing limited depth of knowledge, indicating a need to explore the module’s content further | Does not attempt to address prompts, reflecting that the module’s content was not read | 20 |
    | Data and Communication | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor | Describes how data and communication with the local farms are necessary for the supermarket to implement this endeavor | Describes some means of communication with limited detail, demonstrating limited incorporation of the module’s content | Does not attempt to explain the means of communication | 20 |
    | Factors or Metrics | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of factors or metrics that will determine support for applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket while explaining why | Identifies factors or metrics that will determine support for applying farm-to-table principles to the supermarket and explains why | Identifies some factors or metrics with limited detail demonstrating limited incorporation of the module’s content | Does not attempt to identify factors or metrics | 20 |
    | Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 20 |
    | Total: | 100% |

  • [Solved] SCMG201

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached **files (1)** – ## WK8_SCMG201_DiscussionPrompt.docx **## WK8_SCMG201_DiscussionPrompt.docx** **Discussion Prompt:** In this discussion, describe how accurate forecasting and demand planning contribute to supply chain efficiency. How do you think accurate forecasting and demand plan…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK8_SCMG201_DiscussionPrompt.docx

    **## WK8_SCMG201_DiscussionPrompt.docx**

    **Discussion Prompt:**

    In this discussion, describe how accurate forecasting and demand planning contribute to supply chain efficiency.

    How do you think accurate forecasting and demand planning can impact the overall efficiency of a supply chain, and what are some potential challenges that companies might face in implementing these strategies effectively?

    **## WK8_SCMG201_DiscussionPrompt.docx**

    **Discussion Prompt:**

    In this discussion, describe how accurate forecasting and demand planning contribute to supply chain efficiency.

    How do you think accurate forecasting and demand planning can impact the overall efficiency of a supply chain, and what are some potential challenges that companies might face in implementing these strategies effectively?

  • [Solved] DEFM200

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (1)** – ## WK8DEFM200_AssignmentInstructions.docx **## WK8DEFM200_AssignmentInstructions.docx** **Instructions** **Assignment Directions** Create a page essay, excluding title and reference pages, in APA format, using the current APA information in the library writing resource…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK8DEFM200_AssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## WK8DEFM200_AssignmentInstructions.docx**

    **Instructions**

    **Assignment Directions**

    Create a page essay, excluding title and reference pages, in APA format, using the current APA information in the library writing resources section. Include the following sections: an introduction, a summary of FAR Part Fourteen, a review of relevant library articles, integration of these sources, and a description of sealed bids described in FAR Part Fourteen.

    Resource:
    [FAR [website]](https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far)

    · Read FAR section Part 14 for an understanding of the sealed bid process in federal government contracting.

    · Select library articles that describe the reasons for selecting each contract type used in government contract programs.

    · Integrate information from the FAR sections and library articles. Describe the process for administering a sealed bid contract type.

    **## WK8DEFM200_AssignmentInstructions.docx**

    **Instructions**

    **Assignment Directions**

    Create a page essay, excluding title and reference pages, in APA format, using the current APA information in the library writing resources section. Include the following sections: an introduction, a summary of FAR Part Fourteen, a review of relevant library articles, integration of these sources, and a description of sealed bids described in FAR Part Fourteen.

    Resource:
    [FAR [website]](https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far)

    · Read FAR section Part 14 for an understanding of the sealed bid process in federal government contracting.

    · Select library articles that describe the reasons for selecting each contract type used in government contract programs.

    · Integrate information from the FAR sections and library articles. Describe the process for administering a sealed bid contract type.

  • [Solved] BUSINESS( NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) tutor assignment **files (4)** – ## week4riskreturn.docx – wk4Venture_Capital_Investments_by.pdf – wk4caspital.pdf – wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf **## week4riskreturn.docx** **Instructions** **C…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    tutor assignment

    **files (4)**

    – ## week4riskreturn.docx

    – wk4Venture_Capital_Investments_by.pdf
    – wk4caspital.pdf
    – wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf

    **## week4riskreturn.docx**

    **Instructions**

    **Case 2 – Capital Investment Decisions**

    [Chapter 8]

    Bethesda Mining is a midsized coal mining company with 20 mines located in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky. The company operates deep mines as well as strip mines. Most of the coal mined is sold under contract, with excess production sold on the spot market.

    The coal mining industry, especially high-sulfur coal operations such as Bethesda, has been hard-hit by environmental regulations. Recently, however, a combination of increased demand for coal and new pollution reduction technologies has led to an improved market demand for high-sulfur coal. Bethesda has just been approached by Mid-Ohio Electric Company with a request to supply coal for its electric generators for the next four years. Bethesda Mining does not have enough excess capacity at its existing mines to guarantee the contract. The company is considering opening a strip mine in Ohio on 5,000 acres of land purchased 10 years ago for $5.4 million. Based on a recent appraisal, the company feels it could receive $7.5 million on an aftertax basis if it sold the land today.

    Strip mining is a process where the layers of topsoil above a coal vein are removed and the exposed coal is removed. Some time ago, the company would remove the coal and leave the land in an unusable condition. Changes in mining regulations now force a company to reclaim the land; that is, when the mining is completed, the land must be restored to near its original condition. The land can then be used for other purposes. As they are currently operating at full capacity, Bethesda will need to purchase additional equipment, which will cost $65 million. The equipment will be depreciated on a seven-year MACRS schedule. The contract only runs for four years. At that time, the coal from the site will be entirely mined. The company feels that the equipment can be sold for 60 percent of its initial purchase price. However, Bethesda plans to open another strip mine at that time and will use the equipment at the new mine.

    The contract calls for the delivery of 500,000 tons of coal per year at a price of $84 per ton. Bethesda Mining feels that coal production will be 750,000 tons, 810,000 tons, 830,000 tons, and 720,000 tons, respectively, over the next four years. The excess production will be sold in the spot market at an average of $95 per ton. Variable costs amount to $43 per ton and fixed costs are $5.2 million per year. The mine will require a net working capital investment of 5 percent of sales. The NWC will be built up in the year prior to the sales.

    Bethesda will be responsible for reclaiming the land at termination of the mining. This will occur in Year 5. The company uses an outside company for reclamation of all the company’s strip mines. It is estimated the cost of reclamation will be $5.4 million. After the land is reclaimed, the company plans to donate the land to the state for use as a public park and recreation area as a condition to receive the necessary mining permits. This will occur in Year 5 and result in a charitable expense deduction of $7.5 million. Bethesda has a 21 percent tax rate and a required return of 12 percent on new strip mine projects. Assume a loss in any year will result in a tax credit.

    **Assignment Directions**

    **Write a case analysis of 1,000 – 1,250 words (4 to 5 pages), content (title page and reference page not included) in proper APA format, covering the following requirements:**

    You have been approached by the president of the company with a request to analyze the project. Define, calculate, discuss, and use decision criteria to assess the investment using the following methods:

    1. Payback period.

    2. Profitability index

    3. Net present value

    4. Internal rate of return

    Based on your analysis, should Bethesda Mining take the contract and open the mine? In your analysis, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using each method for capital investment decisions. Discuss any other capital investment techniques that you would use to help you make a more informed decision. Are there any other variables that they should consider in their decision?

    **Submission Guidelines**

    · Prepare this Assignment according to the APA guidelines, including a title page, an introduction, and a conclusion. An abstract is not required. Use in-text citations and include a References section. A template is included in the
    **Resources and Supports**.

    · In your report, make certain that you include at least three (3) credible outside references from search engines or scholarly sources from the APUS Online Library.

    Buchner, A., Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2018). Cross-border venture capital investments: The impact of foreignness on returns.
    _Journal of International Business Studies, 49_(5), 575-604.
    [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6](https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6)

    Uppal, N., & Song, Z. (2025). Venture Capital Investments by U.S. Academic Medical Centers.
    _The New England Journal of Medicine, 393_(21), 2077.
    [https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860)

    Wang, Y., Xiaodong, L., Ruyin, L., & Zhao, J. (2020). Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China’s Energy-intensive Enterprises.
    _Environmental Management, 66_(6), 1059-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01346-w

    **wk4Venture_Capital_Investments_by.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4venture-capital-investments-by-pdf)

    **wk4caspital.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4caspital-pdf)

    **wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4cross-border-venture-capital-i-pdf)

    **wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4cross-border-venture-capital-i-pdf)

    **## week4riskreturn.docx**

    **Instructions**

    **Case 2 – Capital Investment Decisions**

    [Chapter 8]

    Bethesda Mining is a midsized coal mining company with 20 mines located in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky. The company operates deep mines as well as strip mines. Most of the coal mined is sold under contract, with excess production sold on the spot market.

    The coal mining industry, especially high-sulfur coal operations such as Bethesda, has been hard-hit by environmental regulations. Recently, however, a combination of increased demand for coal and new pollution reduction technologies has led to an improved market demand for high-sulfur coal. Bethesda has just been approached by Mid-Ohio Electric Company with a request to supply coal for its electric generators for the next four years. Bethesda Mining does not have enough excess capacity at its existing mines to guarantee the contract. The company is considering opening a strip mine in Ohio on 5,000 acres of land purchased 10 years ago for $5.4 million. Based on a recent appraisal, the company feels it could receive $7.5 million on an aftertax basis if it sold the land today.

    Strip mining is a process where the layers of topsoil above a coal vein are removed and the exposed coal is removed. Some time ago, the company would remove the coal and leave the land in an unusable condition. Changes in mining regulations now force a company to reclaim the land; that is, when the mining is completed, the land must be restored to near its original condition. The land can then be used for other purposes. As they are currently operating at full capacity, Bethesda will need to purchase additional equipment, which will cost $65 million. The equipment will be depreciated on a seven-year MACRS schedule. The contract only runs for four years. At that time, the coal from the site will be entirely mined. The company feels that the equipment can be sold for 60 percent of its initial purchase price. However, Bethesda plans to open another strip mine at that time and will use the equipment at the new mine.

    The contract calls for the delivery of 500,000 tons of coal per year at a price of $84 per ton. Bethesda Mining feels that coal production will be 750,000 tons, 810,000 tons, 830,000 tons, and 720,000 tons, respectively, over the next four years. The excess production will be sold in the spot market at an average of $95 per ton. Variable costs amount to $43 per ton and fixed costs are $5.2 million per year. The mine will require a net working capital investment of 5 percent of sales. The NWC will be built up in the year prior to the sales.

    Bethesda will be responsible for reclaiming the land at termination of the mining. This will occur in Year 5. The company uses an outside company for reclamation of all the company’s strip mines. It is estimated the cost of reclamation will be $5.4 million. After the land is reclaimed, the company plans to donate the land to the state for use as a public park and recreation area as a condition to receive the necessary mining permits. This will occur in Year 5 and result in a charitable expense deduction of $7.5 million. Bethesda has a 21 percent tax rate and a required return of 12 percent on new strip mine projects. Assume a loss in any year will result in a tax credit.

    **Assignment Directions**

    **Write a case analysis of 1,000 – 1,250 words (4 to 5 pages), content (title page and reference page not included) in proper APA format, covering the following requirements:**

    You have been approached by the president of the company with a request to analyze the project. Define, calculate, discuss, and use decision criteria to assess the investment using the following methods:

    1. Payback period.

    2. Profitability index

    3. Net present value

    4. Internal rate of return

    Based on your analysis, should Bethesda Mining take the contract and open the mine? In your analysis, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using each method for capital investment decisions. Discuss any other capital investment techniques that you would use to help you make a more informed decision. Are there any other variables that they should consider in their decision?

    **Submission Guidelines**

    · Prepare this Assignment according to the APA guidelines, including a title page, an introduction, and a conclusion. An abstract is not required. Use in-text citations and include a References section. A template is included in the
    **Resources and Supports**.

    · In your report, make certain that you include at least three (3) credible outside references from search engines or scholarly sources from the APUS Online Library.

    Buchner, A., Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2018). Cross-border venture capital investments: The impact of foreignness on returns.
    _Journal of International Business Studies, 49_(5), 575-604.
    [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6](https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6)

    Uppal, N., & Song, Z. (2025). Venture Capital Investments by U.S. Academic Medical Centers.
    _The New England Journal of Medicine, 393_(21), 2077.
    [https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860)

    Wang, Y., Xiaodong, L., Ruyin, L., & Zhao, J. (2020). Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China’s Energy-intensive Enterprises.
    _Environmental Management, 66_(6), 1059-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01346-w

    **wk4Venture_Capital_Investments_by.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4venture-capital-investments-by-pdf)

    **wk4caspital.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4caspital-pdf)

    **wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4cross-border-venture-capital-i-pdf)

    **## week4riskreturn.docx**

    **Instructions**

    **Case 2 – Capital Investment Decisions**

    [Chapter 8]

    Bethesda Mining is a midsized coal mining company with 20 mines located in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky. The company operates deep mines as well as strip mines. Most of the coal mined is sold under contract, with excess production sold on the spot market.

    The coal mining industry, especially high-sulfur coal operations such as Bethesda, has been hard-hit by environmental regulations. Recently, however, a combination of increased demand for coal and new pollution reduction technologies has led to an improved market demand for high-sulfur coal. Bethesda has just been approached by Mid-Ohio Electric Company with a request to supply coal for its electric generators for the next four years. Bethesda Mining does not have enough excess capacity at its existing mines to guarantee the contract. The company is considering opening a strip mine in Ohio on 5,000 acres of land purchased 10 years ago for $5.4 million. Based on a recent appraisal, the company feels it could receive $7.5 million on an aftertax basis if it sold the land today.

    Strip mining is a process where the layers of topsoil above a coal vein are removed and the exposed coal is removed. Some time ago, the company would remove the coal and leave the land in an unusable condition. Changes in mining regulations now force a company to reclaim the land; that is, when the mining is completed, the land must be restored to near its original condition. The land can then be used for other purposes. As they are currently operating at full capacity, Bethesda will need to purchase additional equipment, which will cost $65 million. The equipment will be depreciated on a seven-year MACRS schedule. The contract only runs for four years. At that time, the coal from the site will be entirely mined. The company feels that the equipment can be sold for 60 percent of its initial purchase price. However, Bethesda plans to open another strip mine at that time and will use the equipment at the new mine.

    The contract calls for the delivery of 500,000 tons of coal per year at a price of $84 per ton. Bethesda Mining feels that coal production will be 750,000 tons, 810,000 tons, 830,000 tons, and 720,000 tons, respectively, over the next four years. The excess production will be sold in the spot market at an average of $95 per ton. Variable costs amount to $43 per ton and fixed costs are $5.2 million per year. The mine will require a net working capital investment of 5 percent of sales. The NWC will be built up in the year prior to the sales.

    Bethesda will be responsible for reclaiming the land at termination of the mining. This will occur in Year 5. The company uses an outside company for reclamation of all the company’s strip mines. It is estimated the cost of reclamation will be $5.4 million. After the land is reclaimed, the company plans to donate the land to the state for use as a public park and recreation area as a condition to receive the necessary mining permits. This will occur in Year 5 and result in a charitable expense deduction of $7.5 million. Bethesda has a 21 percent tax rate and a required return of 12 percent on new strip mine projects. Assume a loss in any year will result in a tax credit.

    **Assignment Directions**

    **Write a case analysis of 1,000 – 1,250 words (4 to 5 pages), content (title page and reference page not included) in proper APA format, covering the following requirements:**

    You have been approached by the president of the company with a request to analyze the project. Define, calculate, discuss, and use decision criteria to assess the investment using the following methods:

    1. Payback period.

    2. Profitability index

    3. Net present value

    4. Internal rate of return

    Based on your analysis, should Bethesda Mining take the contract and open the mine? In your analysis, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using each method for capital investment decisions. Discuss any other capital investment techniques that you would use to help you make a more informed decision. Are there any other variables that they should consider in their decision?

    **Submission Guidelines**

    · Prepare this Assignment according to the APA guidelines, including a title page, an introduction, and a conclusion. An abstract is not required. Use in-text citations and include a References section. A template is included in the
    **Resources and Supports**.

    · In your report, make certain that you include at least three (3) credible outside references from search engines or scholarly sources from the APUS Online Library.

    Buchner, A., Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2018). Cross-border venture capital investments: The impact of foreignness on returns.
    _Journal of International Business Studies, 49_(5), 575-604.
    [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6](https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6)

    Uppal, N., & Song, Z. (2025). Venture Capital Investments by U.S. Academic Medical Centers.
    _The New England Journal of Medicine, 393_(21), 2077.
    [https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2508860)

    Wang, Y., Xiaodong, L., Ruyin, L., & Zhao, J. (2020). Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China’s Energy-intensive Enterprises.
    _Environmental Management, 66_(6), 1059-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01346-w

    **wk4Venture_Capital_Investments_by.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4venture-capital-investments-by-pdf)

    **wk4caspital.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4caspital-pdf)

    **wk4Cross-border_venture_capital_i.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk4cross-border-venture-capital-i-pdf)

  • [Solved] 628 BD 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 628 BD 1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 6-Page Trends Report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) Students will identify and select a contemporary issue, or trend, in higher education financial management from practitioner journals. Using a minimum of 8-10 articles from practitioner journals (i.e. The Chro…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    Students will identify and select a contemporary issue, or trend, in higher education financial management from practitioner journals. Using a minimum of 8-10 articles from practitioner journals (i.e. The Chronicle, Inside Higher Ed, etc.) from the past 2 calendar years and 2-3 scholarly sources, students will identify a trend that is impacting higher education finance, summarize the key themes, and describe the relevance of how the issue they identify is pertinent in higher education finance today. The reason for the high number of citations, is to ensure to topic chosen is classified as a “trend.”

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Accounting HOMEWORK

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **files (3)** – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT3FEEDBACK2.docx – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx** Week Four Assignment Top of Form | | | | –…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    **files (3)**

    – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx

    – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT3FEEDBACK2.docx

    – ## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    Week Four Assignment

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Hide Assignment Information |
    | Turnitin™ | |
    | ![Turnitin™ enabled](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/business-finance-accounting-homework-20966609)This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. |
    | Instructions | |
    | By the end of the week, submit draft of Chapter Two. |

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

    ## image1.gif

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT3FEEDBACK2.docx**

    **Summary of Feedback**

    1. Your voice is missing

    · You are summarizing sources too much.

    · The professor wants more of your opinion, analysis, and interpretation, not just what the article says.

    2.

    3. Don’t end paragraphs with a source

    · Ending with a citation makes it look like you’re only summarizing.

    · You need to tie the source back to your topic or argument in your own words.

    4.

    5. Weave sources into your discussion

    · Instead of dumping information all at once, mix the research into your explanation.

    · Connect the facts to your problem statement or research focus.

    6.

    7. Some facts need citations

    · The professor noticed statements without sources.

    · If it’s factual, it needs a reference.

    8.

    9. Some paragraphs are too long / run-on

    · Break long paragraphs into smaller ones.

    · Make each paragraph focus on one idea.

    10.

    **What the professor really wants overall**

    · Less summary

    · More analysis

    · More connection to your topic

    · Better paragraph structure

    · Proper citations everywhere needed

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf**

    Capstone Project Chapter Grading Rubric
    Course: HSE490 Supervised Senior Project

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Analysis of

    Information

    / 8.348.34 points

    Completely exam-

    ines the fundamen-

    tal issues associated

    with the research

    question.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using current

    and related litera-

    ture that is credible,

    authoritative and

    focused.

    7.5 points

    Examines the funda-

    mental issues asso-

    ciated with the re-

    search question but

    there may be ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using litera-

    ture that is credible,

    but may be irrele-

    vant, or outdated, or

    have limited author-

    ity in the discipline.

    6.3 points

    Examines some is-

    sues associated with

    the research ques-

    tion but there are

    more than a few ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Some Literature is

    used that has ques-

    tionable credibility,

    or have issues re-

    lated to relevancy,

    currency or author-

    ity in the discipline.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Examines

    few if any issues as-

    sociated with the re-

    search question.

    There are many ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Literature is used

    that has minimal if

    any credibility, or

    relevancy, currency

    or authority in the

    discipline.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 1/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Evaluation of

    Sources

    / 8.348.34 points

    Demonstrates a

    thorough appraisal

    of the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    thoroughly reviewed

    and assessed for

    their contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a congru-

    ous and thoughtful

    exposition of ideas.

    7.5 points

    Demonstrates a fair

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but may not

    be thoroughly re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a thought-

    ful exposition of

    ideas.

    6.3 points

    Demonstrates a less

    than fair appraisal of

    the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but for the

    most part have not

    been sufficiently re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a dis-

    parate exposition of

    ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or

    Demonstrates no

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but there is

    little if any review or

    assessment of their

    value

    or contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as an incon-

    gruous exposition of

    ideas.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 2/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Communication

    Skills

    / 8.338.33 points

    Conveys complete

    and exceptional in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains all required

    technical compo-

    nents specified in

    the assignment.

    Contains fewer than

    five formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors.

    APA Style is used

    correctly

    7.5 points

    Conveys sufficient

    information on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains most re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains no more

    than 10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors but

    errors do not de-

    tract from

    understanding.

    Good effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    some errors that do

    not detract from

    overall product.

    6.3 points

    Conveys minimal in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains few re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains more than

    10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors that

    detract from

    understanding.

    Some effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    more than a few er-

    rors that detract

    from overall

    product.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Conveys

    no information on

    the fundamental

    issues.

    Contains very few or

    no required techni-

    cal components.

    There are so many

    formatting, gram-

    matical, or spelling

    that it is difficult to

    read.

    Little or no effort to

    use the APA Style

    properly.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 3/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Critical Thinking / 8.33

    Synthesis of

    Information

    / 8.33

    8.33 points

    Content is ex-

    tremely well thought

    out and at times

    demonstrates origi-

    nal thinking. Critical

    analysis of resources

    and information is

    present via interpre-

    tation and focused

    discussion obvious.

    7.5 points

    Content is well

    thought out but

    there is little origi-

    nality in the thinking

    presented. Some

    critical analysis is

    done but there may

    be areas where re-

    sources and infor-

    mation are dis-

    cussed with minimal

    focus and

    interpretation.

    6.3 points

    Content is pre-

    sented coherently

    but may not be fully

    developed at the

    graduate level.

    Originality of con-

    tent is difficult to

    determine or merely

    presents what oth-

    ers have already

    written. Critical

    analysis is minimal

    as many areas

    present resources

    and information

    with only surface

    level discussion.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Content is

    incoherent, or not

    well-developed at

    the graduate level.

    Lacks Originality.

    Mainly offers what

    others have written

    without focus, inter-

    pretation or in-

    formed discussion

    No Critical analysis

    is offered.

    8.33 points

    A consolidated, the-

    matic integration of

    the fundamental is-

    sues. Extends re-

    search well beyond

    minimum

    requirements.

    7.5 points

    A basic compilation

    of the fundamental

    issues, but integra-

    tion of research into

    a theme may be

    fragmented in some

    areas.

    6.3 points

    A response to some

    individual issues

    with insufficient re-

    search and consoli-

    dation of ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or little evi-

    dence of combining

    researched material

    into a consistent

    whole.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 4/5

    Total / 50

    Overall Score

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Quality of

    Scholarly

    Research

    / 8.338.33 points

    Selected resources

    are mostly scholarly,

    peer-reviewed, and

    represent a disci-

    plined inquiry into

    the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    7.5 points

    Selected resources

    may contain some

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources, but

    most are not. The

    sources inform prac-

    tice. There is some

    effort at inquiry

    into the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    6.3 points

    Selected resources

    have few if any

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources.

    Some sources do in-

    form practice but

    inquiry into the re-

    search

    question/problem

    for study is either

    scattered or missing.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Selected

    resources are nei-

    ther scholarly/peer-

    reviewed nor do

    they inform practice

    meaningfully.

    Connection to the

    research

    question/problem

    for study is lacking

    substance. There is

    a lack of serious

    research.

    Honors
    45 points minimum

    Satisfactory 1
    40 points minimum

    Satisfactory 2
    35 points minimum

    Unsatisfactory
    30 points minimum

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 5/5

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf**

    Capstone Project Chapter Grading Rubric
    Course: HSE490 Supervised Senior Project

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Analysis of

    Information

    / 8.348.34 points

    Completely exam-

    ines the fundamen-

    tal issues associated

    with the research

    question.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using current

    and related litera-

    ture that is credible,

    authoritative and

    focused.

    7.5 points

    Examines the funda-

    mental issues asso-

    ciated with the re-

    search question but

    there may be ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using litera-

    ture that is credible,

    but may be irrele-

    vant, or outdated, or

    have limited author-

    ity in the discipline.

    6.3 points

    Examines some is-

    sues associated with

    the research ques-

    tion but there are

    more than a few ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Some Literature is

    used that has ques-

    tionable credibility,

    or have issues re-

    lated to relevancy,

    currency or author-

    ity in the discipline.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Examines

    few if any issues as-

    sociated with the re-

    search question.

    There are many ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Literature is used

    that has minimal if

    any credibility, or

    relevancy, currency

    or authority in the

    discipline.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 1/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Evaluation of

    Sources

    / 8.348.34 points

    Demonstrates a

    thorough appraisal

    of the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    thoroughly reviewed

    and assessed for

    their contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a congru-

    ous and thoughtful

    exposition of ideas.

    7.5 points

    Demonstrates a fair

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but may not

    be thoroughly re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a thought-

    ful exposition of

    ideas.

    6.3 points

    Demonstrates a less

    than fair appraisal of

    the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but for the

    most part have not

    been sufficiently re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a dis-

    parate exposition of

    ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or

    Demonstrates no

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but there is

    little if any review or

    assessment of their

    value

    or contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as an incon-

    gruous exposition of

    ideas.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 2/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Communication

    Skills

    / 8.338.33 points

    Conveys complete

    and exceptional in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains all required

    technical compo-

    nents specified in

    the assignment.

    Contains fewer than

    five formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors.

    APA Style is used

    correctly

    7.5 points

    Conveys sufficient

    information on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains most re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains no more

    than 10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors but

    errors do not de-

    tract from

    understanding.

    Good effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    some errors that do

    not detract from

    overall product.

    6.3 points

    Conveys minimal in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains few re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains more than

    10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors that

    detract from

    understanding.

    Some effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    more than a few er-

    rors that detract

    from overall

    product.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Conveys

    no information on

    the fundamental

    issues.

    Contains very few or

    no required techni-

    cal components.

    There are so many

    formatting, gram-

    matical, or spelling

    that it is difficult to

    read.

    Little or no effort to

    use the APA Style

    properly.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 3/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Critical Thinking / 8.33

    Synthesis of

    Information

    / 8.33

    8.33 points

    Content is ex-

    tremely well thought

    out and at times

    demonstrates origi-

    nal thinking. Critical

    analysis of resources

    and information is

    present via interpre-

    tation and focused

    discussion obvious.

    7.5 points

    Content is well

    thought out but

    there is little origi-

    nality in the thinking

    presented. Some

    critical analysis is

    done but there may

    be areas where re-

    sources and infor-

    mation are dis-

    cussed with minimal

    focus and

    interpretation.

    6.3 points

    Content is pre-

    sented coherently

    but may not be fully

    developed at the

    graduate level.

    Originality of con-

    tent is difficult to

    determine or merely

    presents what oth-

    ers have already

    written. Critical

    analysis is minimal

    as many areas

    present resources

    and information

    with only surface

    level discussion.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Content is

    incoherent, or not

    well-developed at

    the graduate level.

    Lacks Originality.

    Mainly offers what

    others have written

    without focus, inter-

    pretation or in-

    formed discussion

    No Critical analysis

    is offered.

    8.33 points

    A consolidated, the-

    matic integration of

    the fundamental is-

    sues. Extends re-

    search well beyond

    minimum

    requirements.

    7.5 points

    A basic compilation

    of the fundamental

    issues, but integra-

    tion of research into

    a theme may be

    fragmented in some

    areas.

    6.3 points

    A response to some

    individual issues

    with insufficient re-

    search and consoli-

    dation of ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or little evi-

    dence of combining

    researched material

    into a consistent

    whole.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 4/5

    Total / 50

    Overall Score

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Quality of

    Scholarly

    Research

    / 8.338.33 points

    Selected resources

    are mostly scholarly,

    peer-reviewed, and

    represent a disci-

    plined inquiry into

    the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    7.5 points

    Selected resources

    may contain some

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources, but

    most are not. The

    sources inform prac-

    tice. There is some

    effort at inquiry

    into the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    6.3 points

    Selected resources

    have few if any

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources.

    Some sources do in-

    form practice but

    inquiry into the re-

    search

    question/problem

    for study is either

    scattered or missing.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Selected

    resources are nei-

    ther scholarly/peer-

    reviewed nor do

    they inform practice

    meaningfully.

    Connection to the

    research

    question/problem

    for study is lacking

    substance. There is

    a lack of serious

    research.

    Honors
    45 points minimum

    Satisfactory 1
    40 points minimum

    Satisfactory 2
    35 points minimum

    Unsatisfactory
    30 points minimum

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 5/5

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    Week Four Assignment

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Hide Assignment Information |
    | Turnitin™ | |
    | ![Turnitin™ enabled](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/business-finance-accounting-homework-20966609)This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. |
    | Instructions | |
    | By the end of the week, submit draft of Chapter Two. |

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

    ## image1.gif

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT3FEEDBACK2.docx**

    **Summary of Feedback**

    1. Your voice is missing

    · You are summarizing sources too much.

    · The professor wants more of your opinion, analysis, and interpretation, not just what the article says.

    2.

    3. Don’t end paragraphs with a source

    · Ending with a citation makes it look like you’re only summarizing.

    · You need to tie the source back to your topic or argument in your own words.

    4.

    5. Weave sources into your discussion

    · Instead of dumping information all at once, mix the research into your explanation.

    · Connect the facts to your problem statement or research focus.

    6.

    7. Some facts need citations

    · The professor noticed statements without sources.

    · If it’s factual, it needs a reference.

    8.

    9. Some paragraphs are too long / run-on

    · Break long paragraphs into smaller ones.

    · Make each paragraph focus on one idea.

    10.

    **What the professor really wants overall**

    · Less summary

    · More analysis

    · More connection to your topic

    · Better paragraph structure

    · Proper citations everywhere needed

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf**

    Capstone Project Chapter Grading Rubric
    Course: HSE490 Supervised Senior Project

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Analysis of

    Information

    / 8.348.34 points

    Completely exam-

    ines the fundamen-

    tal issues associated

    with the research

    question.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using current

    and related litera-

    ture that is credible,

    authoritative and

    focused.

    7.5 points

    Examines the funda-

    mental issues asso-

    ciated with the re-

    search question but

    there may be ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using litera-

    ture that is credible,

    but may be irrele-

    vant, or outdated, or

    have limited author-

    ity in the discipline.

    6.3 points

    Examines some is-

    sues associated with

    the research ques-

    tion but there are

    more than a few ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Some Literature is

    used that has ques-

    tionable credibility,

    or have issues re-

    lated to relevancy,

    currency or author-

    ity in the discipline.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Examines

    few if any issues as-

    sociated with the re-

    search question.

    There are many ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Literature is used

    that has minimal if

    any credibility, or

    relevancy, currency

    or authority in the

    discipline.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 1/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Evaluation of

    Sources

    / 8.348.34 points

    Demonstrates a

    thorough appraisal

    of the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    thoroughly reviewed

    and assessed for

    their contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a congru-

    ous and thoughtful

    exposition of ideas.

    7.5 points

    Demonstrates a fair

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but may not

    be thoroughly re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a thought-

    ful exposition of

    ideas.

    6.3 points

    Demonstrates a less

    than fair appraisal of

    the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but for the

    most part have not

    been sufficiently re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a dis-

    parate exposition of

    ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or

    Demonstrates no

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but there is

    little if any review or

    assessment of their

    value

    or contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as an incon-

    gruous exposition of

    ideas.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 2/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Communication

    Skills

    / 8.338.33 points

    Conveys complete

    and exceptional in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains all required

    technical compo-

    nents specified in

    the assignment.

    Contains fewer than

    five formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors.

    APA Style is used

    correctly

    7.5 points

    Conveys sufficient

    information on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains most re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains no more

    than 10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors but

    errors do not de-

    tract from

    understanding.

    Good effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    some errors that do

    not detract from

    overall product.

    6.3 points

    Conveys minimal in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains few re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains more than

    10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors that

    detract from

    understanding.

    Some effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    more than a few er-

    rors that detract

    from overall

    product.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Conveys

    no information on

    the fundamental

    issues.

    Contains very few or

    no required techni-

    cal components.

    There are so many

    formatting, gram-

    matical, or spelling

    that it is difficult to

    read.

    Little or no effort to

    use the APA Style

    properly.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 3/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Critical Thinking / 8.33

    Synthesis of

    Information

    / 8.33

    8.33 points

    Content is ex-

    tremely well thought

    out and at times

    demonstrates origi-

    nal thinking. Critical

    analysis of resources

    and information is

    present via interpre-

    tation and focused

    discussion obvious.

    7.5 points

    Content is well

    thought out but

    there is little origi-

    nality in the thinking

    presented. Some

    critical analysis is

    done but there may

    be areas where re-

    sources and infor-

    mation are dis-

    cussed with minimal

    focus and

    interpretation.

    6.3 points

    Content is pre-

    sented coherently

    but may not be fully

    developed at the

    graduate level.

    Originality of con-

    tent is difficult to

    determine or merely

    presents what oth-

    ers have already

    written. Critical

    analysis is minimal

    as many areas

    present resources

    and information

    with only surface

    level discussion.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Content is

    incoherent, or not

    well-developed at

    the graduate level.

    Lacks Originality.

    Mainly offers what

    others have written

    without focus, inter-

    pretation or in-

    formed discussion

    No Critical analysis

    is offered.

    8.33 points

    A consolidated, the-

    matic integration of

    the fundamental is-

    sues. Extends re-

    search well beyond

    minimum

    requirements.

    7.5 points

    A basic compilation

    of the fundamental

    issues, but integra-

    tion of research into

    a theme may be

    fragmented in some

    areas.

    6.3 points

    A response to some

    individual issues

    with insufficient re-

    search and consoli-

    dation of ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or little evi-

    dence of combining

    researched material

    into a consistent

    whole.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 4/5

    Total / 50

    Overall Score

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Quality of

    Scholarly

    Research

    / 8.338.33 points

    Selected resources

    are mostly scholarly,

    peer-reviewed, and

    represent a disci-

    plined inquiry into

    the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    7.5 points

    Selected resources

    may contain some

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources, but

    most are not. The

    sources inform prac-

    tice. There is some

    effort at inquiry

    into the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    6.3 points

    Selected resources

    have few if any

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources.

    Some sources do in-

    form practice but

    inquiry into the re-

    search

    question/problem

    for study is either

    scattered or missing.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Selected

    resources are nei-

    ther scholarly/peer-

    reviewed nor do

    they inform practice

    meaningfully.

    Connection to the

    research

    question/problem

    for study is lacking

    substance. There is

    a lack of serious

    research.

    Honors
    45 points minimum

    Satisfactory 1
    40 points minimum

    Satisfactory 2
    35 points minimum

    Unsatisfactory
    30 points minimum

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 5/5

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4INSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    Week Four Assignment

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Hide Assignment Information |
    | Turnitin™ | |
    | ![Turnitin™ enabled](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/business-finance-accounting-homework-20966609)This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. |
    | Instructions | |
    | By the end of the week, submit draft of Chapter Two. |

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

    ## image1.gif

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT3FEEDBACK2.docx**

    **Summary of Feedback**

    1. Your voice is missing

    · You are summarizing sources too much.

    · The professor wants more of your opinion, analysis, and interpretation, not just what the article says.

    2.

    3. Don’t end paragraphs with a source

    · Ending with a citation makes it look like you’re only summarizing.

    · You need to tie the source back to your topic or argument in your own words.

    4.

    5. Weave sources into your discussion

    · Instead of dumping information all at once, mix the research into your explanation.

    · Connect the facts to your problem statement or research focus.

    6.

    7. Some facts need citations

    · The professor noticed statements without sources.

    · If it’s factual, it needs a reference.

    8.

    9. Some paragraphs are too long / run-on

    · Break long paragraphs into smaller ones.

    · Make each paragraph focus on one idea.

    10.

    **What the professor really wants overall**

    · Less summary

    · More analysis

    · More connection to your topic

    · Better paragraph structure

    · Proper citations everywhere needed

    **## HSE490ASSIGNMENT4RUBRIC.pdf**

    Capstone Project Chapter Grading Rubric
    Course: HSE490 Supervised Senior Project

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Analysis of

    Information

    / 8.348.34 points

    Completely exam-

    ines the fundamen-

    tal issues associated

    with the research

    question.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using current

    and related litera-

    ture that is credible,

    authoritative and

    focused.

    7.5 points

    Examines the funda-

    mental issues asso-

    ciated with the re-

    search question but

    there may be ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Analyzes key ele-

    ments using litera-

    ture that is credible,

    but may be irrele-

    vant, or outdated, or

    have limited author-

    ity in the discipline.

    6.3 points

    Examines some is-

    sues associated with

    the research ques-

    tion but there are

    more than a few ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Some Literature is

    used that has ques-

    tionable credibility,

    or have issues re-

    lated to relevancy,

    currency or author-

    ity in the discipline.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Examines

    few if any issues as-

    sociated with the re-

    search question.

    There are many ele-

    ments that do not

    address the main

    question

    sufficiently.

    Literature is used

    that has minimal if

    any credibility, or

    relevancy, currency

    or authority in the

    discipline.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 1/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Evaluation of

    Sources

    / 8.348.34 points

    Demonstrates a

    thorough appraisal

    of the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    thoroughly reviewed

    and assessed for

    their contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a congru-

    ous and thoughtful

    exposition of ideas.

    7.5 points

    Demonstrates a fair

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but may not

    be thoroughly re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a thought-

    ful exposition of

    ideas.

    6.3 points

    Demonstrates a less

    than fair appraisal of

    the researched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but for the

    most part have not

    been sufficiently re-

    viewed and as-

    sessed for their con-

    tribution to answer-

    ing the research

    question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as a dis-

    parate exposition of

    ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or

    Demonstrates no

    appraisal of the re-

    searched

    information.

    Sources have been

    offered but there is

    little if any review or

    assessment of their

    value

    or contribution to

    answering the re-

    search question.

    The work is pre-

    sented as an incon-

    gruous exposition of

    ideas.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 2/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Communication

    Skills

    / 8.338.33 points

    Conveys complete

    and exceptional in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains all required

    technical compo-

    nents specified in

    the assignment.

    Contains fewer than

    five formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors.

    APA Style is used

    correctly

    7.5 points

    Conveys sufficient

    information on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains most re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains no more

    than 10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors but

    errors do not de-

    tract from

    understanding.

    Good effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    some errors that do

    not detract from

    overall product.

    6.3 points

    Conveys minimal in-

    formation on the

    fundamental issues.

    Contains few re-

    quired technical

    components.

    Contains more than

    10 formatting,

    grammatical or

    spelling errors that

    detract from

    understanding.

    Some effort to use

    the APA Style al-

    though there are

    more than a few er-

    rors that detract

    from overall

    product.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Conveys

    no information on

    the fundamental

    issues.

    Contains very few or

    no required techni-

    cal components.

    There are so many

    formatting, gram-

    matical, or spelling

    that it is difficult to

    read.

    Little or no effort to

    use the APA Style

    properly.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 3/5

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Critical Thinking / 8.33

    Synthesis of

    Information

    / 8.33

    8.33 points

    Content is ex-

    tremely well thought

    out and at times

    demonstrates origi-

    nal thinking. Critical

    analysis of resources

    and information is

    present via interpre-

    tation and focused

    discussion obvious.

    7.5 points

    Content is well

    thought out but

    there is little origi-

    nality in the thinking

    presented. Some

    critical analysis is

    done but there may

    be areas where re-

    sources and infor-

    mation are dis-

    cussed with minimal

    focus and

    interpretation.

    6.3 points

    Content is pre-

    sented coherently

    but may not be fully

    developed at the

    graduate level.

    Originality of con-

    tent is difficult to

    determine or merely

    presents what oth-

    ers have already

    written. Critical

    analysis is minimal

    as many areas

    present resources

    and information

    with only surface

    level discussion.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Content is

    incoherent, or not

    well-developed at

    the graduate level.

    Lacks Originality.

    Mainly offers what

    others have written

    without focus, inter-

    pretation or in-

    formed discussion

    No Critical analysis

    is offered.

    8.33 points

    A consolidated, the-

    matic integration of

    the fundamental is-

    sues. Extends re-

    search well beyond

    minimum

    requirements.

    7.5 points

    A basic compilation

    of the fundamental

    issues, but integra-

    tion of research into

    a theme may be

    fragmented in some

    areas.

    6.3 points

    A response to some

    individual issues

    with insufficient re-

    search and consoli-

    dation of ideas.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or little evi-

    dence of combining

    researched material

    into a consistent

    whole.

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 4/5

    Total / 50

    Overall Score

    Criteria Honors Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

    Quality of

    Scholarly

    Research

    / 8.338.33 points

    Selected resources

    are mostly scholarly,

    peer-reviewed, and

    represent a disci-

    plined inquiry into

    the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    7.5 points

    Selected resources

    may contain some

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources, but

    most are not. The

    sources inform prac-

    tice. There is some

    effort at inquiry

    into the research

    question/problem

    for study.

    6.3 points

    Selected resources

    have few if any

    scholarly, peer-re-

    viewed sources.

    Some sources do in-

    form practice but

    inquiry into the re-

    search

    question/problem

    for study is either

    scattered or missing.

    5.4 points

    No submission (0

    points) or Selected

    resources are nei-

    ther scholarly/peer-

    reviewed nor do

    they inform practice

    meaningfully.

    Connection to the

    research

    question/problem

    for study is lacking

    substance. There is

    a lack of serious

    research.

    Honors
    45 points minimum

    Satisfactory 1
    40 points minimum

    Satisfactory 2
    35 points minimum

    Unsatisfactory
    30 points minimum

    3/23/26, 8:52 AM Week Four Assignment – HSE490 Supervised Senior Project – National University System

    https://navigate.nu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=121403&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=85319 5/5

  • [Solved] QSO 435 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) ## QSO 435 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Using the scenario organization you selected for Milestone One, you will now develop an Approach Selection decision paper. The decision paper will be targeted for…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    ## QSO 435 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

    Using the scenario organization you selected for Milestone One, you will now develop an Approach Selection decision paper. The decision paper will be targeted for the senior program manager in the Program Management Office (PMO) of your scenario organization. The decision paper will build upon the information paper you developed for Milestone One in Module Two. Specifically, the following **critical elements** must be addressed:

    – Analyze alternatives of various **project management (PM) approaches**.
    – Provide a project management **approach selection** with explanation and defense of decision.
    – Provide an **approach analysis** with detailed examples.

    ### What to Submit

    Your Milestone Two submission, **Approach Selection decision paper,** must be 1–2 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least three references cited in APA format.

    ### AI Usage

    If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow [these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in [this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

    ### Milestone Two Rubric

    CriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (85%)Partially Meets Expectations (55%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)Value **PM Approaches** Exceeds expectations and submission is well organized and detailed to a level that shows keen insight into the nuances, risks, and benefitsCompares and contrasts various types of project management approaches; addresses situation described in the information paper from Milestone OneReviews various types of project management approaches, but does not address situation described in the information paper from Milestone OneDoes not review types of project management approaches, or does not build on information paper from Milestone One30 **Approach Selection** Exceeds expectations and defense is well organized and detailed to a level that shows keen insight into the nuances, risks, and benefits of electing the PM approachesSelects a PM approach type that is comprehensively defended based on specific references to the previous analysis and includes necessary detailSelects a PM approach and defends the approach, but does not make specific references to previous analysis, or lacks necessary detailDoes not select and defend a PM approach type30 **Approach Analysis** Exceeds expectations and analysis professionally details the key principles of the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, with detailed examplesAnalyzes the key principles behind the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, with detailed examplesAnalyzes the key principles behind the selected PM approach and explains why the approach was selected, but does not provide detailed examples or misses key elementsDoes not analyze the key principles of the selected PM approach and does not explain why the approach was selected, or does not select a PM approach30 **Clear Communication** Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication10 **Total:** 100%

    – [\
    \
    TransitioningfromTraditionaltoAdaptiveProjectManagement_Ortiz.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/transitioningfromtraditionaltoadaptiveprojectmanagement-ortiz-docx "TransitioningfromTraditionaltoAdaptiveProjectManagement_Ortiz.docx")