Which of the following best describes the difference between first and third party liability?First…

Which of the following best describes the difference between first and third party liability?
First party liability implies the hospitality establishment committed a crime, second party liability implies a user who had been provided legal access to the establishment’s it instern (but is not an employee) committed a crime, and third party liability implies an individual who is not associated with the establishment committed a crime.
Third party liability is insurance against data breaches that take place against your establishment but from outside sources. First person liability is insurance against customers who experience data breaches.
Fist party liability implies the hospitality establishment has suffered a breach in data security: a third party liability implies an individual user of the hospitality establishment’s IT system has suffered a security breach.
Third party liability references the individual who committed a crime against the hospitality establishment, while first party liability implies the hospitality establishment is to blame for the erroneous data breach.
None of the above are true.