Executive Solution Overview
see attaches **files (6)** – ## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf – Pleaseread.jpeg – ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf – PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBey…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
see attaches
**files (6)**
– ## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
– ## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf
– Pleaseread.jpeg
– ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf
– PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf
– ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf
**## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 700
**Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**
Overview
The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.
Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.
Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.
The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.
Instructions
In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
**Journal Article Review** you will:
· Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;
· Explain the method used to support the claims of the article
· State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.
· State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)
· Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study
· Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.
· Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.
Your
**Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, significant points
in support of the premise,
and the significance of
these to the course and/or
field.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field, but
one or more of them need
improvement.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
One of the following is
missing or insufficiently
analytical: accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Synthesis 40 to >36 pts
Advanced
The review contains an
accurate, detailed, and
well thought out
comparison of the salient
points of the article.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
The review contains
comparisons of the salient
points of the article. The
detail and critical thinking
intersection is less
defined.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
The review vaguely links
the salient points of the
article and is generally
lacking in critical analysis.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Critical
Evaluation
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s informed and
substantiated opinion,
thorough evaluation of the
article’s premise, and
supporting points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview.
54 to >50 pts
Proficient
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s opinion and
some evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
arguments, including with
respect to a biblical
worldview, but overlooks
some points.
50 to >0 pts
Developing
Student’s opinion of the
article is stated, along with
critical evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
argument, but some
significant points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview, are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
60 pts
APA
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Documents sources using
APA formatting accurately
and consistently.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Documents sources using
APA formatting with minor
violations.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Reflects incomplete
knowledge of APA
formatting.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Writing
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar are
excellent. Correct use of
punctuation. No spelling
errors. The paper is at
least 4 full pages.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar
are strong and mostly
correct. Few minor errors
in punctuation and/or
spelling. The paper is 4
pages.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing lacks clarity or
conciseness. Minor
problems with sentence
structure and some
grammatical errors.
Several minor errors in
punctuation and spelling.
The paper is fewer than 4
pages.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Organization 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The organization results in
clarity and presents
logically arranged points.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The overall arrangement
is logical but can
occasionally be difficult to
follow.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Arrangement is less than
clear, or organization is
clear but there are some
digressions.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
**Pleaseread.jpeg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)
**ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)
**PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)
**ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)
**ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)
**## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 700
**Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**
Overview
The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.
Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.
Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.
The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.
Instructions
In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
**Journal Article Review** you will:
· Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;
· Explain the method used to support the claims of the article
· State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.
· State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)
· Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study
· Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.
· Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.
Your
**Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, significant points
in support of the premise,
and the significance of
these to the course and/or
field.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field, but
one or more of them need
improvement.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
One of the following is
missing or insufficiently
analytical: accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Synthesis 40 to >36 pts
Advanced
The review contains an
accurate, detailed, and
well thought out
comparison of the salient
points of the article.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
The review contains
comparisons of the salient
points of the article. The
detail and critical thinking
intersection is less
defined.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
The review vaguely links
the salient points of the
article and is generally
lacking in critical analysis.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Critical
Evaluation
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s informed and
substantiated opinion,
thorough evaluation of the
article’s premise, and
supporting points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview.
54 to >50 pts
Proficient
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s opinion and
some evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
arguments, including with
respect to a biblical
worldview, but overlooks
some points.
50 to >0 pts
Developing
Student’s opinion of the
article is stated, along with
critical evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
argument, but some
significant points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview, are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
60 pts
APA
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Documents sources using
APA formatting accurately
and consistently.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Documents sources using
APA formatting with minor
violations.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Reflects incomplete
knowledge of APA
formatting.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Writing
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar are
excellent. Correct use of
punctuation. No spelling
errors. The paper is at
least 4 full pages.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar
are strong and mostly
correct. Few minor errors
in punctuation and/or
spelling. The paper is 4
pages.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing lacks clarity or
conciseness. Minor
problems with sentence
structure and some
grammatical errors.
Several minor errors in
punctuation and spelling.
The paper is fewer than 4
pages.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Organization 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The organization results in
clarity and presents
logically arranged points.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The overall arrangement
is logical but can
occasionally be difficult to
follow.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Arrangement is less than
clear, or organization is
clear but there are some
digressions.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
**Pleaseread.jpeg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)
**ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)
**PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)
**ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)
**## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 700
**Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**
Overview
The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.
Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.
Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.
The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.
Instructions
In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
**Journal Article Review** you will:
· Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;
· Explain the method used to support the claims of the article
· State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.
· State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)
· Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study
· Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.
· Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.
Your
**Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, significant points
in support of the premise,
and the significance of
these to the course and/or
field.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Includes accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field, but
one or more of them need
improvement.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
One of the following is
missing or insufficiently
analytical: accurate
identification of article
premise, importance to
the course, significant
points in support of the
premise, and/or field.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Synthesis 40 to >36 pts
Advanced
The review contains an
accurate, detailed, and
well thought out
comparison of the salient
points of the article.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
The review contains
comparisons of the salient
points of the article. The
detail and critical thinking
intersection is less
defined.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
The review vaguely links
the salient points of the
article and is generally
lacking in critical analysis.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Critical
Evaluation
of Premise
and
Supporting
Points
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s informed and
substantiated opinion,
thorough evaluation of the
article’s premise, and
supporting points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview.
54 to >50 pts
Proficient
Includes critical thinking
that clearly states the
student’s opinion and
some evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
arguments, including with
respect to a biblical
worldview, but overlooks
some points.
50 to >0 pts
Developing
Student’s opinion of the
article is stated, along with
critical evaluation of the
article’s premise and/or
argument, but some
significant points,
including with respect to a
biblical worldview, are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
60 pts
APA
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Documents sources using
APA formatting accurately
and consistently.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Documents sources using
APA formatting with minor
violations.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Reflects incomplete
knowledge of APA
formatting.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Writing
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar are
excellent. Correct use of
punctuation. No spelling
errors. The paper is at
least 4 full pages.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and
concise. Sentence
structure and grammar
are strong and mostly
correct. Few minor errors
in punctuation and/or
spelling. The paper is 4
pages.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing lacks clarity or
conciseness. Minor
problems with sentence
structure and some
grammatical errors.
Several minor errors in
punctuation and spelling.
The paper is fewer than 4
pages.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Organization 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The organization results in
clarity and presents
logically arranged points.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The overall arrangement
is logical but can
occasionally be difficult to
follow.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Arrangement is less than
clear, or organization is
clear but there are some
digressions.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
PADM700_C01_202620
**Pleaseread.jpeg**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)
**ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)
**PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)
**ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)
Leave a Reply