Tag: Homework Solution

[Solved] MODULE 1_DNP860

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is **files (2)** – ## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx – ## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx **## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx** **Assignment Description:** **Indicator Description** Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the fo…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is

**files (2)**

– ## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx

– ## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx

**## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Indicator Description**

Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least FOUR (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is vital in preparing for your DNP Project. No matter what you elect to focus on for your project, you need to start brainstorming the problems you want to solve. In this week’s assignment, you will analyze the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators.

· Select and share the indicator that resonates with you and impacts your clinical practice.

· Discuss the background of the problem as it relates to your selected indicator.

· Explain why this indicator is worthy of focusing on and describe why this is a problem in your practice.

· Address how this indicator plays a role in the National Quality Strategy.

**Start by reading and following these instructions:**

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

·
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

**Reference:**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

**Additional source**

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_About the national quality strategy_.
[https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_Quality improvement and monitoring at your fingertips._ [https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/](https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/)

Federal Drug Administration. (September 2019).
_Institutional review board (IRBs) and protection of human subjects in clinical trials._ Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Protection of Human Subjects in Clinical Trials | FDA.
[https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials](https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials)

Thomas Craig, K.J., McKillop, M.M., . . . Huang, H.T. (2020). U.S. hospital performance methodologies: A scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.
_BMC Health Services Research,_ 20(640).
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z)

Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
_OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
[https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

**Instruction**

Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

**This is my Topic**

“ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

**## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx**

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

21

points

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx**

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

21

points

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Indicator Description**

Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least FOUR (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is vital in preparing for your DNP Project. No matter what you elect to focus on for your project, you need to start brainstorming the problems you want to solve. In this week’s assignment, you will analyze the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators.

· Select and share the indicator that resonates with you and impacts your clinical practice.

· Discuss the background of the problem as it relates to your selected indicator.

· Explain why this indicator is worthy of focusing on and describe why this is a problem in your practice.

· Address how this indicator plays a role in the National Quality Strategy.

**Start by reading and following these instructions:**

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

·
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

**Reference:**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

**Additional source**

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_About the national quality strategy_.
[https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_Quality improvement and monitoring at your fingertips._ [https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/](https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/)

Federal Drug Administration. (September 2019).
_Institutional review board (IRBs) and protection of human subjects in clinical trials._ Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Protection of Human Subjects in Clinical Trials | FDA.
[https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials](https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials)

Thomas Craig, K.J., McKillop, M.M., . . . Huang, H.T. (2020). U.S. hospital performance methodologies: A scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.
_BMC Health Services Research,_ 20(640).
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z)

Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
_OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
[https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

**Instruction**

Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

**This is my Topic**

“ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

**## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx**

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

21

points

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**## ASSIGNMENT1.2.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Indicator Description**

Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least FOUR (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is vital in preparing for your DNP Project. No matter what you elect to focus on for your project, you need to start brainstorming the problems you want to solve. In this week’s assignment, you will analyze the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators.

· Select and share the indicator that resonates with you and impacts your clinical practice.

· Discuss the background of the problem as it relates to your selected indicator.

· Explain why this indicator is worthy of focusing on and describe why this is a problem in your practice.

· Address how this indicator plays a role in the National Quality Strategy.

**Start by reading and following these instructions:**

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length:** 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

·
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

**Reference:**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

**Additional source**

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_About the national quality strategy_.
[https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).
_Quality improvement and monitoring at your fingertips._ [https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/](https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/)

Federal Drug Administration. (September 2019).
_Institutional review board (IRBs) and protection of human subjects in clinical trials._ Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Protection of Human Subjects in Clinical Trials | FDA.
[https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials](https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials)

Thomas Craig, K.J., McKillop, M.M., . . . Huang, H.T. (2020). U.S. hospital performance methodologies: A scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.
_BMC Health Services Research,_ 20(640).
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z)

Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
_OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
[https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

**Instruction**

Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

**This is my Topic**

“ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

**## Module1AssIGNMENT_RUBRIC.docx**

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

21

points

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Cultural Diversity 5

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Write** a 1,050- to 1,400-word letter to the HR manager that addresses the following: – Introduce yourself and your evaluation of the situation. – Discuss how the organization's new culture can affect its members. – Discuss strategies that can help transnational work groups be successful and effec…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Write** a 1,050- to 1,400-word letter to the HR manager that addresses the following:

– Introduce yourself and your evaluation of the situation.
– Discuss how the organization's new culture can affect its members.
– Discuss strategies that can help transnational work groups be successful and effective when communicating face-to-face.
– Because transnational work groups will generally work virtually, discuss strategies focused on helping virtual, transnational work groups communicate successfully.
– Close the letter with an appropriate summary and closing.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] meka

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Although interest in employee mental health and wellness programs is not new, it has come to dominate the organizational landscape over the last few years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, at no time in the last century has an interest in employee mental health and wellness programs been so imp…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Although interest in employee mental health and wellness programs is not new, it has come to dominate the organizational landscape over the last few years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, at no time in the last century has an interest in employee mental health and wellness programs been so important, not just for employees as individuals but also in relation to the lens through which we, as employees, see ourselves, along with our families, friends, and co-workers.

For this assignment, you are tasked with researching what changes employers are making to their employee benefit plan policies and programs to call attention to the need for employees to be proactive rather than reactive in relation to mental health and wellness issues.

To be successful with this assignment, you must answer the following three These main points should be identified in your summary as level-one headings.

**Do not include all the questions – use keywords in your headings. Refer to the Announcement on Headings**

1. From an employer’s perspective, what are the advantages of establishing an employee mental health & wellness program? Support your comments with specific research.

2. From an employee's perspective, what are the advantages of utilizing a comprehensive, confidential mental health and wellness program designed to be proactive in the early detection of potential problems related to mental health and well-being? (examples: stress, burnout, substance abuse, financial problems, etc.).

3. From a return-on-investment (ROI) perspective, how might an organization measure the effectiveness of its confidential employee mental health & wellness program?

In this section, include three (3) or more key performance indicators (KPIs) that, in your opinion, could be used to determine program success.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] complete discussion post

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Attachment below **files (1)** – ## week3discussion.docx **## week3discussion.docx** 3 Complete a discussion post following the instructions and rubric. Resources are also below for you to use. Rubric: | | | | | — | — | — | | RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussi…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Attachment below

**files (1)**

– ## week3discussion.docx

**## week3discussion.docx**

3

Complete a discussion post following the instructions and rubric. Resources are also below for you to use.

Rubric:

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussion posts minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 11:59pm ET. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 11:59pm ET. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) | **20 to >19.0 ptsExcellent**• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Detailed response to faculty.<br> <br>**19 to >15.0 ptsGood**• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Appropriate reply to faculty.<br> <br>**15 to >12.0 ptsFair**• Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor**• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30 possible points) | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Initial Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.<br> <br>**29 to >23.0 ptsGood** Initial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.<br> <br>**23 to >18.0 ptsFair** Initial Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsPoor** Initial Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly resources are not provided. | 30 pts |

Instructions:

What is the incidence of blood clots from COVID-19 in females over the age of 35?

The above question is an example of a research question. A research question consists of three parts and guides the methods and approaches in which you will study the question to find answers. The research question includes the question, the topic, and the population or variables. In the example provided above, the question examines the prevalence of blood clots from severe COVID-19 in a selected population. From this question, the variables can be assessed, considerations can be analyzed, and populations can be sampled in order to guide the research.

For this Discussion, you will analyze a selected work to identify and analyze the variables, comparisons, and sample sizes. You will explore the potential levels of measurement for your variables and the rationale for the labels, as well as consider the advantages and challenges that you might experience in the statistical analysis.

Reference: Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

**To prepare:**

· View the required media.

· It is recommended you complete the quiz prior to constructing your initial response.

**Post** a response including the following:

· Choose a research study, QI article, or EBP DNP project and interpret at least one continuous demographic variable and one categorical variable.

· Differentiate between comparisons made using descriptive statistics (e.g., the mean and standard deviation) and comparisons based on inferential statistics (e.g., a
_t_ test).

· Compare and contrast the sample sizes used in the research study, the QI project, and the DNP project in terms of type 1 and type 2 errors.

· Explain the SIR rate, how it is developed, and how organizations use it.

· Using the same articles, pick one and differentiate between one descriptive and one inferential statistic used in any one of the three studies/projects.

Resources to use for post:

· Beydoun, A. S., Koss, K., Nielsen, T., Holcomb, A. J., Pichardo, P., Purdy, N., Zebolsky, A. L., Heaton, C. M., McMullen, C. P., Yesensky, J. A., Moore, M. G., Goyal, N., Kohan, J., Sajisevi, M., Tan, K., Petrisor, D., Wax, M. K., Kejner, A. E., Hassan, Z., … Zenga, J. (2022).
[Perioperative topical antisepsis and surgical site infection in patients undergoing upper aerodigestive tract reconstruction\
Links to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047735). JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 148(6), 547–554. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047735

· Sood, N., Lee, R. E., To, J. K., Cervellione, K. L., Smilios, M. D., Chun, H., & Ngai, I. M. (2022).
[Decreased incidence of cesarean surgical site infection rate with hospital‐wide perioperative bundle\
Links to an external site.](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12586). Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 49(1), 141–146. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12586

· Sauer, K. (2023).
[Testing for the treatment of urinary tract infections in symptomatic adult patients residing in long-term care facility: An evidence-based quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/point-care-testing-treatment-urinary-tract/docview/2875242069/se-2?accountid=14872) (Publication No. 30569808) [Doctoral dissertation, Phoenix University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/point-care-testing-treatment-urinary-tract/docview/2875242069/se-2?accountid=14872

· Bullen, P. (n.d.).
[_How to choose a sample size (for the statistically challenged)_ Links to an external site.](https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size). tools4dev. https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, April).
[_NHSN's guide to the 2022 baseline standardized infection ratiosLinks to an external site._](https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/2022rebaseline/sir-guide.pdf). https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/2022rebaseline/sir-guide.pdf

· “Overview of the Standard Infection Ratio (SIR)” (pp. 3–14)

· Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2025).
_Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_(5th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

· Chapter 8, “Evidence Phase: Appraising the Evidence” (pp. 118–129)

· Chapter 9, "Evidence Phase: Summary, Synthesis and Best-Evidence Recommendations" (pp. 132–144)

· Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2025).
_Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics_ (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

· Chapter 1, “Descriptive Statistics and Averages” (pp. 8–15)

· Chapter 2, “What Do Your Data Look Like? Summarizing and Picturing Distributions” (pp. 25–50)

· Chapter 6, “Hypotheticals and You: Making Guesses” (pp. 117–130)

· Chapter 5, “The Normal Curve: It's Shaped Like a Bell and It's Everywhere!” (pp. 97–116)

Niedz, B. (2024). Descriptive statistics [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

**## week3discussion.docx**

3

Complete a discussion post following the instructions and rubric. Resources are also below for you to use.

Rubric:

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussion posts minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 11:59pm ET. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 11:59pm ET. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) | **20 to >19.0 ptsExcellent**• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Detailed response to faculty.<br> <br>**19 to >15.0 ptsGood**• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Appropriate reply to faculty.<br> <br>**15 to >12.0 ptsFair**• Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor**• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30 possible points) | **30 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** Initial Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.<br> <br>**29 to >23.0 ptsGood** Initial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings.<br> <br>**23 to >18.0 ptsFair** Initial Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsPoor** Initial Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly resources are not provided. | 30 pts |

Instructions:

What is the incidence of blood clots from COVID-19 in females over the age of 35?

The above question is an example of a research question. A research question consists of three parts and guides the methods and approaches in which you will study the question to find answers. The research question includes the question, the topic, and the population or variables. In the example provided above, the question examines the prevalence of blood clots from severe COVID-19 in a selected population. From this question, the variables can be assessed, considerations can be analyzed, and populations can be sampled in order to guide the research.

For this Discussion, you will analyze a selected work to identify and analyze the variables, comparisons, and sample sizes. You will explore the potential levels of measurement for your variables and the rationale for the labels, as well as consider the advantages and challenges that you might experience in the statistical analysis.

Reference: Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

**To prepare:**

· View the required media.

· It is recommended you complete the quiz prior to constructing your initial response.

**Post** a response including the following:

· Choose a research study, QI article, or EBP DNP project and interpret at least one continuous demographic variable and one categorical variable.

· Differentiate between comparisons made using descriptive statistics (e.g., the mean and standard deviation) and comparisons based on inferential statistics (e.g., a
_t_ test).

· Compare and contrast the sample sizes used in the research study, the QI project, and the DNP project in terms of type 1 and type 2 errors.

· Explain the SIR rate, how it is developed, and how organizations use it.

· Using the same articles, pick one and differentiate between one descriptive and one inferential statistic used in any one of the three studies/projects.

Resources to use for post:

· Beydoun, A. S., Koss, K., Nielsen, T., Holcomb, A. J., Pichardo, P., Purdy, N., Zebolsky, A. L., Heaton, C. M., McMullen, C. P., Yesensky, J. A., Moore, M. G., Goyal, N., Kohan, J., Sajisevi, M., Tan, K., Petrisor, D., Wax, M. K., Kejner, A. E., Hassan, Z., … Zenga, J. (2022).
[Perioperative topical antisepsis and surgical site infection in patients undergoing upper aerodigestive tract reconstruction\
Links to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047735). JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 148(6), 547–554. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047735

· Sood, N., Lee, R. E., To, J. K., Cervellione, K. L., Smilios, M. D., Chun, H., & Ngai, I. M. (2022).
[Decreased incidence of cesarean surgical site infection rate with hospital‐wide perioperative bundle\
Links to an external site.](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12586). Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 49(1), 141–146. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12586

· Sauer, K. (2023).
[Testing for the treatment of urinary tract infections in symptomatic adult patients residing in long-term care facility: An evidence-based quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/point-care-testing-treatment-urinary-tract/docview/2875242069/se-2?accountid=14872) (Publication No. 30569808) [Doctoral dissertation, Phoenix University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/point-care-testing-treatment-urinary-tract/docview/2875242069/se-2?accountid=14872

· Bullen, P. (n.d.).
[_How to choose a sample size (for the statistically challenged)_ Links to an external site.](https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size). tools4dev. https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, April).
[_NHSN's guide to the 2022 baseline standardized infection ratiosLinks to an external site._](https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/2022rebaseline/sir-guide.pdf). https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/2022rebaseline/sir-guide.pdf

· “Overview of the Standard Infection Ratio (SIR)” (pp. 3–14)

· Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2025).
_Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_(5th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

· Chapter 8, “Evidence Phase: Appraising the Evidence” (pp. 118–129)

· Chapter 9, "Evidence Phase: Summary, Synthesis and Best-Evidence Recommendations" (pp. 132–144)

· Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2025).
_Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics_ (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

· Chapter 1, “Descriptive Statistics and Averages” (pp. 8–15)

· Chapter 2, “What Do Your Data Look Like? Summarizing and Picturing Distributions” (pp. 25–50)

· Chapter 6, “Hypotheticals and You: Making Guesses” (pp. 117–130)

· Chapter 5, “The Normal Curve: It's Shaped Like a Bell and It's Everywhere!” (pp. 97–116)

Niedz, B. (2024). Descriptive statistics [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Math exercice first Bac –need solution

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Hello, I have a math exercise from First Bac level. Can someone solve it step by step please? **files (2)** – ## math_exam_variant_1.pdf – ## math_exam_variant_2.pdf **## math_exam_variant_1.pdf** Exercice 1 Soit la fonction numérique f définie par : f(x) = (x^3 – 4x) / (3x^2 – 3x + 5) 1) C…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Hello,

I have a math exercise from First Bac level.

Can someone solve it step by step please?

**files (2)**

– ## math_exam_variant_1.pdf

– ## math_exam_variant_2.pdf

**## math_exam_variant_1.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 4x) / (3x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (4x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 4) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 4x + 10) / 2x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 4) − 3 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_2.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 7x) / (4x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (7x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 7) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 7x + 10) / 3x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 7) − 4 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_2.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 7x) / (4x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (7x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 7) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 7x + 10) / 3x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 7) − 4 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_1.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 4x) / (3x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (4x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 4) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 4x + 10) / 2x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 4) − 3 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_2.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 7x) / (4x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (7x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 7) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 7x + 10) / 3x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 7) − 4 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_1.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 4x) / (3x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (4x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 4) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 4x + 10) / 2x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 4) − 3 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

**## math_exam_variant_2.pdf**

Exercice 1
Soit la fonction numérique f définie par :

f(x) = (x^3 – 7x) / (4x^2 – 3x + 5)

1) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → +∞

2) Calculer lim f(x) quand x → −∞

Exercice 2 : Calculer les limites suivantes

1) lim (7x^3 + 2x^2 + 4) / (3x + 7) quand x → +∞

2) lim √(x^2 + 7x + 10) / 3x quand x → +∞

3) lim ( √(x + 7) − 4 ) / (x − 1) quand x → 1

Exercice 3

Résoudre dans R :

cos(2x + π/5) = 1/2

On pose : A(x) = sin²x − √2 sinx cosx + cos²x

1) Calculer A(π/5) et A(π/7)

2) Montrer que A(x) = 2 cos(2x + π/5) + 3

3) Résoudre dans l’intervalle [-π , π] l’équation A(x) = 3

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Managing the Health of Populations: HCM425

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

## **Assignment Details** ##### **Unit 5 – Individual Project** (125 points) **Due:** Sun, Mar 15 | **Description** For your final assignment, include your answers to the following, focusing on the evaluation of the program once it is implemented: – What type of data would be collected to evaluate …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

## **Assignment Details**

##### **Unit 5 – Individual Project** (125 points)

**Due:** Sun, Mar 15 | **Description**

For your final assignment, include your answers to the following, focusing on the evaluation of the program once it is implemented:

– What type of data would be collected to evaluate your program, and when?
– What tools or measures would be used to collect the data (e.g., surveys, questionnaires, pre- and post-assessments, town hall meetings. and so on)?
– No health intervention program is immune to challenges. Identify some of the challenges that emerged when implementing your intervention.
– How would you use the evaluation results to refine your intervention and improve future programs?

**Paper Requirements**

The following are the requirements for your assignment:

– Calibri 11-point font and double-spacing
– Proper APA citation and references
– A proper title page
– A reference page
– Free of spelling and grammar errors

Cite your sources using APA format, and remember to include a citation for the article that you are describing.

**Please submit your assignment.**

**For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook and all course resources.**

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Malnutrition in Hospitalized Patients

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– Must use 2-3 scholarly articles within the last 5 years – 2-3 in-text APA Citations (Use Citationmachine.net) – Turn In It score MUST be less than 25% – Slides must include – Etiology, – Nursing Interventions, – Patient Education, – Treatment (if applicable). – Diagnostic/Labs (if applicable) – Me…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– Must use 2-3 scholarly articles within the last 5 years
– 2-3 in-text APA Citations (Use Citationmachine.net)
– Turn In It score MUST be less than 25%
– Slides must include
– Etiology,
– Nursing Interventions,
– Patient Education,
– Treatment (if applicable).
– Diagnostic/Labs (if applicable)
– Medications/Side Effects

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Logistics 8

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) see attached **files (1)** – ## IntegratedLearningProjectAssignmentInstructions10.docx **## IntegratedLearningProjectAssignmentInstructions10.docx** BUSI 615 **Integrated Learning Project…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

see attached

**files (1)**

– ## IntegratedLearningProjectAssignmentInstructions10.docx

**## IntegratedLearningProjectAssignmentInstructions10.docx**

BUSI 615

**Integrated Learning Project Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

The integrated learning assignment is a series of 6 assignments and a final course consolidated submission. All assignments and the compilation of the final consolidated submission is managed as an individual assignment.

**Purpose**

The purpose of the ILP is for everyone to develop a working model of an ERP system applied to a firm of their choosing. This model will be built up in modular format through weekly assignments culminating in the submission of the completed model in the final week of the course together with a management proposal detailing the costs and benefits as they apply to the income statement and balance sheet of the selected firm.

**Resources**

The development of the assignments will be supported not only by written instructions but also with an explanatory Watch item.

**Expectations**

1. Each component, from Module 3: Week 3 will be the development of an ERP module in Excel relevant to the topic for that week. The Excel development will follow SAP and other ERP systems formats. The Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

0. Details on how this ERP assignment could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (min 300 words)

0. Details on how ERP could be operated (management process, who should be responsible, numbers of different users of each module, data accuracy, etc.) within the chosen firm (min 300 words)

0. What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained the ERP system (min 300 words)

0. How the corruption of the data could be prevented (min 300 words)

0. An analysis and composition of the net benefit (benefits minus costs linked to income statement and balance sheet) of the implemented ERP system

1. The final integrated Excel ERP working model for your chosen firm, due at the end of week 8, will tie all the preceding modules together into a fully integrated working ERP model in Excel. The integrated modules will include, Master Production Schedule, Bill of Materials, Materials Requirements Planning, Capacity Planning, Distribution Requirements Planning and Shop Floor Control. The Excel file will be submitted simultaneous with the following written report. The final course report would be about 3,000 words (excluding references and appendices), much of which would have been accumulated over the preceding 6 weeks.

1. The final submission will also include a written management report detailing (1) a recommendation for implementation based on a cost / benefits analysis (2) implementation assignment plan with responsibilities, (3) a justified recommendation for an ERP system (e.g. SAP, or other) and its operation (local or cloud processing, scope of application (national, global, etc.)

**Instructions**

**Part 1 –** **Company selection** – Characteristics – Manufacturing – Publicly available financial accounts – consumer or industrial product (either make to order or make to stock) – examples Tesla / Boeing (search YouTube “Mega factories” and choose one of these documentary examples to appreciate the level of manufacturing detail required). Structure your assignment as follows (word counts are minimums):

o Title page

o Company description (300 words)

o Financial trends: Overview of inventory types/trends/productivity (trends in day’s stock by type, Etc.) (300 words)

Income statements (last 3 years) (300 words)

Balance sheet (last 3 years) (300 words)

o Opportunities for logistics to improve income statement (consider revenues and operating costs) and balance sheet asset productivity. Provide quantitative calculations and probable range of costs / benefits. (300 words)

**Part 2 –** **Master Production Scheduling** **(MPS)** – Develop an Excel based Master Production Schedule for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Also review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 281 through 303 in your Logistics textbook. Your MPS Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the MPS policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 MPS schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other MPS types from your own research of available MPS software (300 words)

**Part 3 –** **Enterprise Resource Planning -** Develop an Excel analysis of the modules and functionality of 3 ERP systems, one of which must be SAP and the other 2 are of your choice. Follow the “ERP Links” tab under the Readings section of Course content for a listing of over 100 ERP software systems, including SAP. Overlay the functionality of these ERP systems onto the main manufacturing processes of your selected firm and determine which software best fits your chosen company. Your Excel analysis will accompany your written assignment which will contain:

· Description of the how the software selection criteria (and which ones) were chosen for your company (300)

· An analysis and tabulation of the strengths and weaknesses of the main modules of each software solution when compared of your selection criteria (300)

· A discussion of any ancillary data capture equipment and other software that may be advantageous to the operation of the ERP system in your company (300)

· Consideration of which functional areas would be responsible for the operation of each of the major ERP modules (300)

· An analysis of the possible software costs of your recommended ERP software (300)

**Part 4 –** **Materials Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Materials Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Show at least 4 MRP levels with sub-assemblies, purchased components, manufactured components, and raw materials. Review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 233 through 305 in your Logistics textbook. Your MRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the MRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 MRP schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other MRP types from your own research of available MRP software (300 words)

**Part 5 –** **Distribution Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Distribution Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Show at least 4 distribution warehouses with 4 components planned for each with at least 1 common to all distribution warehouses. Review the Kaltura presentation for this week, as well as pages 319 through 406 in your Logistics textbook. Your DRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the DRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 DRP schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other DRP types from your own research of available MRP software (300 words)

**Part 6 –** **Capacity Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Capacity Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the
**Integrated Learning Project Example** found on
. Review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 439 through 478 in your Logistics textbook. Your CRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the CRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 CRP schedule formats and logic taken from
**ERP Software** or other CRP types from your own research of available CRP software (300 words)

**Part 7 – Assignment Plan**– Develop a time phased assignment plan for the implementation of an ERP system at your selected firm. Review the assigned Learn material, as well as pages 511 through 551 in your Logistics textbook. Your time phased assignment plan Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Overall structure of the ERP implementation plan detailing responsibilities and timing (300 words)

· Details on the Education and Training activities of the plan, their sequencing and timing (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Bills of Materials sub-assignment to achieve a company document with 98% accuracy (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Warehouse sub-assignment to achieve a minimum of 95% accuracy (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Master Production Schedule sub-assignment to achieve a 98% customer service accuracy (300 words)

**Part 8 – Final Submission** – The final integrated Excel ERP working model for your chosen firm, due at the end of week 8, will tie all the preceding modules together into a fully integrated working ERP model in Excel. The integrated modules will include, Master Production Schedule, Bill of Materials, Materials Requirements Planning, Capacity Planning, Distribution Requirements Planning and Shop Floor Control. The Excel file will be submitted simultaneous with the following written report. The final course report would be about 3,000 words (excluding references and appendices), much of which would have been accumulated over the preceding 6 weeks.

· The final submission will also include a written management report detailing (1) a recommendation for implementation based on a cost / benefits analysis (2) implementation assignment plan with responsibilities, (3) a justified recommendation for an ERP system (e.g. SAP, or other) and its operation (local or cloud processing, scope of application (national, global, etc.)

Page 5 of 5

**## IntegratedLearningProjectAssignmentInstructions10.docx**

BUSI 615

**Integrated Learning Project Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

The integrated learning assignment is a series of 6 assignments and a final course consolidated submission. All assignments and the compilation of the final consolidated submission is managed as an individual assignment.

**Purpose**

The purpose of the ILP is for everyone to develop a working model of an ERP system applied to a firm of their choosing. This model will be built up in modular format through weekly assignments culminating in the submission of the completed model in the final week of the course together with a management proposal detailing the costs and benefits as they apply to the income statement and balance sheet of the selected firm.

**Resources**

The development of the assignments will be supported not only by written instructions but also with an explanatory Watch item.

**Expectations**

1. Each component, from Module 3: Week 3 will be the development of an ERP module in Excel relevant to the topic for that week. The Excel development will follow SAP and other ERP systems formats. The Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

0. Details on how this ERP assignment could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (min 300 words)

0. Details on how ERP could be operated (management process, who should be responsible, numbers of different users of each module, data accuracy, etc.) within the chosen firm (min 300 words)

0. What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained the ERP system (min 300 words)

0. How the corruption of the data could be prevented (min 300 words)

0. An analysis and composition of the net benefit (benefits minus costs linked to income statement and balance sheet) of the implemented ERP system

1. The final integrated Excel ERP working model for your chosen firm, due at the end of week 8, will tie all the preceding modules together into a fully integrated working ERP model in Excel. The integrated modules will include, Master Production Schedule, Bill of Materials, Materials Requirements Planning, Capacity Planning, Distribution Requirements Planning and Shop Floor Control. The Excel file will be submitted simultaneous with the following written report. The final course report would be about 3,000 words (excluding references and appendices), much of which would have been accumulated over the preceding 6 weeks.

1. The final submission will also include a written management report detailing (1) a recommendation for implementation based on a cost / benefits analysis (2) implementation assignment plan with responsibilities, (3) a justified recommendation for an ERP system (e.g. SAP, or other) and its operation (local or cloud processing, scope of application (national, global, etc.)

**Instructions**

**Part 1 –** **Company selection** – Characteristics – Manufacturing – Publicly available financial accounts – consumer or industrial product (either make to order or make to stock) – examples Tesla / Boeing (search YouTube “Mega factories” and choose one of these documentary examples to appreciate the level of manufacturing detail required). Structure your assignment as follows (word counts are minimums):

o Title page

o Company description (300 words)

o Financial trends: Overview of inventory types/trends/productivity (trends in day’s stock by type, Etc.) (300 words)

Income statements (last 3 years) (300 words)

Balance sheet (last 3 years) (300 words)

o Opportunities for logistics to improve income statement (consider revenues and operating costs) and balance sheet asset productivity. Provide quantitative calculations and probable range of costs / benefits. (300 words)

**Part 2 –** **Master Production Scheduling** **(MPS)** – Develop an Excel based Master Production Schedule for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Also review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 281 through 303 in your Logistics textbook. Your MPS Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the MPS policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 MPS schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other MPS types from your own research of available MPS software (300 words)

**Part 3 –** **Enterprise Resource Planning -** Develop an Excel analysis of the modules and functionality of 3 ERP systems, one of which must be SAP and the other 2 are of your choice. Follow the “ERP Links” tab under the Readings section of Course content for a listing of over 100 ERP software systems, including SAP. Overlay the functionality of these ERP systems onto the main manufacturing processes of your selected firm and determine which software best fits your chosen company. Your Excel analysis will accompany your written assignment which will contain:

· Description of the how the software selection criteria (and which ones) were chosen for your company (300)

· An analysis and tabulation of the strengths and weaknesses of the main modules of each software solution when compared of your selection criteria (300)

· A discussion of any ancillary data capture equipment and other software that may be advantageous to the operation of the ERP system in your company (300)

· Consideration of which functional areas would be responsible for the operation of each of the major ERP modules (300)

· An analysis of the possible software costs of your recommended ERP software (300)

**Part 4 –** **Materials Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Materials Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Show at least 4 MRP levels with sub-assemblies, purchased components, manufactured components, and raw materials. Review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 233 through 305 in your Logistics textbook. Your MRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the MRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 MRP schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other MRP types from your own research of available MRP software (300 words)

**Part 5 –** **Distribution Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Distribution Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the illustrative Excel spread sheet to be found under Course Content. Show at least 4 distribution warehouses with 4 components planned for each with at least 1 common to all distribution warehouses. Review the Kaltura presentation for this week, as well as pages 319 through 406 in your Logistics textbook. Your DRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the DRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 DRP schedule formats and logic taken from http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/?more=true#more or other DRP types from your own research of available MRP software (300 words)

**Part 6 –** **Capacity Requirements Planning** – Develop an Excel based Capacity Requirements Plan for your chosen product. Use the format and logic as shown in the
**Integrated Learning Project Example** found on
. Review the Kaptur presentation for this week, as well as pages 439 through 478 in your Logistics textbook. Your CRP Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Details on how this module could be implemented (assignment management process, who should be involved, and why, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· Details on how this module could be operated (management process, key factors in the CRP operating policy, who should be responsible and why, the users of this modules data, etc.) within the chosen firm (300 words)

· What could be the future sources of inaccuracy in the data contained in the module (300 words)

· A comparison of any 2 CRP schedule formats and logic taken from
**ERP Software** or other CRP types from your own research of available CRP software (300 words)

**Part 7 – Assignment Plan**– Develop a time phased assignment plan for the implementation of an ERP system at your selected firm. Review the assigned Learn material, as well as pages 511 through 551 in your Logistics textbook. Your time phased assignment plan Excel file will be accompanied by a written assignment containing:

· Overall structure of the ERP implementation plan detailing responsibilities and timing (300 words)

· Details on the Education and Training activities of the plan, their sequencing and timing (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Bills of Materials sub-assignment to achieve a company document with 98% accuracy (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Warehouse sub-assignment to achieve a minimum of 95% accuracy (300 words)

· Details on the key activities in the Master Production Schedule sub-assignment to achieve a 98% customer service accuracy (300 words)

**Part 8 – Final Submission** – The final integrated Excel ERP working model for your chosen firm, due at the end of week 8, will tie all the preceding modules together into a fully integrated working ERP model in Excel. The integrated modules will include, Master Production Schedule, Bill of Materials, Materials Requirements Planning, Capacity Planning, Distribution Requirements Planning and Shop Floor Control. The Excel file will be submitted simultaneous with the following written report. The final course report would be about 3,000 words (excluding references and appendices), much of which would have been accumulated over the preceding 6 weeks.

· The final submission will also include a written management report detailing (1) a recommendation for implementation based on a cost / benefits analysis (2) implementation assignment plan with responsibilities, (3) a justified recommendation for an ERP system (e.g. SAP, or other) and its operation (local or cloud processing, scope of application (national, global, etc.)

Page 5 of 5

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Law Week 10 Assignment – The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

## **Overview** In this assignment, you evaluate and assess workplace protection legislation, identify the law pursuant to the employment-at-will (EAW) doctrine and legal exceptions, apply this understanding to a business scenario, and explain legal requirements for hiring new employees and your own…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

## **Overview**

In this assignment, you evaluate and assess workplace protection legislation, identify the law pursuant to the employment-at-will (EAW) doctrine and legal exceptions, apply this understanding to a business scenario, and explain legal requirements for hiring new employees and your own home state laws as to workers' compensation and immigration.

## **Instructions**

Respond to the following in 4–6 pages:

1. Cite two federal laws that you believe are the most important for protecting employees from workplace discrimination. Provide a compelling argument for the effectiveness of the legislation in protecting employees and two case law examples to support your assessment.
2. Explain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States.
3. Some states do not allow undocumented workers, or those not legally allowed to work in the United States, to receive workers' compensation benefits. Provide the law in your home state and a compelling and supported (with research) argument advocating for or against your state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers.
4. Provide a comprehensive summary of the employment-at-will (EAW) doctrine that includes all possible legal exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination.
5. Cite and support (with research) an appropriate EAW exception that the employee in each of the following scenarios could reasonably argue to save their job.

**Scenario 1:** _JoAnn, a manager, started a blog on the company website for employee grievances and problems. She noticed that a worker was protesting that allegedly no Asian American employees had gotten a raise in two years at the company. Christine, the employee, also criticized how much CEO Elon had made last year and how he was "out of touch" with the realities of his employees. JoAnn reminded Christine that she was an employee-at-will. The next day, Christine talked to her fellow co-workers about forming a union. JoAnn fired Christine, and Christine is suing for wrongful termination._

**Scenario 2:** _Steven, a department supervisor, fired his secretary, Ann. Ann, a devout Christian, had been putting Right-to-Life flyers in the employee breakroom. Steven talked to Ann twice and reiterated her actions were not appropriate. Ann continued to leave the pamphlets and was also taking time away from work to pray at her desk during the busiest times of the morning. Ann is suing for wrongful termination._

## **Requirements**

– 4–6 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides.
– Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the Sources list are not included in the required assignment page length.

## **Resources**

– Use the [Strayer Library](https://research.strayer.edu/) to conduct your research.
– Include at least three quality references.
– The textbook for this class is a required source for this assignment.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the [Library site](https://library.strayer.edu/sws) for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

– Evaluate federal law relative to workplace discrimination, employment-at-will, or worker's compensation eligibility.

Week 10 Assignment The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace **Week 10 Assignment The Value of Fair Treatment in the WorkplaceCriteriaRatingsPts** Provide a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees. Cite case law to support the assessment. **30 to >27 ptsExemplary** Provided a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees. Cited case law to support the assessment. **27 to >24 ptsCompetent** Provided a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees but failed to sufficiently cite case law to support the assessment. **24 to >21 ptsNeeds Improvement** Provided an uncompelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees or cited case law that is not applicable. **21 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not provide an argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees./ 30 ptsExplain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States. **20 to >18 ptsExemplary** Explained the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States. **18 to >16 ptsCompetent** Explained the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States with 1–2 significant errors or omissions. **16 to >14 ptsNeeds Improvement** Explained the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States with 3–4 significant errors or omissions. **14 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not explain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment or does so with more than 4 significant errors or omissions./ 20 ptsProvided a compelling argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. Argument is supported with research. **30 to >27 ptsExemplary** Provided a compelling argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. Argument is supported with research. **27 to >24 ptsCompetent** Provided a compelling argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers but provided no supporting research. **24 to >21 ptsNeeds Improvement** Provided an uncompelling and unsupported argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. **21 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not provide an argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers./ 30 ptsProvide a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine that includes all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. **20 to >18 ptsExemplary** Provided a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine that includes all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. **18 to >16 ptsCompetent** Provided a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine but omitted all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. **16 to >14 ptsNeeds Improvement** Provided a an incomplete summary of employment-at-will doctrine and possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. **14 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not provide a summary of employment-at-will doctrine./ 20 ptsCite an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. Support the response. **30 to >27 ptsExemplary** Cited an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. Supported the response with evidence. **27 to >24 ptsCompetent** Cited an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. Support lacked detail. **24 to >21 ptsNeeds Improvement** Cited an inappropriate EAW exception that an employee could not reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. **21 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not cite an EAW exception that an employee could argue to save their job in Scenario 1./ 30 ptsCite an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. Support the response. **30 to >27 ptsExemplary** Cited an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. Supported the response with evidence. **27 to >24 ptsCompetent** Cited an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. Support lacked detail. **24 to >21 ptsNeeds Improvement** Cited an inappropriate EAW exception that an employee could not reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. **21 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not submit or did not cite an EAW exception that an employee could argue to save their job in Scenario 2./ 30 ptsInclude at least high quality three references, including the required textbook, as sources for the paper. **20 to >18 ptsExemplary** Included the required number of references; all references are high quality choices. **18 to >16 ptsCompetent** Included the required number of required references; some references are high quality choices. **16 to >14 ptsNeeds Improvement** Did not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor quality choices. **14 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** No references provided./ 20 ptsClarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. **20 to >18 ptsExemplary** 0–2 errors present. **18 to >16 ptsCompetent** 3–4 errors present. **16 to >14 ptsNeeds Improvement** 5–6 errors present. **14 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** More than 6 errors present./ 20 pts

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Law – Criminal Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) See instructions and grading rubric. The **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements: · Title Page; · Introduction; · Body (including an Introduction, Body Par…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

See instructions and grading rubric.

The **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must include the following elements:

· Title Page;

· Introduction;

· Body (including an Introduction, Body Paragraphs/Argument Section, and Conclusion); and

· Reference Page

All components of the **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be written using current APA formatting and must specifically focus upon and discuss the topics listed above.

The title page must use proper formatting as set by the APA style guide. The Introduction must be between 150–250 words and provide a clear summary of the paper.

The body of the **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** must be comprised of 5–7 pages of content. The Title Page and Reference Page are not included in the page count. The introduction must include background information on the topics discussed, a well-written thesis statement, and a preview of points. The body must thoroughly discuss the elements listed, to include the information that might be required to complete both, misdemeanor and felony investigations. Additionally, the **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should provide an in-depth discussion regarding the purpose of internal statements in comparison to external statements or reports and the circumstances under which either may be completed and submitted. Further, the **Research Paper: Differences in Report Writing Documentation Assignment** should discuss the audience that might review these reports and the impact that improper documentation might have upon the report as well as the investigation.

The Reference Page must include at least 3 scholarly/industry sources published within the last five years. The sources must be cited both in the body of the paper as well as in the Reference Page. Biblical references do not count toward the citation requirement.

– [\
\
ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchpaperdifferencesinreportwritingdocumentationassignmentinstructions-docx-10513289 "ResearchPaperDifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationAssignmentInstructions.docx")
– [\
\
ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchpaper-differencesinreportwritingdocumentationgradingrubric-pdf-10513291 "ResearchPaper-DifferencesinReportWritingDocumentationGradingRubric.pdf")

November 6, 2026