My Blog

Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Please review my discussion post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Propose a drug that you would like to use for your CTD.** Each student must have a different drug. In this course you will be creating a Common Technical Document (CTD). **Review** the article [_The responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry_.](https://canvas.asu.edu/courses/255235/files/127963…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Propose a drug that you would like to use for your CTD.**  Each student must have a different drug. In this course you will be creating a Common Technical Document (CTD).

    **Review** the article [_The responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry_.](https://canvas.asu.edu/courses/255235/files/127963487/download?wrap=1 "Durrant the responsibility of the pharma industry PMID 11990688.pdf")

    **Describe** the scope and mission of regulatory authorities based upon the article (cite 3 agencies), regulations (cite 3 examples), and the roles and responsibilities of pharmaceutical industry stakeholders (identify 3).

  • [Solved] Health evolution

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please attached. **files (1)** – ## Assign1Instruction.docx **## Assign1Instruction.docx** Write a 2–3 page paper summarizing the main findings and identifying trends in the evolution of U.S. hospitals from the 1800s to today. Instruction Use template to write a 2–3 page paper in which you explain h…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please attached.

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assign1Instruction.docx

    **## Assign1Instruction.docx**

    Write a 2–3 page paper summarizing the main findings and identifying trends in the evolution of U.S. hospitals from the 1800s to today.

    Instruction

    Use template to write a 2–3 page paper in which you explain how each topic (hospital environment, medical staff education, level of care, and paying for care) changed from the 1800s to the 1900s to today. The template provides detailed instructions for how to complete each section. Use the information from Table 1 (and other sources if you choose) in each section of your paper to describe the differences and explain why those changes matter.

    **Required Sections**

    Follow the template and the detailed instructions for each section. Your paper should have the following sections:

    · APA-formatted title page.

    · Introduction.

    · How Hospital Care Has Changed.

    · Hospital Conditions.

    · Staff Education.

    · Level of Care.

    · Paying for Healthcare.

    · Comparing the Changes.

    · Conclusion.

    · References.

    · Appendix.

    **Your Writing**

    Your writing will be graded according to the following criteria.

    · Address all the assessment components with writing that is clear, well-organized, and demonstrates proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure, with minimal errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Scoring:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Explain the impact of the key healthcare events and changes across the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries on hospitals, medical practice, access, quality, and costs.

    · Hospital Conditions: Compare and contrast the hospital conditions of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Staff Education: Compare and contrast the staff education level in hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Level of Care: Compare and contrast the level of care provided in hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Paying for Healthcare: Compare and contrast the payment systems in the hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Comparing the Changes: Compare the key changes between the different time periods.

    · Competency 4: Communicate in a professional manner that respects the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the standards of healthcare professionals.

    · Address all the assessment components with writing that is clear, well-organized, and demonstrates proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure, with minimal errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    **## Assign1Instruction.docx**

    Write a 2–3 page paper summarizing the main findings and identifying trends in the evolution of U.S. hospitals from the 1800s to today.

    Instruction

    Use template to write a 2–3 page paper in which you explain how each topic (hospital environment, medical staff education, level of care, and paying for care) changed from the 1800s to the 1900s to today. The template provides detailed instructions for how to complete each section. Use the information from Table 1 (and other sources if you choose) in each section of your paper to describe the differences and explain why those changes matter.

    **Required Sections**

    Follow the template and the detailed instructions for each section. Your paper should have the following sections:

    · APA-formatted title page.

    · Introduction.

    · How Hospital Care Has Changed.

    · Hospital Conditions.

    · Staff Education.

    · Level of Care.

    · Paying for Healthcare.

    · Comparing the Changes.

    · Conclusion.

    · References.

    · Appendix.

    **Your Writing**

    Your writing will be graded according to the following criteria.

    · Address all the assessment components with writing that is clear, well-organized, and demonstrates proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure, with minimal errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Scoring:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Explain the impact of the key healthcare events and changes across the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries on hospitals, medical practice, access, quality, and costs.

    · Hospital Conditions: Compare and contrast the hospital conditions of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Staff Education: Compare and contrast the staff education level in hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Level of Care: Compare and contrast the level of care provided in hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Paying for Healthcare: Compare and contrast the payment systems in the hospitals of the 1800s, 1900s, and today.

    · Comparing the Changes: Compare the key changes between the different time periods.

    · Competency 4: Communicate in a professional manner that respects the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the standards of healthcare professionals.

    · Address all the assessment components with writing that is clear, well-organized, and demonstrates proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure, with minimal errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

  • [Solved] PBC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will present the outcomes of the report in a presentation for the organisation. The presentation will last ten minutes plus up to five minutes for questions and should ‘sell’ the solution to the issue, with justification and plans on evaluating impact. Your presentation should concentrate on the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will present the outcomes of the report in a presentation for the organisation. The presentation will last ten minutes plus up to five minutes for questions and should ‘sell’ the solution to the issue, with justification and plans on evaluating impact. Your presentation should concentrate on the solution to the problem and the details of the recommended project, with reference to justification (but this will not be the main thrust of the presentation). Your presentation will include a section on the expected impact of the project and how this will be evaluated. The presentation in this module should complement (not just repeat) your report and should be a ‘call to action’ for your client company.  They need to understand what they can do to follow your plan after watching your presentation.

  • [Solved] Gaming Computer Design

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Java homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-java) ## **Instructions** Create a document that specifies the hardware and software components of a state-of-the-art gaming computer equipped to handle modern 3D gaming titles and justify your reasons for the choice of each co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Java homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-java)

    ## **Instructions**

    Create a document that specifies the hardware and software components of a state-of-the-art gaming computer equipped to handle modern 3D gaming titles and justify your reasons for the choice of each component. State any assumptions that you need to make to create a viable computer. Use diagrams as necessary to explain your design in detail. Your design should identify an OS as well as specify and explain all required hardware (no peripherals) including the following components:

    – Cases and form factor.
    – CPU.
    – Power supply.
    – Motherboard and buses.
    – Memory.
    – Video Cards.
    – Audio.
    – Cooling.

    Make sure to address the following using clear headers to separate sections:

    – Specify the OS and reasons that you chose it.
    – Specify the hardware components and why you chose them.
    – Explain which computer components are most important for driving the ultimate design of the computer.
    – Explain how the motherboard form factor governs the choice of dependent hardware.
    – Discuss the standards that determine CPU and motherboard compatibility.

    ## **Submission Requirements**

    – **Submission:** Submit your assignment in a Word document with well-labeled responses.
    – **Format and style:** Current APA standards. See [Evidence and APALinks to an external site.](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540).
    – **Font and font size:** 12 point Times New Roman.

    ## **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    – Competency 1: Explain hardware and software components, concepts, and standards.
    – Specify appropriate system hardware.
    – Explain how the motherboard form factor governs the choice of dependent hardware.
    – Explain the standards that determine CPU and motherboard compatibility.
    – Competency 3: Explain the interoperation of computer software and hardware.
    – Explain why a specified OS is appropriate for the system hardware and software.
    – Explain which computer components are most important for driving the ultimate design of the computer.
    – Competency 7: Communicate effectively using professional standards appropriate to the IT field.
    – Write explanations that are clear, organized, and generally free of grammatical errors.

  • [Solved] patient care coordination 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## patientcarecoordination.pdf **## patientcarecoordination.pdf** Develop infographic of a preliminary care coordination plan for a selected healthcare problem identified from the Sentinel-U Family Assessment v5. You determine which healthcare problem you will use FROM the simulation…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## patientcarecoordination.pdf

    **## patientcarecoordination.pdf**

    Develop infographic of a preliminary care coordination plan for a
    selected healthcare problem identified from the Sentinel-U Family
    Assessment v5. You determine which healthcare problem you will
    use FROM the simulation. Include physical, psychosocial, and
    cultural considerations for this healthcare problem. Listen to the
    patient simulation and select one of issues the simulated patient
    discusses. Identify and list available community resources for a
    safe and effective continuum of care.

    The first step in any effective project is planning. This
    assessment provides an opportunity for you to strengthen your
    understanding of how to plan and negotiate the coordination of
    care for a particular healthcare problem. Include physical,
    psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this healthcare
    problem. Identify and list available community resources for a
    safe and effective continuum of care.

    Note: You are required to complete these assessments in order
    as each assessment builds on the previous one. You cannot
    submit all assessments at once. You must wait for permission
    from faculty to submit the next assessment.

    Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center.
    Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff
    that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were
    budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated
    to the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the
    success of effectively managing patients in the community
    setting, so you have been asked by your nurse manager to take
    on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the
    process, but you know you will do a good job because, as a
    nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks. As you take on this
    expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the
    specific health concerns of community residents.

    As you begin to prepare for this assessment, complete the virtual
    Sentinel-U simulation titled Family Support and Home
    Assessments v5.

    You are also encouraged to complete the Care Coordination
    Planning activity found in this assessment. Completion of this will
    provide useful practice, particularly for those of you who do not
    have care coordination experience. The information gained from
    completing this activity will help you succeed with the
    assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate
    engagement.

    Note: You are required to complete this assessment before
    Assessments 3, 4 or 5. You must wait for permission from faculty
    before you can submit the next assessment. You cannot submit
    all assessments at once.

    Choose a specific healthcare problem from the simulation and
    create an infographic that visually represents a care coordination
    plan.

    1. Select one health concern and a patient population from
    the Family Support and Home Assessments v5 Sentinel-
    U simulation. There are several potential issues mentioned
    in the interview.

    2. Analyze your selected health concern and the associated
    best practices for health improvement.

    • Address the following content elements in your
    analysis:

    ◦ Best practices: Summarize evidence-based best
    practices related to the chosen healthcare
    problem from the simulation.

    ◦ Physical considerations: Address physical
    aspects of care (for example, medications,
    treatments, safety, food insecurity, childhood
    immunizations, etcetera).

    ◦ Psychosocial considerations: Consider mental
    health, emotional support, and patient coping
    strategies.

    ◦ Cultural considerations: Recognize cultural
    diversity and tailor care accordingly.

    • Cite supporting peer-reviewed, relevant, scholarly
    evidence for best practices-websites are not
    appropriate. Ensure the sources selected are
    relevant to the issue you've selected. Visit
    the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library
    Guide for help finding articles in the Capella library.

    3. Describe two specific SMART (specific, measurable,
    achievable, relevant, time-bound) goals that should be
    established to address the healthcare problem and the
    evidence to support those goals.

    • Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural
    considerations of your specific patient population.

    • Identify available community resources for a safe and
    effective continuum of care.

    • Compile a list of community resources relevant to the
    healthcare problem.

    • Include local clinics, support groups, educational
    programs, and social services if available.

    • Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural
    considerations of your specific patient population.

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    4. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references,
    exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
    Use Academic Writer for guidance in citing sources in
    proper APA style. See the Writing Center for more APA
    resources specific to your degree level.

    The requirements outlined above correspond to the grading
    criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan scoring guide,
    so be sure to address each point in your infographic. Read the
    performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your
    work will be assessed.

    Format
    • Create an infographic that visually represents your care

    coordination plan.

    • Create the infographic using a Poster or PowerPoint

    infographic template.

    • Use of AI to create the Infographic is prohibited.

    • Use clear and concise language

    • Include relevant icons, graphics, and colors to enhance

    readability

    Example Infographics
    • This is an Example Infographic [PPTX]. Feel free to use a

    PowerPoint infographic template and be creative in your
    presentation.

    • Here is an Example Poster Infographic [PDF]. Feel free to
    use a Canva template or other appropriate poster-style
    infographic template and be creative in your presentation.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4472](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4472)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1541](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1541)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862500/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862500/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862495/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862495/download)

    **## patientcarecoordination.pdf**

    Develop infographic of a preliminary care coordination plan for a
    selected healthcare problem identified from the Sentinel-U Family
    Assessment v5. You determine which healthcare problem you will
    use FROM the simulation. Include physical, psychosocial, and
    cultural considerations for this healthcare problem. Listen to the
    patient simulation and select one of issues the simulated patient
    discusses. Identify and list available community resources for a
    safe and effective continuum of care.

    The first step in any effective project is planning. This
    assessment provides an opportunity for you to strengthen your
    understanding of how to plan and negotiate the coordination of
    care for a particular healthcare problem. Include physical,
    psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this healthcare
    problem. Identify and list available community resources for a
    safe and effective continuum of care.

    Note: You are required to complete these assessments in order
    as each assessment builds on the previous one. You cannot
    submit all assessments at once. You must wait for permission
    from faculty to submit the next assessment.

    Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center.
    Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff
    that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were
    budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated
    to the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the
    success of effectively managing patients in the community
    setting, so you have been asked by your nurse manager to take
    on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the
    process, but you know you will do a good job because, as a
    nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks. As you take on this
    expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the
    specific health concerns of community residents.

    As you begin to prepare for this assessment, complete the virtual
    Sentinel-U simulation titled Family Support and Home
    Assessments v5.

    You are also encouraged to complete the Care Coordination
    Planning activity found in this assessment. Completion of this will
    provide useful practice, particularly for those of you who do not
    have care coordination experience. The information gained from
    completing this activity will help you succeed with the
    assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate
    engagement.

    Note: You are required to complete this assessment before
    Assessments 3, 4 or 5. You must wait for permission from faculty
    before you can submit the next assessment. You cannot submit
    all assessments at once.

    Choose a specific healthcare problem from the simulation and
    create an infographic that visually represents a care coordination
    plan.

    1. Select one health concern and a patient population from
    the Family Support and Home Assessments v5 Sentinel-
    U simulation. There are several potential issues mentioned
    in the interview.

    2. Analyze your selected health concern and the associated
    best practices for health improvement.

    • Address the following content elements in your
    analysis:

    ◦ Best practices: Summarize evidence-based best
    practices related to the chosen healthcare
    problem from the simulation.

    ◦ Physical considerations: Address physical
    aspects of care (for example, medications,
    treatments, safety, food insecurity, childhood
    immunizations, etcetera).

    ◦ Psychosocial considerations: Consider mental
    health, emotional support, and patient coping
    strategies.

    ◦ Cultural considerations: Recognize cultural
    diversity and tailor care accordingly.

    • Cite supporting peer-reviewed, relevant, scholarly
    evidence for best practices-websites are not
    appropriate. Ensure the sources selected are
    relevant to the issue you've selected. Visit
    the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library
    Guide for help finding articles in the Capella library.

    3. Describe two specific SMART (specific, measurable,
    achievable, relevant, time-bound) goals that should be
    established to address the healthcare problem and the
    evidence to support those goals.

    • Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural
    considerations of your specific patient population.

    • Identify available community resources for a safe and
    effective continuum of care.

    • Compile a list of community resources relevant to the
    healthcare problem.

    • Include local clinics, support groups, educational
    programs, and social services if available.

    • Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural
    considerations of your specific patient population.

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    4. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references,
    exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
    Use Academic Writer for guidance in citing sources in
    proper APA style. See the Writing Center for more APA
    resources specific to your degree level.

    The requirements outlined above correspond to the grading
    criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan scoring guide,
    so be sure to address each point in your infographic. Read the
    performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your
    work will be assessed.

    Format
    • Create an infographic that visually represents your care

    coordination plan.

    • Create the infographic using a Poster or PowerPoint

    infographic template.

    • Use of AI to create the Infographic is prohibited.

    • Use clear and concise language

    • Include relevant icons, graphics, and colors to enhance

    readability

    Example Infographics
    • This is an Example Infographic [PPTX]. Feel free to use a

    PowerPoint infographic template and be creative in your
    presentation.

    • Here is an Example Poster Infographic [PDF]. Feel free to
    use a Canva template or other appropriate poster-style
    infographic template and be creative in your presentation.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4472](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4472)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1541](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1541)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862500/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862500/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862495/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/60140/files/11862495/download)

  • [Solved] DUN-POLICY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Purpose**: – To formulate written professional communication that advocates for a key nursing issue. – To explore advocacy tools and resources for nurses – To reflect on nursing leadership attributes and personal perspective r/t how each contributes to and influences healthcare policy, social just…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Purpose**:

    – To formulate written professional communication that advocates for a key nursing issue.
    – To explore advocacy tools and resources for nurses
    – To reflect on nursing leadership attributes and personal perspective r/t how each contributes to and influences healthcare policy, social justice, and professional nursing practice.

    **Detailed Outline of Each of the Assignment Parts**

    **PART I:** Legislative Representatives and Policies Students identify 2 House of Representatives and 2 Senators from the **state of your choosing            ( FLORIDA)**. Students then review 2 bills that are sponsored or co-sponsored by the selected state House of Representatives official(s) and 2 bills that are sponsored or co-sponsored by the selected Senate Representative(s) resulting in a description of 4 total bills (see outline below). Then the students will link these 4 bills to nursing, population, health and provide rationale for choosing the particular bills.

    **PART 2:** Writing a Letter to the Selected RepresentativeStudents will write a persuasive letter to one of the chosen state Representatives identified in Part 1 regarding one of the selected 4 bills (from the 4; just chose 1) that the student feels will have the most impact with a rationale for choosing the selected bill. The letter will be written in a business/personal correspondence style including name, contact information and professional salutation for the receiving party (to whom it may concern is not acceptable). Zip codes for both the student and receiving party must be included to verify that letter is addressed to an appropriate elected official, who represents the student as a constituent. Students will need to ensure recipient is the appropriate person for the bill/topic (state vs federal senator, representative, governor, etc.). The uploaded document to Blackboard must follow this format and information. The Florida Nurses Foundation: Legislative Resource Toolkit: on pg 11 (see BB resources) format should be used and it provides you with the template.

    **PART 3:** Identify a Policy/Issue and Advocacy Strategy from a Selected Nursing OrganizationStudents will identify a nursing organization of their choice that has a policy advocacy section. Once the student has selected the organization, they will locate the section on advocacy on the organization's official website and find their current legislative/advocacy agenda (most recent). There are several nursing organizations to choose from these can be found in your Blackboard resources and in your textbook (these should be issues that are current and relevant).

    REFERENCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS WITH DOI#

    WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNITIN

    NEED TO ME NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT

    DUE Dte march18, 2026

    RUBRIC ATTACHED

    APA FORMAT 7TH EDITION

    total 5 pages

    – [\
    \
    RUBRIC.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10516763 "RUBRIC.pdf")

  • [Solved] PA/MB/PNA/FPC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering PA/MB/PNA/FPC.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing YISE-POLICY ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Purpose**: – To formulate written professional communication that advocates for a key nursing issue. – To explore advocacy tools and resources for nurses – To reflect on nursing leadership attributes and personal perspective r/t how each contributes to and influences healthcare policy, social just…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Purpose**:

    – To formulate written professional communication that advocates for a key nursing issue.
    – To explore advocacy tools and resources for nurses
    – To reflect on nursing leadership attributes and personal perspective r/t how each contributes to and influences healthcare policy, social justice, and professional nursing practice.

    **Detailed Outline of Each of the Assignment Parts**

    **PART I:** Legislative Representatives and Policies

    Students identify 2 House of Representatives and 2 Senators from the **state of your choosing            ( FLORIDA)**. Students then review 2 bills that are sponsored or co-sponsored by the selected state House of Representatives official(s) and 2 bills that are sponsored or co-sponsored by the selected Senate Representative(s) resulting in a description of 4 total bills (see outline below). Then the students will link these 4 bills to nursing, population, health and provide rationale for choosing the particular bills.

    **PART 2:** Writing a Letter to the Selected Representative

    Students will write a persuasive letter to one of the chosen state Representatives identified in Part 1 regarding one of the selected 4 bills (from the 4; just chose 1) that the student feels will have the most impact with a rationale for choosing the selected bill. The letter will be written in a business/personal correspondence style including name, contact information and professional salutation for the receiving party (to whom it may concern is not acceptable). Zip codes for both the student and receiving party must be included to verify that letter is addressed to an appropriate elected official, who represents the student as a constituent. Students will need to ensure recipient is the appropriate person for the bill/topic (state vs federal senator, representative, governor, etc.). The uploaded document to Blackboard must follow this format and information. The Florida Nurses Foundation: Legislative Resource Toolkit: on pg 11 (see BB resources) format should be used and it provides you with the template.

    **PART 3:** Identify a Policy/Issue and Advocacy Strategy from a Selected Nursing Organization

    Students will identify a nursing organization of their choice that has a policy advocacy section. Once the student has selected the organization, they will locate the section on advocacy on the organization's official website and find their current legislative/advocacy agenda (most recent). There are several nursing organizations to choose from these can be found in your Blackboard resources and in your textbook (these should be issues that are current and relevant).

    REFERENCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS WITH DOI#

    WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNITIN

    NEED TO ME NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT

    DUE Dte march18, 2026

    RUBRIC ATTACHED

    APA FORMAT 7TH EDITION

    total 5 pages

    – [\
    \
    RUBRIC.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10516761 "RUBRIC.pdf")

  • [Solved] Nursing Week 2_Assignment_DNP860

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Gap Analysis Toolkit **files (2)** – ## Assignment_Week_2.docx – ## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Assignment_Week_2.docx** **Clinical Issue Essay** **Write a 1800-word essay addressing** each of the following points/questions. Be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Gap Analysis Toolkit

    **files (2)**

    – ## Assignment_Week_2.docx

    – ## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Assignment_Week_2.docx**

    **Clinical Issue Essay**

    **Write a 1800-word essay addressing** each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
    **Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
    **Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Gap Analysis Toolkit located in the chapter readings, identify a clinical problem of interest (a current gap/problem affecting the delivery of evidence-based care).

    1.
    **Background:** Research the gap to understand the issue and form your background. The background of the problem is the review of information on why the problem is a pressing concern. It summarizes what is known about the problem being investigated. The background serves as your project's foundation. Support this section with reliable and credible sources.

    2.
    **Problem Statement:** Generate a concise problem statement. The problem statement should include the following items:

    · a description of the nature and context of the problem,

    · the impact of the problem on patients, populations, or societies; and the consequences of not fixing the problem. The problem statement justifies the need for your project, so end your problem statement with information on how your proposed study will contribute to the solution of this problem or issue. This will provide a lead-in to your purpose statement.
    _The statement of the problem is about one page in length._

    3.
    **Proposed PICOT:** Form your PICOT question, breaking it down into discrete sections, and explain each area of the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time (if applicable). Finish this section by writing your PICOT as a complete sentence.

    [**Instructions & Specifications**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Submission**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Rubric**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3)

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations. be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required,
    **check your spelling, and review the rubric.**

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 1800 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure:** Follow APA formatting. Your paper should be crafted with a discrete
    **Introduction (to include a purpose/objective statement), Body, Conclusion, and Reference** page. Body headings to address: Background, Problem Statement, Proposed PICOT.
    **The title and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count.**

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
    **least (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **This is my Topic**

    “ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

    **Refererences**

    Finkelman, A. (2020).
    _Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Review chapters 4 & 5.

    Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN: 9781274226324. Review chapters 4, 5, & 6.

    Library Guides at University of Missouri. (2022).
    _Evidence based nursing practice._ PICO(T) and Clinical Questions – Evidence Based Nursing Practice – Library Guides at University of Missouri Libraries.
    [https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073](https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073)

    Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
    _OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
    [https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

    Cedarville University. (n.d.).
    _POCO keyword chart._ [_https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543_](https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543)

    University of Kentucky Library. (n.d.).
    _Picot development_[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE)

    The National Library of Medicine. (n.d.)
    _PubMed basics._ [_https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026_](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026&ou=118315)

    The National Library of Medicine. (2013).
    _Use MeSH to build a better PubMed query._[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys)

    **Targeted PubMed® Search**

    1. Register for the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Account – (Click “sign in to NCBI” and follow instructions to create an account using one of the 3rd party sign-in options. Please make a note of your log in username and password).

    2. Complete PubMed® activities by following these instructions:

    · Identify a problem or area of potential quality improvement for your DNP Project.

    · Using PubMed®, create a search strategy for your selected topic.

    · Use MeSH® terms and Boolean operators (i.e., AND, OR, NOT).

    After you complete each step below, record the number of references returned by your search. Include the frequency of "ALL" and "Review" for each step. Adjust your search strategy so that you can complete all steps.

    1. Run a basic text search using two MeSH® terms for your topic.

    2. Refine your search by using the LIMIT feature to include only references that are within five years.

    3. Refine further to include references in which the search terms appear in the Abstract/Title.

    4. Refine further still to include references in which the search terms appear only in the Title.

    Use a tracking log to help keep track of your search results.

    **## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    3/15/26, 9:09 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    points

    8

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    10

    points

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269450/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    3/15/26, 9:09 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    points

    8

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    10

    points

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269450/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Assignment_Week_2.docx**

    **Clinical Issue Essay**

    **Write a 1800-word essay addressing** each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
    **Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
    **Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Gap Analysis Toolkit located in the chapter readings, identify a clinical problem of interest (a current gap/problem affecting the delivery of evidence-based care).

    1.
    **Background:** Research the gap to understand the issue and form your background. The background of the problem is the review of information on why the problem is a pressing concern. It summarizes what is known about the problem being investigated. The background serves as your project's foundation. Support this section with reliable and credible sources.

    2.
    **Problem Statement:** Generate a concise problem statement. The problem statement should include the following items:

    · a description of the nature and context of the problem,

    · the impact of the problem on patients, populations, or societies; and the consequences of not fixing the problem. The problem statement justifies the need for your project, so end your problem statement with information on how your proposed study will contribute to the solution of this problem or issue. This will provide a lead-in to your purpose statement.
    _The statement of the problem is about one page in length._

    3.
    **Proposed PICOT:** Form your PICOT question, breaking it down into discrete sections, and explain each area of the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time (if applicable). Finish this section by writing your PICOT as a complete sentence.

    [**Instructions & Specifications**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Submission**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Rubric**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3)

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations. be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required,
    **check your spelling, and review the rubric.**

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 1800 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure:** Follow APA formatting. Your paper should be crafted with a discrete
    **Introduction (to include a purpose/objective statement), Body, Conclusion, and Reference** page. Body headings to address: Background, Problem Statement, Proposed PICOT.
    **The title and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count.**

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
    **least (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **This is my Topic**

    “ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

    **Refererences**

    Finkelman, A. (2020).
    _Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Review chapters 4 & 5.

    Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN: 9781274226324. Review chapters 4, 5, & 6.

    Library Guides at University of Missouri. (2022).
    _Evidence based nursing practice._ PICO(T) and Clinical Questions – Evidence Based Nursing Practice – Library Guides at University of Missouri Libraries.
    [https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073](https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073)

    Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
    _OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
    [https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

    Cedarville University. (n.d.).
    _POCO keyword chart._ [_https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543_](https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543)

    University of Kentucky Library. (n.d.).
    _Picot development_[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE)

    The National Library of Medicine. (n.d.)
    _PubMed basics._ [_https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026_](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026&ou=118315)

    The National Library of Medicine. (2013).
    _Use MeSH to build a better PubMed query._[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys)

    **Targeted PubMed® Search**

    1. Register for the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Account – (Click “sign in to NCBI” and follow instructions to create an account using one of the 3rd party sign-in options. Please make a note of your log in username and password).

    2. Complete PubMed® activities by following these instructions:

    · Identify a problem or area of potential quality improvement for your DNP Project.

    · Using PubMed®, create a search strategy for your selected topic.

    · Use MeSH® terms and Boolean operators (i.e., AND, OR, NOT).

    After you complete each step below, record the number of references returned by your search. Include the frequency of "ALL" and "Review" for each step. Adjust your search strategy so that you can complete all steps.

    1. Run a basic text search using two MeSH® terms for your topic.

    2. Refine your search by using the LIMIT feature to include only references that are within five years.

    3. Refine further to include references in which the search terms appear in the Abstract/Title.

    4. Refine further still to include references in which the search terms appear only in the Title.

    Use a tracking log to help keep track of your search results.

    **## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    3/15/26, 9:09 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    points

    8

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    10

    points

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269450/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Assignment_Week_2.docx**

    **Clinical Issue Essay**

    **Write a 1800-word essay addressing** each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper.
    **Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
    **Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**

    Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Gap Analysis Toolkit located in the chapter readings, identify a clinical problem of interest (a current gap/problem affecting the delivery of evidence-based care).

    1.
    **Background:** Research the gap to understand the issue and form your background. The background of the problem is the review of information on why the problem is a pressing concern. It summarizes what is known about the problem being investigated. The background serves as your project's foundation. Support this section with reliable and credible sources.

    2.
    **Problem Statement:** Generate a concise problem statement. The problem statement should include the following items:

    · a description of the nature and context of the problem,

    · the impact of the problem on patients, populations, or societies; and the consequences of not fixing the problem. The problem statement justifies the need for your project, so end your problem statement with information on how your proposed study will contribute to the solution of this problem or issue. This will provide a lead-in to your purpose statement.
    _The statement of the problem is about one page in length._

    3.
    **Proposed PICOT:** Form your PICOT question, breaking it down into discrete sections, and explain each area of the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time (if applicable). Finish this section by writing your PICOT as a complete sentence.

    [**Instructions & Specifications**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Submission**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3) [**Rubric**](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/118315-DNP860_Sect1_03-10-26/Module%202%20Assignment.html?ou=118315&d2l_body_type=3)

    1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

    2. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations. be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required,
    **check your spelling, and review the rubric.**

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 1800 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure:** Follow APA formatting. Your paper should be crafted with a discrete
    **Introduction (to include a purpose/objective statement), Body, Conclusion, and Reference** page. Body headings to address: Background, Problem Statement, Proposed PICOT.
    **The title and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count.**

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
    **least (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **This is my Topic**

    “ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

    **Refererences**

    Finkelman, A. (2020).
    _Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Review chapters 4 & 5.

    Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN: 9781274226324. Review chapters 4, 5, & 6.

    Library Guides at University of Missouri. (2022).
    _Evidence based nursing practice._ PICO(T) and Clinical Questions – Evidence Based Nursing Practice – Library Guides at University of Missouri Libraries.
    [https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073](https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28271&p=174073)

    Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.
    _OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,_ 23(2).
    [https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01](https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01)

    Cedarville University. (n.d.).
    _POCO keyword chart._ [_https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543_](https://libguides.cedarville.edu/ld.php?content_id=65221543)

    University of Kentucky Library. (n.d.).
    _Picot development_[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgU6840h8GE)

    The National Library of Medicine. (n.d.)
    _PubMed basics._ [_https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026_](https://classroom.aspen.edu/content/enforced/76026-DNP810-JNFJNSN8-03-29-22-Sect1/AUDNPEBPModule1-%20PubMed%20Basics.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=2EjeEapMQj7H3x0QFSeW79Any&ou=76026&ou=118315)

    The National Library of Medicine. (2013).
    _Use MeSH to build a better PubMed query._[Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys)

    **Targeted PubMed® Search**

    1. Register for the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Account – (Click “sign in to NCBI” and follow instructions to create an account using one of the 3rd party sign-in options. Please make a note of your log in username and password).

    2. Complete PubMed® activities by following these instructions:

    · Identify a problem or area of potential quality improvement for your DNP Project.

    · Using PubMed®, create a search strategy for your selected topic.

    · Use MeSH® terms and Boolean operators (i.e., AND, OR, NOT).

    After you complete each step below, record the number of references returned by your search. Include the frequency of "ALL" and "Review" for each step. Adjust your search strategy so that you can complete all steps.

    1. Run a basic text search using two MeSH® terms for your topic.

    2. Refine your search by using the LIMIT feature to include only references that are within five years.

    3. Refine further to include references in which the search terms appear in the Abstract/Title.

    4. Refine further still to include references in which the search terms appear only in the Title.

    Use a tracking log to help keep track of your search results.

    **## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    3/15/26, 9:09 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    points

    8

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    10

    points

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269450/View 1/5

    1/5

  • [Solved] Nursing Help homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Help homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.