Category: Applied Sciences

  • [Solved] Transformational Leadership in Nursing and Its Impact on Healthcare Outcomes

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Transformational Leadership in Nursing and Its Impact on Healthcare Outcomes Healthcare systems across the world are continuously evolving due to technological advancements [NURS FPX 8020 Assessment 1](https://tutorsacademy.co/nurs-fpx-8020-assessment-1/), growing patient populations, and increas…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Transformational Leadership in Nursing and Its Impact on Healthcare Outcomes

    Healthcare systems across the world are continuously evolving due to technological advancements [NURS FPX 8020 Assessment 1](https://tutorsacademy.co/nurs-fpx-8020-assessment-1/), growing patient populations, and increasing demands for high-quality care. In this complex environment, strong leadership is essential for ensuring that healthcare organizations remain effective, patient-centered, and innovative. Among the many leadership styles used in healthcare, transformational leadership has become particularly important in nursing. Transformational leadership focuses on inspiring and motivating team members, encouraging professional development, and fostering a culture of collaboration and innovation. For nurses and healthcare professionals, this leadership approach can significantly improve patient outcomes, strengthen team performance, and support the ongoing transformation of healthcare systems.

    Transformational leadership in nursing emphasizes the ability of leaders to inspire others through a shared vision and a commitment to excellence. Nurse leaders who adopt this approach encourage staff members to think critically, embrace change, and actively participate in improving healthcare practices. Rather than simply directing tasks, transformational leaders build strong relationships with their teams, promote open communication, and support individual growth. This approach creates a work environment where nurses feel valued, motivated, and empowered to contribute to the success of the organization.

    One of the most significant benefits of transformational leadership in nursing is its positive impact on patient care. When nurses are motivated and supported by effective leaders, they are more likely to provide compassionate, attentive, and high-quality care. Transformational leaders encourage nurses to follow evidence-based practices, engage in continuous learning, and prioritize patient safety. By fostering a culture that values innovation and professional excellence, these leaders ensure that patient care is constantly improving. As a result, healthcare organizations experience better clinical outcomes, reduced medical errors, and higher levels of patient satisfaction.

    Transformational leadership also plays a critical role in improving teamwork and collaboration within healthcare organizations. Modern healthcare relies heavily on interdisciplinary cooperation among physicians, nurses, pharmacists, therapists, and other professionals. Effective nurse leaders help create a collaborative environment where team members respect each other’s expertise and work together to achieve shared goals. Transformational leaders encourage open communication, mutual support, and collective problem-solving, which strengthens relationships among healthcare professionals and improves the overall effectiveness of care delivery.

    Another important aspect of transformational leadership is its influence on professional development and workforce retention. Nursing can be a demanding profession, and many healthcare organizations struggle with issues such as burnout, stress, and staff shortages. Transformational leaders address these challenges by supporting the personal and professional growth of their staff. They provide mentorship, encourage continuing education, and recognize the achievements of their team members. When nurses feel supported and appreciated, they are more likely to remain committed to their roles and contribute positively to their organizations. This not only improves staff retention but also strengthens the stability and effectiveness of healthcare teams.

    Innovation is another key area where transformational leadership has a significant impact. Healthcare systems must constantly adapt to new technologies, treatments, and patient needs. Transformational nurse leaders encourage creativity and critical thinking among their teams, allowing nurses to develop new solutions for complex healthcare challenges. By supporting innovation and experimentation, leaders help organizations implement new care models [NURS FPX 8020 Assessment 2](https://tutorsacademy.co/nurs-fpx-8020-assessment-2/), improve clinical processes, and integrate emerging technologies. This forward-thinking approach ensures that healthcare systems remain responsive and capable of meeting evolving patient needs.

    Quality improvement initiatives are closely connected to transformational leadership in nursing. Healthcare organizations must continuously evaluate and improve their practices to maintain high standards of care. Transformational leaders actively involve their teams in quality improvement projects, encouraging nurses to identify areas for improvement and participate in developing solutions. Through data analysis, evidence-based strategies, and collaborative planning, these initiatives lead to safer and more efficient healthcare systems. Nurses who participate in quality improvement efforts gain a deeper understanding of clinical processes and become more engaged in organizational success.

    Communication is another essential element of transformational leadership. Effective nurse leaders maintain clear, honest, and consistent communication with their teams. They listen to staff concerns, provide constructive feedback, and encourage open dialogue about challenges and opportunities. This transparency builds trust between leaders and team members, creating a supportive work environment where individuals feel comfortable sharing ideas and addressing problems. Strong communication also ensures that healthcare teams remain aligned with organizational goals and patient care priorities.

    Transformational leadership also contributes to the development of future healthcare leaders. Experienced nurse leaders serve as mentors and role models for emerging professionals, guiding them in developing leadership skills and professional confidence. By encouraging nurses to take on new responsibilities and participate in decision-making processes, transformational leaders help cultivate the next generation of healthcare leaders. This leadership development ensures that healthcare organizations remain resilient and capable of adapting to future challenges.

    Ethical practice is a fundamental aspect of transformational leadership in nursing. Healthcare professionals must make decisions that respect patient autonomy, protect confidentiality, and promote fairness and equality in care delivery. Transformational leaders emphasize ethical decision-making and encourage nurses to uphold professional standards and values. By promoting integrity and accountability, these leaders help maintain public trust in healthcare institutions and ensure that patient care remains both compassionate and responsible.

    The integration of technology in healthcare also highlights the importance of transformational leadership. Electronic health records [NURS FPX 8020 Assessment 3](https://tutorsacademy.co/nurs-fpx-8020-assessment-3/), telehealth services, and data analytics are transforming the way healthcare is delivered. Nurse leaders must guide their teams in adapting to these technological changes while maintaining high standards of care. Transformational leaders provide the training, resources, and support necessary for nurses to effectively use new technologies. This ensures that technological advancements enhance patient care rather than create barriers or confusion within healthcare teams.

    In addition to improving internal healthcare processes, transformational leadership helps strengthen relationships between healthcare organizations and the communities they serve. Nurse leaders often participate in community outreach programs, public health initiatives, and health education efforts. By engaging with communities, healthcare professionals can better understand patient needs and develop programs that promote prevention, wellness, and health equity. This community-focused approach supports healthier populations and reduces the burden on healthcare systems.

    In conclusion, transformational leadership plays a vital role in advancing nursing practice and improving healthcare outcomes. By inspiring and motivating healthcare professionals, transformational nurse leaders create supportive environments where innovation, collaboration, and professional growth can thrive. Their influence extends beyond individual teams, shaping organizational culture, improving patient care, and strengthening healthcare systems as a whole. Through mentorship, ethical guidance, and commitment to continuous improvement, transformational leaders empower nurses to reach their full potential and contribute meaningfully to the evolving field of healthcare. As healthcare challenges continue to grow, the importance of transformational leadership in nursing will remain essential for ensuring high-quality, patient-centered care and sustainable healthcare systems.

    – [\
    \
    jeshoots-com-l0j0DHVWcIE-unsplash.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/jeshoots-com-l0j0dhvwcie-unsplash-jpg "jeshoots-com-l0j0DHVWcIE-unsplash.jpg")

  • [Solved] I need assistance creating this lab report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Touchstone: Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance Lab Report **ASSIGNMENT:** In this unit, you will complete the Activity titled, _Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance?_. You will write a lab report describing the hypothesis, methods, a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Touchstone: Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance Lab Report

    **ASSIGNMENT:** In this unit, you will complete the Activity titled, _Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance?_. You will write a lab report describing the hypothesis, methods, and conclusions from this lab experience.

    By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:

    – Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis.
    – Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic.
    – Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation.
    – Explain any obtained results.
    – Discuss the conclusions and implications.

    **Download the lab report file. IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone.**

    download [Lab Report – Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance?](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63437-Lab%20Report_Homeostatic%20Control_How%20does%20the%20human%20body%20keep%20itself%20in%20balance.docx)

    The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided and submit it as a Word file. **Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.**

    **Helpful Links:**

    – [The Scientific Method Lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/the-scientific-method-15)

    – [How to Write a Lab Report Lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/how-to-write-a-lab-report-7)

    – [Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
    – [Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)

    [Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/anatomy-and-physiology-i-lab-2-touchstone-2-1#)

    ### A. Directions

    **Step 1**: Download and review the lab report file.

    **Step 2**: Complete each part of the lab report file as you work through the simulation. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.

    – Follow the process presented to you in the [How to Write a Lab Report lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/how-to-write-a-lab-report-7) to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
    – Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.

    **Step 3**: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.

    **Step 4**: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.

    Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.

    ❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report?❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?

    ### B. Rubric

    Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)

    ### Objective and Hypothesis

    Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable). (18%)Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words.Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific.Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation.Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words.Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Background Knowledge

    Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation. (18%)Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear.Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Summary and Steps

    Summarize the steps taken in the simulation. (18%)Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab.Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically.Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation, or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Results

    Explain the obtained results from the simulation. (18%)Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected, and why.Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation, and if the results were expected or unexpected.Explains some of the results of the simulation, but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Conclusions and Implications

    Discusses the conclusions and implications of the simulation. (18%)Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Conventions and Proofreading

    Submission follows conventions for standard written English. (10%)There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability.There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability.There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability.Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.

    ### C. Requirements

    The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

    – Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
    – Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
    – Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    – Submission must include your name and the date.
    – Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.

  • [Solved] Current & Future State of Health care

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx – ## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/current-and-future-state-of-health-care) **HR Management Tools and Teams** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx

    – ## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/current-and-future-state-of-health-care)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf**

    Benchmark – Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Agenda for Training

    Agenda for Training

    0 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present.

    8.16 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is thorough.

    Training Schedule

    Training Schedule

    0 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present, but lacks details

    or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present.

    8.16 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is thorough.

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    0 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present but lacks

    details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is thorough.

    Focus of the Program

    Focus of the Program

    0 points

    The focus of the program is

    not present.

    6.24 points

    The focus of the program is

    present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    The focus of the program is

    present.

    8.16 points

    The focus of the program is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    The focus of the program is

    thorough.

    Written Materials

    Written Materials

    0 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is not

    present.

    6.24 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is present

    but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    present.

    8.16 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    thorough.

    Training Element

    Training Element

    0 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present but

    lacks details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is thorough.

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (B)

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (C3.2)

    0 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are not present.

    6.76 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present but

    lack details or are

    incomplete.

    7.8 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present.

    8.84 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are detailed.

    10.4 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are thorough.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    4.16 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    4.8 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    5.44 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    6.4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    3.64 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    4.2 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    4.76 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    5.6 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf**

    Benchmark – Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Agenda for Training

    Agenda for Training

    0 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present.

    8.16 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is thorough.

    Training Schedule

    Training Schedule

    0 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present, but lacks details

    or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present.

    8.16 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is thorough.

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    0 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present but lacks

    details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is thorough.

    Focus of the Program

    Focus of the Program

    0 points

    The focus of the program is

    not present.

    6.24 points

    The focus of the program is

    present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    The focus of the program is

    present.

    8.16 points

    The focus of the program is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    The focus of the program is

    thorough.

    Written Materials

    Written Materials

    0 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is not

    present.

    6.24 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is present

    but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    present.

    8.16 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    thorough.

    Training Element

    Training Element

    0 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present but

    lacks details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is thorough.

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (B)

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (C3.2)

    0 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are not present.

    6.76 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present but

    lack details or are

    incomplete.

    7.8 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present.

    8.84 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are detailed.

    10.4 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are thorough.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    4.16 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    4.8 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    5.44 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    6.4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    3.64 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    4.2 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    4.76 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    5.6 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/current-and-future-state-of-health-care)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf**

    Benchmark – Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Agenda for Training

    Agenda for Training

    0 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present.

    8.16 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is thorough.

    Training Schedule

    Training Schedule

    0 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present, but lacks details

    or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present.

    8.16 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is thorough.

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    0 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present but lacks

    details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is thorough.

    Focus of the Program

    Focus of the Program

    0 points

    The focus of the program is

    not present.

    6.24 points

    The focus of the program is

    present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    The focus of the program is

    present.

    8.16 points

    The focus of the program is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    The focus of the program is

    thorough.

    Written Materials

    Written Materials

    0 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is not

    present.

    6.24 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is present

    but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    present.

    8.16 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    thorough.

    Training Element

    Training Element

    0 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present but

    lacks details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is thorough.

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (B)

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (C3.2)

    0 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are not present.

    6.76 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present but

    lack details or are

    incomplete.

    7.8 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present.

    8.84 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are detailed.

    10.4 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are thorough.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    4.16 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    4.8 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    5.44 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    6.4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    3.64 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    4.2 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    4.76 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    5.6 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/current-and-future-state-of-health-care)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf**

    Benchmark – Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings – Rubric Total 80 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Agenda for Training

    Agenda for Training

    0 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is present.

    8.16 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    An agenda for training,

    including the topic being

    covered, the presenter, the

    location, and the time block,

    is thorough.

    Training Schedule

    Training Schedule

    0 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is not present.

    6.24 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present, but lacks details

    or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is present.

    8.16 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A training schedule that

    includes the necessary

    preparation of who, what,

    when, where, why, and how

    is thorough.

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    Practice Training Activities

    and Media or Handouts

    0 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present but lacks

    details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of practice

    training activities and any

    media or handouts to be

    provided is thorough.

    Focus of the Program

    Focus of the Program

    0 points

    The focus of the program is

    not present.

    6.24 points

    The focus of the program is

    present but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    The focus of the program is

    present.

    8.16 points

    The focus of the program is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    The focus of the program is

    thorough.

    Written Materials

    Written Materials

    0 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is not

    present.

    6.24 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is present

    but lacks details or

    incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    present.

    8.16 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of written

    materials to be provided

    during the training is

    thorough.

    Training Element

    Training Element

    0 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is not present.

    6.24 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present but

    lacks details or incomplete.

    7.2 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is present.

    8.16 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is detailed.

    9.6 points

    A description of at least one

    computer-, Web-, or DVD-

    based training element that

    will be used in the program,

    including consideration of

    the idea that staff may have

    varying levels of technology

    readiness, is thorough.

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (B)

    Leveraging Workforce

    Diversity (C3.2)

    0 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are not present.

    6.76 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present but

    lack details or are

    incomplete.

    7.8 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are present.

    8.84 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are detailed.

    10.4 points

    An explanation of how

    organizations can leverage

    workforce diversity and a

    description of the benefits of

    diverse knowledge, skills, and

    expertise among team

    members are thorough.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    4.16 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    4.8 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    5.44 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    6.4 points

    Writer is clearly in command

    of standard, written,
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar,

    language use)

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    used.

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    3.64 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    4.2 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    4.76 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    5.6 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Primary Care Allied Health Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## PrimaryCare_Scenario460.pdf – ## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf **## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx** ## Primary Care Application In a total of 250-500 words, respond to the questions located in the scen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## PrimaryCare_Scenario460.pdf

    – ## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf

    **## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    ## Primary Care Application

    In a total of 250-500 words, respond to the questions located in the scenario.

    2

    **## PrimaryCare_Scenario460.pdf**

    PRIMARY CARE Scenario

    Scenario

    A family practice that serves over 4,500 patients is owned by three brothers, all general practitioner
    medical doctors who have been closely watching how the new Patient Protection and Affordable
    Care Act (ACA or “Obamacare”) is developing, especially with the ongoing changes to the eligibilities
    of coverage for patients and reimbursements that now require their facility to change its systems and
    processes for compliance.

    As a health care consultant, you have been retained by the family practice to perform a thorough audit
    and analysis of the facility, including its systems, processes, and procedures, with an emphasis on record
    keeping and coding/billing practices.

    You have also spent some time with the owners of the family practice discussing what the future holds
    regarding the types of treatments, demographics of patients, and the effect of technology on the
    methodologies of patient treatment. Within this context, the client asks you to provide the following:

    Questions:

    1. When comparing the overall health care system in America, how does it compare to just 40
    years ago?
    2. Provide some examples of what specifically is critical for the health care organization to consider
    regarding how treatments are performed on patients.
    3. What technological advancements do you predict in health care in the next 15 years, especially those
    that can be opportunities for a family medical clinic scenario?
    4. What are the regulatory agency changes coming in the near future?
    5. What are your predictions for the success of the ACA, especially in the next 5 years?

    **## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf**

    Primary Care Application: Allied Health Scenario – Rubric Total 30 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less than

    Satisfactory
    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate

    resources for decision

    making.

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate resources

    for decision making.

    0 points

    Student does not utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Solution is

    inappropriate and lacks

    rationale.

    6.83 points

    Student does partially utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Student

    proposes an appropriate

    solution, but significant

    rationale is needed.

    7.88 points

    Student utilizes appropriate

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution in the

    form of a summary.

    Moderate details are needed

    in recognizing implications

    for all parties involved, and in

    supporting rationale.

    8.92 points

    Student significantly utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Minor details are

    needed in recognizing

    implications for all parties

    involved, and in supporting

    rationale.

    10.5 points

    Student completely utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution

    supported with detailed

    rationale.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate

    ethical considerations.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    0 points

    Student does not provide any

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    5.85 points

    Student provides partial

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    6.75 points

    Student provides appropriate

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    7.65 points

    Student provides significant

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    9 points

    Student provides complete

    justification for decisions and

    action plans, including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    Integrates Principles,

    Concepts, Theories, and

    Ideas

    Integrates principles,

    concepts, theories, and ideas

    presented in the course

    content and program of

    study in a logical manner.

    0 points

    Student does not

    successfully integrate ideas

    or course concepts; or the

    combination of elements is

    not logical or verifiable.

    5.85 points

    Student attempts to

    integrate ideas or course

    concepts. The combination of

    elements is not logicalor

    verifiable.

    6.75 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, but the

    combination of elements at

    times is confusing.

    7.65 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    combination of elements is

    logical or verifiable.

    9 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    synthesis is unique. Synthesis

    shows careful planning and

    attention to how different

    elements fit together. The

    combination of elements is

    logical and verifiable.

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    0.98 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    1.13 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    1.28 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    1.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard

    written academic English.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf**

    Primary Care Application: Allied Health Scenario – Rubric Total 30 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less than

    Satisfactory
    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate

    resources for decision

    making.

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate resources

    for decision making.

    0 points

    Student does not utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Solution is

    inappropriate and lacks

    rationale.

    6.83 points

    Student does partially utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Student

    proposes an appropriate

    solution, but significant

    rationale is needed.

    7.88 points

    Student utilizes appropriate

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution in the

    form of a summary.

    Moderate details are needed

    in recognizing implications

    for all parties involved, and in

    supporting rationale.

    8.92 points

    Student significantly utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Minor details are

    needed in recognizing

    implications for all parties

    involved, and in supporting

    rationale.

    10.5 points

    Student completely utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution

    supported with detailed

    rationale.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate

    ethical considerations.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    0 points

    Student does not provide any

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    5.85 points

    Student provides partial

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    6.75 points

    Student provides appropriate

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    7.65 points

    Student provides significant

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    9 points

    Student provides complete

    justification for decisions and

    action plans, including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    Integrates Principles,

    Concepts, Theories, and

    Ideas

    Integrates principles,

    concepts, theories, and ideas

    presented in the course

    content and program of

    study in a logical manner.

    0 points

    Student does not

    successfully integrate ideas

    or course concepts; or the

    combination of elements is

    not logical or verifiable.

    5.85 points

    Student attempts to

    integrate ideas or course

    concepts. The combination of

    elements is not logicalor

    verifiable.

    6.75 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, but the

    combination of elements at

    times is confusing.

    7.65 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    combination of elements is

    logical or verifiable.

    9 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    synthesis is unique. Synthesis

    shows careful planning and

    attention to how different

    elements fit together. The

    combination of elements is

    logical and verifiable.

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    0.98 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    1.13 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    1.28 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    1.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard

    written academic English.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    ## Primary Care Application

    In a total of 250-500 words, respond to the questions located in the scenario.

    2

    **## PrimaryCare_Scenario460.pdf**

    PRIMARY CARE Scenario

    Scenario

    A family practice that serves over 4,500 patients is owned by three brothers, all general practitioner
    medical doctors who have been closely watching how the new Patient Protection and Affordable
    Care Act (ACA or “Obamacare”) is developing, especially with the ongoing changes to the eligibilities
    of coverage for patients and reimbursements that now require their facility to change its systems and
    processes for compliance.

    As a health care consultant, you have been retained by the family practice to perform a thorough audit
    and analysis of the facility, including its systems, processes, and procedures, with an emphasis on record
    keeping and coding/billing practices.

    You have also spent some time with the owners of the family practice discussing what the future holds
    regarding the types of treatments, demographics of patients, and the effect of technology on the
    methodologies of patient treatment. Within this context, the client asks you to provide the following:

    Questions:

    1. When comparing the overall health care system in America, how does it compare to just 40
    years ago?
    2. Provide some examples of what specifically is critical for the health care organization to consider
    regarding how treatments are performed on patients.
    3. What technological advancements do you predict in health care in the next 15 years, especially those
    that can be opportunities for a family medical clinic scenario?
    4. What are the regulatory agency changes coming in the near future?
    5. What are your predictions for the success of the ACA, especially in the next 5 years?

    **## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf**

    Primary Care Application: Allied Health Scenario – Rubric Total 30 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less than

    Satisfactory
    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate

    resources for decision

    making.

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate resources

    for decision making.

    0 points

    Student does not utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Solution is

    inappropriate and lacks

    rationale.

    6.83 points

    Student does partially utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Student

    proposes an appropriate

    solution, but significant

    rationale is needed.

    7.88 points

    Student utilizes appropriate

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution in the

    form of a summary.

    Moderate details are needed

    in recognizing implications

    for all parties involved, and in

    supporting rationale.

    8.92 points

    Student significantly utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Minor details are

    needed in recognizing

    implications for all parties

    involved, and in supporting

    rationale.

    10.5 points

    Student completely utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution

    supported with detailed

    rationale.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate

    ethical considerations.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    0 points

    Student does not provide any

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    5.85 points

    Student provides partial

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    6.75 points

    Student provides appropriate

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    7.65 points

    Student provides significant

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    9 points

    Student provides complete

    justification for decisions and

    action plans, including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    Integrates Principles,

    Concepts, Theories, and

    Ideas

    Integrates principles,

    concepts, theories, and ideas

    presented in the course

    content and program of

    study in a logical manner.

    0 points

    Student does not

    successfully integrate ideas

    or course concepts; or the

    combination of elements is

    not logical or verifiable.

    5.85 points

    Student attempts to

    integrate ideas or course

    concepts. The combination of

    elements is not logicalor

    verifiable.

    6.75 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, but the

    combination of elements at

    times is confusing.

    7.65 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    combination of elements is

    logical or verifiable.

    9 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    synthesis is unique. Synthesis

    shows careful planning and

    attention to how different

    elements fit together. The

    combination of elements is

    logical and verifiable.

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    0.98 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    1.13 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    1.28 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    1.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard

    written academic English.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## PrimaryCareApplicationAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    ## Primary Care Application

    In a total of 250-500 words, respond to the questions located in the scenario.

    2

    **## PrimaryCare_Scenario460.pdf**

    PRIMARY CARE Scenario

    Scenario

    A family practice that serves over 4,500 patients is owned by three brothers, all general practitioner
    medical doctors who have been closely watching how the new Patient Protection and Affordable
    Care Act (ACA or “Obamacare”) is developing, especially with the ongoing changes to the eligibilities
    of coverage for patients and reimbursements that now require their facility to change its systems and
    processes for compliance.

    As a health care consultant, you have been retained by the family practice to perform a thorough audit
    and analysis of the facility, including its systems, processes, and procedures, with an emphasis on record
    keeping and coding/billing practices.

    You have also spent some time with the owners of the family practice discussing what the future holds
    regarding the types of treatments, demographics of patients, and the effect of technology on the
    methodologies of patient treatment. Within this context, the client asks you to provide the following:

    Questions:

    1. When comparing the overall health care system in America, how does it compare to just 40
    years ago?
    2. Provide some examples of what specifically is critical for the health care organization to consider
    regarding how treatments are performed on patients.
    3. What technological advancements do you predict in health care in the next 15 years, especially those
    that can be opportunities for a family medical clinic scenario?
    4. What are the regulatory agency changes coming in the near future?
    5. What are your predictions for the success of the ACA, especially in the next 5 years?

    **## Rubric-PrimaryCareApplication.pdf**

    Primary Care Application: Allied Health Scenario – Rubric Total 30 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less than

    Satisfactory
    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate

    resources for decision

    making.

    Demonstrate the ability to

    utilize appropriate resources

    for decision making.

    0 points

    Student does not utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Solution is

    inappropriate and lacks

    rationale.

    6.83 points

    Student does partially utilize

    appropriate resources for

    decision making. Student

    proposes an appropriate

    solution, but significant

    rationale is needed.

    7.88 points

    Student utilizes appropriate

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution in the

    form of a summary.

    Moderate details are needed

    in recognizing implications

    for all parties involved, and in

    supporting rationale.

    8.92 points

    Student significantly utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Minor details are

    needed in recognizing

    implications for all parties

    involved, and in supporting

    rationale.

    10.5 points

    Student completely utilizes

    resources for decision

    making. Student proposes an

    appropriate solution

    supported with detailed

    rationale.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate

    ethical considerations.

    Provide justification for

    decisions and action plans

    including appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    0 points

    Student does not provide any

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    5.85 points

    Student provides partial

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    6.75 points

    Student provides appropriate

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    7.65 points

    Student provides significant

    justification for decisions and

    action plans including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    9 points

    Student provides complete

    justification for decisions and

    action plans, including

    appropriate ethical

    considerations.

    Integrates Principles,

    Concepts, Theories, and

    Ideas

    Integrates principles,

    concepts, theories, and ideas

    presented in the course

    content and program of

    study in a logical manner.

    0 points

    Student does not

    successfully integrate ideas

    or course concepts; or the

    combination of elements is

    not logical or verifiable.

    5.85 points

    Student attempts to

    integrate ideas or course

    concepts. The combination of

    elements is not logicalor

    verifiable.

    6.75 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, but the

    combination of elements at

    times is confusing.

    7.65 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    combination of elements is

    logical or verifiable.

    9 points

    Student integrates ideas or

    course concepts, and

    synthesis is unique. Synthesis

    shows careful planning and

    attention to how different

    elements fit together. The

    combination of elements is

    logical and verifiable.

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    0.98 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    1.13 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    1.28 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    1.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard

    written academic English.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Anatomy Lab Touchstone Assignment and Details

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Touchstone: Smooth Muscle: Learn how your gut contracts! **ASSIGNMENT:** In this unit, you will complete the Activity titled _Smooth Muscle: Learn how your gut contracts!_ You will write a lab report describing the hypothesis, methods, and conclusions from this lab experience. By completing the l…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Touchstone: Smooth Muscle: Learn how your gut contracts!

    **ASSIGNMENT:** In this unit, you will complete the Activity titled _Smooth Muscle: Learn how your gut contracts!_ You will write a lab report describing the hypothesis, methods, and conclusions from this lab experience.

    By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:

    – Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis.
    – Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic.
    – Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation.
    – Explain any obtained results.
    – Discuss the conclusions and implications.

    **Download the lab report file. IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone.**

    download [Lab Report – Smooth muscle: Learn how your gut contracts!](https://app.sophia.org/download/attachment/63438-Lab%20Report_Smooth%20Muscle_Learn%20how%20your%20gut%20contracts.docx)

    The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided and submit it as a Word file. **Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.**

    **Helpful Links:**

    – [The Scientific Method Lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/the-scientific-method-15)

    – [How to Write a Lab Report Lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/how-to-write-a-lab-report-7)

    – [Academic Integrity Guidelines](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/touchstones-academic-integrity-guidelines)
    – [Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/ethical-standards-and-appropriate-use-of-ai)

    [Share your feedback on Touchstones](https://app.sophia.org/spcc/anatomy-and-physiology-i-lab-2-touchstone-5-1#)

    ### A. Directions

    **Step 1**: Download and review the lab report file.

    **Step 2**: Complete each part of the lab report file as you work through the simulation. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.

    – Follow the process presented to you in the [How to Write a Lab Report lesson](https://app.sophia.org/tutorials/how-to-write-a-lab-report-7) to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
    – Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.

    **Step 3**: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.

    **Step 4**: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.

    Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.

    ❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report?❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?

    ### B. Rubric

    Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)

    ### Objective and Hypothesis

    Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable). (18%)Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words.Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific.Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation.Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words.Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Background Knowledge

    Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation. (18%)Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear.Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Summary and Steps

    Summarize the steps taken in the simulation. (18%)Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab.Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically.Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Results

    Explain the obtained results from the simulation. (18%)Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected and why.Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation and if the results were expected or unexpected.Explains some of the results of the simulation but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Conclusions and Implications

    Discuss the conclusions and implications of the simulation. (18%)Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.

    ### Conventions and Proofreading

    Submission follows conventions for standard written English. (10%)There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability.There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability.There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability.Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.

    ### C. Requirements

    The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

    – Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
    – Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
    – Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    – Submission must include your name and the date.
    – Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.

    – [\
    \
    LabReport_SmoothMuscle_Learnhowyourgutcontracts.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/labreport-smoothmuscle-learnhowyourgutcontracts-docx "LabReport_SmoothMuscle_Learnhowyourgutcontracts.docx")

  • [Solved] Research Design and Methods

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Reflect on how you can apply the concepts learned in this course to your current career, future career, entrepreneurial venture, or personal endeavors. How might the lessons you have learned positively impact your decision-making effectiveness and goal attainment? In your answer, consider the differ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Reflect on how you can apply the concepts learned in this course to your current career, future career, entrepreneurial venture, or personal endeavors. How might the lessons you have learned positively impact your decision-making effectiveness and goal attainment? In your answer, consider the different research methods you have learned in this course.

    Submit your response as an attached Word document. Your response must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

  • [Solved] Research Design and Methods

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Locate a primary research article in an academic journal from the CSU Online Library where the researcher or researchers used a qualitative research strategy. After reading the article, explain the following elements: – Phenomena under study, – research design, – analytical approach, – data analysis…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Locate a primary research article in an academic journal from the CSU Online Library where the researcher or researchers used a qualitative research strategy. After reading the article, explain the following elements:

    – Phenomena under study,
    – research design,
    – analytical approach,
    – data analysis procedures used,
    – data collection method,
    – sampling design (describe research participants and method of selection),
    – findings,
    – personal reflection on the use of a qualitative versus quantitative research strategy.

    Your assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length, not counting the required references page. Please thoroughly address all required elements listed above. Responses should be written in a narrative format rather than being formatted as short bullet points. Please use APA-compliant headings and sub-headings that align with the individual assignment elements and please respond to the assignment elements in the same sequence they are requested in the instructions. Do not combine elements within a section. Each assignment element should have its own section with APA heading. Adhere to all other APA Style and Formatting guidelines, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Include at least the article used as a source, but other credible sources may be used as needed.

  • [Solved] Week 1 DQ

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Week1DQQuestions.docx **## Week1DQQuestions.docx** MGT6152. 21Project Performance Management Title: Project Management Fundamentals. Author: Shelly Morris Publisher: Seneca College. Licensed under CC 4.0. Year Published: 2021 Edition: 1st ISBN: Licensed under CC 4.0 **Week 1: Disc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week1DQQuestions.docx

    **## Week1DQQuestions.docx**

    MGT6152. 21Project Performance Management

    Title: Project Management Fundamentals.

    Author: Shelly Morris

    Publisher: Seneca College.

    Licensed under CC 4.0.

    Year Published: 2021

    Edition: 1st ISBN:

    Licensed under CC 4.0

    **Week 1: Discussion – Welcome & Introductions**

    One of the most critical aspects of an online course is the interaction between you and your fellow learners. Please review the course Syllabus and Professor's Expectations, then write and post a new discussion topic consisting of a self-introduction including a mention of your educational and employment background as they relate to the topics of this course. Also, include a response to the following:

    · What are your expectations for this course?

    · What specific goals do you want to accomplish by the end of the course?

    · Consider and describe how this course may contribute to your career and/or academic goals.

    · Discuss your apprehensions, excitement, or challenges as you begin this course.

    · Is there an interesting fact or aspect of yourself that you would like to share with the class?

    This discussion provides an excellent opportunity for you and your fellow learners to get to know each other. Please ensure your post is well-written, grammatically correct, and informative.

    **Initial Post: Select one of the (ethically challenged) projects below for your initial post**

    It is crucial for project managers to consider the ethical implications of their decisions and actions and to prioritize ethical principles throughout the project lifecycle. The case studies below demonstrate the importance of ethical decision-making in project management and the consequences of failing to prioritize ethical principles.

    **1-5: Catastrophic Safety Failures**

    1.
    **Boeing 737 MAX Crisis** – Speed-to-market took priority over safety, leading to two fatal crashes due to faulty MCAS software.

    2.
    **Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill** – Cost-cutting and ignored safety warnings resulted in a catastrophic environmental disaster.

    3.
    **Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster** – Mismanagement of a reactor safety test led to one of history’s worst nuclear accidents.

    4.
    **Rana Plaza Collapse** – Project mismanagement ignored building safety regulations, leading to over 1,100 deaths.

    5.
    **Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster** – Failure to implement safety controls in an industrial project led to a deadly gas leak.

    **6-10: Corporate Fraud & Deception**

    6.
    **Volkswagen Emissions Scandal** – Engineers programmed software to cheat emissions tests, leading to lawsuits and fines.

    7.
    **Enron Scandal** – Executives manipulated financial reports, causing a major corporate collapse.

    8.
    **Theranos Scandal** – False claims about medical technology misled investors and endangered public health.

    9.
    **Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal** – Employees created fake customer accounts under unethical project incentives.

    10.
    **2008 Subprime Mortgage Crisis** – Poor project oversight in financial risk assessment led to a global economic collapse.

    **11-15: Infrastructure & Environmental Negligence**

    11.
    **Flint Water Crisis** – A failure in public project execution led to lead contamination in drinking water.

    12.
    **Boston Big Dig** – Poor project oversight resulted in excessive cost overruns and serious safety issues.

    13.
    **Three Gorges Dam** – Disregard for environmental and social impacts led to mass displacement and ecological damage.

    14.
    **PG&E California Wildfires** – Neglected infrastructure maintenance caused devastating wildfires and lawsuits.

    15.
    **Hurricane Katrina Response** – Poor planning and mismanagement in disaster recovery worsened the crisis.

    **16-20: Product Failures & Technology Mismanagement**

    16.
    **Ford Pinto Case** – Cost-cutting in design led to fatal explosions in rear-end collisions.

    17.
    **Takata Airbag Recall** – Ignoring quality defects in airbag production led to fatalities and global recalls.

    18.
    **Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Recall** – Rushed production led to battery failures, fires, and a global recall.

    19.
    **Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal** – Poor project oversight on data privacy led to unethical use of user information.

    20.
    **Panama Canal Expansion** – Financial mismanagement, contractual disputes, and poor labor conditions led to delays and cost overruns.

    **Select one of the (ethically challenged) projects above for your initial post**. Research the ethical dilemma, draft a summary, and apply the
    [PMI Ethical Decision-Making Framework (EDMF)](https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/ethical-decision-making-framework.pdf?rev=53450dfbbf1d4596b639018ab1163300&sc_lang_temp=en) to defend a possible ethical alternative in your initial post.

    Your initial submission should be a substantive post (~400+ words). Your response should include APA-compliant in-text citations and references. (APA 7th edition style

    **## Week1DQQuestions.docx**

    MGT6152. 21Project Performance Management

    Title: Project Management Fundamentals.

    Author: Shelly Morris

    Publisher: Seneca College.

    Licensed under CC 4.0.

    Year Published: 2021

    Edition: 1st ISBN:

    Licensed under CC 4.0

    **Week 1: Discussion – Welcome & Introductions**

    One of the most critical aspects of an online course is the interaction between you and your fellow learners. Please review the course Syllabus and Professor's Expectations, then write and post a new discussion topic consisting of a self-introduction including a mention of your educational and employment background as they relate to the topics of this course. Also, include a response to the following:

    · What are your expectations for this course?

    · What specific goals do you want to accomplish by the end of the course?

    · Consider and describe how this course may contribute to your career and/or academic goals.

    · Discuss your apprehensions, excitement, or challenges as you begin this course.

    · Is there an interesting fact or aspect of yourself that you would like to share with the class?

    This discussion provides an excellent opportunity for you and your fellow learners to get to know each other. Please ensure your post is well-written, grammatically correct, and informative.

    **Initial Post: Select one of the (ethically challenged) projects below for your initial post**

    It is crucial for project managers to consider the ethical implications of their decisions and actions and to prioritize ethical principles throughout the project lifecycle. The case studies below demonstrate the importance of ethical decision-making in project management and the consequences of failing to prioritize ethical principles.

    **1-5: Catastrophic Safety Failures**

    1.
    **Boeing 737 MAX Crisis** – Speed-to-market took priority over safety, leading to two fatal crashes due to faulty MCAS software.

    2.
    **Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill** – Cost-cutting and ignored safety warnings resulted in a catastrophic environmental disaster.

    3.
    **Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster** – Mismanagement of a reactor safety test led to one of history’s worst nuclear accidents.

    4.
    **Rana Plaza Collapse** – Project mismanagement ignored building safety regulations, leading to over 1,100 deaths.

    5.
    **Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster** – Failure to implement safety controls in an industrial project led to a deadly gas leak.

    **6-10: Corporate Fraud & Deception**

    6.
    **Volkswagen Emissions Scandal** – Engineers programmed software to cheat emissions tests, leading to lawsuits and fines.

    7.
    **Enron Scandal** – Executives manipulated financial reports, causing a major corporate collapse.

    8.
    **Theranos Scandal** – False claims about medical technology misled investors and endangered public health.

    9.
    **Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal** – Employees created fake customer accounts under unethical project incentives.

    10.
    **2008 Subprime Mortgage Crisis** – Poor project oversight in financial risk assessment led to a global economic collapse.

    **11-15: Infrastructure & Environmental Negligence**

    11.
    **Flint Water Crisis** – A failure in public project execution led to lead contamination in drinking water.

    12.
    **Boston Big Dig** – Poor project oversight resulted in excessive cost overruns and serious safety issues.

    13.
    **Three Gorges Dam** – Disregard for environmental and social impacts led to mass displacement and ecological damage.

    14.
    **PG&E California Wildfires** – Neglected infrastructure maintenance caused devastating wildfires and lawsuits.

    15.
    **Hurricane Katrina Response** – Poor planning and mismanagement in disaster recovery worsened the crisis.

    **16-20: Product Failures & Technology Mismanagement**

    16.
    **Ford Pinto Case** – Cost-cutting in design led to fatal explosions in rear-end collisions.

    17.
    **Takata Airbag Recall** – Ignoring quality defects in airbag production led to fatalities and global recalls.

    18.
    **Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Recall** – Rushed production led to battery failures, fires, and a global recall.

    19.
    **Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal** – Poor project oversight on data privacy led to unethical use of user information.

    20.
    **Panama Canal Expansion** – Financial mismanagement, contractual disputes, and poor labor conditions led to delays and cost overruns.

    **Select one of the (ethically challenged) projects above for your initial post**. Research the ethical dilemma, draft a summary, and apply the
    [PMI Ethical Decision-Making Framework (EDMF)](https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/ethical-decision-making-framework.pdf?rev=53450dfbbf1d4596b639018ab1163300&sc_lang_temp=en) to defend a possible ethical alternative in your initial post.

    Your initial submission should be a substantive post (~400+ words). Your response should include APA-compliant in-text citations and references. (APA 7th edition style

  • [Solved] Etik Draft

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Etik Draft.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Benchmark Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx – ## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/applied-sciences-benchmark-assignment) **HR Management Tools and Teams** **Directions:**…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx

    – ## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/applied-sciences-benchmark-assignment)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf**

    Benchmark Assignment: HR Management Tools and Teams – Rubric Total 170 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    0 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    NA

    19.13 points

    NA

    21.68 points

    NA

    25.5 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is

    present.

    Staffing and Work

    Production

    Staffing and Work Production

    0 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are not present.

    16.58 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present, but lack

    detail or are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present.

    21.68 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are thorough.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks

    0 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are not present.

    16.58 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present, but lack detail or

    are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present.

    21.68 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are thorough.

    Team Dynamics Employed

    by Successful Teams

    Team Dynamics Employed by

    Successful Teams

    0 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are not

    present.

    16.58 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present, but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present.

    21.68 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    thorough.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge and Skills

    0 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    not present.

    16.58 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present.

    21.68 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    thorough.

    Methods and Approaches

    to Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (B)

    Methods and Approaches to

    Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (C3.3)

    0 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present

    but lacks detail or is

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present.

    21.68 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is detailed.

    Methods and approaches

    mostly link with the skills

    identified.

    25.5 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is thorough.

    Methods and approaches link

    with the skills identified.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    5.53 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    6.38 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    7.23 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    8.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    5.53 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    6.38 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    7.23 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    8.5 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf**

    Benchmark Assignment: HR Management Tools and Teams – Rubric Total 170 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    0 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    NA

    19.13 points

    NA

    21.68 points

    NA

    25.5 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is

    present.

    Staffing and Work

    Production

    Staffing and Work Production

    0 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are not present.

    16.58 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present, but lack

    detail or are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present.

    21.68 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are thorough.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks

    0 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are not present.

    16.58 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present, but lack detail or

    are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present.

    21.68 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are thorough.

    Team Dynamics Employed

    by Successful Teams

    Team Dynamics Employed by

    Successful Teams

    0 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are not

    present.

    16.58 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present, but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present.

    21.68 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    thorough.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge and Skills

    0 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    not present.

    16.58 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present.

    21.68 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    thorough.

    Methods and Approaches

    to Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (B)

    Methods and Approaches to

    Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (C3.3)

    0 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present

    but lacks detail or is

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present.

    21.68 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is detailed.

    Methods and approaches

    mostly link with the skills

    identified.

    25.5 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is thorough.

    Methods and approaches link

    with the skills identified.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    5.53 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    6.38 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    7.23 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    8.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    5.53 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    6.38 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    7.23 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    8.5 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/applied-sciences-benchmark-assignment)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf**

    Benchmark Assignment: HR Management Tools and Teams – Rubric Total 170 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    0 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    NA

    19.13 points

    NA

    21.68 points

    NA

    25.5 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is

    present.

    Staffing and Work

    Production

    Staffing and Work Production

    0 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are not present.

    16.58 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present, but lack

    detail or are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present.

    21.68 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are thorough.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks

    0 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are not present.

    16.58 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present, but lack detail or

    are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present.

    21.68 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are thorough.

    Team Dynamics Employed

    by Successful Teams

    Team Dynamics Employed by

    Successful Teams

    0 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are not

    present.

    16.58 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present, but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present.

    21.68 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    thorough.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge and Skills

    0 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    not present.

    16.58 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present.

    21.68 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    thorough.

    Methods and Approaches

    to Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (B)

    Methods and Approaches to

    Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (C3.3)

    0 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present

    but lacks detail or is

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present.

    21.68 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is detailed.

    Methods and approaches

    mostly link with the skills

    identified.

    25.5 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is thorough.

    Methods and approaches link

    with the skills identified.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    5.53 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    6.38 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    7.23 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    8.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    5.53 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    6.38 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    7.23 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    8.5 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **## Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/applied-sciences-benchmark-assignment)

    **HR Management Tools and Teams**

    **Directions:** Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

    **Part 1: Organization Selection**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:** |

    **Part 2: Staffing and Work Production**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_departmental level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Quality Improvement and Management**(What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Improvement and Techniques** (Which techniques improve quality?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Tools of Management**(What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. <br>3. |
    | **Benchmarks**(What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. |
    | **Organization Vision and Mission**(Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Alignment**(How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 3: Team Dynamics** **Successful Teams Employ**

    As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a
    **_team level_**. Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Characteristics**(Identify characteristics of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. | **Practices**(Identify practices of successful teams.)<br> <br>1.<br>2. |
    | **Methods and Approaches**(Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) <br> <br>1. <br>2. | **Examples of Use**(Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)<br> <br>1. <br>2. |

    **Part 4: Cross-Functional Application**

    Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

    Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

    1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

    2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

    **References**

    © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Rubric-BenchmarkAssignment_HRManagementToolsandTeams.pdf**

    Benchmark Assignment: HR Management Tools and Teams – Rubric Total 170 points

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    Selected Health Care

    Organization and Link

    0 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    NA

    19.13 points

    NA

    21.68 points

    NA

    25.5 points

    The selected health care

    organization and link is

    present.

    Staffing and Work

    Production

    Staffing and Work Production

    0 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are not present.

    16.58 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present, but lack

    detail or are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are present.

    21.68 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Quality improvement and

    management, improvement

    and techniques, tools of

    management, and examples

    of use are thorough.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks

    0 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are not present.

    16.58 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present, but lack detail or

    are incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are present.

    21.68 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are detailed.

    25.5 points

    Benchmarks, examples of

    use, organizational vision

    and mission, and alignment

    are thorough.

    Team Dynamics Employed

    by Successful Teams

    Team Dynamics Employed by

    Successful Teams

    0 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are not

    present.

    16.58 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present, but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    present.

    21.68 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    Characteristics, practices,

    methods and approaches,

    and examples of use are

    thorough.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge and Skills

    0 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    not present.

    16.58 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present but lack detail or are

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    present.

    21.68 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    detailed.

    25.5 points

    The knowledge and skills to

    acquire on the personal

    leadership development

    journey and specific

    strategies and examples are

    thorough.

    Methods and Approaches

    to Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (B)

    Methods and Approaches to

    Encourage a Culture of

    Collaboration (C3.3)

    0 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is not

    present.

    16.58 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present

    but lacks detail or is

    incomplete.

    19.13 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is present.

    21.68 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is detailed.

    Methods and approaches

    mostly link with the skills

    identified.

    25.5 points

    An analysis of two or three

    methods and approaches

    used to encourage a culture

    of collaboration within

    diverse teams, work groups,

    or organizations is thorough.

    Methods and approaches link

    with the skills identified.

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    Mechanics of Writing

    (includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use)

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive

    enough that they impede

    communication of meaning.

    Inappropriate word choice or

    sentence construction is

    employed.

    5.53 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies in

    language choice (register) or

    word choice are present.

    Sentence structure is correct

    but not varied.

    6.38 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    7.23 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors, although

    a few may be present. The

    writer uses a variety of

    effective sentence structures

    and figures of speech.

    8.5 points

    The writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Documentation of Sources

    Documentation of Sources

    (citations, footnotes,

    references, bibliography, etc.,

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    5.53 points

    Documentation of sources is

    inconsistent or incorrect, as

    appropriate to assignment

    6.38 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style, although some

    7.23 points

    Sources are documented, as

    appropriate to assignment

    8.5 points

    Sources are completely and

    correctly documented, as

    appropriate to assignment
    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory
    2. 2: Less Than

    Satisfactory
    3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

    as appropriate to assignment

    and style)

    and style, with numerous

    formatting errors.

    formatting errors may be

    present.

    and style, and format is

    mostly correct.

    and style, and format is free

    of error.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)