Executive Solution Overview
SEE ATTACHED **files (5)** – ## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf – ## CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx – Comparing_Fiscal_Federalism_—-_Part_1_Framework_and_Principles.pdf – R46382.3.pdf – Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf **## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf** Criteria Ratings Points Content …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
SEE ATTACHED
**files (5)**
– ## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf
– ## CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx
– Comparing_Fiscal_Federalism_—-_Part_1_Framework_and_Principles.pdf
– R46382.3.pdf
– Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf
**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content –
Analysis,
Critique of
Material
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses ow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would benet
from additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Content –
Organization
24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper eectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not ow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not
Present
24 pts
Content –
Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benet from greater
critique, evaluation,
and synthesis.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benet from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure –
Mechanics
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and the word
choice is appropriate.
The Paper is 8-10 pages.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
The Paper is 6–8
pages.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. The Paper
does not meet the length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Current APA
Format
Elements
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
The title page,
references, etc. are
correctly formatted.
Paper is double-spaced
with 1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page, references,
etc. are present with
few errors. The Paper
is double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present. Title
page, references, etc., are
included, though numerous
errors are present. The Paper
is double-spaced, but the
margins or fonts are incorrect.
The paper is acceptably
formatted.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Research
Elements
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
High-quality primary and
secondary sources are
used in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8-10 sources are used, in
addition to the course text
and the Bible. A complete
and accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are used.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6–8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are
acceptably supported
by research.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are used.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate references list is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
**## CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 804
**Case Study Assignment Instructions**
Overview
You will complete 6
**Case Study Assignments** throughout this course. Below you will find a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due. You will also find the instructions and description for each assignment.
**Instructions**
· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis
· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.
· All citations and format must be in current APA format
· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis
· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
· Paper must be 8-10 pages (
**Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment** must be 10-12 pages).
Below is a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due.
| | |
| — | — |
| **Title of Assignment** | **Module: Week** |
| Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment | Module 2: Week 2 |
| Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment | Module 3: Week 3 |
| Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment | Module 4: Week 4 |
| Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment | Module 5: Week 5 |
| Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment | Module 6: Week 6 |
| Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment | Module 7: Week 7 |
**Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment**
Define the fiscal federalism model and provide a scholarly paper concerning the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to U.S. states and local governments.
**Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment**
Christensen and Wise (2009) state,
[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.
For this
**Case Study Assignment,** you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.
**Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment**
In 1959, Congress created the U.S. ACIR as a 26-member bipartisan federal commission to give continuing attention to intergovernmental problems (Pub. L. No. 86-380, 73 Stat. 703). On October 1, 1996, its authority to carry out the purposes stated in its Congressionally authorized legislation “sunset.”
Some scholars have called for its re-creation while others have mentioned it served little purpose. For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper for your support or denial of the re-establishment of the U.S. ACIR.
**Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment**
During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally, to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.
Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.
**Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment**
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA.
Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8-10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
**Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment**
Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters.
1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**Comparing_Fiscal_Federalism_—-_Part_1_Framework_and_Principles.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/comparing-fiscal-federalism-part-1-framework-and-principles-pdf)
**R46382.3.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/r46382-3-pdf)
**Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oates-essayfiscalfederalism-1999-pdf-10522853)
**Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oates-essayfiscalfederalism-1999-pdf-10522853)
**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content –
Analysis,
Critique of
Material
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses ow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would benet
from additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Content –
Organization
24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper eectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not ow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not
Present
24 pts
Content –
Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benet from greater
critique, evaluation,
and synthesis.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benet from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure –
Mechanics
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and the word
choice is appropriate.
The Paper is 8-10 pages.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
The Paper is 6–8
pages.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. The Paper
does not meet the length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Current APA
Format
Elements
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
The title page,
references, etc. are
correctly formatted.
Paper is double-spaced
with 1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page, references,
etc. are present with
few errors. The Paper
is double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present. Title
page, references, etc., are
included, though numerous
errors are present. The Paper
is double-spaced, but the
margins or fonts are incorrect.
The paper is acceptably
formatted.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Research
Elements
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
High-quality primary and
secondary sources are
used in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8-10 sources are used, in
addition to the course text
and the Bible. A complete
and accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are used.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6–8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are
acceptably supported
by research.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are used.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate references list is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
**## CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 804
**Case Study Assignment Instructions**
Overview
You will complete 6
**Case Study Assignments** throughout this course. Below you will find a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due. You will also find the instructions and description for each assignment.
**Instructions**
· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis
· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.
· All citations and format must be in current APA format
· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis
· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
· Paper must be 8-10 pages (
**Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment** must be 10-12 pages).
Below is a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due.
| | |
| — | — |
| **Title of Assignment** | **Module: Week** |
| Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment | Module 2: Week 2 |
| Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment | Module 3: Week 3 |
| Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment | Module 4: Week 4 |
| Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment | Module 5: Week 5 |
| Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment | Module 6: Week 6 |
| Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment | Module 7: Week 7 |
**Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment**
Define the fiscal federalism model and provide a scholarly paper concerning the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to U.S. states and local governments.
**Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment**
Christensen and Wise (2009) state,
[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.
For this
**Case Study Assignment,** you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.
**Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment**
In 1959, Congress created the U.S. ACIR as a 26-member bipartisan federal commission to give continuing attention to intergovernmental problems (Pub. L. No. 86-380, 73 Stat. 703). On October 1, 1996, its authority to carry out the purposes stated in its Congressionally authorized legislation “sunset.”
Some scholars have called for its re-creation while others have mentioned it served little purpose. For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper for your support or denial of the re-establishment of the U.S. ACIR.
**Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment**
During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally, to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.
Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.
**Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment**
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA.
Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8-10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
**Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment**
Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters.
1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**Comparing_Fiscal_Federalism_—-_Part_1_Framework_and_Principles.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/comparing-fiscal-federalism-part-1-framework-and-principles-pdf)
**R46382.3.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/r46382-3-pdf)
**Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oates-essayfiscalfederalism-1999-pdf-10522853)
**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content –
Analysis,
Critique of
Material
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses ow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would benet
from additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Content –
Organization
24 to >21 pts
Advanced
The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper eectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not ow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not
Present
24 pts
Content –
Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benet from greater
critique, evaluation,
and synthesis.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benet from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure –
Mechanics
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and the word
choice is appropriate.
The Paper is 8-10 pages.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
The Paper is 6–8
pages.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. The Paper
does not meet the length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Current APA
Format
Elements
13 to >11 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
The title page,
references, etc. are
correctly formatted.
Paper is double-spaced
with 1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.
11 to >10 pts
Proficient
Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page, references,
etc. are present with
few errors. The Paper
is double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present. Title
page, references, etc., are
included, though numerous
errors are present. The Paper
is double-spaced, but the
margins or fonts are incorrect.
The paper is acceptably
formatted.
0 pts
Not
Present
13 pts
Structure –
Research
Elements
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
High-quality primary and
secondary sources are
used in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8-10 sources are used, in
addition to the course text
and the Bible. A complete
and accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are used.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6–8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate references
list is provided.
Arguments are
acceptably supported
by research.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are used.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate references list is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 120
Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM804_D02_202620
**## CaseStudyAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 804
**Case Study Assignment Instructions**
Overview
You will complete 6
**Case Study Assignments** throughout this course. Below you will find a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due. You will also find the instructions and description for each assignment.
**Instructions**
· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis
· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.
· All citations and format must be in current APA format
· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis
· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
· Paper must be 8-10 pages (
**Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment** must be 10-12 pages).
Below is a chart with each
**Case Study Assignment** and the Module: Week it is due.
| | |
| — | — |
| **Title of Assignment** | **Module: Week** |
| Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment | Module 2: Week 2 |
| Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment | Module 3: Week 3 |
| Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment | Module 4: Week 4 |
| Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment | Module 5: Week 5 |
| Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment | Module 6: Week 6 |
| Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment | Module 7: Week 7 |
**Case Study: Fiscal Federalism Assignment**
Define the fiscal federalism model and provide a scholarly paper concerning the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to U.S. states and local governments.
**Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment**
Christensen and Wise (2009) state,
[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.
For this
**Case Study Assignment,** you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.
**Case Study: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Assignment**
In 1959, Congress created the U.S. ACIR as a 26-member bipartisan federal commission to give continuing attention to intergovernmental problems (Pub. L. No. 86-380, 73 Stat. 703). On October 1, 1996, its authority to carry out the purposes stated in its Congressionally authorized legislation “sunset.”
Some scholars have called for its re-creation while others have mentioned it served little purpose. For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper for your support or denial of the re-establishment of the U.S. ACIR.
**Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment**
During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally, to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.
Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.
**Case Study: Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force Assignment**
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA.
Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8-10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
**Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment**
Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters.
1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**Comparing_Fiscal_Federalism_—-_Part_1_Framework_and_Principles.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/comparing-fiscal-federalism-part-1-framework-and-principles-pdf)
**R46382.3.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/r46382-3-pdf)
**Oates-EssayFiscalFederalism-1999.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oates-essayfiscalfederalism-1999-pdf-10522853)