Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] right to treatment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    How does the "right to treatment" principle balance the ethical obligation to provide necessary medical care with the practical challenges of resource allocation, and 2. what criteria should be used to determine who qualifies for treatment in situations of limited resources? 3. What does the "right …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    How does the "right to treatment" principle balance the ethical obligation to provide necessary medical care with the practical challenges of resource allocation, and 2. what criteria should be used to determine who qualifies for treatment in situations of limited resources? 3. What does the "right to treatment" mean, and 4. how should we decide who gets medical care when resources are limited?

    300 words for initial post.

  • [Solved] Dissertation Help: Chapter 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Dissertation Help: Chapter 2.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Power Point Needed Health Information Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Read the paper and redo the power point attached. **files (2)** – ## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx – ## PIprojectDraft.docx **## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx** Performance Improvement Initiative Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers Willow View Medical Center Health Information Management Department Problem St…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Read the paper and redo the power point attached.

    **files (2)**

    – ## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx

    – ## PIprojectDraft.docx

    **## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx**

    Performance Improvement Initiative

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Willow View Medical Center

    Health Information Management Department

    Problem Statement

    Willow View Medical Center has a low percentage of credentialed HIM coding staff. Despite meeting productivity standards, many experienced coders lack formal credentials, creating compliance, reimbursement, and workforce sustainability risks (AHIMA, n.d.).

    Who, When, and Where

    Who: HIM coders, department leadership, and organizational stakeholders

    When: During performance reviews, audits, and hiring processes

    Where: HIM Department at Willow View Medical Center

    Why This Is an Issue

    Credentialing supports coding accuracy, regulatory compliance, and data integrity. Lack of credentials increases organizational risk and limits workforce advancement (AHIMA, 2023; CDC, 2023).

    PI Methodology: PDSA

    Plan: Assess credentialing gaps and barriers

    Do: Provide education, exam prep, and financial support

    Study: Monitor credentialing progress

    Act: Adjust strategies to improve outcomes

    PI Visual Tools

    • Gantt Chart: 12-month credentialing timeline

    • Fishbone Diagram: Root cause analysis

    • Bar Chart: Credentialed vs. non-credentialed staff baseline

    Expected Outcomes

    • Increased number of credentialed HIM staff

    • Improved compliance and coding accuracy

    • Stronger workforce readiness and retention

    References

    American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    See accompanying PI document for full APA references

    **## PIprojectDraft.docx**

    RUNNING HEAD: INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 1

    INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 2

    HIM 301 SEC 401

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Abstract

    This performance improvement (PI) initiative addresses the low number of credentialed Health Information Management (HIM) coding staff at Willow View Medical Center, a concern that directly impacts data quality, regulatory compliance, and workforce sustainability (American Health Information Management Association [AHIMA], n.d.-a). “The Certified Coding Associate (CCA) certification is perfect for those who interpret healthcare data for medical coding and evaluate medical claims. As a CCA, you'll gain knowledge of clinical classification systems, reimbursement methodologies, patient health information, compliance, and more.” (Certified Coding Associate (CCA) | AHIMA, n.d.). A leadership directive requires all employees in roles where credentialing is available to obtain a professional credential within one year, aligning with industry expectations for standardized coding practices and professional competency. While current coders meet productivity standards, many are experienced, aging staff without formal credentials, creating organizational risk related to reimbursement integrity and long-term workforce viability. “As skills-based hiring continues to gain momentum across industries, employers are increasingly prioritizing candidates with specialized expertise.” (AHIMA, 2023). “Recognizing this shift in healthcare and the increasing importance of HI integrity, AHIMA has developed microcredentials for high-demand skill sets demonstrating the HI professional’s proficiency in specialized areas, commitment to skills-based competency, and understanding of industry priorities.” (AHIMA, 2023). The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model will guide this initiative by assessing credentialing gaps, implementing supportive interventions such as exam preparation and education resources, monitoring progress, and refining strategies to ensure successful credential attainment. This structured improvement approach supports accurate health data reporting and aligns with national data quality standards emphasized by public health agencies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).). To support analysis and planning, a bar chart was used to illustrate the baseline distribution of credentialed versus non-credentialed staff, clearly demonstrating the magnitude of the credentialing gap. A fishbone diagram was developed to identify root causes contributing to low credentialing rates, including workforce demographics, financial barriers, limited study time, and lack of structured incentives. Additionally, a Gantt chart outlines the 12-month implementation timeline for the initiative, establishing clear milestones and accountability throughout the credentialing process.

    Figure 1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 1. Credentialing PI Gantt Chart illustrating the 12-month implementation timeline.

    Figure 2

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 2. Bar chart showing the percentage of credentialed versus non-credentialed HIM coders.

    Figure 3

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 3. Fishbone diagram identifying root causes contributing to low credentialed staff numbers.

    References

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Associate (CCA).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Specialist (CCS).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Professional Certification Approval Program (PCAP).
    [https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/](https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (2023). AHIMA microcredentials empower health information professionals to thrive in a skills-based job market.
    [https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/](https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Importance of accurate health data coding.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## PIprojectDraft.docx**

    RUNNING HEAD: INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 1

    INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 2

    HIM 301 SEC 401

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Abstract

    This performance improvement (PI) initiative addresses the low number of credentialed Health Information Management (HIM) coding staff at Willow View Medical Center, a concern that directly impacts data quality, regulatory compliance, and workforce sustainability (American Health Information Management Association [AHIMA], n.d.-a). “The Certified Coding Associate (CCA) certification is perfect for those who interpret healthcare data for medical coding and evaluate medical claims. As a CCA, you'll gain knowledge of clinical classification systems, reimbursement methodologies, patient health information, compliance, and more.” (Certified Coding Associate (CCA) | AHIMA, n.d.). A leadership directive requires all employees in roles where credentialing is available to obtain a professional credential within one year, aligning with industry expectations for standardized coding practices and professional competency. While current coders meet productivity standards, many are experienced, aging staff without formal credentials, creating organizational risk related to reimbursement integrity and long-term workforce viability. “As skills-based hiring continues to gain momentum across industries, employers are increasingly prioritizing candidates with specialized expertise.” (AHIMA, 2023). “Recognizing this shift in healthcare and the increasing importance of HI integrity, AHIMA has developed microcredentials for high-demand skill sets demonstrating the HI professional’s proficiency in specialized areas, commitment to skills-based competency, and understanding of industry priorities.” (AHIMA, 2023). The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model will guide this initiative by assessing credentialing gaps, implementing supportive interventions such as exam preparation and education resources, monitoring progress, and refining strategies to ensure successful credential attainment. This structured improvement approach supports accurate health data reporting and aligns with national data quality standards emphasized by public health agencies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).). To support analysis and planning, a bar chart was used to illustrate the baseline distribution of credentialed versus non-credentialed staff, clearly demonstrating the magnitude of the credentialing gap. A fishbone diagram was developed to identify root causes contributing to low credentialing rates, including workforce demographics, financial barriers, limited study time, and lack of structured incentives. Additionally, a Gantt chart outlines the 12-month implementation timeline for the initiative, establishing clear milestones and accountability throughout the credentialing process.

    Figure 1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 1. Credentialing PI Gantt Chart illustrating the 12-month implementation timeline.

    Figure 2

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 2. Bar chart showing the percentage of credentialed versus non-credentialed HIM coders.

    Figure 3

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 3. Fishbone diagram identifying root causes contributing to low credentialed staff numbers.

    References

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Associate (CCA).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Specialist (CCS).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Professional Certification Approval Program (PCAP).
    [https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/](https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (2023). AHIMA microcredentials empower health information professionals to thrive in a skills-based job market.
    [https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/](https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Importance of accurate health data coding.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx**

    Performance Improvement Initiative

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Willow View Medical Center

    Health Information Management Department

    Problem Statement

    Willow View Medical Center has a low percentage of credentialed HIM coding staff. Despite meeting productivity standards, many experienced coders lack formal credentials, creating compliance, reimbursement, and workforce sustainability risks (AHIMA, n.d.).

    Who, When, and Where

    Who: HIM coders, department leadership, and organizational stakeholders

    When: During performance reviews, audits, and hiring processes

    Where: HIM Department at Willow View Medical Center

    Why This Is an Issue

    Credentialing supports coding accuracy, regulatory compliance, and data integrity. Lack of credentials increases organizational risk and limits workforce advancement (AHIMA, 2023; CDC, 2023).

    PI Methodology: PDSA

    Plan: Assess credentialing gaps and barriers

    Do: Provide education, exam prep, and financial support

    Study: Monitor credentialing progress

    Act: Adjust strategies to improve outcomes

    PI Visual Tools

    • Gantt Chart: 12-month credentialing timeline

    • Fishbone Diagram: Root cause analysis

    • Bar Chart: Credentialed vs. non-credentialed staff baseline

    Expected Outcomes

    • Increased number of credentialed HIM staff

    • Improved compliance and coding accuracy

    • Stronger workforce readiness and retention

    References

    American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    See accompanying PI document for full APA references

    **## PIprojectDraft.docx**

    RUNNING HEAD: INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 1

    INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 2

    HIM 301 SEC 401

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Abstract

    This performance improvement (PI) initiative addresses the low number of credentialed Health Information Management (HIM) coding staff at Willow View Medical Center, a concern that directly impacts data quality, regulatory compliance, and workforce sustainability (American Health Information Management Association [AHIMA], n.d.-a). “The Certified Coding Associate (CCA) certification is perfect for those who interpret healthcare data for medical coding and evaluate medical claims. As a CCA, you'll gain knowledge of clinical classification systems, reimbursement methodologies, patient health information, compliance, and more.” (Certified Coding Associate (CCA) | AHIMA, n.d.). A leadership directive requires all employees in roles where credentialing is available to obtain a professional credential within one year, aligning with industry expectations for standardized coding practices and professional competency. While current coders meet productivity standards, many are experienced, aging staff without formal credentials, creating organizational risk related to reimbursement integrity and long-term workforce viability. “As skills-based hiring continues to gain momentum across industries, employers are increasingly prioritizing candidates with specialized expertise.” (AHIMA, 2023). “Recognizing this shift in healthcare and the increasing importance of HI integrity, AHIMA has developed microcredentials for high-demand skill sets demonstrating the HI professional’s proficiency in specialized areas, commitment to skills-based competency, and understanding of industry priorities.” (AHIMA, 2023). The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model will guide this initiative by assessing credentialing gaps, implementing supportive interventions such as exam preparation and education resources, monitoring progress, and refining strategies to ensure successful credential attainment. This structured improvement approach supports accurate health data reporting and aligns with national data quality standards emphasized by public health agencies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).). To support analysis and planning, a bar chart was used to illustrate the baseline distribution of credentialed versus non-credentialed staff, clearly demonstrating the magnitude of the credentialing gap. A fishbone diagram was developed to identify root causes contributing to low credentialing rates, including workforce demographics, financial barriers, limited study time, and lack of structured incentives. Additionally, a Gantt chart outlines the 12-month implementation timeline for the initiative, establishing clear milestones and accountability throughout the credentialing process.

    Figure 1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 1. Credentialing PI Gantt Chart illustrating the 12-month implementation timeline.

    Figure 2

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 2. Bar chart showing the percentage of credentialed versus non-credentialed HIM coders.

    Figure 3

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 3. Fishbone diagram identifying root causes contributing to low credentialed staff numbers.

    References

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Associate (CCA).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Specialist (CCS).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Professional Certification Approval Program (PCAP).
    [https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/](https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (2023). AHIMA microcredentials empower health information professionals to thrive in a skills-based job market.
    [https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/](https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Importance of accurate health data coding.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## PIProjectPoweroint.pptx**

    Performance Improvement Initiative

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Willow View Medical Center

    Health Information Management Department

    Problem Statement

    Willow View Medical Center has a low percentage of credentialed HIM coding staff. Despite meeting productivity standards, many experienced coders lack formal credentials, creating compliance, reimbursement, and workforce sustainability risks (AHIMA, n.d.).

    Who, When, and Where

    Who: HIM coders, department leadership, and organizational stakeholders

    When: During performance reviews, audits, and hiring processes

    Where: HIM Department at Willow View Medical Center

    Why This Is an Issue

    Credentialing supports coding accuracy, regulatory compliance, and data integrity. Lack of credentials increases organizational risk and limits workforce advancement (AHIMA, 2023; CDC, 2023).

    PI Methodology: PDSA

    Plan: Assess credentialing gaps and barriers

    Do: Provide education, exam prep, and financial support

    Study: Monitor credentialing progress

    Act: Adjust strategies to improve outcomes

    PI Visual Tools

    • Gantt Chart: 12-month credentialing timeline

    • Fishbone Diagram: Root cause analysis

    • Bar Chart: Credentialed vs. non-credentialed staff baseline

    Expected Outcomes

    • Increased number of credentialed HIM staff

    • Improved compliance and coding accuracy

    • Stronger workforce readiness and retention

    References

    American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    See accompanying PI document for full APA references

    **## PIprojectDraft.docx**

    RUNNING HEAD: INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 1

    INCREASING CREDENTIALED STAFF Page 2

    HIM 301 SEC 401

    Increasing Credentialed Staff Numbers

    Abstract

    This performance improvement (PI) initiative addresses the low number of credentialed Health Information Management (HIM) coding staff at Willow View Medical Center, a concern that directly impacts data quality, regulatory compliance, and workforce sustainability (American Health Information Management Association [AHIMA], n.d.-a). “The Certified Coding Associate (CCA) certification is perfect for those who interpret healthcare data for medical coding and evaluate medical claims. As a CCA, you'll gain knowledge of clinical classification systems, reimbursement methodologies, patient health information, compliance, and more.” (Certified Coding Associate (CCA) | AHIMA, n.d.). A leadership directive requires all employees in roles where credentialing is available to obtain a professional credential within one year, aligning with industry expectations for standardized coding practices and professional competency. While current coders meet productivity standards, many are experienced, aging staff without formal credentials, creating organizational risk related to reimbursement integrity and long-term workforce viability. “As skills-based hiring continues to gain momentum across industries, employers are increasingly prioritizing candidates with specialized expertise.” (AHIMA, 2023). “Recognizing this shift in healthcare and the increasing importance of HI integrity, AHIMA has developed microcredentials for high-demand skill sets demonstrating the HI professional’s proficiency in specialized areas, commitment to skills-based competency, and understanding of industry priorities.” (AHIMA, 2023). The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model will guide this initiative by assessing credentialing gaps, implementing supportive interventions such as exam preparation and education resources, monitoring progress, and refining strategies to ensure successful credential attainment. This structured improvement approach supports accurate health data reporting and aligns with national data quality standards emphasized by public health agencies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2023).). To support analysis and planning, a bar chart was used to illustrate the baseline distribution of credentialed versus non-credentialed staff, clearly demonstrating the magnitude of the credentialing gap. A fishbone diagram was developed to identify root causes contributing to low credentialing rates, including workforce demographics, financial barriers, limited study time, and lack of structured incentives. Additionally, a Gantt chart outlines the 12-month implementation timeline for the initiative, establishing clear milestones and accountability throughout the credentialing process.

    Figure 1

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 1. Credentialing PI Gantt Chart illustrating the 12-month implementation timeline.

    Figure 2

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 2. Bar chart showing the percentage of credentialed versus non-credentialed HIM coders.

    Figure 3

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/power-point-needed)

    Figure 3. Fishbone diagram identifying root causes contributing to low credentialed staff numbers.

    References

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Associate (CCA).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/cca/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Certified Coding Specialist (CCS).
    [https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/](https://www.ahima.org/certification-careers/certifications-overview/ccs/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (n.d.). Professional Certification Approval Program (PCAP).
    [https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/](https://www.ahima.org/business-solutions/overview/higher-education/pcap/)

    American Health Information Management Association. (2023). AHIMA microcredentials empower health information professionals to thrive in a skills-based job market.
    [https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/](https://www.ahima.org/news-publications/press-room-press-releases/2023-press-releases/ahima-microcredentials/)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Importance of accurate health data coding.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-standards/index.htm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

  • [Solved] PA7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering PA7.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] OSHA VIII

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## UnitVIIIJournal.docx – ## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx** Unit VIII This journal has two parts. First, in your own words, describe the difference between leading and lagging indicators and their role and value in a safety management system. Next, th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## UnitVIIIJournal.docx

    – ## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Unit VIII

    This journal has two parts. First, in your own words, describe the difference between leading and lagging indicators and their role and value in a safety management system.

    Next, think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional), have used leading and lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe one specific example of a leading and a lagging indicator that were used. Do you believe each was effective? Why, or why not? Give specific examples to support your opinion. Former job as a fuel specialist in the Army

    Your journal submission must be at least 500 words in length. Outside sources and APA Style are not required.

    **## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Describe safety-related roles and responsibilities of employees.

    2. Identify occupational hazards commonly encountered in industry
    2.1 Recognize fire hazards in the workplace.

    3. Apply hazard identification and analysis techniques to workplace scenarios.

    3.1 Describe how leading and lagging indicators are applied in risk management.

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.

    5. Apply adult learning strategies to workplace safety and health training.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 17: Fire Safety

    Chapter 18: Construction Safety

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    So far, this course has described how a safety management system can be implemented in an organization to
    reduce health and safety risks.

    • Unit I discussed the safety-related roles and responsibilities of individuals working in an organization.
    Specifically, the role of the safety professional was reviewed, outlining how his or her actions can be
    critical in getting management’s commitment to safety as well as ensuring that employees are
    involved.

    • Unit II examined hazards commonly encountered in industry including health, chemical, physical,
    ergonomic, and biological. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA)
    requirements for written plans were assessed for specific hazards.

    • Unit III went on to describe how conducting a job hazard analysis (JHA) is used to identify hazards in
    different job scenarios.

    • Unit IV introduced the concept of the hierarchy of controls, articulating how they can be applied to
    control hazards that are identified during the JHA.

    • Unit V introduced the process of risk assessment, relating it to the hierarchy of controls by explaining
    how the controls are used to achieve a desired level of risk reduction.

    • Unit VI summarized adult learning strategies, examining how they can be applied to workplace safety
    and health training. It highlighted how training is a critical component of communicating hazards and
    their controls to the employees who work with them daily.

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Strategies for Managing Risk

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Unit VII tied the first six units together under the framework of a safety management system. It
    summarized the key elements of a safety management system and considered how the approach can
    be used in conjunction with efforts focused on safety behaviors.

    • Now, in Unit VIII, we will close the course by looking at risk management techniques.

    When developing a risk management strategy, the focus should be on reducing the risk of having incidents
    occur. This would include efforts to reduce the possibility of experiencing the same types of incidents
    repeatedly by mitigating known risks that cause those incidents, while also identifying previously unknown
    risks and putting controls in place to mitigate or prevent them before they can occur. An organization can
    obtain a better understanding of known risks by examining lagging indicators, while unknown risks can be
    identified by reviewing leading indicators. This unit will describe how leading and lagging indicators are
    applied in risk management. It will also explain how risk management techniques can be used to reduce
    workplace safety and health risks.

    OSHA (2016) defines lagging indicators as a “retrospective set of metrics” (p. 1) or the “rear-view mirror”
    (p. 2) because they result from a look at what has already happened. The following are examples of where to
    find lagging indicators:

    • experience modification rate (EMR),
    • injury reports,
    • employee reported near misses, and
    • injury rates (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    As mentioned, these indicators provide information concerning what has already occurred. They can be used
    in combination with other metrics to assess safety performance and then used to determine the organization’s
    level of risk. For example, organizations can use injury and illness rates, including total recordable incidence
    rate (TRIR) and days of restricted work activity or job transfer (DART), to compare themselves to similar
    organizations in the same industry. If they are performing poorly in comparison to equivalent organizations,
    risk management techniques would need to be applied.

    Incident reports such as those being described can be used as the starting point for the application of risk
    management techniques. As explained in Unit I, injuries and illnesses must be documented with a report on
    OSHA’s Form 301. This is only the minimum requirement, though, so organizations that are committed to
    effective risk management should conduct a thorough root cause investigation to define the causal factor for
    any incident. While root cause investigations can initially be used to implement immediate controls, they can
    also be useful in identifying recurring issues that point to a deficiency in the safety management system.

    Past regulatory performance is another lagging indicator that can be used to identify recurring issues. If your
    organization is cited for the same issues repeatedly, it is likely that a system deficiency exists that must be
    addressed. Identifying and correcting these internal system deficiencies will result in a reduced risk for the
    organization. However, while it is important to correct these internal management deficiencies, organizations
    must also mitigate external risks. A source of external risk that most organizations are required to address is
    having outside contractors working on their site.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Contractors bring outside employees onto the site, which introduces new hazards to the organization. Before
    these contractors are permitted into an organization, they should go through a pre-qualification process that
    should include a review of their safety performance as part of risk management (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).
    Lagging indicators can be used to assess the contractors’ safety performance by comparing them to their
    competitors in the same manner as cost or relevant qualifications. As already discussed, TRIR and DART are
    useful in assessing past safety performance in terms of OSHA recordable injuries.

    Another metric that is commonly used when assessing a contractor’s safety performance is experience
    modification rate (EMR); this entails all workers’ compensation history, not only those incidents that met the
    OSHA recordable requirements (Martin & Corcoran, 2018). EMR can provide a total picture of all injuries that
    the contractor has experienced; this includes the severity of these injuries since it considers the cost of the
    injury. EMRs use the workers’ compensation
    data to produce a numerical score, which
    indicates the contractor’s level of risk, as
    shown in the image on the right:

    • score less than 1 means the
    company is less risky than average,

    • score of 1 means the company is no
    more and no less risky than average,
    and

    • score greater than 1 means the
    company is riskier than average
    (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).

    Hiring contractors who accept less risk than
    the average in their industry will reduce the
    level of risk presented to the hosting
    organization by the contractors brought on-
    site. Overall, these lagging indicators should be used as a guide to assess the effectiveness of current risk
    management techniques. This, in turn, will determine if additional efforts are required.

    OSHA (2016) defines leading indicators as a “preventative set of metrics” (p. 1) or “the road ahead” (p. 2)
    because they assess processes and procedures that are in place to prevent incidents. Examples of leading
    indicators found in the workplace include the following. Each type will be briefly explained in the list below:

    • written safety programs and audit programs,
    • hazard identification and reporting programs,
    • standard operating procedures (SOPs) that include safety requirements,
    • completed JHAs,
    • training records and requirements,
    • mechanical integrity programs,
    • preventative maintenance procedures,
    • process hazard analysis (PHA) requirements, and
    • management of change (MoC) procedures (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    Written safety programs and audit programs are focused on reducing the risk of incidents. An organization’s
    written safety programs demonstrate where they desire to be in terms of safety. Are they written with a focus
    only on compliance with federal, state, and local requirements, or do they strive to go above and beyond by
    implementing best practices? These standards set the level of expectation for employees.

    Hazard identification and reporting programs demonstrate that the organization has a proactive mindset and
    encourages employee involvement in the organization’s safety program. Employees who are involved and
    have a program for identifying and reporting hazards are likely to have a focus on safety.

    SOPs with integrated safety requirements demonstrate that an organization is focused on standardizing
    employee actions while taking steps to reduce risks by making safety a part of the employee’s work. This has
    employees viewing safety as a part of their jobs, not something that is in addition to their jobs.

    (Adapted from Martin & Corcoran, 2018)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Completed JHAs demonstrate that the organization is focused on systematically identifying and mitigating
    risks. Through the application of JHA findings, employees will be exposed to a lower level of risk while on
    the job.

    Training records and requirements demonstrate that the organization’s management is committed to
    improving the employee’s skills and knowledge by committing the resources to provide training. Well-trained
    employees will have the skills and abilities that will enable them to work safely.

    Mechanical integrity programs and preventative maintenance procedures demonstrate that the organization
    is committed to consistent and efficient operation by ensuring that equipment is in good operating condition,
    which will result in a reduction of equipment issues. Minimizing equipment issues reduces equipment
    downtime and emergencies during which employees can be exposed to unnecessary risks due to rushing
    and frustration.

    PHA requirements and MoC processes demonstrate the organization’s focus on preemptively identifying risks
    so that they can be addressed before they are realized and incidents occur.

    MoC procedures focus on bringing a cross-functional team together to review changes to the organization to
    identify and mitigate risks to each aspect of the organization, such as safety, quality, environmental,
    efficiency, and so on.

    The application of leading indicators as part of an overall risk management program can be seen in fire safety
    programs. Fire safety programs must include aggressive risk management techniques because of the
    potential for significant loss. Organizations can prepare written safety plans that go beyond OSHA
    requirements, implementing best practices developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). An
    effective risk management technique is the development of fire safety plans that exceed OSHA requirements.

    (Pedneault, 2006)

    (Gilfan, 2011)
    Fire safety programs, which must include aggressive risk
    management techniques due to the potential for significant loss,
    often apply leading indicators as part of an overall risk management
    program.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Self-inspection programs can be established that require employees
    to routinely assess the organization’s facility for fire hazards. SOPs
    can be implemented that require all electrical work to be completed
    by certified electricians who are trained on the National Electric
    Code (NEC) and the Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace,
    NFPA 70E. This will reduce the risk of electrical fires. Mechanical
    integrity testing programs and preventative maintenance schedules
    can be developed to ensure that all equipment remains in
    compliance with NEC requirements. PHA and MoC procedures can
    be established to ensure that unexpected changes are not made to
    the facility that would introduce uncontrolled fire risks. This
    combined effort of risk management techniques will result in a risk
    management program that will reduce risk to the employees, the
    facility, and the organization.

    Risk management is a critical component of any plan intended to
    ensure continuous safety improvement in an organization. A
    successful risk management program requires a combination of
    rearview mirror self-assessment using lagging indicators in addition
    to a forward-thinking focus on leading indicators.

    References

    Dowley, P. (2009, June 20). Electrical safety (3977595441) [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electrical_Safety_(3977595441).jpg

    Gilfan. (2011, May 2). Fire and safety plan [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_and_Safety_Plan.jpg

    Martin, L. F., & Corcoran, D. (2018). Supervisors’ safety manual (11th ed.). National Safety Council.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Pedneault, S. (2006, October 27). Fire inside an abandoned convent in Massueville, Quebec, Canada

    [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_inside_an_abandoned_convent_in_Massueville,_Quebe
    c,_Canada.jpg

    Suggested Unit Resources

    This unit’s content addresses the concept of risk management techniques for workplace safety and health
    risks. It focuses on managing risks during normal operations. However, emergency scenarios can present
    unique risks for an organization.

    It is recommended that you read Chapter 19: Emergency Management in the textbook and learn more about
    what can happen during emergencies as well as what can be done to possibly prevent them. The topics
    addressed include the following:

    • prevention, mitigation, preparedness, continuity, response, and recovery;
    • OSHA Emergency Plan Requirements and FEMA’s Core Capabilities; and
    • Incident Command System Training.

    Effective risk management for fire
    safety must include all aspects,
    including electrical risks.
    (Dowley, 2009)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional),
    have used leading and/or lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe the indicators used.
    Explain if you believe they were or were not successful, and why.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Describe safety-related roles and responsibilities of employees.

    2. Identify occupational hazards commonly encountered in industry
    2.1 Recognize fire hazards in the workplace.

    3. Apply hazard identification and analysis techniques to workplace scenarios.

    3.1 Describe how leading and lagging indicators are applied in risk management.

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.

    5. Apply adult learning strategies to workplace safety and health training.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 17: Fire Safety

    Chapter 18: Construction Safety

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    So far, this course has described how a safety management system can be implemented in an organization to
    reduce health and safety risks.

    • Unit I discussed the safety-related roles and responsibilities of individuals working in an organization.
    Specifically, the role of the safety professional was reviewed, outlining how his or her actions can be
    critical in getting management’s commitment to safety as well as ensuring that employees are
    involved.

    • Unit II examined hazards commonly encountered in industry including health, chemical, physical,
    ergonomic, and biological. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA)
    requirements for written plans were assessed for specific hazards.

    • Unit III went on to describe how conducting a job hazard analysis (JHA) is used to identify hazards in
    different job scenarios.

    • Unit IV introduced the concept of the hierarchy of controls, articulating how they can be applied to
    control hazards that are identified during the JHA.

    • Unit V introduced the process of risk assessment, relating it to the hierarchy of controls by explaining
    how the controls are used to achieve a desired level of risk reduction.

    • Unit VI summarized adult learning strategies, examining how they can be applied to workplace safety
    and health training. It highlighted how training is a critical component of communicating hazards and
    their controls to the employees who work with them daily.

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Strategies for Managing Risk

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Unit VII tied the first six units together under the framework of a safety management system. It
    summarized the key elements of a safety management system and considered how the approach can
    be used in conjunction with efforts focused on safety behaviors.

    • Now, in Unit VIII, we will close the course by looking at risk management techniques.

    When developing a risk management strategy, the focus should be on reducing the risk of having incidents
    occur. This would include efforts to reduce the possibility of experiencing the same types of incidents
    repeatedly by mitigating known risks that cause those incidents, while also identifying previously unknown
    risks and putting controls in place to mitigate or prevent them before they can occur. An organization can
    obtain a better understanding of known risks by examining lagging indicators, while unknown risks can be
    identified by reviewing leading indicators. This unit will describe how leading and lagging indicators are
    applied in risk management. It will also explain how risk management techniques can be used to reduce
    workplace safety and health risks.

    OSHA (2016) defines lagging indicators as a “retrospective set of metrics” (p. 1) or the “rear-view mirror”
    (p. 2) because they result from a look at what has already happened. The following are examples of where to
    find lagging indicators:

    • experience modification rate (EMR),
    • injury reports,
    • employee reported near misses, and
    • injury rates (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    As mentioned, these indicators provide information concerning what has already occurred. They can be used
    in combination with other metrics to assess safety performance and then used to determine the organization’s
    level of risk. For example, organizations can use injury and illness rates, including total recordable incidence
    rate (TRIR) and days of restricted work activity or job transfer (DART), to compare themselves to similar
    organizations in the same industry. If they are performing poorly in comparison to equivalent organizations,
    risk management techniques would need to be applied.

    Incident reports such as those being described can be used as the starting point for the application of risk
    management techniques. As explained in Unit I, injuries and illnesses must be documented with a report on
    OSHA’s Form 301. This is only the minimum requirement, though, so organizations that are committed to
    effective risk management should conduct a thorough root cause investigation to define the causal factor for
    any incident. While root cause investigations can initially be used to implement immediate controls, they can
    also be useful in identifying recurring issues that point to a deficiency in the safety management system.

    Past regulatory performance is another lagging indicator that can be used to identify recurring issues. If your
    organization is cited for the same issues repeatedly, it is likely that a system deficiency exists that must be
    addressed. Identifying and correcting these internal system deficiencies will result in a reduced risk for the
    organization. However, while it is important to correct these internal management deficiencies, organizations
    must also mitigate external risks. A source of external risk that most organizations are required to address is
    having outside contractors working on their site.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Contractors bring outside employees onto the site, which introduces new hazards to the organization. Before
    these contractors are permitted into an organization, they should go through a pre-qualification process that
    should include a review of their safety performance as part of risk management (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).
    Lagging indicators can be used to assess the contractors’ safety performance by comparing them to their
    competitors in the same manner as cost or relevant qualifications. As already discussed, TRIR and DART are
    useful in assessing past safety performance in terms of OSHA recordable injuries.

    Another metric that is commonly used when assessing a contractor’s safety performance is experience
    modification rate (EMR); this entails all workers’ compensation history, not only those incidents that met the
    OSHA recordable requirements (Martin & Corcoran, 2018). EMR can provide a total picture of all injuries that
    the contractor has experienced; this includes the severity of these injuries since it considers the cost of the
    injury. EMRs use the workers’ compensation
    data to produce a numerical score, which
    indicates the contractor’s level of risk, as
    shown in the image on the right:

    • score less than 1 means the
    company is less risky than average,

    • score of 1 means the company is no
    more and no less risky than average,
    and

    • score greater than 1 means the
    company is riskier than average
    (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).

    Hiring contractors who accept less risk than
    the average in their industry will reduce the
    level of risk presented to the hosting
    organization by the contractors brought on-
    site. Overall, these lagging indicators should be used as a guide to assess the effectiveness of current risk
    management techniques. This, in turn, will determine if additional efforts are required.

    OSHA (2016) defines leading indicators as a “preventative set of metrics” (p. 1) or “the road ahead” (p. 2)
    because they assess processes and procedures that are in place to prevent incidents. Examples of leading
    indicators found in the workplace include the following. Each type will be briefly explained in the list below:

    • written safety programs and audit programs,
    • hazard identification and reporting programs,
    • standard operating procedures (SOPs) that include safety requirements,
    • completed JHAs,
    • training records and requirements,
    • mechanical integrity programs,
    • preventative maintenance procedures,
    • process hazard analysis (PHA) requirements, and
    • management of change (MoC) procedures (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    Written safety programs and audit programs are focused on reducing the risk of incidents. An organization’s
    written safety programs demonstrate where they desire to be in terms of safety. Are they written with a focus
    only on compliance with federal, state, and local requirements, or do they strive to go above and beyond by
    implementing best practices? These standards set the level of expectation for employees.

    Hazard identification and reporting programs demonstrate that the organization has a proactive mindset and
    encourages employee involvement in the organization’s safety program. Employees who are involved and
    have a program for identifying and reporting hazards are likely to have a focus on safety.

    SOPs with integrated safety requirements demonstrate that an organization is focused on standardizing
    employee actions while taking steps to reduce risks by making safety a part of the employee’s work. This has
    employees viewing safety as a part of their jobs, not something that is in addition to their jobs.

    (Adapted from Martin & Corcoran, 2018)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Completed JHAs demonstrate that the organization is focused on systematically identifying and mitigating
    risks. Through the application of JHA findings, employees will be exposed to a lower level of risk while on
    the job.

    Training records and requirements demonstrate that the organization’s management is committed to
    improving the employee’s skills and knowledge by committing the resources to provide training. Well-trained
    employees will have the skills and abilities that will enable them to work safely.

    Mechanical integrity programs and preventative maintenance procedures demonstrate that the organization
    is committed to consistent and efficient operation by ensuring that equipment is in good operating condition,
    which will result in a reduction of equipment issues. Minimizing equipment issues reduces equipment
    downtime and emergencies during which employees can be exposed to unnecessary risks due to rushing
    and frustration.

    PHA requirements and MoC processes demonstrate the organization’s focus on preemptively identifying risks
    so that they can be addressed before they are realized and incidents occur.

    MoC procedures focus on bringing a cross-functional team together to review changes to the organization to
    identify and mitigate risks to each aspect of the organization, such as safety, quality, environmental,
    efficiency, and so on.

    The application of leading indicators as part of an overall risk management program can be seen in fire safety
    programs. Fire safety programs must include aggressive risk management techniques because of the
    potential for significant loss. Organizations can prepare written safety plans that go beyond OSHA
    requirements, implementing best practices developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). An
    effective risk management technique is the development of fire safety plans that exceed OSHA requirements.

    (Pedneault, 2006)

    (Gilfan, 2011)
    Fire safety programs, which must include aggressive risk
    management techniques due to the potential for significant loss,
    often apply leading indicators as part of an overall risk management
    program.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Self-inspection programs can be established that require employees
    to routinely assess the organization’s facility for fire hazards. SOPs
    can be implemented that require all electrical work to be completed
    by certified electricians who are trained on the National Electric
    Code (NEC) and the Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace,
    NFPA 70E. This will reduce the risk of electrical fires. Mechanical
    integrity testing programs and preventative maintenance schedules
    can be developed to ensure that all equipment remains in
    compliance with NEC requirements. PHA and MoC procedures can
    be established to ensure that unexpected changes are not made to
    the facility that would introduce uncontrolled fire risks. This
    combined effort of risk management techniques will result in a risk
    management program that will reduce risk to the employees, the
    facility, and the organization.

    Risk management is a critical component of any plan intended to
    ensure continuous safety improvement in an organization. A
    successful risk management program requires a combination of
    rearview mirror self-assessment using lagging indicators in addition
    to a forward-thinking focus on leading indicators.

    References

    Dowley, P. (2009, June 20). Electrical safety (3977595441) [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electrical_Safety_(3977595441).jpg

    Gilfan. (2011, May 2). Fire and safety plan [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_and_Safety_Plan.jpg

    Martin, L. F., & Corcoran, D. (2018). Supervisors’ safety manual (11th ed.). National Safety Council.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Pedneault, S. (2006, October 27). Fire inside an abandoned convent in Massueville, Quebec, Canada

    [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_inside_an_abandoned_convent_in_Massueville,_Quebe
    c,_Canada.jpg

    Suggested Unit Resources

    This unit’s content addresses the concept of risk management techniques for workplace safety and health
    risks. It focuses on managing risks during normal operations. However, emergency scenarios can present
    unique risks for an organization.

    It is recommended that you read Chapter 19: Emergency Management in the textbook and learn more about
    what can happen during emergencies as well as what can be done to possibly prevent them. The topics
    addressed include the following:

    • prevention, mitigation, preparedness, continuity, response, and recovery;
    • OSHA Emergency Plan Requirements and FEMA’s Core Capabilities; and
    • Incident Command System Training.

    Effective risk management for fire
    safety must include all aspects,
    including electrical risks.
    (Dowley, 2009)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional),
    have used leading and/or lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe the indicators used.
    Explain if you believe they were or were not successful, and why.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Unit VIII

    This journal has two parts. First, in your own words, describe the difference between leading and lagging indicators and their role and value in a safety management system.

    Next, think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional), have used leading and lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe one specific example of a leading and a lagging indicator that were used. Do you believe each was effective? Why, or why not? Give specific examples to support your opinion. Former job as a fuel specialist in the Army

    Your journal submission must be at least 500 words in length. Outside sources and APA Style are not required.

    **## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Describe safety-related roles and responsibilities of employees.

    2. Identify occupational hazards commonly encountered in industry
    2.1 Recognize fire hazards in the workplace.

    3. Apply hazard identification and analysis techniques to workplace scenarios.

    3.1 Describe how leading and lagging indicators are applied in risk management.

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.

    5. Apply adult learning strategies to workplace safety and health training.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 17: Fire Safety

    Chapter 18: Construction Safety

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    So far, this course has described how a safety management system can be implemented in an organization to
    reduce health and safety risks.

    • Unit I discussed the safety-related roles and responsibilities of individuals working in an organization.
    Specifically, the role of the safety professional was reviewed, outlining how his or her actions can be
    critical in getting management’s commitment to safety as well as ensuring that employees are
    involved.

    • Unit II examined hazards commonly encountered in industry including health, chemical, physical,
    ergonomic, and biological. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA)
    requirements for written plans were assessed for specific hazards.

    • Unit III went on to describe how conducting a job hazard analysis (JHA) is used to identify hazards in
    different job scenarios.

    • Unit IV introduced the concept of the hierarchy of controls, articulating how they can be applied to
    control hazards that are identified during the JHA.

    • Unit V introduced the process of risk assessment, relating it to the hierarchy of controls by explaining
    how the controls are used to achieve a desired level of risk reduction.

    • Unit VI summarized adult learning strategies, examining how they can be applied to workplace safety
    and health training. It highlighted how training is a critical component of communicating hazards and
    their controls to the employees who work with them daily.

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Strategies for Managing Risk

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Unit VII tied the first six units together under the framework of a safety management system. It
    summarized the key elements of a safety management system and considered how the approach can
    be used in conjunction with efforts focused on safety behaviors.

    • Now, in Unit VIII, we will close the course by looking at risk management techniques.

    When developing a risk management strategy, the focus should be on reducing the risk of having incidents
    occur. This would include efforts to reduce the possibility of experiencing the same types of incidents
    repeatedly by mitigating known risks that cause those incidents, while also identifying previously unknown
    risks and putting controls in place to mitigate or prevent them before they can occur. An organization can
    obtain a better understanding of known risks by examining lagging indicators, while unknown risks can be
    identified by reviewing leading indicators. This unit will describe how leading and lagging indicators are
    applied in risk management. It will also explain how risk management techniques can be used to reduce
    workplace safety and health risks.

    OSHA (2016) defines lagging indicators as a “retrospective set of metrics” (p. 1) or the “rear-view mirror”
    (p. 2) because they result from a look at what has already happened. The following are examples of where to
    find lagging indicators:

    • experience modification rate (EMR),
    • injury reports,
    • employee reported near misses, and
    • injury rates (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    As mentioned, these indicators provide information concerning what has already occurred. They can be used
    in combination with other metrics to assess safety performance and then used to determine the organization’s
    level of risk. For example, organizations can use injury and illness rates, including total recordable incidence
    rate (TRIR) and days of restricted work activity or job transfer (DART), to compare themselves to similar
    organizations in the same industry. If they are performing poorly in comparison to equivalent organizations,
    risk management techniques would need to be applied.

    Incident reports such as those being described can be used as the starting point for the application of risk
    management techniques. As explained in Unit I, injuries and illnesses must be documented with a report on
    OSHA’s Form 301. This is only the minimum requirement, though, so organizations that are committed to
    effective risk management should conduct a thorough root cause investigation to define the causal factor for
    any incident. While root cause investigations can initially be used to implement immediate controls, they can
    also be useful in identifying recurring issues that point to a deficiency in the safety management system.

    Past regulatory performance is another lagging indicator that can be used to identify recurring issues. If your
    organization is cited for the same issues repeatedly, it is likely that a system deficiency exists that must be
    addressed. Identifying and correcting these internal system deficiencies will result in a reduced risk for the
    organization. However, while it is important to correct these internal management deficiencies, organizations
    must also mitigate external risks. A source of external risk that most organizations are required to address is
    having outside contractors working on their site.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Contractors bring outside employees onto the site, which introduces new hazards to the organization. Before
    these contractors are permitted into an organization, they should go through a pre-qualification process that
    should include a review of their safety performance as part of risk management (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).
    Lagging indicators can be used to assess the contractors’ safety performance by comparing them to their
    competitors in the same manner as cost or relevant qualifications. As already discussed, TRIR and DART are
    useful in assessing past safety performance in terms of OSHA recordable injuries.

    Another metric that is commonly used when assessing a contractor’s safety performance is experience
    modification rate (EMR); this entails all workers’ compensation history, not only those incidents that met the
    OSHA recordable requirements (Martin & Corcoran, 2018). EMR can provide a total picture of all injuries that
    the contractor has experienced; this includes the severity of these injuries since it considers the cost of the
    injury. EMRs use the workers’ compensation
    data to produce a numerical score, which
    indicates the contractor’s level of risk, as
    shown in the image on the right:

    • score less than 1 means the
    company is less risky than average,

    • score of 1 means the company is no
    more and no less risky than average,
    and

    • score greater than 1 means the
    company is riskier than average
    (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).

    Hiring contractors who accept less risk than
    the average in their industry will reduce the
    level of risk presented to the hosting
    organization by the contractors brought on-
    site. Overall, these lagging indicators should be used as a guide to assess the effectiveness of current risk
    management techniques. This, in turn, will determine if additional efforts are required.

    OSHA (2016) defines leading indicators as a “preventative set of metrics” (p. 1) or “the road ahead” (p. 2)
    because they assess processes and procedures that are in place to prevent incidents. Examples of leading
    indicators found in the workplace include the following. Each type will be briefly explained in the list below:

    • written safety programs and audit programs,
    • hazard identification and reporting programs,
    • standard operating procedures (SOPs) that include safety requirements,
    • completed JHAs,
    • training records and requirements,
    • mechanical integrity programs,
    • preventative maintenance procedures,
    • process hazard analysis (PHA) requirements, and
    • management of change (MoC) procedures (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    Written safety programs and audit programs are focused on reducing the risk of incidents. An organization’s
    written safety programs demonstrate where they desire to be in terms of safety. Are they written with a focus
    only on compliance with federal, state, and local requirements, or do they strive to go above and beyond by
    implementing best practices? These standards set the level of expectation for employees.

    Hazard identification and reporting programs demonstrate that the organization has a proactive mindset and
    encourages employee involvement in the organization’s safety program. Employees who are involved and
    have a program for identifying and reporting hazards are likely to have a focus on safety.

    SOPs with integrated safety requirements demonstrate that an organization is focused on standardizing
    employee actions while taking steps to reduce risks by making safety a part of the employee’s work. This has
    employees viewing safety as a part of their jobs, not something that is in addition to their jobs.

    (Adapted from Martin & Corcoran, 2018)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Completed JHAs demonstrate that the organization is focused on systematically identifying and mitigating
    risks. Through the application of JHA findings, employees will be exposed to a lower level of risk while on
    the job.

    Training records and requirements demonstrate that the organization’s management is committed to
    improving the employee’s skills and knowledge by committing the resources to provide training. Well-trained
    employees will have the skills and abilities that will enable them to work safely.

    Mechanical integrity programs and preventative maintenance procedures demonstrate that the organization
    is committed to consistent and efficient operation by ensuring that equipment is in good operating condition,
    which will result in a reduction of equipment issues. Minimizing equipment issues reduces equipment
    downtime and emergencies during which employees can be exposed to unnecessary risks due to rushing
    and frustration.

    PHA requirements and MoC processes demonstrate the organization’s focus on preemptively identifying risks
    so that they can be addressed before they are realized and incidents occur.

    MoC procedures focus on bringing a cross-functional team together to review changes to the organization to
    identify and mitigate risks to each aspect of the organization, such as safety, quality, environmental,
    efficiency, and so on.

    The application of leading indicators as part of an overall risk management program can be seen in fire safety
    programs. Fire safety programs must include aggressive risk management techniques because of the
    potential for significant loss. Organizations can prepare written safety plans that go beyond OSHA
    requirements, implementing best practices developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). An
    effective risk management technique is the development of fire safety plans that exceed OSHA requirements.

    (Pedneault, 2006)

    (Gilfan, 2011)
    Fire safety programs, which must include aggressive risk
    management techniques due to the potential for significant loss,
    often apply leading indicators as part of an overall risk management
    program.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Self-inspection programs can be established that require employees
    to routinely assess the organization’s facility for fire hazards. SOPs
    can be implemented that require all electrical work to be completed
    by certified electricians who are trained on the National Electric
    Code (NEC) and the Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace,
    NFPA 70E. This will reduce the risk of electrical fires. Mechanical
    integrity testing programs and preventative maintenance schedules
    can be developed to ensure that all equipment remains in
    compliance with NEC requirements. PHA and MoC procedures can
    be established to ensure that unexpected changes are not made to
    the facility that would introduce uncontrolled fire risks. This
    combined effort of risk management techniques will result in a risk
    management program that will reduce risk to the employees, the
    facility, and the organization.

    Risk management is a critical component of any plan intended to
    ensure continuous safety improvement in an organization. A
    successful risk management program requires a combination of
    rearview mirror self-assessment using lagging indicators in addition
    to a forward-thinking focus on leading indicators.

    References

    Dowley, P. (2009, June 20). Electrical safety (3977595441) [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electrical_Safety_(3977595441).jpg

    Gilfan. (2011, May 2). Fire and safety plan [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_and_Safety_Plan.jpg

    Martin, L. F., & Corcoran, D. (2018). Supervisors’ safety manual (11th ed.). National Safety Council.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Pedneault, S. (2006, October 27). Fire inside an abandoned convent in Massueville, Quebec, Canada

    [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_inside_an_abandoned_convent_in_Massueville,_Quebe
    c,_Canada.jpg

    Suggested Unit Resources

    This unit’s content addresses the concept of risk management techniques for workplace safety and health
    risks. It focuses on managing risks during normal operations. However, emergency scenarios can present
    unique risks for an organization.

    It is recommended that you read Chapter 19: Emergency Management in the textbook and learn more about
    what can happen during emergencies as well as what can be done to possibly prevent them. The topics
    addressed include the following:

    • prevention, mitigation, preparedness, continuity, response, and recovery;
    • OSHA Emergency Plan Requirements and FEMA’s Core Capabilities; and
    • Incident Command System Training.

    Effective risk management for fire
    safety must include all aspects,
    including electrical risks.
    (Dowley, 2009)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional),
    have used leading and/or lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe the indicators used.
    Explain if you believe they were or were not successful, and why.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIIJournal.docx**

    Unit VIII

    This journal has two parts. First, in your own words, describe the difference between leading and lagging indicators and their role and value in a safety management system.

    Next, think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional), have used leading and lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe one specific example of a leading and a lagging indicator that were used. Do you believe each was effective? Why, or why not? Give specific examples to support your opinion. Former job as a fuel specialist in the Army

    Your journal submission must be at least 500 words in length. Outside sources and APA Style are not required.

    **## UnitVIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Describe safety-related roles and responsibilities of employees.

    2. Identify occupational hazards commonly encountered in industry
    2.1 Recognize fire hazards in the workplace.

    3. Apply hazard identification and analysis techniques to workplace scenarios.

    3.1 Describe how leading and lagging indicators are applied in risk management.

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.

    5. Apply adult learning strategies to workplace safety and health training.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 17: Fire Safety

    Chapter 18: Construction Safety

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    So far, this course has described how a safety management system can be implemented in an organization to
    reduce health and safety risks.

    • Unit I discussed the safety-related roles and responsibilities of individuals working in an organization.
    Specifically, the role of the safety professional was reviewed, outlining how his or her actions can be
    critical in getting management’s commitment to safety as well as ensuring that employees are
    involved.

    • Unit II examined hazards commonly encountered in industry including health, chemical, physical,
    ergonomic, and biological. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA)
    requirements for written plans were assessed for specific hazards.

    • Unit III went on to describe how conducting a job hazard analysis (JHA) is used to identify hazards in
    different job scenarios.

    • Unit IV introduced the concept of the hierarchy of controls, articulating how they can be applied to
    control hazards that are identified during the JHA.

    • Unit V introduced the process of risk assessment, relating it to the hierarchy of controls by explaining
    how the controls are used to achieve a desired level of risk reduction.

    • Unit VI summarized adult learning strategies, examining how they can be applied to workplace safety
    and health training. It highlighted how training is a critical component of communicating hazards and
    their controls to the employees who work with them daily.

    UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE
    Strategies for Managing Risk

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    [http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf](http://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3896.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    • Unit VII tied the first six units together under the framework of a safety management system. It
    summarized the key elements of a safety management system and considered how the approach can
    be used in conjunction with efforts focused on safety behaviors.

    • Now, in Unit VIII, we will close the course by looking at risk management techniques.

    When developing a risk management strategy, the focus should be on reducing the risk of having incidents
    occur. This would include efforts to reduce the possibility of experiencing the same types of incidents
    repeatedly by mitigating known risks that cause those incidents, while also identifying previously unknown
    risks and putting controls in place to mitigate or prevent them before they can occur. An organization can
    obtain a better understanding of known risks by examining lagging indicators, while unknown risks can be
    identified by reviewing leading indicators. This unit will describe how leading and lagging indicators are
    applied in risk management. It will also explain how risk management techniques can be used to reduce
    workplace safety and health risks.

    OSHA (2016) defines lagging indicators as a “retrospective set of metrics” (p. 1) or the “rear-view mirror”
    (p. 2) because they result from a look at what has already happened. The following are examples of where to
    find lagging indicators:

    • experience modification rate (EMR),
    • injury reports,
    • employee reported near misses, and
    • injury rates (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    As mentioned, these indicators provide information concerning what has already occurred. They can be used
    in combination with other metrics to assess safety performance and then used to determine the organization’s
    level of risk. For example, organizations can use injury and illness rates, including total recordable incidence
    rate (TRIR) and days of restricted work activity or job transfer (DART), to compare themselves to similar
    organizations in the same industry. If they are performing poorly in comparison to equivalent organizations,
    risk management techniques would need to be applied.

    Incident reports such as those being described can be used as the starting point for the application of risk
    management techniques. As explained in Unit I, injuries and illnesses must be documented with a report on
    OSHA’s Form 301. This is only the minimum requirement, though, so organizations that are committed to
    effective risk management should conduct a thorough root cause investigation to define the causal factor for
    any incident. While root cause investigations can initially be used to implement immediate controls, they can
    also be useful in identifying recurring issues that point to a deficiency in the safety management system.

    Past regulatory performance is another lagging indicator that can be used to identify recurring issues. If your
    organization is cited for the same issues repeatedly, it is likely that a system deficiency exists that must be
    addressed. Identifying and correcting these internal system deficiencies will result in a reduced risk for the
    organization. However, while it is important to correct these internal management deficiencies, organizations
    must also mitigate external risks. A source of external risk that most organizations are required to address is
    having outside contractors working on their site.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Contractors bring outside employees onto the site, which introduces new hazards to the organization. Before
    these contractors are permitted into an organization, they should go through a pre-qualification process that
    should include a review of their safety performance as part of risk management (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).
    Lagging indicators can be used to assess the contractors’ safety performance by comparing them to their
    competitors in the same manner as cost or relevant qualifications. As already discussed, TRIR and DART are
    useful in assessing past safety performance in terms of OSHA recordable injuries.

    Another metric that is commonly used when assessing a contractor’s safety performance is experience
    modification rate (EMR); this entails all workers’ compensation history, not only those incidents that met the
    OSHA recordable requirements (Martin & Corcoran, 2018). EMR can provide a total picture of all injuries that
    the contractor has experienced; this includes the severity of these injuries since it considers the cost of the
    injury. EMRs use the workers’ compensation
    data to produce a numerical score, which
    indicates the contractor’s level of risk, as
    shown in the image on the right:

    • score less than 1 means the
    company is less risky than average,

    • score of 1 means the company is no
    more and no less risky than average,
    and

    • score greater than 1 means the
    company is riskier than average
    (Martin & Corcoran, 2018).

    Hiring contractors who accept less risk than
    the average in their industry will reduce the
    level of risk presented to the hosting
    organization by the contractors brought on-
    site. Overall, these lagging indicators should be used as a guide to assess the effectiveness of current risk
    management techniques. This, in turn, will determine if additional efforts are required.

    OSHA (2016) defines leading indicators as a “preventative set of metrics” (p. 1) or “the road ahead” (p. 2)
    because they assess processes and procedures that are in place to prevent incidents. Examples of leading
    indicators found in the workplace include the following. Each type will be briefly explained in the list below:

    • written safety programs and audit programs,
    • hazard identification and reporting programs,
    • standard operating procedures (SOPs) that include safety requirements,
    • completed JHAs,
    • training records and requirements,
    • mechanical integrity programs,
    • preventative maintenance procedures,
    • process hazard analysis (PHA) requirements, and
    • management of change (MoC) procedures (Martin & Corcoran, 2018; OSHA, 2016).

    Written safety programs and audit programs are focused on reducing the risk of incidents. An organization’s
    written safety programs demonstrate where they desire to be in terms of safety. Are they written with a focus
    only on compliance with federal, state, and local requirements, or do they strive to go above and beyond by
    implementing best practices? These standards set the level of expectation for employees.

    Hazard identification and reporting programs demonstrate that the organization has a proactive mindset and
    encourages employee involvement in the organization’s safety program. Employees who are involved and
    have a program for identifying and reporting hazards are likely to have a focus on safety.

    SOPs with integrated safety requirements demonstrate that an organization is focused on standardizing
    employee actions while taking steps to reduce risks by making safety a part of the employee’s work. This has
    employees viewing safety as a part of their jobs, not something that is in addition to their jobs.

    (Adapted from Martin & Corcoran, 2018)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Completed JHAs demonstrate that the organization is focused on systematically identifying and mitigating
    risks. Through the application of JHA findings, employees will be exposed to a lower level of risk while on
    the job.

    Training records and requirements demonstrate that the organization’s management is committed to
    improving the employee’s skills and knowledge by committing the resources to provide training. Well-trained
    employees will have the skills and abilities that will enable them to work safely.

    Mechanical integrity programs and preventative maintenance procedures demonstrate that the organization
    is committed to consistent and efficient operation by ensuring that equipment is in good operating condition,
    which will result in a reduction of equipment issues. Minimizing equipment issues reduces equipment
    downtime and emergencies during which employees can be exposed to unnecessary risks due to rushing
    and frustration.

    PHA requirements and MoC processes demonstrate the organization’s focus on preemptively identifying risks
    so that they can be addressed before they are realized and incidents occur.

    MoC procedures focus on bringing a cross-functional team together to review changes to the organization to
    identify and mitigate risks to each aspect of the organization, such as safety, quality, environmental,
    efficiency, and so on.

    The application of leading indicators as part of an overall risk management program can be seen in fire safety
    programs. Fire safety programs must include aggressive risk management techniques because of the
    potential for significant loss. Organizations can prepare written safety plans that go beyond OSHA
    requirements, implementing best practices developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). An
    effective risk management technique is the development of fire safety plans that exceed OSHA requirements.

    (Pedneault, 2006)

    (Gilfan, 2011)
    Fire safety programs, which must include aggressive risk
    management techniques due to the potential for significant loss,
    often apply leading indicators as part of an overall risk management
    program.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Self-inspection programs can be established that require employees
    to routinely assess the organization’s facility for fire hazards. SOPs
    can be implemented that require all electrical work to be completed
    by certified electricians who are trained on the National Electric
    Code (NEC) and the Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace,
    NFPA 70E. This will reduce the risk of electrical fires. Mechanical
    integrity testing programs and preventative maintenance schedules
    can be developed to ensure that all equipment remains in
    compliance with NEC requirements. PHA and MoC procedures can
    be established to ensure that unexpected changes are not made to
    the facility that would introduce uncontrolled fire risks. This
    combined effort of risk management techniques will result in a risk
    management program that will reduce risk to the employees, the
    facility, and the organization.

    Risk management is a critical component of any plan intended to
    ensure continuous safety improvement in an organization. A
    successful risk management program requires a combination of
    rearview mirror self-assessment using lagging indicators in addition
    to a forward-thinking focus on leading indicators.

    References

    Dowley, P. (2009, June 20). Electrical safety (3977595441) [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electrical_Safety_(3977595441).jpg

    Gilfan. (2011, May 2). Fire and safety plan [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_and_Safety_Plan.jpg

    Martin, L. F., & Corcoran, D. (2018). Supervisors’ safety manual (11th ed.). National Safety Council.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). The use of metrics in process safety management

    (PSM) facilities (OSHA Fact Sheet No. DOC FS-3896). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3896.pdf

    Pedneault, S. (2006, October 27). Fire inside an abandoned convent in Massueville, Quebec, Canada

    [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_inside_an_abandoned_convent_in_Massueville,_Quebe
    c,_Canada.jpg

    Suggested Unit Resources

    This unit’s content addresses the concept of risk management techniques for workplace safety and health
    risks. It focuses on managing risks during normal operations. However, emergency scenarios can present
    unique risks for an organization.

    It is recommended that you read Chapter 19: Emergency Management in the textbook and learn more about
    what can happen during emergencies as well as what can be done to possibly prevent them. The topics
    addressed include the following:

    • prevention, mitigation, preparedness, continuity, response, and recovery;
    • OSHA Emergency Plan Requirements and FEMA’s Core Capabilities; and
    • Incident Command System Training.

    Effective risk management for fire
    safety must include all aspects,
    including electrical risks.
    (Dowley, 2009)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about how you, or your current or former employer (if you have not worked as a safety professional),
    have used leading and/or lagging indicators to manage risk in your organization. Describe the indicators used.
    Explain if you believe they were or were not successful, and why.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

  • [Solved] OSHA VII

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## UnitVIIProject.docx – ## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf **## UnitVIIProject.docx** **Unit VII Project:** **Outlining a Training Program Proposal** In this assignment, you will develop a plan for an effective training program that is tailored for the specific needs of newly hir…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## UnitVIIProject.docx

    – ## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf

    **## UnitVIIProject.docx**

    **Unit VII Project:**

    **Outlining a Training Program Proposal**

    In this assignment, you will develop a plan for an effective training program that is tailored for the specific needs of newly hired, adult employees. You are encouraged to consider your own current or former workplace as a basis for this training plan.

    Develop your plan by addressing each of the requirements in the order presented below.

    · Begin by identifying the type of worksite and whether a safety management system, a behavior-based system approach, or both are used to effectively manage safety performance. Explain why this approach is effective in this worksite environment.

    · Next, clearly define a critical safety-related need that will be met using your training.

    · It is suggested you choose a safety issue that is either most prevalent at the worksite, or one to which all employees are exposed. For example, do not choose forklift operator safety training if there is only one or two people who operate a forklift at the work site.

    · Explain what resources you would use to define this need. Create at least of two learning objectives stating how your training will address the need. Be sure to use the ABCD concept when developing your objectives.

    · Explain how you would design the training to be focused on newly hired, adult participants using activity-based learning concepts. Include at least two activities you would have the participants complete.

    · Identify at least five resources, references, or materials you would use to develop the training materials, and explain how they will support the objectives. At least two of the five resources must be found in the CSU Online Library. These could include technical publications on your topic, scholarly articles, peer-reviewed research, or videos.

    · Outline how your course would be delivered, including what resources would be needed (i.e., educational resources, rooms, projectors, other physical requirements).

    · Describe how you would plan the participants’ time and provide feedback on their actions and responses during the training, ensuring that you have policies in place to maintain control of the training.

    · Prepare a method for evaluating the training; provide at least five example questions that could be used to assess the participants’ retention of knowledge and evaluate the training’s course content and delivery.

    Your project must be at least four pages but no more than five pages in length, not counting the title page (if used) or references page. Your project must have in text citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    **## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.
    4.1 Describe how the safety management systems approach can be used in conjunction with

    efforts focused on safe behaviors.
    4.2 Identify the challenges to effective employee involvement in safety and health programs.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Human Performance and Safety Culture, pp. 41–48, 71–74

    Chapter 5: Employee Involvement

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Read pp. 109–110 of the following article.

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Read pp. 3–8, 11–14, and 27–29 of the following report.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). Recommended practices for safety and health

    programs (OSHA Report No. 3885).
    https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf

    UNIT VII STUDY GUIDE
    Safety Management Systems

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Unit Lesson

    This course has covered several key elements for managing safety and health. Unit I covered the roles
    and responsibilities of the safety professional. In Units II and III, the concept of hazard identification was
    presented. Units IV and V discussed the various controls that can be put into place to reduce the risk of
    the identified hazards. Unit VI explained how to develop an effective program for training adult employees
    on those controls. In this unit, we will tie these elements together under the framework of a safety
    management system.

    Like any other critical aspect of business, safety must be managed. Numerous organizations have published
    frameworks for developing an effective safety management system. Several of these frameworks come in the
    form of consensus standards that organizations can choose to follow. These include the American National
    Standards Institute (ANSI) and American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) publication American
    National Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Z-10, the British Standards
    Institution’s (BSI) Occupational Health and Safety System Standard OHSAS-18001, and the International
    Organization for Standardization’s Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.

    Guidelines for implementing safety management systems have also been published. These include the
    National Safety Council’s Nine Elements of a Successful Safety & Health System and the Occupational
    Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) publications Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
    and Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs. While these all differ in their levels of
    complexity and content, they all focus on similar elements:

    • management commitment,
    • employee participation,
    • hazard identification and assessment,
    • hazard control,
    • safety and health training, and
    • commitment to continuous improvement.

    These elements should sound familiar since they have all been covered to some extent in this course. Let’s
    look at each one in more detail and examine how they are all interrelated.

    In most—if not all—organizations, you will see posters, banners, or policy statements that reference a
    commitment to zero injuries, or posters and signs stating mottos and slogans such as “All employees will go
    home the same way they came to work.” Does that alone demonstrate management commitment to
    employee safety and health? No, it does not—it is only one component of it.

    While management’s commitment to safety and health must be clearly stated, it must also state that safety
    and health is as important as all other components of the business including quality, profit, production, and so
    on (OSHA, 2015). The statement must also include a commitment of resources to support health and safety
    improvements, noting that the highest levels of senior management will be responsible for safety and health
    performance. To back up the written statement, management must establish goals for which they will hold
    themselves accountable. These goals should be focused on specific actions, not general injury and illness
    performance (OSHA, 2015).

    The goal of zero injuries should be obvious; no member of management ever wants employees injured at
    work. However, what specific goals are management committed to achieving in order to reduce the risk of
    employees being exposed to workplace hazards? An example goal might state, “Encourage employees to
    report workplace hazards by ensuring that they are free from retaliation and by providing a system that will
    track the controls put into place to mitigate the risk of the reported hazards.”

    Goals such as this also demonstrate management’s commitment of resources to safety and health—another
    critical requirement. Finally, management must hold all levels of the organization accountable for achieving
    the goals that they have set. All employees must be made aware of their roles and responsibilities with a clear
    explanation of what is expected from them (OSHA, 2015). Both positive and constructive feedback must be
    given to ensure that employees are continually aware of whether their actions and behaviors align with the
    organization’s commitment to safety.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Without management commitment, a safety management system is not possible. However, an effective safety
    management system cannot be implemented in a top-down approach—the employees must be involved.
    Employees must be engaged in all aspects of the system, from program development through its
    implementation and continuous improvement. If employees are involved in the program, they will take
    ownership of it and want it to succeed. Engaged employees are more likely to provide feedback that will
    provide insight concerning where the program should focus its efforts as part of its continuous improvement.
    They are also more likely to fully participate in the program’s initiatives, including hazard reporting, incident
    investigations, and training (OSHA, 2015).

    When a management team committed to reducing safety and health risks is combined with the support of an
    engaged workforce, hazards can be effectively identified and assessed. An important part of this is
    conducting quality investigations of incidents when they occur. This includes those incidents that result in an
    injury or illness as well as high-potential near misses or other conditions that identify a clear hazard (OSHA,
    2015). Remember, an effective safety and health management system is concerned with more than injuries
    and illness alone; it strives to reduce the risk of their occurrence. It is vital that employees are engaged so
    that they report near misses and other unsafe conditions proactively, before they are found because of an
    injury or illness.

    The purpose and focus of these investigations cannot be to assign blame. If that happens, employee trust will
    be lost, and the workforce may become disengaged. In addition to being counterproductive, assigning blame
    will not remove the hazard. Incident investigations must focus on the possibility of root causes, plural,
    because there may be more than one (OSHA, 2015). Outside of incident investigations, other tools such as a
    job hazard analysis (JHA) can also be used to identify hazards.

    Once hazards are identified, controls must be put into place. This provides important feedback for the
    employees and demonstrates that the hazards they are reporting are indeed being addressed. If no action is
    taken, the employees will likely feel that their input is being ignored, causing them to lose interest and stop
    reporting hazards.

    As covered in Units IV and V, control strategies should be based on the hierarchy of controls. Employees
    must be involved in the application of these controls. Preference should be given to the higher level of
    controls of elimination, substitution, and engineering controls, which will have a greater impact in terms of risk
    reduction than the lower levels of controls—administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE).
    Management can demonstrate commitment to employee safety and health by supporting the higher levels of
    controls, even though these will generally cost more to apply and implement than the lower levels. This
    support, despite increased costs, demonstrates to the workforce that management’s commitment to the safety
    and health management system is more than just a written statement.

    Once hazards have been identified and appropriate controls have been put into place, this information must
    be communicated to employees. Health and safety training that increases hazard awareness and educates
    employees on the applicable controls is a critical component of an effective safety management system
    (OSHA, 2015). As discussed in Unit VI, a needs assessment must be completed so that focused objectives
    can be developed to meet the specific needs of the employees who require the training.

    In establishing a safety management system, all levels of the organization will have a need for some level of
    awareness training so that a consistent message is delivered. The objectives of this training should be clear:

    • communicate the goals of the safety management system,
    • explain the safety and health policy for the organization,
    • reinforce management’s commitment to safety and health,
    • describe the importance of employee participation,
    • encourage the reporting of unsafe acts and conditions, and
    • define the roles and responsibilities of each level of the organization.

    Once implemented, the organization is not finished with the design and development of the safety
    management system; it must enter a process of continuous improvement. According to Meiling et al., (2014),

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    continuous improvement is a process of applying the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle to make incremental
    enhancements to a process as the need for them becomes evident:

    • Plan: plan an action to address a current deficiency.
    • Do: apply the action.
    • Check: evaluate how effective the action is at correcting the deficiency.
    • Act: respond to the evaluation and return to the planning stage if the action was not effective.

    The PDCA cycle can be applied to ensure continuous improvement of a safety management system.

    Do—This step involves turning these
    objectives into plans, polices, procedures, and
    workplace improvements.

    Plan—Planning should focus on creating specific
    objectives that support the goal established under the
    safety management system.

    Check—The results of these plans, polices, procedures,
    and improvements must be checked using key
    performance
    indicators
    (KPIs) that
    include both
    leading and
    lagging
    values.

    Testing critical KPIs provides
    feedback during the Check step of
    the PDCA cycle.
    (Group of Diverse, 2018)

    The PDCA cycle starts with planning to
    determine objectives and actions that
    support established goals of the safety
    management system being developed.
    (Reyes, 2018)

    Plans, policies,
    procedures, and
    improvements
    outlined in the
    planning stage are
    implemented during
    the Do step of the
    PDCA cycle.
    (LaRochelle, 2017)

    During the Act step of the PDCA cycle,
    actions are taken to fully implement
    policies, procedures, and workplace
    improvements that have proven
    effective.
    (Bruckner, 2018)

    Visual depiction of the PDCA cycle outlines the steps in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process
    (Meiling et al., 2014, p. 110)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Act—If the KPIs demonstrate that the objectives were met, the actions become standards, formalizing them in
    the organization. If the KPIs demonstrate that an objective was not met, the cycle reverts to the planning
    stage to make improvements on the action before trying it again.

    Unit VII brought together the concepts covered in the first six units of this course, tying them to the essential
    elements of a safety management system. The unit content demonstrates how the safety and health concepts
    covered in this course can be organized around the framework of a safety management system for
    implementation in any organization.

    References

    Bruckner, E. (2018, April 17). Gate, fence, sign and sunlight [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/o1jqBoyB9qY

    Group of diverse people having a business meeting [Photograph]. (2018). Rawpixel.

    https://www.rawpixel.com/image/414143/group-diverse-people-having-business-meeting

    LaRochelle, M. (2017, October 8). Welding, welder, mask and burning [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/c-vWdiICscA

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=eds-live&scope=site

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Reyes, A. (2018, July 12). Bulletin board with flow chart [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/qWwpHwip31M

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the links below.

    Access the document listed below to learn about the components the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) believes are important to safety management as well as implementation tools and
    resources. The information provided will be useful when establishing, implementing, maintaining, and
    improving safety and health programs.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about safety measures put into place where you work or have worked in the past. Prepare a one-page
    essay that aligns these safety measures with the key elements of a safety management system. Provide
    specific examples; for example, fire extinguisher training would fit in the category of safety and health training.

    Briefly describe how each of the safety measures relates to and supports each of the others across the
    elements. If you cannot provide an example of a safety measure implemented at your workplace for any of
    the elements, describe how your workplace could implement a safety measure under that element.

    If you are not currently working, describe examples of safety measures that could be put into place under
    each element.

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.
    4.1 Describe how the safety management systems approach can be used in conjunction with

    efforts focused on safe behaviors.
    4.2 Identify the challenges to effective employee involvement in safety and health programs.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Human Performance and Safety Culture, pp. 41–48, 71–74

    Chapter 5: Employee Involvement

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Read pp. 109–110 of the following article.

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Read pp. 3–8, 11–14, and 27–29 of the following report.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). Recommended practices for safety and health

    programs (OSHA Report No. 3885).
    https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf

    UNIT VII STUDY GUIDE
    Safety Management Systems

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Unit Lesson

    This course has covered several key elements for managing safety and health. Unit I covered the roles
    and responsibilities of the safety professional. In Units II and III, the concept of hazard identification was
    presented. Units IV and V discussed the various controls that can be put into place to reduce the risk of
    the identified hazards. Unit VI explained how to develop an effective program for training adult employees
    on those controls. In this unit, we will tie these elements together under the framework of a safety
    management system.

    Like any other critical aspect of business, safety must be managed. Numerous organizations have published
    frameworks for developing an effective safety management system. Several of these frameworks come in the
    form of consensus standards that organizations can choose to follow. These include the American National
    Standards Institute (ANSI) and American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) publication American
    National Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Z-10, the British Standards
    Institution’s (BSI) Occupational Health and Safety System Standard OHSAS-18001, and the International
    Organization for Standardization’s Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.

    Guidelines for implementing safety management systems have also been published. These include the
    National Safety Council’s Nine Elements of a Successful Safety & Health System and the Occupational
    Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) publications Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
    and Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs. While these all differ in their levels of
    complexity and content, they all focus on similar elements:

    • management commitment,
    • employee participation,
    • hazard identification and assessment,
    • hazard control,
    • safety and health training, and
    • commitment to continuous improvement.

    These elements should sound familiar since they have all been covered to some extent in this course. Let’s
    look at each one in more detail and examine how they are all interrelated.

    In most—if not all—organizations, you will see posters, banners, or policy statements that reference a
    commitment to zero injuries, or posters and signs stating mottos and slogans such as “All employees will go
    home the same way they came to work.” Does that alone demonstrate management commitment to
    employee safety and health? No, it does not—it is only one component of it.

    While management’s commitment to safety and health must be clearly stated, it must also state that safety
    and health is as important as all other components of the business including quality, profit, production, and so
    on (OSHA, 2015). The statement must also include a commitment of resources to support health and safety
    improvements, noting that the highest levels of senior management will be responsible for safety and health
    performance. To back up the written statement, management must establish goals for which they will hold
    themselves accountable. These goals should be focused on specific actions, not general injury and illness
    performance (OSHA, 2015).

    The goal of zero injuries should be obvious; no member of management ever wants employees injured at
    work. However, what specific goals are management committed to achieving in order to reduce the risk of
    employees being exposed to workplace hazards? An example goal might state, “Encourage employees to
    report workplace hazards by ensuring that they are free from retaliation and by providing a system that will
    track the controls put into place to mitigate the risk of the reported hazards.”

    Goals such as this also demonstrate management’s commitment of resources to safety and health—another
    critical requirement. Finally, management must hold all levels of the organization accountable for achieving
    the goals that they have set. All employees must be made aware of their roles and responsibilities with a clear
    explanation of what is expected from them (OSHA, 2015). Both positive and constructive feedback must be
    given to ensure that employees are continually aware of whether their actions and behaviors align with the
    organization’s commitment to safety.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Without management commitment, a safety management system is not possible. However, an effective safety
    management system cannot be implemented in a top-down approach—the employees must be involved.
    Employees must be engaged in all aspects of the system, from program development through its
    implementation and continuous improvement. If employees are involved in the program, they will take
    ownership of it and want it to succeed. Engaged employees are more likely to provide feedback that will
    provide insight concerning where the program should focus its efforts as part of its continuous improvement.
    They are also more likely to fully participate in the program’s initiatives, including hazard reporting, incident
    investigations, and training (OSHA, 2015).

    When a management team committed to reducing safety and health risks is combined with the support of an
    engaged workforce, hazards can be effectively identified and assessed. An important part of this is
    conducting quality investigations of incidents when they occur. This includes those incidents that result in an
    injury or illness as well as high-potential near misses or other conditions that identify a clear hazard (OSHA,
    2015). Remember, an effective safety and health management system is concerned with more than injuries
    and illness alone; it strives to reduce the risk of their occurrence. It is vital that employees are engaged so
    that they report near misses and other unsafe conditions proactively, before they are found because of an
    injury or illness.

    The purpose and focus of these investigations cannot be to assign blame. If that happens, employee trust will
    be lost, and the workforce may become disengaged. In addition to being counterproductive, assigning blame
    will not remove the hazard. Incident investigations must focus on the possibility of root causes, plural,
    because there may be more than one (OSHA, 2015). Outside of incident investigations, other tools such as a
    job hazard analysis (JHA) can also be used to identify hazards.

    Once hazards are identified, controls must be put into place. This provides important feedback for the
    employees and demonstrates that the hazards they are reporting are indeed being addressed. If no action is
    taken, the employees will likely feel that their input is being ignored, causing them to lose interest and stop
    reporting hazards.

    As covered in Units IV and V, control strategies should be based on the hierarchy of controls. Employees
    must be involved in the application of these controls. Preference should be given to the higher level of
    controls of elimination, substitution, and engineering controls, which will have a greater impact in terms of risk
    reduction than the lower levels of controls—administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE).
    Management can demonstrate commitment to employee safety and health by supporting the higher levels of
    controls, even though these will generally cost more to apply and implement than the lower levels. This
    support, despite increased costs, demonstrates to the workforce that management’s commitment to the safety
    and health management system is more than just a written statement.

    Once hazards have been identified and appropriate controls have been put into place, this information must
    be communicated to employees. Health and safety training that increases hazard awareness and educates
    employees on the applicable controls is a critical component of an effective safety management system
    (OSHA, 2015). As discussed in Unit VI, a needs assessment must be completed so that focused objectives
    can be developed to meet the specific needs of the employees who require the training.

    In establishing a safety management system, all levels of the organization will have a need for some level of
    awareness training so that a consistent message is delivered. The objectives of this training should be clear:

    • communicate the goals of the safety management system,
    • explain the safety and health policy for the organization,
    • reinforce management’s commitment to safety and health,
    • describe the importance of employee participation,
    • encourage the reporting of unsafe acts and conditions, and
    • define the roles and responsibilities of each level of the organization.

    Once implemented, the organization is not finished with the design and development of the safety
    management system; it must enter a process of continuous improvement. According to Meiling et al., (2014),

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    continuous improvement is a process of applying the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle to make incremental
    enhancements to a process as the need for them becomes evident:

    • Plan: plan an action to address a current deficiency.
    • Do: apply the action.
    • Check: evaluate how effective the action is at correcting the deficiency.
    • Act: respond to the evaluation and return to the planning stage if the action was not effective.

    The PDCA cycle can be applied to ensure continuous improvement of a safety management system.

    Do—This step involves turning these
    objectives into plans, polices, procedures, and
    workplace improvements.

    Plan—Planning should focus on creating specific
    objectives that support the goal established under the
    safety management system.

    Check—The results of these plans, polices, procedures,
    and improvements must be checked using key
    performance
    indicators
    (KPIs) that
    include both
    leading and
    lagging
    values.

    Testing critical KPIs provides
    feedback during the Check step of
    the PDCA cycle.
    (Group of Diverse, 2018)

    The PDCA cycle starts with planning to
    determine objectives and actions that
    support established goals of the safety
    management system being developed.
    (Reyes, 2018)

    Plans, policies,
    procedures, and
    improvements
    outlined in the
    planning stage are
    implemented during
    the Do step of the
    PDCA cycle.
    (LaRochelle, 2017)

    During the Act step of the PDCA cycle,
    actions are taken to fully implement
    policies, procedures, and workplace
    improvements that have proven
    effective.
    (Bruckner, 2018)

    Visual depiction of the PDCA cycle outlines the steps in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process
    (Meiling et al., 2014, p. 110)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Act—If the KPIs demonstrate that the objectives were met, the actions become standards, formalizing them in
    the organization. If the KPIs demonstrate that an objective was not met, the cycle reverts to the planning
    stage to make improvements on the action before trying it again.

    Unit VII brought together the concepts covered in the first six units of this course, tying them to the essential
    elements of a safety management system. The unit content demonstrates how the safety and health concepts
    covered in this course can be organized around the framework of a safety management system for
    implementation in any organization.

    References

    Bruckner, E. (2018, April 17). Gate, fence, sign and sunlight [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/o1jqBoyB9qY

    Group of diverse people having a business meeting [Photograph]. (2018). Rawpixel.

    https://www.rawpixel.com/image/414143/group-diverse-people-having-business-meeting

    LaRochelle, M. (2017, October 8). Welding, welder, mask and burning [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/c-vWdiICscA

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=eds-live&scope=site

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Reyes, A. (2018, July 12). Bulletin board with flow chart [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/qWwpHwip31M

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the links below.

    Access the document listed below to learn about the components the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) believes are important to safety management as well as implementation tools and
    resources. The information provided will be useful when establishing, implementing, maintaining, and
    improving safety and health programs.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about safety measures put into place where you work or have worked in the past. Prepare a one-page
    essay that aligns these safety measures with the key elements of a safety management system. Provide
    specific examples; for example, fire extinguisher training would fit in the category of safety and health training.

    Briefly describe how each of the safety measures relates to and supports each of the others across the
    elements. If you cannot provide an example of a safety measure implemented at your workplace for any of
    the elements, describe how your workplace could implement a safety measure under that element.

    If you are not currently working, describe examples of safety measures that could be put into place under
    each element.

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIProject.docx**

    **Unit VII Project:**

    **Outlining a Training Program Proposal**

    In this assignment, you will develop a plan for an effective training program that is tailored for the specific needs of newly hired, adult employees. You are encouraged to consider your own current or former workplace as a basis for this training plan.

    Develop your plan by addressing each of the requirements in the order presented below.

    · Begin by identifying the type of worksite and whether a safety management system, a behavior-based system approach, or both are used to effectively manage safety performance. Explain why this approach is effective in this worksite environment.

    · Next, clearly define a critical safety-related need that will be met using your training.

    · It is suggested you choose a safety issue that is either most prevalent at the worksite, or one to which all employees are exposed. For example, do not choose forklift operator safety training if there is only one or two people who operate a forklift at the work site.

    · Explain what resources you would use to define this need. Create at least of two learning objectives stating how your training will address the need. Be sure to use the ABCD concept when developing your objectives.

    · Explain how you would design the training to be focused on newly hired, adult participants using activity-based learning concepts. Include at least two activities you would have the participants complete.

    · Identify at least five resources, references, or materials you would use to develop the training materials, and explain how they will support the objectives. At least two of the five resources must be found in the CSU Online Library. These could include technical publications on your topic, scholarly articles, peer-reviewed research, or videos.

    · Outline how your course would be delivered, including what resources would be needed (i.e., educational resources, rooms, projectors, other physical requirements).

    · Describe how you would plan the participants’ time and provide feedback on their actions and responses during the training, ensuring that you have policies in place to maintain control of the training.

    · Prepare a method for evaluating the training; provide at least five example questions that could be used to assess the participants’ retention of knowledge and evaluate the training’s course content and delivery.

    Your project must be at least four pages but no more than five pages in length, not counting the title page (if used) or references page. Your project must have in text citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    **## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.
    4.1 Describe how the safety management systems approach can be used in conjunction with

    efforts focused on safe behaviors.
    4.2 Identify the challenges to effective employee involvement in safety and health programs.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Human Performance and Safety Culture, pp. 41–48, 71–74

    Chapter 5: Employee Involvement

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Read pp. 109–110 of the following article.

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Read pp. 3–8, 11–14, and 27–29 of the following report.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). Recommended practices for safety and health

    programs (OSHA Report No. 3885).
    https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf

    UNIT VII STUDY GUIDE
    Safety Management Systems

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Unit Lesson

    This course has covered several key elements for managing safety and health. Unit I covered the roles
    and responsibilities of the safety professional. In Units II and III, the concept of hazard identification was
    presented. Units IV and V discussed the various controls that can be put into place to reduce the risk of
    the identified hazards. Unit VI explained how to develop an effective program for training adult employees
    on those controls. In this unit, we will tie these elements together under the framework of a safety
    management system.

    Like any other critical aspect of business, safety must be managed. Numerous organizations have published
    frameworks for developing an effective safety management system. Several of these frameworks come in the
    form of consensus standards that organizations can choose to follow. These include the American National
    Standards Institute (ANSI) and American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) publication American
    National Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Z-10, the British Standards
    Institution’s (BSI) Occupational Health and Safety System Standard OHSAS-18001, and the International
    Organization for Standardization’s Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.

    Guidelines for implementing safety management systems have also been published. These include the
    National Safety Council’s Nine Elements of a Successful Safety & Health System and the Occupational
    Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) publications Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
    and Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs. While these all differ in their levels of
    complexity and content, they all focus on similar elements:

    • management commitment,
    • employee participation,
    • hazard identification and assessment,
    • hazard control,
    • safety and health training, and
    • commitment to continuous improvement.

    These elements should sound familiar since they have all been covered to some extent in this course. Let’s
    look at each one in more detail and examine how they are all interrelated.

    In most—if not all—organizations, you will see posters, banners, or policy statements that reference a
    commitment to zero injuries, or posters and signs stating mottos and slogans such as “All employees will go
    home the same way they came to work.” Does that alone demonstrate management commitment to
    employee safety and health? No, it does not—it is only one component of it.

    While management’s commitment to safety and health must be clearly stated, it must also state that safety
    and health is as important as all other components of the business including quality, profit, production, and so
    on (OSHA, 2015). The statement must also include a commitment of resources to support health and safety
    improvements, noting that the highest levels of senior management will be responsible for safety and health
    performance. To back up the written statement, management must establish goals for which they will hold
    themselves accountable. These goals should be focused on specific actions, not general injury and illness
    performance (OSHA, 2015).

    The goal of zero injuries should be obvious; no member of management ever wants employees injured at
    work. However, what specific goals are management committed to achieving in order to reduce the risk of
    employees being exposed to workplace hazards? An example goal might state, “Encourage employees to
    report workplace hazards by ensuring that they are free from retaliation and by providing a system that will
    track the controls put into place to mitigate the risk of the reported hazards.”

    Goals such as this also demonstrate management’s commitment of resources to safety and health—another
    critical requirement. Finally, management must hold all levels of the organization accountable for achieving
    the goals that they have set. All employees must be made aware of their roles and responsibilities with a clear
    explanation of what is expected from them (OSHA, 2015). Both positive and constructive feedback must be
    given to ensure that employees are continually aware of whether their actions and behaviors align with the
    organization’s commitment to safety.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Without management commitment, a safety management system is not possible. However, an effective safety
    management system cannot be implemented in a top-down approach—the employees must be involved.
    Employees must be engaged in all aspects of the system, from program development through its
    implementation and continuous improvement. If employees are involved in the program, they will take
    ownership of it and want it to succeed. Engaged employees are more likely to provide feedback that will
    provide insight concerning where the program should focus its efforts as part of its continuous improvement.
    They are also more likely to fully participate in the program’s initiatives, including hazard reporting, incident
    investigations, and training (OSHA, 2015).

    When a management team committed to reducing safety and health risks is combined with the support of an
    engaged workforce, hazards can be effectively identified and assessed. An important part of this is
    conducting quality investigations of incidents when they occur. This includes those incidents that result in an
    injury or illness as well as high-potential near misses or other conditions that identify a clear hazard (OSHA,
    2015). Remember, an effective safety and health management system is concerned with more than injuries
    and illness alone; it strives to reduce the risk of their occurrence. It is vital that employees are engaged so
    that they report near misses and other unsafe conditions proactively, before they are found because of an
    injury or illness.

    The purpose and focus of these investigations cannot be to assign blame. If that happens, employee trust will
    be lost, and the workforce may become disengaged. In addition to being counterproductive, assigning blame
    will not remove the hazard. Incident investigations must focus on the possibility of root causes, plural,
    because there may be more than one (OSHA, 2015). Outside of incident investigations, other tools such as a
    job hazard analysis (JHA) can also be used to identify hazards.

    Once hazards are identified, controls must be put into place. This provides important feedback for the
    employees and demonstrates that the hazards they are reporting are indeed being addressed. If no action is
    taken, the employees will likely feel that their input is being ignored, causing them to lose interest and stop
    reporting hazards.

    As covered in Units IV and V, control strategies should be based on the hierarchy of controls. Employees
    must be involved in the application of these controls. Preference should be given to the higher level of
    controls of elimination, substitution, and engineering controls, which will have a greater impact in terms of risk
    reduction than the lower levels of controls—administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE).
    Management can demonstrate commitment to employee safety and health by supporting the higher levels of
    controls, even though these will generally cost more to apply and implement than the lower levels. This
    support, despite increased costs, demonstrates to the workforce that management’s commitment to the safety
    and health management system is more than just a written statement.

    Once hazards have been identified and appropriate controls have been put into place, this information must
    be communicated to employees. Health and safety training that increases hazard awareness and educates
    employees on the applicable controls is a critical component of an effective safety management system
    (OSHA, 2015). As discussed in Unit VI, a needs assessment must be completed so that focused objectives
    can be developed to meet the specific needs of the employees who require the training.

    In establishing a safety management system, all levels of the organization will have a need for some level of
    awareness training so that a consistent message is delivered. The objectives of this training should be clear:

    • communicate the goals of the safety management system,
    • explain the safety and health policy for the organization,
    • reinforce management’s commitment to safety and health,
    • describe the importance of employee participation,
    • encourage the reporting of unsafe acts and conditions, and
    • define the roles and responsibilities of each level of the organization.

    Once implemented, the organization is not finished with the design and development of the safety
    management system; it must enter a process of continuous improvement. According to Meiling et al., (2014),

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    continuous improvement is a process of applying the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle to make incremental
    enhancements to a process as the need for them becomes evident:

    • Plan: plan an action to address a current deficiency.
    • Do: apply the action.
    • Check: evaluate how effective the action is at correcting the deficiency.
    • Act: respond to the evaluation and return to the planning stage if the action was not effective.

    The PDCA cycle can be applied to ensure continuous improvement of a safety management system.

    Do—This step involves turning these
    objectives into plans, polices, procedures, and
    workplace improvements.

    Plan—Planning should focus on creating specific
    objectives that support the goal established under the
    safety management system.

    Check—The results of these plans, polices, procedures,
    and improvements must be checked using key
    performance
    indicators
    (KPIs) that
    include both
    leading and
    lagging
    values.

    Testing critical KPIs provides
    feedback during the Check step of
    the PDCA cycle.
    (Group of Diverse, 2018)

    The PDCA cycle starts with planning to
    determine objectives and actions that
    support established goals of the safety
    management system being developed.
    (Reyes, 2018)

    Plans, policies,
    procedures, and
    improvements
    outlined in the
    planning stage are
    implemented during
    the Do step of the
    PDCA cycle.
    (LaRochelle, 2017)

    During the Act step of the PDCA cycle,
    actions are taken to fully implement
    policies, procedures, and workplace
    improvements that have proven
    effective.
    (Bruckner, 2018)

    Visual depiction of the PDCA cycle outlines the steps in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process
    (Meiling et al., 2014, p. 110)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Act—If the KPIs demonstrate that the objectives were met, the actions become standards, formalizing them in
    the organization. If the KPIs demonstrate that an objective was not met, the cycle reverts to the planning
    stage to make improvements on the action before trying it again.

    Unit VII brought together the concepts covered in the first six units of this course, tying them to the essential
    elements of a safety management system. The unit content demonstrates how the safety and health concepts
    covered in this course can be organized around the framework of a safety management system for
    implementation in any organization.

    References

    Bruckner, E. (2018, April 17). Gate, fence, sign and sunlight [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/o1jqBoyB9qY

    Group of diverse people having a business meeting [Photograph]. (2018). Rawpixel.

    https://www.rawpixel.com/image/414143/group-diverse-people-having-business-meeting

    LaRochelle, M. (2017, October 8). Welding, welder, mask and burning [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/c-vWdiICscA

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=eds-live&scope=site

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Reyes, A. (2018, July 12). Bulletin board with flow chart [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/qWwpHwip31M

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the links below.

    Access the document listed below to learn about the components the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) believes are important to safety management as well as implementation tools and
    resources. The information provided will be useful when establishing, implementing, maintaining, and
    improving safety and health programs.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about safety measures put into place where you work or have worked in the past. Prepare a one-page
    essay that aligns these safety measures with the key elements of a safety management system. Provide
    specific examples; for example, fire extinguisher training would fit in the category of safety and health training.

    Briefly describe how each of the safety measures relates to and supports each of the others across the
    elements. If you cannot provide an example of a safety measure implemented at your workplace for any of
    the elements, describe how your workplace could implement a safety measure under that element.

    If you are not currently working, describe examples of safety measures that could be put into place under
    each element.

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    **## UnitVIIProject.docx**

    **Unit VII Project:**

    **Outlining a Training Program Proposal**

    In this assignment, you will develop a plan for an effective training program that is tailored for the specific needs of newly hired, adult employees. You are encouraged to consider your own current or former workplace as a basis for this training plan.

    Develop your plan by addressing each of the requirements in the order presented below.

    · Begin by identifying the type of worksite and whether a safety management system, a behavior-based system approach, or both are used to effectively manage safety performance. Explain why this approach is effective in this worksite environment.

    · Next, clearly define a critical safety-related need that will be met using your training.

    · It is suggested you choose a safety issue that is either most prevalent at the worksite, or one to which all employees are exposed. For example, do not choose forklift operator safety training if there is only one or two people who operate a forklift at the work site.

    · Explain what resources you would use to define this need. Create at least of two learning objectives stating how your training will address the need. Be sure to use the ABCD concept when developing your objectives.

    · Explain how you would design the training to be focused on newly hired, adult participants using activity-based learning concepts. Include at least two activities you would have the participants complete.

    · Identify at least five resources, references, or materials you would use to develop the training materials, and explain how they will support the objectives. At least two of the five resources must be found in the CSU Online Library. These could include technical publications on your topic, scholarly articles, peer-reviewed research, or videos.

    · Outline how your course would be delivered, including what resources would be needed (i.e., educational resources, rooms, projectors, other physical requirements).

    · Describe how you would plan the participants’ time and provide feedback on their actions and responses during the training, ensuring that you have policies in place to maintain control of the training.

    · Prepare a method for evaluating the training; provide at least five example questions that could be used to assess the participants’ retention of knowledge and evaluate the training’s course content and delivery.

    Your project must be at least four pages but no more than five pages in length, not counting the title page (if used) or references page. Your project must have in text citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    **## UnitVIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    4. Discuss safety and health management systems approaches for controlling workplace hazards.
    4.1 Describe how the safety management systems approach can be used in conjunction with

    efforts focused on safe behaviors.
    4.2 Identify the challenges to effective employee involvement in safety and health programs.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 3: Human Performance and Safety Culture, pp. 41–48, 71–74

    Chapter 5: Employee Involvement

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Read pp. 109–110 of the following article.

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Read pp. 3–8, 11–14, and 27–29 of the following report.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). Recommended practices for safety and health

    programs (OSHA Report No. 3885).
    https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf

    UNIT VII STUDY GUIDE
    Safety Management Systems

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/docs/OSHA_SHP_Recommended_Practices.pdf)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Unit Lesson

    This course has covered several key elements for managing safety and health. Unit I covered the roles
    and responsibilities of the safety professional. In Units II and III, the concept of hazard identification was
    presented. Units IV and V discussed the various controls that can be put into place to reduce the risk of
    the identified hazards. Unit VI explained how to develop an effective program for training adult employees
    on those controls. In this unit, we will tie these elements together under the framework of a safety
    management system.

    Like any other critical aspect of business, safety must be managed. Numerous organizations have published
    frameworks for developing an effective safety management system. Several of these frameworks come in the
    form of consensus standards that organizations can choose to follow. These include the American National
    Standards Institute (ANSI) and American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) publication American
    National Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Z-10, the British Standards
    Institution’s (BSI) Occupational Health and Safety System Standard OHSAS-18001, and the International
    Organization for Standardization’s Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.

    Guidelines for implementing safety management systems have also been published. These include the
    National Safety Council’s Nine Elements of a Successful Safety & Health System and the Occupational
    Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) publications Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
    and Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs. While these all differ in their levels of
    complexity and content, they all focus on similar elements:

    • management commitment,
    • employee participation,
    • hazard identification and assessment,
    • hazard control,
    • safety and health training, and
    • commitment to continuous improvement.

    These elements should sound familiar since they have all been covered to some extent in this course. Let’s
    look at each one in more detail and examine how they are all interrelated.

    In most—if not all—organizations, you will see posters, banners, or policy statements that reference a
    commitment to zero injuries, or posters and signs stating mottos and slogans such as “All employees will go
    home the same way they came to work.” Does that alone demonstrate management commitment to
    employee safety and health? No, it does not—it is only one component of it.

    While management’s commitment to safety and health must be clearly stated, it must also state that safety
    and health is as important as all other components of the business including quality, profit, production, and so
    on (OSHA, 2015). The statement must also include a commitment of resources to support health and safety
    improvements, noting that the highest levels of senior management will be responsible for safety and health
    performance. To back up the written statement, management must establish goals for which they will hold
    themselves accountable. These goals should be focused on specific actions, not general injury and illness
    performance (OSHA, 2015).

    The goal of zero injuries should be obvious; no member of management ever wants employees injured at
    work. However, what specific goals are management committed to achieving in order to reduce the risk of
    employees being exposed to workplace hazards? An example goal might state, “Encourage employees to
    report workplace hazards by ensuring that they are free from retaliation and by providing a system that will
    track the controls put into place to mitigate the risk of the reported hazards.”

    Goals such as this also demonstrate management’s commitment of resources to safety and health—another
    critical requirement. Finally, management must hold all levels of the organization accountable for achieving
    the goals that they have set. All employees must be made aware of their roles and responsibilities with a clear
    explanation of what is expected from them (OSHA, 2015). Both positive and constructive feedback must be
    given to ensure that employees are continually aware of whether their actions and behaviors align with the
    organization’s commitment to safety.

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Without management commitment, a safety management system is not possible. However, an effective safety
    management system cannot be implemented in a top-down approach—the employees must be involved.
    Employees must be engaged in all aspects of the system, from program development through its
    implementation and continuous improvement. If employees are involved in the program, they will take
    ownership of it and want it to succeed. Engaged employees are more likely to provide feedback that will
    provide insight concerning where the program should focus its efforts as part of its continuous improvement.
    They are also more likely to fully participate in the program’s initiatives, including hazard reporting, incident
    investigations, and training (OSHA, 2015).

    When a management team committed to reducing safety and health risks is combined with the support of an
    engaged workforce, hazards can be effectively identified and assessed. An important part of this is
    conducting quality investigations of incidents when they occur. This includes those incidents that result in an
    injury or illness as well as high-potential near misses or other conditions that identify a clear hazard (OSHA,
    2015). Remember, an effective safety and health management system is concerned with more than injuries
    and illness alone; it strives to reduce the risk of their occurrence. It is vital that employees are engaged so
    that they report near misses and other unsafe conditions proactively, before they are found because of an
    injury or illness.

    The purpose and focus of these investigations cannot be to assign blame. If that happens, employee trust will
    be lost, and the workforce may become disengaged. In addition to being counterproductive, assigning blame
    will not remove the hazard. Incident investigations must focus on the possibility of root causes, plural,
    because there may be more than one (OSHA, 2015). Outside of incident investigations, other tools such as a
    job hazard analysis (JHA) can also be used to identify hazards.

    Once hazards are identified, controls must be put into place. This provides important feedback for the
    employees and demonstrates that the hazards they are reporting are indeed being addressed. If no action is
    taken, the employees will likely feel that their input is being ignored, causing them to lose interest and stop
    reporting hazards.

    As covered in Units IV and V, control strategies should be based on the hierarchy of controls. Employees
    must be involved in the application of these controls. Preference should be given to the higher level of
    controls of elimination, substitution, and engineering controls, which will have a greater impact in terms of risk
    reduction than the lower levels of controls—administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE).
    Management can demonstrate commitment to employee safety and health by supporting the higher levels of
    controls, even though these will generally cost more to apply and implement than the lower levels. This
    support, despite increased costs, demonstrates to the workforce that management’s commitment to the safety
    and health management system is more than just a written statement.

    Once hazards have been identified and appropriate controls have been put into place, this information must
    be communicated to employees. Health and safety training that increases hazard awareness and educates
    employees on the applicable controls is a critical component of an effective safety management system
    (OSHA, 2015). As discussed in Unit VI, a needs assessment must be completed so that focused objectives
    can be developed to meet the specific needs of the employees who require the training.

    In establishing a safety management system, all levels of the organization will have a need for some level of
    awareness training so that a consistent message is delivered. The objectives of this training should be clear:

    • communicate the goals of the safety management system,
    • explain the safety and health policy for the organization,
    • reinforce management’s commitment to safety and health,
    • describe the importance of employee participation,
    • encourage the reporting of unsafe acts and conditions, and
    • define the roles and responsibilities of each level of the organization.

    Once implemented, the organization is not finished with the design and development of the safety
    management system; it must enter a process of continuous improvement. According to Meiling et al., (2014),

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    continuous improvement is a process of applying the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle to make incremental
    enhancements to a process as the need for them becomes evident:

    • Plan: plan an action to address a current deficiency.
    • Do: apply the action.
    • Check: evaluate how effective the action is at correcting the deficiency.
    • Act: respond to the evaluation and return to the planning stage if the action was not effective.

    The PDCA cycle can be applied to ensure continuous improvement of a safety management system.

    Do—This step involves turning these
    objectives into plans, polices, procedures, and
    workplace improvements.

    Plan—Planning should focus on creating specific
    objectives that support the goal established under the
    safety management system.

    Check—The results of these plans, polices, procedures,
    and improvements must be checked using key
    performance
    indicators
    (KPIs) that
    include both
    leading and
    lagging
    values.

    Testing critical KPIs provides
    feedback during the Check step of
    the PDCA cycle.
    (Group of Diverse, 2018)

    The PDCA cycle starts with planning to
    determine objectives and actions that
    support established goals of the safety
    management system being developed.
    (Reyes, 2018)

    Plans, policies,
    procedures, and
    improvements
    outlined in the
    planning stage are
    implemented during
    the Do step of the
    PDCA cycle.
    (LaRochelle, 2017)

    During the Act step of the PDCA cycle,
    actions are taken to fully implement
    policies, procedures, and workplace
    improvements that have proven
    effective.
    (Bruckner, 2018)

    Visual depiction of the PDCA cycle outlines the steps in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process
    (Meiling et al., 2014, p. 110)

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 5

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Act—If the KPIs demonstrate that the objectives were met, the actions become standards, formalizing them in
    the organization. If the KPIs demonstrate that an objective was not met, the cycle reverts to the planning
    stage to make improvements on the action before trying it again.

    Unit VII brought together the concepts covered in the first six units of this course, tying them to the essential
    elements of a safety management system. The unit content demonstrates how the safety and health concepts
    covered in this course can be organized around the framework of a safety management system for
    implementation in any organization.

    References

    Bruckner, E. (2018, April 17). Gate, fence, sign and sunlight [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/o1jqBoyB9qY

    Group of diverse people having a business meeting [Photograph]. (2018). Rawpixel.

    https://www.rawpixel.com/image/414143/group-diverse-people-having-business-meeting

    LaRochelle, M. (2017, October 8). Welding, welder, mask and burning [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/c-vWdiICscA

    Meiling, J. H., Sandberg, M., & Johnsson, H. (2014). A study of a plan-do-check-act method used in less

    industrialized activities: Two cases from industrialized housebuilding. Construction Management and
    Economics, 32(1/2), 109–125.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
    t=true&db=bsu&AN=95004459&site=eds-live&scope=site

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Reyes, A. (2018, July 12). Bulletin board with flow chart [Photograph]. Unsplash.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/qWwpHwip31M

    OSH 2301, Introduction to Workplace Safety 6

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the links below.

    Access the document listed below to learn about the components the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration (OSHA) believes are important to safety management as well as implementation tools and
    resources. The information provided will be useful when establishing, implementing, maintaining, and
    improving safety and health programs.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). OSHA safety and health program management

    guidelines: November 2015 draft for public comment.
    https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf

    Learning Activities (Nongraded)

    Nongraded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their course of study. You do not have to submit
    them. If you have questions, contact your instructor for further guidance and information.

    Think about safety measures put into place where you work or have worked in the past. Prepare a one-page
    essay that aligns these safety measures with the key elements of a safety management system. Provide
    specific examples; for example, fire extinguisher training would fit in the category of safety and health training.

    Briefly describe how each of the safety measures relates to and supports each of the others across the
    elements. If you cannot provide an example of a safety measure implemented at your workplace for any of
    the elements, describe how your workplace could implement a safety measure under that element.

    If you are not currently working, describe examples of safety measures that could be put into place under
    each element.

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/shpmguidelines/SHPM_guidelines.pdf)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VII
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources
    – Learning Activities (Nongraded)

  • [Solved] NU584 Unit 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NU584 Unit 8.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nu576 unit 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nu576 unit 8.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NA6,MB9,PA4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering NA6,MB9,PA4.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Length: Create a podcast of 8 – 10 minutes duration. Also, provide the script (2-3 pages) in APA format. References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly references.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing) **files (2)** – ## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx – ## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx **## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx** Assignment 1: Identify the Importance of Innovation to Organizational Success **Instructions*…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing)

    **files (2)**

    – ## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx

    – ## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx

    **## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx**

    Assignment 1: Identify the Importance of Innovation to Organizational Success

    **Instructions**

    You are a CMO leading a new innovative product launch. In this role, Your company has requested to interview you to explain the importance of innovation and how it leads to organizational success, even when current strategies have been productive. Develop a podcast about innovation and how it benefits organizations.

    In your podcast, you will:

    · Define innovation;

    · Compare innovation and creativity; and

    · Explain how innovation leads to organizational growth and success

    **Requirements**

    Length: Create a podcast of 8 – 10 minutes duration. Also, provide the script (2-3 pages) in APA format.

    References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly references.

    The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to the National University's Academic Integrity Policy.

    **Grading**

    This assignment is worth 10 points and is due on Sunday. Refer to the rubric for more specifics on how this will be graded.

    **## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceeds All Expectations (94-100%)** | **Exceeds Most Expectations (90-93%)** | **Meets Expectations (83-89%)** | **Below Expectations (73-82%)** | **Does Not Meet Expectations (0-72%)** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Identified a definition of innovation | 3 points<br>Student identified a clear definition with sound support for the choice. | 2.79 points<br>Student identified a definition and provided an explanation  which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student identified a definition with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student identified a definition without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not define innovation. | Score of Identified a definition of innovation,<br>/ 3 |
    | Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity | 3 points<br>Student provided a clear comparison with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student provided a comparison with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student provided a comparison with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student provided a comparison without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a comparison. | Score of Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity,<br>/ 3 |
    | Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth | 3 points<br>Student developed a clear discussion with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student developed a discussion with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student developed a discussion with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student developed a discussion without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a discussion. | Score of Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth,<br>/ 3 |
    | Podcast script follows APA standards. | 1 point<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, with no more than 1 or 2 errors. | 0.93 points<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting with only 3 or 4 errors. | 0.89 points<br>Student used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, having less than 5 errors. | 0.82 points<br>Student used some correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting. | 0.72 points<br>Student needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting because many errors were evident. | Score of Podcast script follows APA standards.,<br>/ 1 |

    **## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceeds All Expectations (94-100%)** | **Exceeds Most Expectations (90-93%)** | **Meets Expectations (83-89%)** | **Below Expectations (73-82%)** | **Does Not Meet Expectations (0-72%)** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Identified a definition of innovation | 3 points<br>Student identified a clear definition with sound support for the choice. | 2.79 points<br>Student identified a definition and provided an explanation  which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student identified a definition with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student identified a definition without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not define innovation. | Score of Identified a definition of innovation,<br>/ 3 |
    | Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity | 3 points<br>Student provided a clear comparison with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student provided a comparison with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student provided a comparison with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student provided a comparison without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a comparison. | Score of Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity,<br>/ 3 |
    | Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth | 3 points<br>Student developed a clear discussion with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student developed a discussion with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student developed a discussion with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student developed a discussion without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a discussion. | Score of Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth,<br>/ 3 |
    | Podcast script follows APA standards. | 1 point<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, with no more than 1 or 2 errors. | 0.93 points<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting with only 3 or 4 errors. | 0.89 points<br>Student used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, having less than 5 errors. | 0.82 points<br>Student used some correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting. | 0.72 points<br>Student needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting because many errors were evident. | Score of Podcast script follows APA standards.,<br>/ 1 |

    **## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx**

    Assignment 1: Identify the Importance of Innovation to Organizational Success

    **Instructions**

    You are a CMO leading a new innovative product launch. In this role, Your company has requested to interview you to explain the importance of innovation and how it leads to organizational success, even when current strategies have been productive. Develop a podcast about innovation and how it benefits organizations.

    In your podcast, you will:

    · Define innovation;

    · Compare innovation and creativity; and

    · Explain how innovation leads to organizational growth and success

    **Requirements**

    Length: Create a podcast of 8 – 10 minutes duration. Also, provide the script (2-3 pages) in APA format.

    References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly references.

    The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to the National University's Academic Integrity Policy.

    **Grading**

    This assignment is worth 10 points and is due on Sunday. Refer to the rubric for more specifics on how this will be graded.

    **## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceeds All Expectations (94-100%)** | **Exceeds Most Expectations (90-93%)** | **Meets Expectations (83-89%)** | **Below Expectations (73-82%)** | **Does Not Meet Expectations (0-72%)** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Identified a definition of innovation | 3 points<br>Student identified a clear definition with sound support for the choice. | 2.79 points<br>Student identified a definition and provided an explanation  which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student identified a definition with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student identified a definition without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not define innovation. | Score of Identified a definition of innovation,<br>/ 3 |
    | Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity | 3 points<br>Student provided a clear comparison with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student provided a comparison with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student provided a comparison with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student provided a comparison without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a comparison. | Score of Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity,<br>/ 3 |
    | Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth | 3 points<br>Student developed a clear discussion with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student developed a discussion with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student developed a discussion with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student developed a discussion without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a discussion. | Score of Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth,<br>/ 3 |
    | Podcast script follows APA standards. | 1 point<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, with no more than 1 or 2 errors. | 0.93 points<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting with only 3 or 4 errors. | 0.89 points<br>Student used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, having less than 5 errors. | 0.82 points<br>Student used some correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting. | 0.72 points<br>Student needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting because many errors were evident. | Score of Podcast script follows APA standards.,<br>/ 1 |

    **## Assignment1InstructionsHM.docx**

    Assignment 1: Identify the Importance of Innovation to Organizational Success

    **Instructions**

    You are a CMO leading a new innovative product launch. In this role, Your company has requested to interview you to explain the importance of innovation and how it leads to organizational success, even when current strategies have been productive. Develop a podcast about innovation and how it benefits organizations.

    In your podcast, you will:

    · Define innovation;

    · Compare innovation and creativity; and

    · Explain how innovation leads to organizational growth and success

    **Requirements**

    Length: Create a podcast of 8 – 10 minutes duration. Also, provide the script (2-3 pages) in APA format.

    References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly references.

    The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to the National University's Academic Integrity Policy.

    **Grading**

    This assignment is worth 10 points and is due on Sunday. Refer to the rubric for more specifics on how this will be graded.

    **## ASSIGNMENT1RUBRICHM.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Exceeds All Expectations (94-100%)** | **Exceeds Most Expectations (90-93%)** | **Meets Expectations (83-89%)** | **Below Expectations (73-82%)** | **Does Not Meet Expectations (0-72%)** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Identified a definition of innovation | 3 points<br>Student identified a clear definition with sound support for the choice. | 2.79 points<br>Student identified a definition and provided an explanation  which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student identified a definition with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student identified a definition without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not define innovation. | Score of Identified a definition of innovation,<br>/ 3 |
    | Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity | 3 points<br>Student provided a clear comparison with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student provided a comparison with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student provided a comparison with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student provided a comparison without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a comparison. | Score of Developed a comparison between innovation and creativity,<br>/ 3 |
    | Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth | 3 points<br>Student developed a clear discussion with sound support. | 2.79 points<br>Student developed a discussion with an explanation which needed more substance. | 2.67 points<br>Student developed a discussion with no support for its appropriateness. | 2.46 points<br>Student developed a discussion without accompanying explanations as to why the definition was appropriate. | 2.16 points<br>Student did not provide a discussion. | Score of Discussed how innovation leads to organizational growth,<br>/ 3 |
    | Podcast script follows APA standards. | 1 point<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, with no more than 1 or 2 errors. | 0.93 points<br>Student used correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting with only 3 or 4 errors. | 0.89 points<br>Student used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting, having less than 5 errors. | 0.82 points<br>Student used some correct grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting. | 0.72 points<br>Student needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and (when applicable) APA formatting because many errors were evident. | Score of Podcast script follows APA standards.,<br>/ 1 |