Tag: Law

  • [Solved] criminal justice professional

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Once a **criminal justice professional** has completed an evaluation, they must interpret the results to determine the best approach to improving **standard operating procedures** (SOPs) related to a program or policy. In this…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Once a **criminal justice professional** has completed an evaluation, they must interpret the results to determine the best approach to improving **standard operating procedures** (SOPs) related to a program or policy.

    In this assessment, you will develop data interpretation and communication processes that can be used to inform and guide changes to operating procedures.

    #### **Assessment Deliverable**

    **Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word standard operating procedures improvement memorandum in which you analyze how to interpret and communicate evaluation findings that are essential to quality improvement.** The memorandum would be submitted to your supervisor and other key decision-makers who would have approved the evaluation you completed in the Wk 3 Summative Assessment: Program and Policy Evaluation Proposal. They want to understand how you will communicate and use your results.

    Include the following headers and content in your memorandum:

    **Opening Statement**

    – Summarize the purpose and value of program evaluation.

    **Recommendations for Interpreting Evaluation Results**

    – Explain the importance of accuracy when interpreting and communicating evaluation results.
    – Describe 2 strategies you will use when interpreting evaluation results. Justify your response by explaining how your strategies ensure accuracy and reduce errors in your evaluative conclusions.

    **Recommendations for Reporting Evaluation Results**

    – Explain the benefit of ongoing and regular communication throughout the evaluation process.
    – Describe 2 strategies you will use to communicate details about your program evaluation to decision-makers and/or stakeholders before, during, and after evaluation. Justify your response by explaining how your strategies will address diverse stakeholder needs.

    **Recommendations for Using Evaluation Results**

    – Explain the importance of managing change processes that may be required as a result of your evaluative conclusions.
    – Describe 2 strategies you will use to integrate changes to SOPs to the program. Justify your response by explaining how your strategies will ensure all stakeholders groups are considered and ethical guidelines are established.

    **Conclusion/Call to Action/Collaborative Approach to Evaluation**

    – Identify an action step your supervisor or stakeholders can take to support your evaluation recommendations.

    **MEMORANDUM**

    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png)

    ![homework question](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/loader.e99f1ef323fecd089c1cdcaaadcd1f9b.gif)

    plagiarism checkPurchase $40

    – ### [Week 5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/week-5-20965469)

    NOT RATED

    7 months ago

  • [Solved] cry 499 need help wk10

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) ## **Overview** For this assignment, you will complete an SWS formatted **written report (not a text message submission) in a Word document** that further explores three of the programs out of the six you identified in last we…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    ## **Overview**

    For this assignment, you will complete an SWS formatted **written report (not a text message submission) in a Word document** that further explores three of the programs out of the six you identified in last week's assignment. The work should be between **5-7 pages (not including the cover and reference pages)**.

    ## **Scenario**

    You have been asked to review the six programs you presented last week and select one that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues for each of the three scenarios.

    Watch the video briefing by your police chief below to get help in completing your assignment.

    – [Community Problem SolvingLinks to an external site.](https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/956951/uiconf_id/43830551/entry_id/1_ijwcwze7/embed/dynamic)

    [Video TranscriptLinks to an external site.](https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/sumid001641/wrapper.asp)

    ## **Prepare**

    Review the six programs you presented last week and select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. Review [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/27586/files/18017913?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/27586/files/18017913/download?download_frd=1) scenarios, as needed, to refresh your memory.

    Then, using the information in chapters 11, 12, and 13 in _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_, [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](https://research-ebsco-com.libdatab.strayer.edu/c/clktk4/search/details/abvrbl4g2v?db=nlebk) and your own research, to create a report that determines and details the programs you feel would best address each of the three scenarios documented in the Community Issues PDF.

    ## **Instructions**

    Of the six programs you presented last week, select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. For each of the three programs:

    – Evaluate each of the three programs in detail to include specific actions taken and anticipated positive results.
    – Determine the stakeholders who will be part of the program, including an explanation of each of their roles.
    – Establish two potential challenges that may arise with the implementation of each program.
    – Present policy proposals that will address each of those challenges.
    – Support your writing with at least five sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the [library](https://library.strayer.edu/) or review [library guides](https://library.strayer.edu/guides).

    This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the [Library site](https://library.strayer.edu/sws) for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    – Apply criminal justice theories as a problem-solving tool for identified situations.
    – Demonstrate effective communication via multiple channels.
    – Demonstrate effective research and analysis of complex criminal justice issues and policies.
    – Analyze policy in order to create and implement appropriate revisions.

    ## **Resources**

    – From _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_:

    – Chapter 11, " [Selected Approaches to Training and Planning](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_261)."
    – Chapter 12, " [Distinctive Community-Policing Programs](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_301)."
    – Chapter 13, " [The Future of Community Policing](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_327)."
    – [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2553236&site=eds-live&scope=site).
    – [Criminal Justice Research Collection](https://library.strayer.edu/cjrc)
    – [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/27586/files/18017913?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/27586/files/18017913/download?download_frd=1)

  • [Solved] law question 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (2)** – ## lawquestion561.docx – CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf **## lawquestion561.docx** Week 1 · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 1 & 2 · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (2)**

    – ## lawquestion561.docx

    – CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf

    **## lawquestion561.docx**

    Week 1

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 1 & 2

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 1

    Week 2

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 3 & 4

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 2

    **CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crisisinterventionsyllabus-pdf)

    **CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crisisinterventionsyllabus-pdf)

    **## lawquestion561.docx**

    Week 1

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 1 & 2

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 1

    Week 2

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 3 & 4

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 2

    **CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crisisinterventionsyllabus-pdf)

    **## lawquestion561.docx**

    Week 1

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 1 & 2

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 1

    Week 2

    · James et al. (2025). Crisis intervention strategies (9th ed.). Chapters 3 & 4

    · Shane, J. (2020). Stress inside police departments (1st ed.). Routledge Chapter 2

    **CRISISINTERVENTIONSyllabus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crisisinterventionsyllabus-pdf)

  • [Solved] Research problem-solving models and consider how you could use these models to evaluate criminal justice issues or programs.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Research problem-solving models and consider how you could use these models to evaluate criminal justice issues or programs. Select a local, state, or federal criminal justice policy and research it. This could be the policy y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Research problem-solving models and consider how you could use these models to evaluate criminal justice issues or programs.

    Select a local, state, or federal criminal justice policy and research it. This could be the policy you researched and analyzed in Weeks 1–3 or select a different policy of your choice. Potential topics include:

    – Stand your ground policy/castle doctrine
    – Registries for individuals who have committed sexual offenses
    – No bail policy/bail reform
    – Plea bargaining
    – Three-strikes policies
    – Counterterrorism policies

    _Note:_ Speak with your faculty member if you need assistance selecting a policy for this assessment.

    #### **Assessment Deliverable**

    **Create a 12- to 15-slide presentation in which you explain how your selected problem-solving model can be applied to evaluating a criminal justice policy.** This presentation will be included in a workshop for new hires who will be evaluating criminal justice policies and programs.

    Address the following in your presentation:

    – Explain the value of evaluating criminal justice policies.
    – Summarize the criminal justice policy selected.
    – Specify whether the policy is applicable in local, state, or federal contexts.
    – Include relevant details about the criminal justice policy’s purpose and its relevance to contemporary criminal justice issues.
    – Analyze the ethical considerations regarding the policy. Include relevant details about:
    – The advantages and challenges of the policy
    – The public perception toward the policy
    – The success of the policy in curbing criminal offenses
    – Any unintended outcomes or consequences of the policy
    – A problem or issue with the policy that needs a resolution
    – Summarize the problem-solving model you selected for evaluation. Consider reviewing the problem-solving resources in the Assessment Support section.
    – Explain how the problem-solving model can be used to evaluate and/or address ethical concerns related to the policy.
    – Describe the process and intended outcomes of applying the problem-solving model to resolve the identified policy issue.

    **SARA Model (Scanning, Analysis, Response, Assessment)**

    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png)

    ![homework question](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/loader.e99f1ef323fecd089c1cdcaaadcd1f9b.gif)

    plagiarism checkPurchase $20

    – ### [Criminal Justice week 4](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/criminal-justice-week-4-20965465)

    NOT RATED

    7 months ago

  • [Solved] Law – Criminal Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Assignment

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Assignment

  • [Solved] Due 3/20

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attaches **files (6)** – ## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf – Pleaseread.jpeg – ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf – PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBey…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attaches

    **files (6)**

    – ## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf

    – Pleaseread.jpeg
    – ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf
    – PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf
    – ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf

    **## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    PADM 700

    **Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.

    Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.

    Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.

    The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.

    Instructions

    In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
    **Journal Article Review** you will:

    · Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;

    · Explain the method used to support the claims of the article

    · State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.

    · State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)

    · Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study

    · Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.

    · Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.

    Your
    **Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, significant points
    in support of the premise,
    and the significance of
    these to the course and/or
    field.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field, but
    one or more of them need
    improvement.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    One of the following is
    missing or insufficiently
    analytical: accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Synthesis 40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    The review contains an
    accurate, detailed, and
    well thought out
    comparison of the salient
    points of the article.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    The review contains
    comparisons of the salient
    points of the article. The
    detail and critical thinking
    intersection is less
    defined.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The review vaguely links
    the salient points of the
    article and is generally
    lacking in critical analysis.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Critical
    Evaluation
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    60 to >54 pts

    Advanced

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s informed and
    substantiated opinion,
    thorough evaluation of the
    article’s premise, and
    supporting points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview.

    54 to >50 pts

    Proficient

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s opinion and
    some evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    arguments, including with
    respect to a biblical
    worldview, but overlooks
    some points.

    50 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Student’s opinion of the
    article is stated, along with
    critical evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    argument, but some
    significant points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview, are
    overlooked.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    60 pts

    APA
    Formatting

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting accurately
    and consistently.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting with minor
    violations.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Reflects incomplete
    knowledge of APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Writing
    Mechanics

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Writing is clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar are
    excellent. Correct use of
    punctuation. No spelling
    errors. The paper is at
    least 4 full pages.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Writing is mostly clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar
    are strong and mostly
    correct. Few minor errors
    in punctuation and/or
    spelling. The paper is 4
    pages.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Writing lacks clarity or
    conciseness. Minor
    problems with sentence
    structure and some
    grammatical errors.
    Several minor errors in
    punctuation and spelling.
    The paper is fewer than 4
    pages.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Organization 20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    The organization results in
    clarity and presents
    logically arranged points.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    The overall arrangement
    is logical but can
    occasionally be difficult to
    follow.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Arrangement is less than
    clear, or organization is
    clear but there are some
    digressions.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    **Pleaseread.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)

    **ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)

    **PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)

    **ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)

    **ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)

    **## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    PADM 700

    **Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.

    Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.

    Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.

    The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.

    Instructions

    In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
    **Journal Article Review** you will:

    · Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;

    · Explain the method used to support the claims of the article

    · State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.

    · State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)

    · Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study

    · Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.

    · Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.

    Your
    **Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, significant points
    in support of the premise,
    and the significance of
    these to the course and/or
    field.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field, but
    one or more of them need
    improvement.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    One of the following is
    missing or insufficiently
    analytical: accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Synthesis 40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    The review contains an
    accurate, detailed, and
    well thought out
    comparison of the salient
    points of the article.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    The review contains
    comparisons of the salient
    points of the article. The
    detail and critical thinking
    intersection is less
    defined.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The review vaguely links
    the salient points of the
    article and is generally
    lacking in critical analysis.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Critical
    Evaluation
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    60 to >54 pts

    Advanced

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s informed and
    substantiated opinion,
    thorough evaluation of the
    article’s premise, and
    supporting points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview.

    54 to >50 pts

    Proficient

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s opinion and
    some evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    arguments, including with
    respect to a biblical
    worldview, but overlooks
    some points.

    50 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Student’s opinion of the
    article is stated, along with
    critical evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    argument, but some
    significant points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview, are
    overlooked.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    60 pts

    APA
    Formatting

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting accurately
    and consistently.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting with minor
    violations.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Reflects incomplete
    knowledge of APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Writing
    Mechanics

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Writing is clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar are
    excellent. Correct use of
    punctuation. No spelling
    errors. The paper is at
    least 4 full pages.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Writing is mostly clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar
    are strong and mostly
    correct. Few minor errors
    in punctuation and/or
    spelling. The paper is 4
    pages.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Writing lacks clarity or
    conciseness. Minor
    problems with sentence
    structure and some
    grammatical errors.
    Several minor errors in
    punctuation and spelling.
    The paper is fewer than 4
    pages.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Organization 20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    The organization results in
    clarity and presents
    logically arranged points.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    The overall arrangement
    is logical but can
    occasionally be difficult to
    follow.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Arrangement is less than
    clear, or organization is
    clear but there are some
    digressions.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    **Pleaseread.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)

    **ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)

    **PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)

    **ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)

    **## ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    PADM 700

    **Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.

    Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.

    Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.

    The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.

    Instructions

    In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this
    **Journal Article Review** you will:

    · Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;

    · Explain the method used to support the claims of the article

    · State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.

    · State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)

    · Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study

    · Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.

    · Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.

    Your
    **Journal Article Review Assignment** should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, significant points
    in support of the premise,
    and the significance of
    these to the course and/or
    field.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    Includes accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field, but
    one or more of them need
    improvement.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    One of the following is
    missing or insufficiently
    analytical: accurate
    identification of article
    premise, importance to
    the course, significant
    points in support of the
    premise, and/or field.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Synthesis 40 to >36 pts

    Advanced

    The review contains an
    accurate, detailed, and
    well thought out
    comparison of the salient
    points of the article.

    36 to >33 pts

    Proficient

    The review contains
    comparisons of the salient
    points of the article. The
    detail and critical thinking
    intersection is less
    defined.

    33 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The review vaguely links
    the salient points of the
    article and is generally
    lacking in critical analysis.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Critical
    Evaluation
    of Premise
    and
    Supporting
    Points

    60 to >54 pts

    Advanced

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s informed and
    substantiated opinion,
    thorough evaluation of the
    article’s premise, and
    supporting points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview.

    54 to >50 pts

    Proficient

    Includes critical thinking
    that clearly states the
    student’s opinion and
    some evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    arguments, including with
    respect to a biblical
    worldview, but overlooks
    some points.

    50 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Student’s opinion of the
    article is stated, along with
    critical evaluation of the
    article’s premise and/or
    argument, but some
    significant points,
    including with respect to a
    biblical worldview, are
    overlooked.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    60 pts

    APA
    Formatting

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting accurately
    and consistently.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documents sources using
    APA formatting with minor
    violations.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Reflects incomplete
    knowledge of APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Writing
    Mechanics

    20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Writing is clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar are
    excellent. Correct use of
    punctuation. No spelling
    errors. The paper is at
    least 4 full pages.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Writing is mostly clear and
    concise. Sentence
    structure and grammar
    are strong and mostly
    correct. Few minor errors
    in punctuation and/or
    spelling. The paper is 4
    pages.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Writing lacks clarity or
    conciseness. Minor
    problems with sentence
    structure and some
    grammatical errors.
    Several minor errors in
    punctuation and spelling.
    The paper is fewer than 4
    pages.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Organization 20 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    The organization results in
    clarity and presents
    logically arranged points.

    18 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    The overall arrangement
    is logical but can
    occasionally be difficult to
    follow.

    16 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Arrangement is less than
    clear, or organization is
    clear but there are some
    digressions.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric |
    PADM700_C01_202620

    **Pleaseread.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleaseread-jpeg)

    **ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ortiz-2002-tribal-governance-and-public-administration-pdf)

    **PublicAdministrationReview-2014-Bryson-PublicValueGovernanceMovingBeyondTraditionalPublicAdministrationand.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/publicadministrationreview-2014-bryson-publicvaluegovernancemovingbeyondtraditionalpublicadministrationand-pdf)

    **ReadFischerpages53through61.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readfischerpages53through61-pdf)

  • [Solved] research paper – law enforcement

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

  • [Solved] research paper – correctional

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

  • [Solved] week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (4)** – ## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf – ## week3524.docx – ## Week3class561.docx – -MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf **## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf** Case Study Analyses Course: MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (4)**

    – ## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf

    – ## week3524.docx

    – ## Week3class561.docx

    – -MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf

    **## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf**

    Case Study Analyses
    Course: MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

    Total / 30

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Content / 23

    Organization,

    Grammar and

    Mechanics

    / 4

    APA Style / 3

    23 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates clear compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    relevant facts relating

    to the case study, and

    accurately applies the

    methods, theories, and

    procedures discussed

    in the relevant chapter

    to analyze the case

    study. Your analysis

    demonstrates com-

    plete understanding of

    the relevant concepts

    in the chapter.

    19 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates basic compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content summa-

    rizes basic facts of the

    case study, and applies

    the methods, theories,

    and procedures dis-

    cussed in the relevant

    chapter to analyze the

    case study. Paper

    demonstrates a basic

    understanding of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied.

    16 points

    Your analysis includes

    discussion of materials

    which demonstrates

    comprehension, but

    without critical think-

    ing and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    cursory review of the

    case study and conclu-

    sory review of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied in

    such a way that it is

    not clear how they

    apply.

    11.4 points

    Your analysis fails to

    demonstrate critical

    and evaluation skills.

    Content does not re-

    view relevant facts of

    the case study does

    not apply methods,

    theories or procedures

    to the case study to

    demonstrate your

    understanding.

    4 points

    Paper is logically orga-

    nized; easily followed;

    contains effective,

    smooth, and logical

    transitions; and con-

    tains a professional

    format.

    No major issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, or

    mechanics.

    3 points

    Paper has a clear struc-

    ture with some digres-

    sions or irrelevances; is

    easily followed; in-

    cludes basic transi-

    tions; and contains a

    structured format.

    Minor issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, and

    mechanics.

    2 points

    Paper has some level

    of organization though

    there are too many ir-

    relevancies or digres-

    sions; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains ineffec-

    tive transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Several issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    1 point

    There is no apparent

    organization to the pa-

    per; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains no or

    poor transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Significant issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    3 points

    The most current

    edition of APA style

    with proper with prop-

    er in-text citations and

    references is adhered

    with no mistakes.

    2 points

    APA style is adhered to

    with minor mistakes.

    1 point

    APA style is adhered to

    with major mistakes.

    0 points

    APA style is not used.

    3/18/26, 10:18 AM Case Study 2 – MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2119658&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1049217 1/2

    **## week3524.docx**

    **524 discussions – 300 words each**

    524 d1

    This week’s readings have presented trends in sentencing laws across the U.S. (in Chapter 5) and sex offender registration, notification, and commitment laws (in Chapter 8 of Reddington and Bonham text).

    Now choose one of the two issues below and be sure to fully respond to all questions. (You may choose to discuss both, but are not required to).

    A. Consider the authors’ positions on sentencing models discussed in Chapter 5, and research sentencing models used in your state.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions?  In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research on your state’s sentencing laws. What models are used in your state? How do you assess the current models in your state?

    · Have there been suggested legislative changes? If so, give specific information by discussing the year and reason for the change. What was this change designed to address? Has it met its objectives?

    · Include online links to all relevant information in your state.

    B. Consider the authors’ positions regarding sex offender registration and community notification law and civil commitment laws in Chapter 8.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions? In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research of your state’s sex offender registration and community notification laws and civil commitment laws. Describe your state’s laws with cites to the pertinent laws.  In what areas do you believe these laws are effective? In what areas can they be improved?

    · As displayed on page 167 of Reddington and Bonham text, Congress has conditioned funding to the states by requiring that each state pass sex offender registries. The authors discuss the challenges in creating such centralized registries. Discuss your views on the practice of federal conditioning funding to the states on the passage of federally mandated laws. Explain your areas of agreement or disagreement with this practice.

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    524 d2

    There is a lot of information about national special interest groups and their relationship to Congress. Consider the following links that direct the public to various interest groups and track their ratings and campaign contributions to members of Congress.

    ·
    [Political Parties and Interest Groups](http://www.latimes.com/la-politics-politicalsites-htmlstory.html)

    ·
    [Top Interest Groups Giving to Members of Congress, 2020 Cycle](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/mems.php)

    ·
    [National Special Interest Groups](https://votesmart.org/interest-groups)

    Having considered the various links, select one special interest group.

    · What role does this special interest group play in Congressional criminal justice policy making?

    · How has the group sought to influence policy making at the legislative level?

    · Has the existence of this group and the role it plays created an enhancement or a hindrance to the creation of effective, responsive criminal justice programs?

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **Case study**

    Instructions

    Read Case Study 2.2: The Goals of Mandatory Sentencing on pages 108 – 112 of Welsh and Harris text and answer questions 1-3 on page 112

    · Write a goal statement for the creation of mandatory sentencing policies. Explain how you defined this goal based on the evidence in the case study.

    · Identify and describe any incompatible goals or values of different stakeholders.

    · Create specific objective(s) you would use to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, using the four components of the objective(s).

    · Explain how you reached the four components of the objective(s).

    Textbooks

    Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **## Week3class561.docx**

    Week 3 class 561

    **300-400 words discussion**

    **CIT in Action**

    Officer Williams is dispatched to a call about a 28-year-old man, Jason, behaving erratically in a local park. Witnesses report that Jason is yelling incoherently, pacing back and forth, and swinging a metal rod. Upon arrival, Officer Williams observes Jason appearing disoriented and agitated. Rather than immediately escalating the situation, Officer Williams, trained in Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) techniques, uses verbal de-escalation strategies. He maintains a calm demeanor, gives Jason space, and begins a dialogue, asking open-ended questions to determine Jason’s mental state.

    Through their interaction, Officer Williams learns that Jason has schizophrenia, is off his medication, and is feeling overwhelmed by recent personal losses. By using CIT principles, Officer Williams avoids the use of force, secures the metal rod safely, and connects Jason with a mental health professional from a nearby crisis team. Jason agrees to go to a local crisis center for further evaluation and treatment, demonstrating the success of CIT in resolving potentially volatile situations without harm.

    **Initial Post:**

    Based on this scenario, please address the following in your initial post:

    1. How did Officer Williams apply CIT techniques to de-escalate the situation? What specific strategies contributed to the positive outcome?

    2. How could the use of CIT principles in this case benefit both law enforcement and the individual in crisis? How might the outcome differ if Officer Williams lacked CIT training?

    3. What additional strategies or resources could be used in similar scenarios to enhance the response and outcomes for individuals with mental health issues?

    **Project**

    **Police and Mental Health: Evolving Roles in Crisis Intervention**

    In March 2020, Daniel Prude, a Black man experiencing a mental health crisis, encountered police in Rochester, New York. His family had called 911 for help, seeking assistance for his mental health condition. The situation escalated, and Prude died after police restrained him using a controversial method. This incident sparked widespread protests, highlighting issues with police intervention in mental health crises and the need for systemic reform.

    [This article](https://www.rochesterfirst.com/daniel-prude/daniel-prude-timeline-from-march-encounter-with-police-to-current-protests-in-rochester-police-excessive-force-new-york-black-man-chicago-jefferson-avenue-president-trump-mayo-lovely-warren-andrew-cu/) provides further background and context with respect to the case.

    Through this assignment, you will explore the complex dynamics between law enforcement, mental health systems, and communities to propose ways to prevent similar tragedies.

    Assignment instructions: This assignment has two parts:

    **Part 1: Interactive Brochure:** Design a digital brochure that addresses the following:

    1.
    **Overview of Police and Crisis Intervention**

    · The traditional role of police in crisis response.

    · The growing focus on de-escalation and mental health training.

    2.
    **The Daniel Prude Case Analysis**

    · Briefly outline the key events of the Daniel Prude case.

    · Analyze what went wrong (e.g., lack of mental health support, use of force).

    · Highlight systemic challenges revealed by the case.

    3.
    **Key Takeaways and Recommendations**

    · Lessons learned from the Daniel Prude case.

    · Proposals for improving police response (e.g., Crisis Intervention Teams, mental health professionals co-responding).

    4.
    **Community and Mental Health Resources**

    · Provide links or information about resources such as National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and local crisis support systems.

    For Part 1, submit the brochure as a PDF or an interactive online link in the appropriate dropbox. Here are some resources for you to use:

    ·
    [Picsart: The Professional Brochure Maker](https://picsart.com/brochure-maker/?utm_source=google_ads&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=google-perf-web-us-dsa-all-sites&utm_content=dsa-all-websites&utm_optimization=purchase&utm_user_type=new&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrC0zD9KMasRW_6i4hEMmLSThEJbS1zZ6PLb9HbVrEtkNKIIiom4nFEaAlPNEALw_wcB)

    ·
    [Canva: Design and print beautiful brochures](https://www.canva.com/brochures/?utm_source=google_sem&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=us_en_all_payback-print_flyers_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_adgroup=us_en_all_payback-print_brochures_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_keyword=%2Bbrochures&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrDdmhU18vkRg2MsxAnNQRVnxthZwZjaJXwo76iM_qUlT35oTj4wyqoaAsgoEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds)

    ·
    [Adobe: Make a custom brochure](https://www.adobe.com/express/create/brochure)

    Textbooks

    · Shane, J. (2019). Stress Inside Police Departments. Taylor & Francis.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891)

    · James, R. (2024). Crisis Intervention Strategies (9th ed.). Cengage Learning US.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787)

    **-MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/-mscj561bde-crisisintervention-columbiacollegeofmissouri-pdf)

    **-MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/-mscj561bde-crisisintervention-columbiacollegeofmissouri-pdf)

    **## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf**

    Case Study Analyses
    Course: MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

    Total / 30

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Content / 23

    Organization,

    Grammar and

    Mechanics

    / 4

    APA Style / 3

    23 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates clear compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    relevant facts relating

    to the case study, and

    accurately applies the

    methods, theories, and

    procedures discussed

    in the relevant chapter

    to analyze the case

    study. Your analysis

    demonstrates com-

    plete understanding of

    the relevant concepts

    in the chapter.

    19 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates basic compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content summa-

    rizes basic facts of the

    case study, and applies

    the methods, theories,

    and procedures dis-

    cussed in the relevant

    chapter to analyze the

    case study. Paper

    demonstrates a basic

    understanding of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied.

    16 points

    Your analysis includes

    discussion of materials

    which demonstrates

    comprehension, but

    without critical think-

    ing and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    cursory review of the

    case study and conclu-

    sory review of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied in

    such a way that it is

    not clear how they

    apply.

    11.4 points

    Your analysis fails to

    demonstrate critical

    and evaluation skills.

    Content does not re-

    view relevant facts of

    the case study does

    not apply methods,

    theories or procedures

    to the case study to

    demonstrate your

    understanding.

    4 points

    Paper is logically orga-

    nized; easily followed;

    contains effective,

    smooth, and logical

    transitions; and con-

    tains a professional

    format.

    No major issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, or

    mechanics.

    3 points

    Paper has a clear struc-

    ture with some digres-

    sions or irrelevances; is

    easily followed; in-

    cludes basic transi-

    tions; and contains a

    structured format.

    Minor issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, and

    mechanics.

    2 points

    Paper has some level

    of organization though

    there are too many ir-

    relevancies or digres-

    sions; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains ineffec-

    tive transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Several issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    1 point

    There is no apparent

    organization to the pa-

    per; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains no or

    poor transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Significant issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    3 points

    The most current

    edition of APA style

    with proper with prop-

    er in-text citations and

    references is adhered

    with no mistakes.

    2 points

    APA style is adhered to

    with minor mistakes.

    1 point

    APA style is adhered to

    with major mistakes.

    0 points

    APA style is not used.

    3/18/26, 10:18 AM Case Study 2 – MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2119658&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1049217 1/2

    **## week3524.docx**

    **524 discussions – 300 words each**

    524 d1

    This week’s readings have presented trends in sentencing laws across the U.S. (in Chapter 5) and sex offender registration, notification, and commitment laws (in Chapter 8 of Reddington and Bonham text).

    Now choose one of the two issues below and be sure to fully respond to all questions. (You may choose to discuss both, but are not required to).

    A. Consider the authors’ positions on sentencing models discussed in Chapter 5, and research sentencing models used in your state.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions?  In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research on your state’s sentencing laws. What models are used in your state? How do you assess the current models in your state?

    · Have there been suggested legislative changes? If so, give specific information by discussing the year and reason for the change. What was this change designed to address? Has it met its objectives?

    · Include online links to all relevant information in your state.

    B. Consider the authors’ positions regarding sex offender registration and community notification law and civil commitment laws in Chapter 8.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions? In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research of your state’s sex offender registration and community notification laws and civil commitment laws. Describe your state’s laws with cites to the pertinent laws.  In what areas do you believe these laws are effective? In what areas can they be improved?

    · As displayed on page 167 of Reddington and Bonham text, Congress has conditioned funding to the states by requiring that each state pass sex offender registries. The authors discuss the challenges in creating such centralized registries. Discuss your views on the practice of federal conditioning funding to the states on the passage of federally mandated laws. Explain your areas of agreement or disagreement with this practice.

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    524 d2

    There is a lot of information about national special interest groups and their relationship to Congress. Consider the following links that direct the public to various interest groups and track their ratings and campaign contributions to members of Congress.

    ·
    [Political Parties and Interest Groups](http://www.latimes.com/la-politics-politicalsites-htmlstory.html)

    ·
    [Top Interest Groups Giving to Members of Congress, 2020 Cycle](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/mems.php)

    ·
    [National Special Interest Groups](https://votesmart.org/interest-groups)

    Having considered the various links, select one special interest group.

    · What role does this special interest group play in Congressional criminal justice policy making?

    · How has the group sought to influence policy making at the legislative level?

    · Has the existence of this group and the role it plays created an enhancement or a hindrance to the creation of effective, responsive criminal justice programs?

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **Case study**

    Instructions

    Read Case Study 2.2: The Goals of Mandatory Sentencing on pages 108 – 112 of Welsh and Harris text and answer questions 1-3 on page 112

    · Write a goal statement for the creation of mandatory sentencing policies. Explain how you defined this goal based on the evidence in the case study.

    · Identify and describe any incompatible goals or values of different stakeholders.

    · Create specific objective(s) you would use to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, using the four components of the objective(s).

    · Explain how you reached the four components of the objective(s).

    Textbooks

    Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **## Week3class561.docx**

    Week 3 class 561

    **300-400 words discussion**

    **CIT in Action**

    Officer Williams is dispatched to a call about a 28-year-old man, Jason, behaving erratically in a local park. Witnesses report that Jason is yelling incoherently, pacing back and forth, and swinging a metal rod. Upon arrival, Officer Williams observes Jason appearing disoriented and agitated. Rather than immediately escalating the situation, Officer Williams, trained in Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) techniques, uses verbal de-escalation strategies. He maintains a calm demeanor, gives Jason space, and begins a dialogue, asking open-ended questions to determine Jason’s mental state.

    Through their interaction, Officer Williams learns that Jason has schizophrenia, is off his medication, and is feeling overwhelmed by recent personal losses. By using CIT principles, Officer Williams avoids the use of force, secures the metal rod safely, and connects Jason with a mental health professional from a nearby crisis team. Jason agrees to go to a local crisis center for further evaluation and treatment, demonstrating the success of CIT in resolving potentially volatile situations without harm.

    **Initial Post:**

    Based on this scenario, please address the following in your initial post:

    1. How did Officer Williams apply CIT techniques to de-escalate the situation? What specific strategies contributed to the positive outcome?

    2. How could the use of CIT principles in this case benefit both law enforcement and the individual in crisis? How might the outcome differ if Officer Williams lacked CIT training?

    3. What additional strategies or resources could be used in similar scenarios to enhance the response and outcomes for individuals with mental health issues?

    **Project**

    **Police and Mental Health: Evolving Roles in Crisis Intervention**

    In March 2020, Daniel Prude, a Black man experiencing a mental health crisis, encountered police in Rochester, New York. His family had called 911 for help, seeking assistance for his mental health condition. The situation escalated, and Prude died after police restrained him using a controversial method. This incident sparked widespread protests, highlighting issues with police intervention in mental health crises and the need for systemic reform.

    [This article](https://www.rochesterfirst.com/daniel-prude/daniel-prude-timeline-from-march-encounter-with-police-to-current-protests-in-rochester-police-excessive-force-new-york-black-man-chicago-jefferson-avenue-president-trump-mayo-lovely-warren-andrew-cu/) provides further background and context with respect to the case.

    Through this assignment, you will explore the complex dynamics between law enforcement, mental health systems, and communities to propose ways to prevent similar tragedies.

    Assignment instructions: This assignment has two parts:

    **Part 1: Interactive Brochure:** Design a digital brochure that addresses the following:

    1.
    **Overview of Police and Crisis Intervention**

    · The traditional role of police in crisis response.

    · The growing focus on de-escalation and mental health training.

    2.
    **The Daniel Prude Case Analysis**

    · Briefly outline the key events of the Daniel Prude case.

    · Analyze what went wrong (e.g., lack of mental health support, use of force).

    · Highlight systemic challenges revealed by the case.

    3.
    **Key Takeaways and Recommendations**

    · Lessons learned from the Daniel Prude case.

    · Proposals for improving police response (e.g., Crisis Intervention Teams, mental health professionals co-responding).

    4.
    **Community and Mental Health Resources**

    · Provide links or information about resources such as National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and local crisis support systems.

    For Part 1, submit the brochure as a PDF or an interactive online link in the appropriate dropbox. Here are some resources for you to use:

    ·
    [Picsart: The Professional Brochure Maker](https://picsart.com/brochure-maker/?utm_source=google_ads&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=google-perf-web-us-dsa-all-sites&utm_content=dsa-all-websites&utm_optimization=purchase&utm_user_type=new&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrC0zD9KMasRW_6i4hEMmLSThEJbS1zZ6PLb9HbVrEtkNKIIiom4nFEaAlPNEALw_wcB)

    ·
    [Canva: Design and print beautiful brochures](https://www.canva.com/brochures/?utm_source=google_sem&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=us_en_all_payback-print_flyers_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_adgroup=us_en_all_payback-print_brochures_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_keyword=%2Bbrochures&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrDdmhU18vkRg2MsxAnNQRVnxthZwZjaJXwo76iM_qUlT35oTj4wyqoaAsgoEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds)

    ·
    [Adobe: Make a custom brochure](https://www.adobe.com/express/create/brochure)

    Textbooks

    · Shane, J. (2019). Stress Inside Police Departments. Taylor & Francis.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891)

    · James, R. (2024). Crisis Intervention Strategies (9th ed.). Cengage Learning US.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787)

    **-MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/-mscj561bde-crisisintervention-columbiacollegeofmissouri-pdf)

    **## CaseStudy2rubric.pdf**

    Case Study Analyses
    Course: MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

    Total / 30

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Content / 23

    Organization,

    Grammar and

    Mechanics

    / 4

    APA Style / 3

    23 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates clear compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    relevant facts relating

    to the case study, and

    accurately applies the

    methods, theories, and

    procedures discussed

    in the relevant chapter

    to analyze the case

    study. Your analysis

    demonstrates com-

    plete understanding of

    the relevant concepts

    in the chapter.

    19 points

    Your analysis demon-

    strates basic compre-

    hension, critical think-

    ing, and evaluation

    skills. Content summa-

    rizes basic facts of the

    case study, and applies

    the methods, theories,

    and procedures dis-

    cussed in the relevant

    chapter to analyze the

    case study. Paper

    demonstrates a basic

    understanding of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied.

    16 points

    Your analysis includes

    discussion of materials

    which demonstrates

    comprehension, but

    without critical think-

    ing and evaluation

    skills. Content provides

    cursory review of the

    case study and conclu-

    sory review of the

    methods, theories and

    procedures studied in

    such a way that it is

    not clear how they

    apply.

    11.4 points

    Your analysis fails to

    demonstrate critical

    and evaluation skills.

    Content does not re-

    view relevant facts of

    the case study does

    not apply methods,

    theories or procedures

    to the case study to

    demonstrate your

    understanding.

    4 points

    Paper is logically orga-

    nized; easily followed;

    contains effective,

    smooth, and logical

    transitions; and con-

    tains a professional

    format.

    No major issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, or

    mechanics.

    3 points

    Paper has a clear struc-

    ture with some digres-

    sions or irrelevances; is

    easily followed; in-

    cludes basic transi-

    tions; and contains a

    structured format.

    Minor issues with

    needing edits, gram-

    matical issues, and

    mechanics.

    2 points

    Paper has some level

    of organization though

    there are too many ir-

    relevancies or digres-

    sions; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains ineffec-

    tive transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Several issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    1 point

    There is no apparent

    organization to the pa-

    per; is difficult to fol-

    low; contains no or

    poor transitions; and is

    presented in a rambling

    format.

    Significant issues with

    needing additional ed-

    its, grammatical issues,

    and mechanics.

    3 points

    The most current

    edition of APA style

    with proper with prop-

    er in-text citations and

    references is adhered

    with no mistakes.

    2 points

    APA style is adhered to

    with minor mistakes.

    1 point

    APA style is adhered to

    with major mistakes.

    0 points

    APA style is not used.

    3/18/26, 10:18 AM Case Study 2 – MSCJ 524 ADE – CJ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2119658&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1049217 1/2

    **## week3524.docx**

    **524 discussions – 300 words each**

    524 d1

    This week’s readings have presented trends in sentencing laws across the U.S. (in Chapter 5) and sex offender registration, notification, and commitment laws (in Chapter 8 of Reddington and Bonham text).

    Now choose one of the two issues below and be sure to fully respond to all questions. (You may choose to discuss both, but are not required to).

    A. Consider the authors’ positions on sentencing models discussed in Chapter 5, and research sentencing models used in your state.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions?  In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research on your state’s sentencing laws. What models are used in your state? How do you assess the current models in your state?

    · Have there been suggested legislative changes? If so, give specific information by discussing the year and reason for the change. What was this change designed to address? Has it met its objectives?

    · Include online links to all relevant information in your state.

    B. Consider the authors’ positions regarding sex offender registration and community notification law and civil commitment laws in Chapter 8.

    · In what ways do you agree with the author's positions? In what ways do you disagree with the author’s positions?

    · Conduct online research of your state’s sex offender registration and community notification laws and civil commitment laws. Describe your state’s laws with cites to the pertinent laws.  In what areas do you believe these laws are effective? In what areas can they be improved?

    · As displayed on page 167 of Reddington and Bonham text, Congress has conditioned funding to the states by requiring that each state pass sex offender registries. The authors discuss the challenges in creating such centralized registries. Discuss your views on the practice of federal conditioning funding to the states on the passage of federally mandated laws. Explain your areas of agreement or disagreement with this practice.

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    524 d2

    There is a lot of information about national special interest groups and their relationship to Congress. Consider the following links that direct the public to various interest groups and track their ratings and campaign contributions to members of Congress.

    ·
    [Political Parties and Interest Groups](http://www.latimes.com/la-politics-politicalsites-htmlstory.html)

    ·
    [Top Interest Groups Giving to Members of Congress, 2020 Cycle](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/mems.php)

    ·
    [National Special Interest Groups](https://votesmart.org/interest-groups)

    Having considered the various links, select one special interest group.

    · What role does this special interest group play in Congressional criminal justice policy making?

    · How has the group sought to influence policy making at the legislative level?

    · Has the existence of this group and the role it plays created an enhancement or a hindrance to the creation of effective, responsive criminal justice programs?

    Textbooks

    · Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    · Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **Case study**

    Instructions

    Read Case Study 2.2: The Goals of Mandatory Sentencing on pages 108 – 112 of Welsh and Harris text and answer questions 1-3 on page 112

    · Write a goal statement for the creation of mandatory sentencing policies. Explain how you defined this goal based on the evidence in the case study.

    · Identify and describe any incompatible goals or values of different stakeholders.

    · Create specific objective(s) you would use to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, using the four components of the objective(s).

    · Explain how you reached the four components of the objective(s).

    Textbooks

    Jr., F.P.R. B. (2019). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies: At the Intersection of the Media, Public Fear and Legislative Response (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781531011376)

    Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2016). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781317271550

    **## Week3class561.docx**

    Week 3 class 561

    **300-400 words discussion**

    **CIT in Action**

    Officer Williams is dispatched to a call about a 28-year-old man, Jason, behaving erratically in a local park. Witnesses report that Jason is yelling incoherently, pacing back and forth, and swinging a metal rod. Upon arrival, Officer Williams observes Jason appearing disoriented and agitated. Rather than immediately escalating the situation, Officer Williams, trained in Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) techniques, uses verbal de-escalation strategies. He maintains a calm demeanor, gives Jason space, and begins a dialogue, asking open-ended questions to determine Jason’s mental state.

    Through their interaction, Officer Williams learns that Jason has schizophrenia, is off his medication, and is feeling overwhelmed by recent personal losses. By using CIT principles, Officer Williams avoids the use of force, secures the metal rod safely, and connects Jason with a mental health professional from a nearby crisis team. Jason agrees to go to a local crisis center for further evaluation and treatment, demonstrating the success of CIT in resolving potentially volatile situations without harm.

    **Initial Post:**

    Based on this scenario, please address the following in your initial post:

    1. How did Officer Williams apply CIT techniques to de-escalate the situation? What specific strategies contributed to the positive outcome?

    2. How could the use of CIT principles in this case benefit both law enforcement and the individual in crisis? How might the outcome differ if Officer Williams lacked CIT training?

    3. What additional strategies or resources could be used in similar scenarios to enhance the response and outcomes for individuals with mental health issues?

    **Project**

    **Police and Mental Health: Evolving Roles in Crisis Intervention**

    In March 2020, Daniel Prude, a Black man experiencing a mental health crisis, encountered police in Rochester, New York. His family had called 911 for help, seeking assistance for his mental health condition. The situation escalated, and Prude died after police restrained him using a controversial method. This incident sparked widespread protests, highlighting issues with police intervention in mental health crises and the need for systemic reform.

    [This article](https://www.rochesterfirst.com/daniel-prude/daniel-prude-timeline-from-march-encounter-with-police-to-current-protests-in-rochester-police-excessive-force-new-york-black-man-chicago-jefferson-avenue-president-trump-mayo-lovely-warren-andrew-cu/) provides further background and context with respect to the case.

    Through this assignment, you will explore the complex dynamics between law enforcement, mental health systems, and communities to propose ways to prevent similar tragedies.

    Assignment instructions: This assignment has two parts:

    **Part 1: Interactive Brochure:** Design a digital brochure that addresses the following:

    1.
    **Overview of Police and Crisis Intervention**

    · The traditional role of police in crisis response.

    · The growing focus on de-escalation and mental health training.

    2.
    **The Daniel Prude Case Analysis**

    · Briefly outline the key events of the Daniel Prude case.

    · Analyze what went wrong (e.g., lack of mental health support, use of force).

    · Highlight systemic challenges revealed by the case.

    3.
    **Key Takeaways and Recommendations**

    · Lessons learned from the Daniel Prude case.

    · Proposals for improving police response (e.g., Crisis Intervention Teams, mental health professionals co-responding).

    4.
    **Community and Mental Health Resources**

    · Provide links or information about resources such as National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and local crisis support systems.

    For Part 1, submit the brochure as a PDF or an interactive online link in the appropriate dropbox. Here are some resources for you to use:

    ·
    [Picsart: The Professional Brochure Maker](https://picsart.com/brochure-maker/?utm_source=google_ads&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=google-perf-web-us-dsa-all-sites&utm_content=dsa-all-websites&utm_optimization=purchase&utm_user_type=new&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrC0zD9KMasRW_6i4hEMmLSThEJbS1zZ6PLb9HbVrEtkNKIIiom4nFEaAlPNEALw_wcB)

    ·
    [Canva: Design and print beautiful brochures](https://www.canva.com/brochures/?utm_source=google_sem&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=us_en_all_payback-print_flyers_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_adgroup=us_en_all_payback-print_brochures_lower_rev_roas_bm&utm_keyword=%2Bbrochures&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA6Ou5BhCrARIsAPoTxrDdmhU18vkRg2MsxAnNQRVnxthZwZjaJXwo76iM_qUlT35oTj4wyqoaAsgoEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds)

    ·
    [Adobe: Make a custom brochure](https://www.adobe.com/express/create/brochure)

    Textbooks

    · Shane, J. (2019). Stress Inside Police Departments. Taylor & Francis.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781000762891)

    · James, R. (2024). Crisis Intervention Strategies (9th ed.). Cengage Learning US.
    [https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787](https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9798214125787)

    **-MSCJ561BDE-CRISISINTERVENTION-ColumbiaCollegeofMissouri.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/-mscj561bde-crisisintervention-columbiacollegeofmissouri-pdf)

  • [Solved] CJ 320 Milestone One

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Please see the attached file below and also include a title page. **files (1)** – ## MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip **## MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip** ## Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.html ## CJ 32…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Please see the attached file below and also include a title page.

    **files (1)**

    – ## MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip

    **## MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

    ## Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.html

    ## CJ 320 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Overview

    The ability to conduct research using state corrections data is a valuable skill to have not only for this course but for further study in the criminal justice field. It is also a valuable skill for practicing professionals.

    ### Prompt

    In a short paper, respond to the questions below about sentencing policies and the demographics of offenders. Summarize your research from available resources that describe corrections in your selected state.

    – What type of sentencing is employed in your selected state?
    – What is the current sentencing philosophy in the state?
    – Since when has this philosophy been in place?
    – What was the impact on the prison population?
    – What are the demographics of offenders in your state in terms of the criteria below?

    – Age
    – Race
    – Gender
    – Incarceration rate
    – Education level
    – Whether or not offenders had substance abuse problems at time of incarceration (if available)

    ### What to Submit

    Your milestone should be about 1 to 2 pages in length, with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

    ### AI Usage

    If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
    [these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
    [this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

    ### Milestone One Rubric

    | Criteria | Meets Expectations (100%) | Partially Meets Expectations (75%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Type of Sentencing in Selected State | The type of sentencing is correctly identified | The type of sentencing is not accurately identified | No evidence of type of sentencing | 20 |
    | Sentencing Philosophy and Adoption Timeline | Philosophy is correctly identified and adoption timeline is accurate | Philosophy is not properly identified and/or adoption timeline is not accurate | No evidence of sentencing philosophy and/or adoption timeline | 20 |
    | Impact of Sentencing Policy on Prison Population | Impact of sentencing is correctly identified and explained with reference to the source material(s) | Important aspects related to the impact of sentencing are missing from the explanation | No evidence of describing the impact of sentencing | 20 |
    | Demographic Data for Specified Categories | Demographic data is accurately described for all specified categories | Demographic data for one or more specified categories is not accurately described | No evidence demographic data | 20 |
    | Organization | The paper is well organized and the reader is able to easily find relevant data | The paper’s organization makes it difficult for the reader to find relevant data | The paper is very poorly organized | 10 |
    | Clear Communication | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 10 |
    | Total: | 100% |

    **## MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

    ## Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.html

    ## CJ 320 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Overview

    The ability to conduct research using state corrections data is a valuable skill to have not only for this course but for further study in the criminal justice field. It is also a valuable skill for practicing professionals.

    ### Prompt

    In a short paper, respond to the questions below about sentencing policies and the demographics of offenders. Summarize your research from available resources that describe corrections in your selected state.

    – What type of sentencing is employed in your selected state?
    – What is the current sentencing philosophy in the state?
    – Since when has this philosophy been in place?
    – What was the impact on the prison population?
    – What are the demographics of offenders in your state in terms of the criteria below?

    – Age
    – Race
    – Gender
    – Incarceration rate
    – Education level
    – Whether or not offenders had substance abuse problems at time of incarceration (if available)

    ### What to Submit

    Your milestone should be about 1 to 2 pages in length, with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

    ### AI Usage

    If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
    [these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
    [this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

    ### Milestone One Rubric

    | Criteria | Meets Expectations (100%) | Partially Meets Expectations (75%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Type of Sentencing in Selected State | The type of sentencing is correctly identified | The type of sentencing is not accurately identified | No evidence of type of sentencing | 20 |
    | Sentencing Philosophy and Adoption Timeline | Philosophy is correctly identified and adoption timeline is accurate | Philosophy is not properly identified and/or adoption timeline is not accurate | No evidence of sentencing philosophy and/or adoption timeline | 20 |
    | Impact of Sentencing Policy on Prison Population | Impact of sentencing is correctly identified and explained with reference to the source material(s) | Important aspects related to the impact of sentencing are missing from the explanation | No evidence of describing the impact of sentencing | 20 |
    | Demographic Data for Specified Categories | Demographic data is accurately described for all specified categories | Demographic data for one or more specified categories is not accurately described | No evidence demographic data | 20 |
    | Organization | The paper is well organized and the reader is able to easily find relevant data | The paper’s organization makes it difficult for the reader to find relevant data | The paper is very poorly organized | 10 |
    | Clear Communication | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 10 |
    | Total: | 100% |